How to make one project build before all others? - visual-studio

I know you can set Build Dependencies for projects in Visual Studio and that will make the dependency build before the other projects. However, I have a project that all others will depend on (including new ones that may be added in the future), and so I'd rather just say "this project must build first, before all others" without bothering to set a dependency for every other project. Is there a way to do this in VS?

Is there a way to do this in VS?
Visual Studio calculates the build order according to your dependence. Like project A depends on project B, Visual Studio will build B prior to A. So if you want to make one project build before all others, you could not avoid this bothering setting or Visual Studio could not get the build order, will build in the error order.
In order to avoid set a dependency for every other project, you can right-click on your solution and find the Project Dependencies menu item:
The dialog that opens will allow you to set build dependencies and show you the calculated build order (you can affect the order by changing the dependencies).
In this case, you can set a dependency for every other project at once, no need to set for each one, but for new ones that may be added in the future, you still need to do the settings after added.

Related

Visual Studio 2019 build order is not working

My solution structure is like this:
WiX Installer: depends on Project A and B
Project A: depends on Project B
Project B: no dependencies
It is configured like that in the build dependencies. The displayed build order (right click on the solution -> project build order) is the correct one (Project B -> Project A -> Installer). But for some reason when i try to rebuild the whole solution thats not the order in which Visual Studio actually tries to build the projects. It always starts with Project A which of course then fails cause of the missing dependency of Project B.
If i manually build the projects in the right order everything works.
In my .sln file projects are listed like this:
Project("{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}") = "ProjectA", ProjectA\ProjectA.csproj", "{B80B7A8F-0576-41FA-BD3D-B3C6F5F8D6E7}"
EndProject
Project("{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}") = "ProjectB", "ProjectB\ProjectB.csproj", "{D127D2C1-0F13-41F1-B4A1-218BC53ABC40}"
EndProject
Project("{930C7802-8A8C-48F9-8165-68863BCCD9DD}") = "Installer", "Installer\Installer.wixproj", "{1D504782-E92A-4C60-9ADC-6067E7E301AA}"
ProjectSection(ProjectDependencies) = postProject
{B80B7A8F-0576-41FA-BD3D-B3C6F5F8D6E7} = {B80B7A8F-0576-41FA-BD3D-B3C6F5F8D6E7}
{D127D2C1-0F13-41F1-B4A1-218BC53ABC40} = {D127D2C1-0F13-41F1-B4A1-218BC53ABC40}
EndProjectSection
EndProject
Any idea what might cause this issue?
Usually, the build order is saved in the solution file(.sln file) like this:
So when you use this, you should build the whole solution with that file. But
However, in vs IDE, when you build A single project, it can follow the specified build order, but in msbuild command line, msbuild projectA.xxproj does not build B first and then build A according to the specified dependencies. This is also unique to vs ides, although the build dependencies are stored in xxx.sln rather than individual xxx.proj files.
Unless the entire solution(msbuild xxx.sln) is built in MSBuild Command Line, it will be built sequentially.
This is the situation that generally causes this difference.
But for some reason when i try to rebuild the whole solution thats not
the order in which Visual Studio actually tries to build the projects.
I wonder what you did caused this and if you build the whole solution(xxx.sln file), this issue will not happen. So I want to know which build format or what you did to your solution.
Since MSBuild cannot build wixproj file, so you should use VS IDE or devenv xxx.sln /build to build the whole solution.
Suggestion
As a suggestion, you could use Project Reference instead to specify build order which will set the order in every xxx.proj rather than xxx.sln file. This will be more reliable and safe.
1) Remove the build orders under Project Dependencies(Right-click on Solution)
2) Right-click on WIX project-->References-->Add Reference-->Projects-->Select Project A and Project B.
3) Right-click on Project A-->References-->Add Reference-->Project-->Project B.
In addition, if it does not help you, please share with us what you did to cause this issue and any steps which caused it so that it will help us troubleshoot your issue more quickly.
Update 1
Just hint from Eric, and thanks to him for sharing the solution and test result.
Solution
First, remove all the project dependencies and then re-add them, after that, it fixes the issue. It could be an issue to this project since it was migrated from old VS2010.
I had the same problem. I was able to build my solution in Visual Studio. But when building it on Azure DevOps Pipelines with MSBuild, it built them in the wrong order; with my WiX .wixproj project being built before one of its dependencies.
My .sln file looked like this:
What I did to solve the problem, was to manually add more dependencies to this file:
So my advice is to look in your .sln file and add additional dependencies that you think would make sense.

