I have been tweaking GCC 6.3.0 to get it to use the libc++ runtime instead of libstdc++ so that g++ can be used without worrying about C++ runtime incompatibilities:
https://github.com/RJVB/macstrop/tree/master/lang/gcc6
The tweak works, I can build and run KDE software using g++ against Qt5 and KF5 frameworks (and everything else) built with various clang versions.
What doesn't work is generating code that uses AVX and presumably most or all newer intrinsic instructions.
This is not a new issue that's never been invoked on here; it's answered here for instance: How to use AVX/pclmulqdq on Mac OS X
Evidently one can configure gcc to call the linked script instead of the actual as executable.
But can gcc not be configured to use another assembler altogether, like nasm, and would that solve this issue?
Related
I have just upgraded to OS X 10.8 "Mountain Lion" and I start regretting having done that.
I am no longer able to build my (simple) parallel code that uses OpenMP.
By looking here and there I understood that Apple is no more using 'gcc' but 'llvm' - quite likely due to licence-related issues. Unfortunately 'llvm' does not (yet?) support OpenMP.
I cannot believe many programs based on OpenMP will not run any more on OS X, so my question is: how can I enable OpenMP in Mountain Lion?
After reading the excellent answer of Hristo Iliev, I think I missing more than I initially thought.
I am not using XCode. The building is based on CMake and make/gcc. Yesterday I installed gcc 4.2 via macports, but - as of today - my code is still in source form because - for some strange reasons - I am not able to switch the compilation to gcc (same errors related to OpenMP).
The problem now is that CMake keeps using the llvm compiler.
In the root CMakeLists.txt I added the following two lines:
set(CMAKE_C_COMPILER "/opt/local/bin/gcc-apple-4.2")
set(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER "/opt/local/bin/gcc-apple-4.2")
and I also added two environments variables:
export CXX=/opt/local/bin/gcc-apple-4.2
export CC=/opt/local/bin/gcc-apple-4.2
When CMake tries to find OpenMP ( FIND_PACKAGE(OpenMP) ) I get the following output:
-- The compiler is /opt/local/bin/gcc-apple-4.2
-- Try OpenMP C flag = [-fopenmp]
-- Performing Test OpenMP_FLAG_DETECTED
-- Performing Test OpenMP_FLAG_DETECTED - Failed
[...]
CMake Error at /opt/local/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:97 (message):
Could NOT find OpenMP (missing: OpenMP_C_FLAGS OpenMP_CXX_FLAGS)
Call Stack (most recent call first):
/opt/local/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:291 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
/opt/local/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindOpenMP.cmake:159 (find_package_handle_standard_args)
demo/CMakeLists.txt:8 (FIND_PACKAGE)
I tried to run /opt/local/bin/gcc-apple-4.2 manually and it fails due to a missing libgomp.
Regards
LLVM is a compiler framework that Apple uses extensively in OS X (most notably in the OpenGL implementation), not a compiler itself. There are two LLVM frontends available in Xcode - the old GCC-based one llvm-gcc (which supports OpenMP 2.5) and the new clang (which does not support OpenMP). clang has extensive static code analysis capabilities and also much nicer error reporting, especially with C++ code. Mostly that's the reason Apple is investing in it and moving away from GCC (the FreeBSD project, on the other side, is seeking to replace GCC with clang for purely license-related reasons). There is an ongoing project clomp (not to be mistaken with Intel's Cluster OpenMP) that seeks to create an OpenMP-aware version of clang, but it is far from mature.
If you do not need new OpenMP constructs like explicit tasks and can live with some bugs, you can still use the old GCC frontend. Just switch the compiler suite in the project settings to LLVM GCC 4.2:
This one is based on the really ancient GCC 4.2.1 and no longer seems to be developed. Should you need a newer version of GCC, simply build one. Unfortunately I cannot provide you with information on how to integrate it into Xcode. It works for me on the command line with GCC 4.7.1 and OS X 10.8.2 (and I don't use Xcode much).
Just adding few words to excellent Hristo's answer: you can install gcc via MacPorts. This is much simpler than compiling everything by hands (and compiling gcc from scratch might be really non-trivial task due to dependencies, etc).
So, install MacPorts, do "sudo port install gcc47", wait few hours and you'll end with gcc-mp-4.7 which is able to compile your OpenMP code.
Is there an option to GCC that changes the path of the assembler it uses? I'm getting errors from Solaris /usr/ccs/bin/as when using GCC to attempt to compile Haskell, but I've got a copy of GNU as in my path so when I type which as and as --version they use the GNU version, not the Solaris version. Unfortunately it seems GCC ignores the GNU version in the path and goes to the Solaris version. I'm trying to build Haskell on Solaris and I don't think it sits well with the Solaris assembler. I hope I can change this behaviour with a simple wrapper script so I don't have to recompile GCC.
Specifying the assembler to be used is not possible at run time. It has to be done when configuring gcc:
--with-gnu-as
Specify that the compiler should assume that the assembler it finds is the GNU
assembler. However, this does not modify the rules to find an assembler and will
result in confusion if the assembler found is not actually the GNU assembler.
(Confusion may also result if the compiler finds the GNU assembler but has not
been configured with --with-gnu-as.)
Note the part I've put in italics. Of course you could temporarily change /usr/ccs/bin/as to call the gnu assembler (provided you have the necessary permissions), but the above seems to suggest that you'll very likely run into problems. The gcc build process actually checks the features the assembler supports and generates code for exactly that assembler.
I suggest you build a new version of gcc first (configured to use the gnu tools), and then use that to build ghc.
I have Lion 10.7.3 with the Command-line tool installed. I wanted to experiment with C++11, so I used homebrew to install GCC 4.7 as documented here.
