I want every time my mock changes and paesss to dataa, the barchart can re-render or updated. I watch dataa in barchart component, but it didn't work.
"console.log('this', this.dataa);" never trigger. I have no idea which part is wrong.
here is my code:
<sr-bar-chart
:title= "descriptionText.title_traffic"
:dataa= "mock"
:unit="descriptionText.avg7d_unit_people"
:index="'1'"
:barColor="'#adadad'"
and in bar chart component
export default {
name: 'sceneBarChart',
props: ['title', 'dataa', 'unit', 'index', 'barColor'],
data() {
return {
count: 0
};
},
watchers: {
dataa() {
console.log('this', this.dataa);
this.drawMap();
}
},
methods: {
drawMap() {
....
}
},
mounted() {
this.drawMap();
}
};
Thanks!
Use watch rather than watcher and just for good measure I'd add the newValue parameter as well.
watch: {
dataa(newValue) {
console.log('this', this.count);
this.drawMap();
}
here is more info on watched properties: https://v2.vuejs.org/v2/guide/computed.html#Watchers
Related
(Edited)
Refetching with the generated query type seems to work different from the refetch function in Apollo Client useQuery. I don't understand how to phrase it - can anyone provide an example?
I'm realizing the problem is probably either my refetch is not properly phrased, or maybe the store is only hitting the cached query. I've been going over my code for days and I can't figure out what it could be. I've tried await blocks too.
The refetch worked with svelte-apollo, but i'm trying to eliminate that dependency. I've also tried Apollo Client's useQuery, but the whole point of graphql-codegen with typescript-svelte-apollo is to use the generated typescript wrapper for the query.
When I assign the generated query to a reactive constant in my Svelte front-end code,
$: observations = getObservations({ variables: { filter } });
the query does not refetch when i update the query variables, as I would expect.
This is how my svelte template is using the query. The filter object changes based on a form user input. I've tried this with an await block too.
<script lang="ts">
import { getObservations } from '$lib/generated';
$: observations = getObservations({ variables: { filter } });
function handleFilter(event) {
filter = event.detail;
}
</script>
{#if $observations.loading}
Loading...
{:else if $observations.error}
{$observations.error}
{:else if $observations.data}
{#each $observations.data['observations']['edges'] as edge}
<Item node={edge['node']} />
{/each}
{/if}
Since this plugin allows to use the query directly, without Apollo's useQuery, i'm not sure how to phrase a refetch.
If i do $observations.refetch(); inside handleFilter(e), i get an error
Property 'refetch' does not exist on type 'Readable<ApolloQueryResult<GetObservationsQuery> & { query: ObservableQuery<GetObservationsQuery, Exact<{ filter?: FilterObservationsInput; }>>; }>'.ts(2339)
There's nothing fancy in my config. Am I doing something wrong here?
schema: src/graphql/schema.graphql
documents:
- src/graphql/queries.graphql
- src/graphql/mutations.graphql
generates:
src/lib/generated.ts:
plugins:
- typescript
- typescript-operations
- graphql-codegen-svelte-apollo
config:
clientPath: src/lib/shared/client
# asyncQuery: true
scalars:
ISO8601Date: Date
ISO8601DateTime: Date
Here's the client:
export default new ApolloClient({
link: authLink.concat(httpLink),
cache: new InMemoryCache({
typePolicies: {
Query: {
fields: {
observations: relayStylePagination(),
},
},
},
})
});
The generated query:
export const getObservations = (
options: Omit<
WatchQueryOptions<GetObservationsQueryVariables>,
"query"
>
): Readable<
ApolloQueryResult<GetObservationsQuery> & {
query: ObservableQuery<
GetObservationsQuery,
GetObservationsQueryVariables
>;
}
> => {
const q = client.watchQuery({
query: GetObservationsDoc,
...options,
});
var result = readable<
ApolloQueryResult<GetObservationsQuery> & {
query: ObservableQuery<
GetObservationsQuery,
GetObservationsQueryVariables
>;
}
>(
{ data: {} as any, loading: true, error: undefined, networkStatus: 1, query: q },
(set) => {
q.subscribe((v: any) => {
set({ ...v, query: q });
});
}
);
return result;
}
Here's the query document that it's built from:
query getObservations($filter: FilterObservationsInput) {
observations(filter: $filter) {
pageInfo {
startCursor
endCursor
hasNextPage
hasPreviousPage
}
edges {
cursor
node {
id
createdAt
updatedAt
when
where
imgSrcThumb
imgSrcSm
imgSrcMed
thumbImage {
width
height
}
name {
formatName
author
}
user {
name
login
}
rssLog {
detail
}
}
}
}
}
I'm having the dexie stores showed in the print screen below:
Dexie stores print screen
My goal is to update a dexie field row from a store without losing the rest of the data.