Define build order on build machine

I know that I can define a specific build order using dependencies in Visual Studio, but my question is do those dependencies and build order stay the same whenever I check-in my work to TFS and run a build on the TFS server? I ask because I am having some issues when it comes to having multiple projects in the same solution where project B references project A, and project C references project B, etc.
The solution builds locally just fine because I have set the dependencies such that project B always builds first, but it doesn't seem like this configuration carries over to TFS.
Is this possible to do on the TFS build side?
TF Build will build your projects in the same order, dependency order, that they are built in Visual Studio.
If you reference a project (no reference a projects output but the project) then it will all cascade correctly. Direct Binary references do not cascade correctly as both VS and MSBuild assume it is already built.
Make sure your updated solution file, with the build order, Is committed to TFS.
Ensure that your build is targeting this solution file rather than a list of projects.
As others have said Project References are the key, check all references point to the project and not the binary output.
If the references are correct then the build order will be correct automatically and manual intervention is only really required for projects such as wix projects where the installer project should always be built last after all of the other outputs have been completed.

Forced to Rebuild Project Depedencies in Visual Studio 2012

I recently upgraded to VS.NET 2012 and I started encountering a very frustrating issue when debugging.
Project A has a project reference to Project B. When I edit Project B, I would expect that action of building/debugging Project A to detect the change in Project B and automatically include it during the build of Project A. (That's kinda the point of project dependencies.) And that's exactly what used to happen in VS 2010.
But this doesn't happen in 2012. Indeed, even if I build Project B explicitly, Project A will not pick up that change unless I rebuild project A.
So now I'm forced to explicitly build Project B then go back to Project A and explicitly rebuild it for the modifications in Project B to be included.
Thoughts?
Did you set the dependency projects in your solution?
We can set them from:
Right click solution->Properties->Project Dependencies
By the way, did you build your solution in the Visual Studio IDE or by msbuild command?
If you use msbuild to build the projects, you should add DependsOnTargets attribute in your project files.
More information you can refer to:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms366724.aspx
Your 3rd paragraph seems to indicate a misunderstanding with the way dependencies work. Forgive me if I am mistaken.
If project A has a dependency on project B, building project B would not force a rebuild of project A. Building project A however should check for changes in project B and rebuild B automatically if needed.
Project A in this case is the parent or root project. Building the parent would check all the projects on which it depends and rebuild them if they are out of date. Always building the parent would automatically build outdated dependencies first, and then the parent project would be built picking up any new changes in the dependencies.
A
\
B
|\
C D
In this example, if B had dependencies they would be built as well. If you explicitly built B, its dependencies C and D would be checked and rebuilt but not A.
If you explicitly built A, first C and D would be checked and rebuilt if necessary, then B, then finally A.
I had a similar problem before, and the cause was that the A's reference to B was a regular reference (to the DLL file), rather than a "Project Reference". This situation would certainly explain the behaviour you see.
To check, look at ProjectA.csproj in a text editor, and examine all the <Reference> and <ProjectReference> elements to make sure they are the way you think they should be.
I think you're looking for a continuous integration (CI) server. A CI can be configured to monitor source repositories and triggered to build target assemblies when new changes have been committed to the code base.
Otherwise, as others have mentioned, project dependencies can be used to rebuild referenced assemblies.
One potential cause of this is locked .suo files. See my answer on this question:
Visual Studio 2012 not building dependent projects

what can cause Visual Studio to rebuild my entire solution all the time?

I have a largeish solution in Visual Studio 2008 (around 30 projects, all C# and Script#), including some test projects.
When I start the application or run my tests, way to often Visual Studio rebuilds everything rather than just the changed parts and their dependencies.
If I don't change anything at all, it will not rebuild, but as soon as I change any file in any project, everything in the entire solution will be rebuilt, even the 90% of projects which were not affected at all.
Does anyone have an idea of what the problem can be, or provide me a hint of where I can start troubleshooting it?
Edit: To clarify, all projects in the solution are rebuilt, even those which are not directly or indirectly dependent on the project that has actually been modified. Even those which the modified project depends on, so it can't be a simple project reference issue.
The build sequence is determined by the project references (dependencies).
To avoid to build the projects depending on the project you've edited, you can use Build Current under the menu Build.
I setup CTL+B as shortcut to Build Current which saved me a lot of time than F6. Everytime I just use CTL+B after I save a file.
Hopefully this will help.
You can use the configuration manager to set up a specific config for your sln that will only build the projects you specify. You can find it under Build->Configuration Manager

Build Incrementally in VS 2005

We have a 50 projects solution in VS 2005.
Is any way to get incremental build if nothing was changed?
It is kind of doing it now, but it executes all prebuild and post build events for each project.
Is any way to prevent it?
Have a look at the Build Events tab. Notice the dropdown at the bottom that says Run the post-build event:. Does it say "On successful build"? Try changing it to "When the build updates the project output".
Visual studio does what you describe by default, custom build steps are not executed for up to date projects.
Something in your dependancies or build settings are causing it to update all builds. Unfortunately it's hard to track down without additional infromation.
If you know ahead of time which ones you would like to build or not build, you could create different build configurations that only build specified projects.
This solution doesn't use dependencies at all, so it will only work if you have a few different distinct groups of projects.

Resources