I'm using some SQL query with MyBatis to update data to my Oracle db, but the system stop half way and not throwing any error.
Some forum say that it might because of connection pool size, time out problem or might be SqlSessionFactory configuration problem.
I changed all the timeout to 30 sec but still have the same problem
//my hikari datasource setup
#Bean
public HikariDataSource dataSource() {
HikariDataSource db = new HikariDataSource();
db.setDriverClassName(driverClassName);
db.setJdbcUrl(url);
db.setUsername(username);
db.setPassword(pwd);
db.setReadOnly(false);
db.setMaximunPoolSize(80);
db.setConnectionTimeout(30000);
db.setIdleTimeout(30000);
db.setMaxLifetime(30000);
db.setMinimunIdle(5);
db.setValidationTimeout(500);
return db;
}
The section I'm calling update to my Oracle db
try (SqlSession sqlSession = sqlSessionFactory.openSession(ExecutorType.BATCH)) {
ItemMapper mapper = sqlSession.getMapper(ItemMapper.class);
for (Object obj: lists) {
//It only works fine when I'm calling insert function
mapper.update(obj);
}
//After running this statement then system got stuck
sqlSession.flushStatements();
sqlSession.clearCache();
sqlSession.commit();
} catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
This is MyBatis .xml file
<update id="update">
UPDATE <include refid="tableName" />
SET
item_price = #{price},
update_time = #{updateTime}
WHERE id = #{id}
</update>
But the weird things is everything works fine while I'm calling insert sql statement, the system will hang or stuck at sqlSession.flushStatements(); and not throwing any errors only when I change to update sql statement.
UPDATE
Even I use normal MyBatis update query also make the whole system hang but nothing happen if I use insert query..
The normal update query i execute
Obj obj = new Obj();
obj.setprice("1");
obj.setupdateTime(new Date());
mapper.update(obj);
This problem has been solve weirdly, seems like there is some uncommited session in somewhere although I actually restarted my server.
Just manually one click of commit button in Oracle database, then my program able to update data in database.
Please feel free to share any relevant information about some weird uncommited session of Oracle database here
I'm using JDBC db2 driver, a.k.a. JT400 to connect to db2 server on Application System/400, a midrange computer system.
My goal is to insert into three Tables, from outside of IBM mainframe, which would be cloud instance(eg. Amazon WS).
To make the performance better
1) I am using already established connections to connect to db2.
(using org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource or com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCManagedConnectionPoolDataSource, both are working fine.)
public class AS400JDBCManagedConnectionPoolDataSource extends AS400JDBCManagedDataSource implements ConnectionPoolDataSource, Referenceable, Serializable {
}
public class AS400JDBCManagedDataSource extends ToolboxWrapper implements DataSource, Referenceable, Serializable, Cloneable {
}
2) I want to cache the insert into statements for all three tables, so that I don't have to send query every time and compile every time, which is expensive. I would instead just pass the parameters only. (Obviously I am doing this using JDBC prepared statements)
Based on an official IBM document Optimize Access to DB2 for i5/OS
from Java and WebSphere, page 17-20 - Enabling Extended Dynamic Support, it's possible to cache the statement with AS400JDBCManagedConnectionPoolDataSource.
BUT, the problem is the insert into queries are being compiled each time, which is taking 200ms * 3 queries = 600ms each time.
