In ~/src/project/ containing all the files, I'm attempting to run bundle and bundle install, but it tells me I need a gem called "buff-extensions" and that gem installer requires Ruby version >= 2.2.0 to work properly.
When I ran ruby --version, it said Ruby 2.2.4p230 is being used when run from that directory.
I know there are several versions of Ruby on the machine in several places, and I'm struggling to follow the paths and figure out which technology is using which piece.
The Bundler docs spell this out:
You can specify the required version of Ruby in the Gemfile with ruby. If the Gemfile is loaded on a different Ruby version, Bundler will raise an exception with an explanation.
ruby '1.9.3'
What this means is that this app has a dependency to a Ruby VM that is ABI compatible with 1.9.3. If the version check does not match, Bundler will raise an exception. This will ensure the running code matches. You can be more specific with the :engine and :engine_version options.
ruby '1.9.3', :engine => 'jruby', :engine_version => '1.6.7'
I finally figured out the exact incantation in order to get the intended result, and I now realize the situation is unreasonable to expect any stranger to attempt to answer.
It involved chef, and I was supposed to run chef exec bundle.
Related
I'm new to Ruby and I'm having a lot of trouble trying to use Nokogiri. I've been trying to find a resolution for hours now, so any help is appreciated. I tried searching for and using solutions from other related SO posts before caving and posting my own. When I run ruby -v I get: ruby 1.8.7 (2011-06-30 patchlevel 352) [x86_64-linux]
(Edit: I have updated ruby with updates-alternatives --config ruby and selected /usr/bin/ruby1.9.1 but when I do ruby -v it is now showing version 1.9.3 WTF am I doing wrong here?)
I have a new project directory at ~/workspace/ruby/rubycrawler/ and I used Bundler to install nokogiri, which installed correctly:
Using mini_portile (0.5.2)
Using nokogiri (1.6.1)
Using bundler (1.5.1)
Your bundle is complete!
Running bundle show nokogiri returns /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/nokogiri-1.6.1.
In the directory I'm running the script from I have a simple html file named "index.html". The script I'm trying to run is even simpler (or so I thought):
require 'nokogiri'
page = Nokogiri::HTML(open("index.html"))
puts page.class # Nokogiri::HTML::Document
The error is rubycrawler.rb:1:in 'require': no such file to load -- nokogiri (LoadError).
I also added require 'rubygems' even though I read it isn't needed for 1.9+ and still no luck.
A lot of searching shows "Did you put this gem in your Gemfile?". So I generate a Gemfile and add gem 'nokogiri'. I try running the small script again and get the same error. I read "Try deleting Gemfile.lock." so I did but still couldn't get it to work. I then read to try testing it out in irb so I tested "open-uri" and "nokogiri" and here's what I got:
irb(main):001:0> require 'open-uri'
=> true
irb(main):003:0> require 'nokogiri'
LoadError: no such file to load -- nokogiri
I'm really having a lot of trouble figuring this out, so really any help at all is really appreciated.
Ruby tools like RVM, Bundler, etc., to the novice, appear to do a lot of magic, but really, there is no magic to them. The key here lies in what Bundler actually does for you. It manages a manifest of dependencies, BUT at runtime, those dependencies STILL have to get loaded somehow, and my gut feeling is that is what is not happening here.
Regardless of what version of Ruby you are using, if you are using Bundler, there's an easy way to do this. Precede the command that starts your program with "bundle exec" and that will make Bundler edit Ruby's load path so that it includes all the things in the manifest (Gemfile.lock).
For example:
$ bundle exec ruby foo.rb
A additional note for anyone using RVM: RVM generally will modify the shebangs in the scripts that launch programs like "ruby" or "rake" so that they use the "ruby_no_exec" shell (or similar) instead of the plain old "ruby" shell. That alternate shell is Bundler-aware and makes it generally unnecessary to type "bundle exec," but since the OP is using system Ruby, that's not applicable and commands should be manually prefixed with "bundle exec".
Hope this helps!
In addition to Kent's answer, I would recommend switching to RVM instead of using the system installed ruby. System rubies tend to be horribly out of date, especially when it comes to important things like features and security updates. It might not help you in your current situation, but it would be well worth the time. If you are unfamiliar: http://rvm.io
I have developed a simple ruby application without any MVC, and runs on command prompt using ruby 1.9.2 . It also has a Gemfile. I want this application to run on machines running ruby 1.8.7 and 1.9.3 as well. So how can I set it right for multiple environments.
Please Guide.
Thanks
At first you have to make sure that your code is compatible with the syntax of ruby 1.8 and 1.9 https://stackoverflow.com/a/21621/335523
Then make sure that the gems you used support both versions of ruby. (Read through their github page or documentation)
If you are using gems that do not suport both versions of ruby you have to find alternative gems that provide the same functionality in each environment and specify them in your gem file like this:
gem 'rcov', :platforms => :ruby_18
gem 'simplecov', :platforms => :ruby_19
-- UPDATE --
Ok its fixed. This is what I did. remove all ruby and rubygems completely. then install ruby1.9.1-full and rubygems1.9.1 then install the twitter gem.
Hi guys,
I am having trouble working with the Twitter gem. I am using ruby 1.8.7
After installing when I try to run a simple script I get this error
ruby twitter.rb
./twitter.rb:5: uninitialized constant Twitter (NameError)
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in gem_original_require'
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:inrequire'
from twitter.rb:2
I running this on a Ubuntu box. I checked with gem -list and I see the Twitter (1.1.0) is listed there.
this is the code I am trying to run
require "rubygems"
require 'twitter'
puts Twitter.user_timeline("test").first.text
Any ideas ?
