I'm having a problem using websockets in my backend. I have to re-write some old with golang and old developer using websocket while one client tracking other client's location.
both client connecting websocket with given url
"\(URLConstants.webSocketURL)?token=\(token)&jobId=\(jobId)"
So I thought both client connecting websocket with her/his own token and I need to reflect user's message to other user. I can open two sockets with given url.
It's the first time that I'm using websocket so I'm not sure I'm asking the right question.
You need to send the information to the existing sessions that you stored from opened connection and distribute the information to other users.
Try to go through this solution to get some inspiration https://github.com/suricatatalk/core/blob/master/core.go.
Related
NestJS 8， socket.io 4
Client user has a socket being able to receive data from the server. Not sending.
Refresh browser, the socket ID changed. Socket on the client receive 'connect' event! Yet. On server side, no logging at all. Which kind of explained point 1.
After reboot nest, problem is gone. But it comes back eventually.
My current troubleshooting direction is
Was the connection on the client dead already and it's still trying somehow to update the socket?
Browser does some caching, service worker?
I hope someone can enlighten. This happens after upgrade to socket.io 4 from 2.
It's my own stupidity.
My tenant who own the namespace. In order to reach him, I create his namespace and send message to it no matter he's online or offline.
This works fine in socket.io 2. I don't know why.
What I should do, is to check whether or not, the namespace exists or not first.
That's why the issue that I have is that the server somehow seems able to pipe message to the namespace, yet the tenant cannot send the message to the server because the tenant was not initialized properly in the nest gateway.
I have one api for stock trade.
this is the url for websocket communication with api server.
https://kite.trade/docs/connect/v3/websocket/
I've read about websocket for laravel, but almost are the content about sending socket request from client to server.
If then, in my case, I have to turn on browser all day long to get live market quote.
I want to make it possible to get live market data without turn on browser.
Till my understanding is, in node.js, using socket.io client, it is possible to send websocket request from server to socket server.
But in laravel, I could not find way.
If anyone has experience, please help me.
Thanks.
I'm new to software development in general, and I'm writing a backend for a simple ride-sharing iOS application (which I'll develop later). I'm using Vapor to create the backend.
When a user makes a trip request to the API, I want to create a new trip and establish a websocket session between the user and a driver. The problem I'm having is how can I notify a driver that a request is in and add him to the session?
Here's what I've come up with so far, although I'm not sure if it's going to work:
When a trip request comes in, I would create a session and a trip object with the session id. When a driver visits the "Trip requests" tab in the app he would make a get request to retrieve active trip requests. When he then clicks on one of the trip requests, he would make a request with the session id of that particular trip to be added to that session.
The problems I'm seeing with the above solution is that that would make the User the Poster, and the Driver the Observer, which I'm not sure is the way to go since I want the driver to act as a poster (to send location updates so that the user can track the driver on the map in real time).
Another problem is that users would have to wait indefinitely before a driver accepts their request.
Is there a better way to notify the driver of a trip request? How can I go about achieving this?
First, you will get trouble when trying to establish a direct connection between user and driver, because it's quite difficult to directly connect to an app on a smartphone (changing IPs, NAT, firewalls and opening ports are some of the problems).
I'd suggest, you implement some kind of REST API for the trips/trip requests. To notify the driver or send updates back to the user, you can either use push notifications (for iOS it's APNS) or websockets. In the best case both for different situations.
Here are some hints for further research on those topics:
WebSockets: In Vapor, an example chat app using websockets , WebSocket wrapper for Vapor
Push notifications: Gorush, push notification server, Apple Notifications, (WIP: APNS on NIO)
I hope that helps for your next steps. Your question is quite broad to be more specific.
I have an API running on a server, which handle users connection and a messaging system.
Beside that, I launched a websocket on that same server, waiting for connections and stuff.
And let's say we can get access to this by an Android app.
I'm having troubles to figure out what I should do now, here are my thoughts:
1 - When a user connect to the app, the API connect to the websocket. We allow the Android app only to listen on this socket to get new messages. When the user want to answer, the Android app send a message to the API. The API writes itself the received message to the socket, which will be read back by the Android app used by another user.
This way, the API can store the message in database before writing it in the socket.