Example I'm using,
public class CustomerOrderEventHandler extends MultiEventHandler {
private static Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(CustomerOrderEventHandler.class);
//private BasicDataSource establishedConnections = new BasicDataSource();
//private DB2SimpleDataSource nativeEstablishedConnections = new DB2SimpleDataSource();
private AS400JDBCManagedConnectionPoolDataSource dynamicEstablishedConnections =
new AS400JDBCManagedConnectionPoolDataSource();
private State3 orderState3;
private State2 orderState2;
private State1 orderState1;
public CustomerOrderEventHandler() throws SQLException {
dynamicEstablishedConnections.setServerName(State.server);
dynamicEstablishedConnections.setDatabaseName(State.DATABASE);
dynamicEstablishedConnections.setUser(State.user);
dynamicEstablishedConnections.setPassword(State.password);
dynamicEstablishedConnections.setSavePasswordWhenSerialized(true);
dynamicEstablishedConnections.setPrompt(false);
dynamicEstablishedConnections.setMinPoolSize(3);
dynamicEstablishedConnections.setInitialPoolSize(5);
dynamicEstablishedConnections.setMaxPoolSize(50);
dynamicEstablishedConnections.setExtendedDynamic(true);
Connection connection = dynamicEstablishedConnections.getConnection();
connection.close();
}
public void onEvent(CustomerOrder orderEvent){
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
Connection dbConnection = null;
try {
dbConnection = dynamicEstablishedConnections.getConnection();
long connectionSetupTime = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
state3 = new State3(dbConnection);
state2 = new State2(dbConnection);
state1 = new State1(dbConnection);
long initialisation = System.currentTimeMillis() - start - connectionSetupTime;
int[] state3Result = state3.apply(orderEvent);
int[] state2Result = state2.apply(orderEvent);
long state1Result = state1.apply(orderEvent);
dbConnection.commit();
logger.info("eventId="+ getEventId(orderEvent) +
",connectionSetupTime=" + connectionSetupTime +
",queryPreCompilation=" + initialisation +
",insertionOnlyTimeTaken=" +
(System.currentTimeMillis() - (start + connectionSetupTime + initialisation)) +
",insertionTotalTimeTaken=" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
} catch (SQLException e) {
logger.error("Error updating the order states.", e);
if(dbConnection != null) {
try {
dbConnection.rollback();
} catch (SQLException e1) {
logger.error("Error rolling back the state.", e1);
}
}
throw new CustomerOrderEventHandlerRuntimeException("Error updating the customer order states.", e);
}
}
private Long getEventId(CustomerOrder order) {
return Long.valueOf(order.getMessageHeader().getCorrelationId());
}
}
And the States with insert commands look like below,
import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager;
import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.SQLException;
public class State2 extends State {
private static Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(DetailState.class);
Connection connection;
PreparedStatement preparedStatement;
String detailsCompiledQuery = "INSERT INTO " + DATABASE + "." + getStateName() +
"(" + DetailState.EVENT_ID + ", " +
State2.ORDER_NUMBER + ", " +
State2.SKU_ID + ", " +
State2.SKU_ORDERED_QTY + ") VALUES(?, ?, ?, ?)";
public State2(Connection connection) throws SQLException {
this.connection = connection;
this.preparedStatement = this.connection.prepareStatement(detailsCompiledQuery); // this is taking ~200ms each time
this.preparedStatement.setPoolable(true); //might not be required, not sure
}
public int[] apply(CustomerOrder event) throws StateException {
event.getMessageBody().getDetails().forEach(detail -> {
try {
preparedStatement.setLong(1, getEventId(event));
preparedStatement.setString(2, getOrderNo(event));
preparedStatement.setInt(3, detail.getSkuId());
preparedStatement.setInt(4, detail.getQty());
preparedStatement.addBatch();
} catch (SQLException e) {
logger.error(e);
throw new StateException("Error setting up data", e);
}
});
long startedTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
int[] inserted = new int[0];
try {
inserted = preparedStatement.executeBatch();
} catch (SQLException e) {
throw new StateException("Error updating allocations data", e);
}
logger.info("eventId="+ getEventId(event) +
",state=details,insertionTimeTaken=" + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startedTime));
return inserted;
}
#Override
protected String getStateName() {
return properties.getProperty("state.order.details.name");
}
}
So the flow is each time an event is received(eg. CustomerOrder), it gets the establishedConnection and then asks the states to initialise their statements.
The metrics for timing look as below,
for the first event, it takes 580ms to create the preparedStatements for 3 tables.
{"timeMillis":1489982655836,"thread":"ScalaTest-run-running-CustomerOrderEventHandlerSpecs","level":"INFO","loggerName":"com.xyz.customerorder.events.handler.CustomerOrderEventHandler",
"message":"eventId=1489982654314,connectionSetupTime=1,queryPreCompilation=580,insertionOnlyTimeTaken=938,insertionTotalTimeTaken=1519","endOfBatch":false,"loggerFqcn":"org.apache.logging.log4j.spi.AbstractLogger","threadId":1,"threadPriority":5}
for the second event, takes 470ms to prepare the statements for 3 tables, which is less than the first event but just < 100ms, I assume it to be drastically less, as it should not even make it to compilation.