I believe it only works with Ruby 1.9 If you want to use twitter gem try version 0.9 with Ruby 1.8.x
This works for me:
ruby-1.9.2-p0 > require 'twitter'
=> true
ruby-1.9.2-p0 > puts Twitter.user_timeline("test").first.text
TExES Pedagogy and Professional Responsibilities EC-12 Teacher Certification Test Prep Study Guid… - by Sharon A Wynne http://amzn.to/f3kF74
=> nil
which version of ruby are you using?
gouravtiwari21's comment seems to fix the problem, but it's wrong to suggest that the twitter gem requires 0.9.0 if you want to run it using Ruby 1.8.x.
You can check out the version compatibility here:
http://travis-ci.org/#!/jnunemaker/twitter
It shows the twitter gem working with Ruby installs as low as 1.8.7.
For me, it was an issue with having the correct dependent gems, as well as the correct versions.
Here's how I got it working:
I ran:
sudo gem list
And compared the versions of specific gems with what I found here:
https://github.com/jnunemaker/twitter/blob/master/HISTORY.md (I simply searched for the word 'dependency' to see which versions twitter cared about.
I also found this diff:
https://github.com/jnunemaker/twitter/commit/ac8114c1f6ba2da20c2267d3133252c2ffc6b6a3
And I compared the gems listed there with what I had installed, and I just made sure my system lined up with what I was seeing in the version notes. Oftentimes what happened is that I had multiple versions of a gem, and for some reason, the lower version was taking precedence.
I'm not sure why I still have to add
gem 'twitter', '1.7.1'
to my Gemfile, but alas, that's the last step required in order to get this stuff working.
Don't forget to restart your server, and you should be good!
I'm new to Ruby. I have a .bundle file. I put it in the source folder and did
require('my.bundle')
But when I call the methods in the bundle, the definition is not found. Do I have to install them or include them in some other way to access them?
I am on Ruby version 1.8.7 (latest version on Mac).
I highly recommend using RVM to manage your Ruby installation, including your gems, so if you don't already have that, get it and follow the instructions for installing it. Make sure you do the part about modifying your bash startup script or you'll see weird behavior, like the wrong Ruby being called. Also, use the steps in "RVM and RubyGems" to install your gems or you can run into weird behavior with gems being installed under the wrong or an unexpected Ruby.
Second, use the gem command to install gems:
gem install gem_to_install
replacing "gem_to_install" with the name of the gem you want, and it will be installed into the appropriate gem folder for your Ruby.
If you are on Ruby 1.92, and trying to require a gem to use as a module in your code, use:
require 'gemname'
if it is installed via the gem command. And, if it is a module you wrote or have in your program's directory or below it, use:
require_relative 'path/to/gem/gemname'
If you are on a Ruby < 1.9 you'll also need to add require 'rubygems' above your other require lines, then use require './path/to/gem/gemname'.
Thanks, but my .bundle is not in gems. How do I install/require a .bundle file I already have?
If you wrote it look into rubygems/gemcutter or bundler for info on bundling and managing gems.
You can install a gem without using the app by going into the directory containing the gem and running setup.rb. See http://i.loveruby.net/en/projects/setup/doc/usage.html for a decent writeup or the official docs at: http://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/3
Is it possible to add a gem dependency only if the person is using a certain version of ruby?
Background: I'm working on a fork of a project that uses Test::Unit::Autorunner and the like. They are part of the standard library in ruby 1.8, but aren't part of the standard library in 1.9.1, and is instead in the "test-unit" gem. I want to add a dependency that says that if someone's using ruby 1.9.1 or later, install the "test-unit" gem, but if they're using 1.8 or earlier, they don't need to install anything.
If you look at the gemspec documentation for add_dependency, there isn't an option for a ruby version. Perhaps you could use the post_install_message attribute to tell the user to install the gem if they're using ruby 1.9.
I did this exact thing for a project. The trick is to add the script as an extension, which will then get executed at install time on the user's machine.
Here are code snippets and links to our github:
First, when in the gemspec (we're actually using a Rakefile to generate it, but the result ends up the same) source
# This file *needs* to be named this, there are other files
# for other extension processors
s.extensions << 'ext/mkrf_conf.rb'
And then the relevant lines in that mkrf_conf.rb source
require 'rubygems/dependency_installer.rb'
inst = Gem::DependencyInstaller.new
inst.install "test-unit" if RUBY_VERSION > "1.9"
Gem doesn't support conditional dependencies (except on gem builder's environment -as noted above), and bundler is not a viable option to solve this either - see https://github.com/carlhuda/bundler/issues/1281
hay ... i'm kind of a ruby newbie ... if this is the best way to do it.
any way ... i wish i can do that using only Ruby .... though u can use your operating system shell to do that, by using this in your program installer, just execute (works for Linux based operating systems):
$ruby --version
(u can execute that from a ruby installer file, just like: ruby --version)
and put a possibility according to output, if it's 1.9.1 add an extra line to execute:
$ sudo gem install gem_name
else, just leave it be.
Checkout this tutorial in the Ruby Programming wikibook.
Tt shows how to install different versions of dependencies depending on what version of ruby the installee is using.
(short answer--it ain't as easy as it should be)
You can't. You need to build two gems, one with
spec.required_ruby_version = '~> 1.8.6'
and one with
spec.required_ruby_version = '~> 1.9.1'
spec.add_dependency 'test-unit', '~> 2.0.5'
Gemspecs are just ruby files anyway, so you can execute any ruby code inside them, so:
spec.add_dependency = 'test-unit', '>= 2.0' if RUBY_VERSION =~ '1.9'
EDIT: Specs run only on the builders machine.