Spring - Data persisted by JdbcTemplate unable to be seen by JpaRepository - spring

Question

I am building a Spring Boot application which requires the need for persistence via JDBC and selecting/reading via JPA/Hibernate. I have implemented both of these types of operations using Spring's JdbcTemplate and Spring Data's JpaRepository.
After I persist using JdbcTemplate I am unable to see the data via JpaRepository even though they share the same datasource. I am able to read the data if I use JdbcTemplate.
NOTE: I am using two data sources. One is configured in another class without the #Primary annotation using its own entity manager factory and transaction manager, which is why I've needed to explicitly define it below using Spring Boot's default bean terminology "transactionManager" and "entityManagerFactory".
The following is my embedded database configuration for the primary beans:
#Configuration
#EnableJpaRepositories(basePackages = {"com.repository"})
public class H2DataSourceConfiguration {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(H2DataSourceConfiguration.class);
#Bean(destroyMethod = "shutdown")
#Primary
public DataSource dataSource() {
return new EmbeddedDatabaseBuilder()
.setType(EmbeddedDatabaseType.H2)
.setName("dataSource")
.build();
}
#Bean
#Primary
public LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean entityManagerFactory(EntityManagerFactoryBuilder builder, DataSource dataSource) {
return builder
.dataSource(dataSource)
.packages("com.my.domain", "org.springframework.data.jpa.convert.threeten")
.build();
}
#Bean
#Primary
public JpaTransactionManager transactionManager(EntityManagerFactory entityManagerFactory) {
JpaTransactionManager jpaTransactionManager = new JpaTransactionManager(entityManagerFactory);
return jpaTransactionManager;
}
}
The persistence happens in a different transaction to the reading of the data, however they share the same service.
Both operations happen within the #Transactional annotation. Both repository beans are specified in the same service and also contain the #Transactional annotation. The service looks as follows:
#Service
#Transactional
public class MyServiceImpl implements MyService {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MyServiceImpl.class);
#Autowired
private MyJpaRepository myJpaRepository;
#Autowired
private MyJdbcRepository myJdbcRepository;
...
}
MyJdbcRepositoryImpl.java:
#Repository
#Transactional(propagation = Propagataion.MANDATORY)
public class MyJdbcRepositoryImpl implements MyJdbcRepository {
#Autowired
private NamedParameterJdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
// methods within here all use jdbcTemplate.query(...)
}
MyJpaRepository.java:
#Repository
#Transactional(propagation = Propagataion.MANDATORY)
public interface AcquisitionJpaRepository extends JpaRepository<AcquisitionEntity, Long> {
}
Is it at all possible that the jdbctemplate calls are saving to a different h2 database?

Answer 1

The above configuration is correct!
The problem was that the JdbcTemplate calls had the schema owner as a prefix.
For example:
select * from I_AM_SCHEMA.KILL_ME
However, I had both the #Entity annotation and the #Table annotation on the entity object and only specified the table name!
Example:
#Entity
#Table(name = "KILL_ME")
So, we were writing to one table with JdbcTemplate but reading from a completely different other table via JPA/Hibernate due to us missing the prefix.
The correct fix was to prefix the entity name in the #Entity annotation:
#Entity("I_AM_SCHEMA.KILL_ME")
DONE!