{"timeMillis":1489982667243,"thread":"ScalaTest-run-running-PurchaseOrderEventHandlerSpecs","level":"INFO","loggerName":"com.xyz.customerorder.events.handler.CustomerOrderEventHandler",
"message":"eventId=1489982665456,connectionSetupTime=0,queryPreCompilation=417,insertionOnlyTimeTaken=1363,insertionTotalTimeTaken=1780","endOfBatch":false,"loggerFqcn":"org.apache.logging.log4j.spi.AbstractLogger","threadId":1,"threadPriority":5}
What I'm thinking is since I'm closing preparedStatement for that particular connection, it does not even exist for new connection. If thats the case whats the point of having statement caching at all in multi-threaded environment.
The documentation has similar example, where its making transactions inside the same connection which is not the case for me, as I need to have multiple connections at the same time.
Questions
Primary
Q1) Is DB2 JDBC driver caching the statements at all, between multiple connections? Because I don't see much difference while preparing the statement. (see example, first one takes ~600ms, second one takes ~500ms)
References
ODP = Open Data Path
SQL packages
SQL packages are permanent objects used to store information related
to prepared SQL statements. They can be used by the IBM iSeries Access
for the IBM Toolbox for
Java JDBC driver. They are also used by applications which use the
QSQPRCED (SQL Process Extended Dynamic) API interface.
In the case JDBC, the existence of the SQL package is
checked when the client application issues the first prepare of a SQL
Statement. If the package does not exist, it is created at that time
(even though it may not yet contain any SQL statements)
Tomcat jdbc connection pool configuration - DB2 on iSeries(AS400)
IBM Data Server Driver for JDBC and SQLJ statement caching
A couple of important things to note regarding statement caching:
Because Statement objects are child objects of a given Connection, once the Connection is closed all child objects (e.g. all Statement objects) must also be closed.
It is not possible to associate a statement from one connection with a different connection.
Statement pooling may or may not be done be by a given JDBC driver. Statement pooling may also be performed by a connection management layer (i.e. application server)
Per JDBC spec, default value for Statement.isPoolable() == false and PreparedStatement.isPoolable() == true, however this flag is only a hint to the JDBC driver. There is no guarantee from the spec that statement pooling will occur.
First off, I am not sure if the JT400 driver does statement caching. The document you referenced in your question comment, Optimize Access to DB2 for i5/OS from Java and WebSphere, is specific to using the JT400 JDBC driver with WebSphere application server, and on slide #3 it indicates that statement caching comes from the WebSphere connection management layer, not the native JDBC driver layer. Given that, I'm going to assume that the JT400 JDBC driver doesn't support statement caching on its own.
So at this point you are probably going to want to plug into some sort of app server (unless you want to implement statement caching on your own, which is sort of re-inventing the wheel). I know for sure that both WebSphere Application Server products (traditional and Liberty) support statement caching for any JDBC driver.
For WebSphere Liberty (the newer product), the data source config is the following:
<dataSource jndiName="jdbc/myDS" statementCacheSize="10">
<jdbcDriver libraryRef="DB2iToolboxLib"/>
<properties.db2.i.toolbox databaseName="YOURDB" serverName="localhost"/>
</dataSource>
<library id="DB2iToolboxLib">
<fileset dir="/path/to/jdbc/driver/dir" includes="jt400.jar"/>
</library>
The key bit being the statementCacheSize attribute of <dataSource>, which has a default value of 10.
(Disclaimer, I'm a WebSphere dev, so I'm going to talk about what I know)
First off, the IBM i Java documentation is here: IBM Toolbox for Java
Secondly, I don't see where you are setting the "extended dynamic" property to true which provides
a mechanism for caching dynamic SQL statements on the server. The first
time a particular SQL statement is prepared, it is stored in a SQL
package on the server. If the package does not exist, it is
automatically created. On subsequent prepares of the same SQL
statement, the server can skip a significant part of the processing by
using information stored in the SQL package. If this is set to "true",
then a package name must be set using the "package" property.