For example: when I edit and save the field "com_name" from the second row (key={2}) I want to update "com_name" only and not lose the rest of the properties, see first and the third row.
I already tried with collection.modify and table.update but both deleted the rest of the properties when used the code below:
dexieDB.table('company').where('dexieKey').equals('{1}')
//USING table.update
//.update(dexieRecord.dexiekey, {
// company: {
// com_name: "TOP SERVE 2"
// }
//})
.modify(
{
company:
{
com_name: TOP SERVE 2
}
}
)
.then(function (updated) {
if (updated)
console.log("Success.");
else
console.log("Nothing was updated.");
})
.catch(function (err) { console.log(err); });
Any idea how can I accomplish that?
Thanks
Alex
You where right to use Table.update or Collection.modify. They should never delete other properties than the ones specified. Can you paste a jsitor.com or jsfiddle repro of that and someone may help you pinpoint why the code doesn't work as expected.
Now that you are saying I realised that company and contact stores are created dynamically and editedRecords store has the indexes explicitly declared therefore when update company or contact store, since dexie doesn't see the indexes will overwrite. I haven't tested it yet but I suspect this is the behaviour.
See the print screen below:
Dexie stores overview
Basically I have json raw data from db and in the browser I create the stores and stores data based on it, see code below:
function createDexieTables(jsonData) { //jsonData - array, is the json from db
const stores = {};
const editedRecordsTable = 'editedRecords';
jsonData.forEach((jsonPackage) => {
for (table in jsonPackage) {
if (_.find(dexieDB.tables, { 'name': table }) == undefined) {
stores[table] = 'dexieKey';
}
}
});
stores[editedRecordsTable] = 'dexieKey, table';
addDataToDexie(stores, jsonData);
}
function addDataToDexie(stores, jsonData) {
dbv1 = dexieDB.version(1);
if (jsonData.length > 0) {
dbv1.stores(stores);
jsonData.forEach((jsonPackage) => {
for (table in jsonPackage) {
jsonPackage[table].forEach((tableRow) => {
dexieDB.table(table).add(tableRow)
.then(function () {
console.log(tableRow, ' added to dexie db.');
})
.catch(function () {
console.log(tableRow, ' already exists.');
});
});
}
});
}
}
This is the json, which I convert to object and save to dexie in the value column and the key si "dexieKey":
[
{
"company": [
{
"dexieKey": "{1}",
"company": {
"com_pk": 1,
"com_name": "CloudFire",
"com_city": "Round Rock",
"serverLastEdit": [
{
"com_pk": "2021-06-02T11:30:24.774Z"
},
{
"com_name": "2021-06-02T11:30:24.774Z"
},
{
"com_city": "2021-06-02T11:30:24.774Z"
}
],
"userLastEdit": []
}
}
]
}
]
Any idea why indexes were not populated when generating them dynamically?
Given the JSON data, i understand what's going wrong.
Instead of passing the following to update():
{
company:
{
com_name: "TOP SERVE 2"
}
}
You probably meant to pass this:
{
"company.com_name": "TOP SERVE 2"
}
Another hint is to do the add within an rw transaction, or even better if you can use bulkAdd() instead to optimize the performance.
Don't get the query to contentful to work.
Receive error message:
TypeError: Cannot read property 'allContentfulMagArticle' of undefined
datais undefined inside the Posts component. Can't see what i'm doing wrong here.
import { graphql } from 'gatsby';
import Post from "./post.js";
import './posts.css';
export const query = graphql`
query {
allContentfulMagArticle{
edges{
node{
index
title
name
subHeading
extract {
raw
}
slug
}
}
}
}
`
const Posts = ({ data }) => {
return (
<section className="posts">
<ul className="post-list">
{data.allContentfulMagArticle.edges.map(({ node }) => (
<Post
key={node.index}
id={node.index}
node={node}
title={node.title}
name={node.name}
// image={node.frontmatter.featuredImage.childImageSharp.fluid}
subheading={node.subheading}
body={node.extract.raw}
/>
))}
</ul>
</section>
)
}
export default Posts
Here my gatsby-config.js:
require('dotenv').config({
path: `.env`,
})
module.exports = {
siteMetadata: {
title: `XX`,
description: `XX`,
author: `Lisa Lee`,
url: `https://www.tortmagazine.com`
},
plugins: [
`gatsby-plugin-react-helmet`,
'gatsby-plugin-fontawesome-css',
'gatsby-plugin-sharp',
`gatsby-transformer-sharp`,
`gatsby-transformer-remark`,
{
resolve: `gatsby-source-filesystem`,
options: {
path: `${__dirname}/src/`,
},
},
{
resolve: `gatsby-source-contentful`,
options: {
spaceId: process.env.GATSBY_CONTENTFUL_SPACE_ID,
accessToken: process.env.GATSBY_CONTENTFUL_ACCESS_TOKEN,
},
},
],
}
You used the word "component" to describe your Posts but the query you are using only works in a page, or in the context of createPage (so in a template file as well). If you are indeed in a component, that will be the issue. If not, then I'm not clear what is wrong, I use the same pattern (eg: data.edges.node.map()) and it works for me.