2- The API does not connect to the websocket in any way. The Android app listen and write to the websocket when needed, and should, when writing to the websocket, also send a request to the API so it can store the message in DB.
May be none of the above is correct, please let me know
EDIT
I already understood why I should use a websocket, seems like it's the best way to have this "real time" system (when getting a new message for example) instead of forcing the client to make an HTTP request every x seconds to check if there are new messages.
What I still don't understand, is how it is suppose to communicate with my database. Sorry if my example is not clear, but I'll try to keep going with it :
My messaging system need to store all messages in my API database, to have some kind of historic of the conversation.
But it seems like a websocket must be running separately from the API, I mean it's another program right? Because it's not for HTTP requests
So should the API also listen to this websocket to catch new messages and store them?
You really have not described what the requirements are for your application so it's hard for us to directly advise what your app should do. You really shouldn't start out your analysis by saying that you have a webSocket and you're trying to figure out what to do with it. Instead, lay out the requirements of your app and figure out what technology will best meet those requirements.
Since your requirements are not clear, I'll talk about what a webSocket is best used for and what more traditional http requests are best used for.
Here are some characteristics of a webSocket:
It's designed to be continuously connected over some longer duration of time (much longer than the duration of one exchange between client and server).
The connection is typically made from a client to a server.
Once the connection is established, then data can be sent in either direction from client to server or from server to client at any time. This is a huge difference from a typical http request where data can only be requested by the client - with an http request the server can not initiate the sending of data to the client.
A webSocket is not a request/response architecture by default. In fact to make it work like request/response requires building a layer on top of the webSocket protocol so you can tell which response goes with which request. http is natively request/response.
Because a webSocket is designed to be continuously connected (or at least connected for some duration of time), it works very well (and with lower overhead) for situations where there is frequent communication between the two endpoints. The connection is already established and data can just be sent without any connection establishment overhead. In addition, the overhead per message is typically smaller with a webSocket than with http.
So, here are a couple typical reasons why you might choose one over the other.
If you need to be able to send data from server to client without having the client regular poll for new data, then a webSocket is very well designed for that and http cannot do that.
If you are frequently sending lots of small bits of data (for example, a temperature probe sending the current temperature every 10 seconds), then a webSocket will incur less network and server overhead than initiating a new http request for every new piece of data.
If you don't have either of the above situations, then you may not have any real need for a webSocket and an http request/response model may just be simpler.
If you really need request/response where a specific response is tied to a specific request, then that is built into http and is not a built-in feature of webSockets.
You may also find these other posts useful:
What are the pitfalls of using Websockets in place of RESTful HTTP?
What's the difference between WebSocket and plain socket communication?
Push notification | is websocket mandatory?
How does WebSockets server architecture work?
Response to Your Edit
But it seems like a websocket must be running separately from the API,
I mean it's another program right? Because it's not for HTTP requests
The same process that supports your API can also be serving the webSocket connections. Thus, when you get incoming data on the webSocket, you can just write it directly to the database the same way the API would access the database. So, NO the webSocket server does not have to be a separate program or process.
So should the API also listen to this websocket to catch new messages
and store them?
No, I don't think so. Only one process can be listening to a set of incoming webSocket connections.
I'm giving socket.io a whirl and I'm curious as to what I should and shouldn't be doing with websockets.
For example is there a way to authenticate a websocket (include id in every message perhaps?)? Let's say I'm creating a 'google docs' like app in which people can create new documents. Should I be using AJAX to create new documents instead of websockets? That way I can use the standard HTTP transport layer to do all of the user authorization (checking session, etc) and then simply ping back the page with a websocket event. Curious as to how people handle situations like this.
I would recommend using AJAX wherever you do not absolutely need web sockets. Web sockets end up creating more load on the server side (socket.io will take care of fallbacks in case web sockets & flash sockets are not available). In short, use web sockets where you need to maintain that state/connection to the client.
If you wish to use web sockets, using cookies with socket.io would be one approach that would allow you to keep track of your sessions. If not using socket.io right away, you can send req.sessionID (key) to the client, store the session information in Redis/Mongo etc. When the socket.io connection is attempted, read the cookie value & send it to the server - where you can get the session store information. There may be issues if you use flash sockets as one of the fallbacks.
Hope this helps.