How can I now upgrade the /usr/bin/g++ to be the one installed by Homebrew? Is it as simple as symlinking it? I just want to double check and make sure. Thanks!
First, are you sure you need g++ 4.7? As you can see from the C++11 implementation status page, recent versions of clang support most of C++11 too. Of course there are still things that g++ handles and clang doesn't, but there are also still things that clang supports and g++ doesn't. And, more importantly, you already have a recent version of clang, from Apple, configured and ready to go, as your default compiler. Plus, g++ after 4.2 doesn't support Mac extensions like, say, -arch, which means you can't use it to build a whole lot of third-party software (because most configure scripts assume that if you're on a Mac, your compiler supports Mac extensions).
But if you want g++ 4.7, you can do it. Just not by trying to replace /usr/bin/g++ with a different version. Never replace anything in /usr/bin (or /System) with non-Apple stuff except in a few very rare cases (when you have a strong reassurance from someone who knows what they're talking about).
A better thing to do is to just install another compiler in parallel. Just let Homebrew install its favorite way (so it installs into some prefix like /usr/local/Cellar/gcc/4.7, then symlinks all the appropriate stuff into /usr/local/bin, etc.), and use it that way.
When compiling your code, instead of writing g++, write /usr/local/bin/g++, or g++-4.7.
If you get tired of doing that, put /usr/local/bin higher on your PATH that /usr/bin, or create a shell alias, or stick it in the environment variable CXX and write $CXX instead of g++.
If you're using a GUI IDE, you should be able to configure it to use your compiler by setting the path to it somewhere. (Unless you're using Xcode, which you can only configure to work with Apple-tested compilers.)
This is all you need for experimenting with your own code. If you want to compile third-party applications with this compiler, that may be a bit more complicated. You don't often actually compile each source file and link the result together; you just do configure && make and let them do the heavy lifting for you.
Fortunately, most packages will respect the standard environment variables, especially CXX for specifying a default C++ compiler and CC for a default C compiler. (That's why I suggested the name CXX above.)
Just remember that, again, g++ 4.7 doesn't support Mac extensions, so if you're not prepared to debug a bunch of autoconf-based configure scripts complaining that your compiler can't generate code because it assumed it could throw -arch x86_64 at any compiler on a Mac, etc., don't do this.
I am trying to compile a program that uses the pclmulqdq instruction present in new Intel processors. I've installed GCC 4.6 using macports but when I compile my program (which uses the intrinsic _mm_clmulepi64_si128), I get
/var/folders/ps/sfjmtgx5771_qbqnh4c9xclr0000gn/T//ccEAWWhd.s:16:no such
instruction: `pclmulqdq $0, %xmm0,%xmm1'
It seems that GCC is able to generate the correct assembly code from the instrinsic, but the assembler does not recognize the instruction.
I've installed binutils using macports, but the problem persists. How do I know which assembler gcc is using? The XCode assembler probably does not support it, but the binutils assembler should.
A simpler solution that fixed this problem for me was adding -Wa,-q to the compiler flags. From the man pages for as (version 1.38):
-q
Use the clang(1) integrated assembler instead of the GNU based system assembler.
The -Wa part passes it from the compiler driver to the assembler, much like -Wl passes arguments to the linker.
The GNU assembler (GAS) is not supported in Mac OS X.
In order to use AVX, I had to:
Install GCC using MacPorts;
Replace the native OS X assembler (/usr/bin/as) by a script which calls the clang assembler.
Compile the program with the installed GCC (e.g. gcc-mp-4.7)
The strange thing is that while the clang assembler supports AVX, the clang compiler does not recognize the AVX instrinsics, forcing the ugly workaround above.
The built in version of as is outdated. (In OS X 10.8.3)
/usr/libexec/as/x86_64/as -v
Apple Inc version cctools-839, GNU assembler version 1.38
There does not seem to exist a version of gas for OS X. (See:
Installing GNU Assembler in OSX)
Using the clang assembler via a script hack (as pointed out by Conrado PLG) is one workaround. However, it does require administrator privileges and overwrites OS X-bundled executables, causing a risk of it being overwritten by a new (yet possibly outdated) version of as bundled with a future version of OS X.
Is there then a better workaround?
As noted on Why does cross gcc invoke native 'as'? it seems to be possible to specify which "as"-executable and flags to use (using "-specs=..."). A cleaner workaround to the problem seems to be to pass the correct "-specs" flags to invoke the clang assembler. This does not require admin privileges and does not risk being broken by an OS X update. The exact details of how to perform this remains to be found out (anyone?).
If this workaround becomes trouble-free and transparent enough, it may be warranted to use those settings as a default (or at least variant) for the macport gcc (so that it supports "-march=native" and the like). There is such as configure.args setting ("--with-as=${prefix}/bin/as", as seen in https://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/lang/gcc48/Portfile ), which could be replaced.
Just use
as --version
AVX appeared around version 2.18.50 in gas/binutils.
It appears that I fixed my issue by using the gcc / asm syntax where asm{} function is passed a string consisting of assembler statements surrounded by quotes and separated by a backslash and newline or backslash and quoted string containing another assembler statement.
https://www.ibiblio.org/gferg/ldp/GCC-Inline-Assembly-HOWTO.html#s3
I am new to llvm/clang and have successfully built clang with MinGW.
I have one simple question - is MinGW gcc still needed for clang to work as a c/c++ compiler?
Thanks,
jweiboman
Right now - unfortunately, yes. clang will use gcc to assemble / link the stuff. This is necessary to e.g. provide the proper cmdline for linker invocation adding CRT objects & libraries.
As soon as someone will provide the the complete "toolchain" definition for mingw in clang, this won't be necessary. Only assembler and linker (part of binutils) will be required.