The only other difference I noticed is in gatsby-config, I define an environment key. I'm not sure what the behavior is if none is defined, probably defaults to master so you may also want to confirm you're on the right environment.
I'm trying to validate fields in my form, but I keep getting an error message.
Here is my code:
Ext.define('ExtDoc.views.extfields.FieldsValidator',{
valEng: function(val) {
var engTest = /^[a-zA-Z0-9\s]+$/;
Ext.apply(Ext.form.field.VTypes, {
eng: function(val, field) {
return engTest.test(val);
},
engText: 'Write it in English Please',
// vtype Mask property: The keystroke filter mask
engMask: /[a-zA-Z0-9_\u0600-\u06FF\s]/i
});
}
});
And I define my field as follow:
{
"name": "tik_moed_chasifa",
"type": "ExtDoc.views.extfields.ExtDocTextField",
"label": "moed_hasifa",
"vtype": "eng",
"msgTarget": "under"
}
The first snippet is in a separate js file, and I have it in my fields js file as required.
When I start typing text in the text field, I keep seeing the following error msg in the explorer debugger:
"SCRIPT438: Object doesn't support property or method 'eng' "
What could it be? Have I declared something wrong?
You have defined your own class with a function valEng(val), but you don't instantiate it, neither do you call the function anywhere.
Furthermore, your function valEng(val) does not require a parameter, because you are not using that parameter anywhere.
It would be far easier and more readable, would you remove the Ext.define part and create the validators right where you need them. For instance if you need them inside an initComponent function:
initComponent:function() {
var me = this;
Ext.apply(Ext.form.field.VTypes, {
mobileNumber:function(val, field) {
var numeric = /^[0-9]+$/
if(!Ext.String.startsWith(val,'+')) return false;
if(!numeric.test(val.substring(1))) return false;
return true;
},
mobileNumberText:'This is not a valid mobile number'
});
Ext.apply(me,{
....
items: [{
xtype:'fieldcontainer',
items:[{
xtype: 'combobox',
vtype: 'mobileNumber',
Or, you could add to your Application.js, in the init method, if you need it quite often at different levels of your application:
Ext.define('MyApp.Application', {
extend: 'Ext.app.Application',
views: [
],
controllers: [
],
stores: [
],
init:function() {
Ext.apply(Ext.form.field.VTypes, {
mobileNumber:function(val, field) {
var numeric = /^[0-9]+$/
if(!Ext.String.startsWith(val,'+')) return false;
if(!numeric.test(val.substring(1))) return false;
return true;
},
mobileNumberText:'This is not a valid mobile number'
});
}
How to write outputFields, getFatQuery, getConfigs for create new item and update items list
Please take a look gist or live
Questions are
getFatQuery() {
return Relay.QL`
???
`;
}
getConfigs() {
return [???];
}
outputFields: {
???
},
The outputFields in your schema make up the GraphQL type CreateActivityPayload that will be generated from your schema.js file. A mutation is like a regular query, but with side effects. In outputFields you get to decide what's queryable. Since your store is the only thing in your app that can change as a result of this mutation, we can start with that.
outputFields: {
store: {
type: storeType,
resolve: () => store,
},
}
The fat query operates on these output fields. Here you tell Relay what could possibly change as a result of this mutation. Adding an activity could change the following fields:
getFatQuery() {
return Relay.QL`
fragment on CreateActivityPayload #relay(pattern: true) {
store {
activities
}
}
`;
}
Finally, the config tells Relay what to do with the query when it gets it, or even if it needs to be made at all. Here, you're looking to update a field after creating a new activity. Use the FIELDS_CHANGE config to tell Relay to update your store.
getConfigs() {
return [{
type: 'FIELDS_CHANGE',
fieldsIDs: {
store: this.props.storeId,
},
}];
}
See more: https://facebook.github.io/relay/docs/guides-mutations.html