I think you're missing some steps in using the managed pool...here's the first example in the IBM docs
import javax.naming.Context;
import javax.naming.InitialContext;
import javax.sql.DataSource;
import com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCManagedConnectionPoolDataSource;
import com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCManagedDataSource;
public class TestJDBCConnPoolSnippet
{
void test()
{
AS400JDBCManagedConnectionPoolDataSource cpds0 = new AS400JDBCManagedConnectionPoolDataSource();
// Set general datasource properties. Note that both connection pool datasource (CPDS) and managed
// datasource (MDS) have these properties, and they might have different values.
cpds0.setServerName(host);
cpds0.setDatabaseName(host);//iasp can be here
cpds0.setUser(userid);
cpds0.setPassword(password);
cpds0.setSavePasswordWhenSerialized(true);
// Set connection pooling-specific properties.
cpds0.setInitialPoolSize(initialPoolSize_);
cpds0.setMinPoolSize(minPoolSize_);
cpds0.setMaxPoolSize(maxPoolSize_);
cpds0.setMaxLifetime((int)(maxLifetime_/1000)); // convert to seconds
cpds0.setMaxIdleTime((int)(maxIdleTime_/1000)); // convert to seconds
cpds0.setPropertyCycle((int)(propertyCycle_/1000)); // convert to seconds
//cpds0.setReuseConnections(false); // do not re-use connections
// Set the initial context factory to use.
System.setProperty(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, "com.sun.jndi.fscontext.RefFSContextFactory");
// Get the JNDI Initial Context.
Context ctx = new InitialContext();
// Note: The following is an alternative way to set context properties locally:
// Properties env = new Properties();
// env.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, "com.sun.jndi.fscontext.RefFSContextFactory");
// Context ctx = new InitialContext(env);
ctx.rebind("mydatasource", cpds0); // We can now do lookups on cpds, by the name "mydatasource".
// Create a standard DataSource object that references it.
AS400JDBCManagedDataSource mds0 = new AS400JDBCManagedDataSource();
mds0.setDescription("DataSource supporting connection pooling");
mds0.setDataSourceName("mydatasource");
ctx.rebind("ConnectionPoolingDataSource", mds0);
DataSource dataSource_ = (DataSource)ctx.lookup("ConnectionPoolingDataSource");
AS400JDBCManagedDataSource mds_ = (AS400JDBCManagedDataSource)dataSource_;
boolean isHealthy = mds_.checkPoolHealth(false); //check pool health
Connection c = dataSource_.getConnection();
}
}
I am going to handle multiple time zone in my web application by resetting database session time zone every time getting DB connection.
The code looks like:
public Connection getConnection(GmDNSNamesEnum enDNSName) throws AppError
{
...
DataSource ds = (DataSource) ic.lookup(enDNSName.getDNSName());
conn = ds.getConnection();
conn.setAutoCommit(false);
setTimeZone(strTimeZone);
...
return conn;
}
private void setTimeZone(String strTimeZone){
Statement stmt = null;
if(conn != null) {
try{
stmt = conn.createStatement();
stmt.execute("alter session set time_zone=\'" + strTimeZone+"\'");
} catch (Exception e)
{
String strErrorMsg = GmCommonClass.getExceptionStackTrace(e);
log.error("Exception e "+strErrorMsg);
throw new AppError(e);
}
}
}
Is there any alternate way to set database session time zone?
now, I am looking for configure datasource with different timezone in jboss/weblogic server and use appropriate datasource specific to user timezone instead of every time reset the session time zone by executing alter session script.
thanks in advance
Wow ok.
Perhaps you could try persisting the dates and times into timezone-aware database columns instead of contorting the data source each time you connect? The convention is to store dates in UTC time, then do timezone conversion in the presentation layer (or at least post-retrieval).
I've got Java web application running on Tomcat with SSO via SPNEGO/Kerberos and I want to pass kerberos ticket to database, Oracle DB in my case (like impersonation in MS products). I've found an example of implementation (http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/java.111/b31224/clntsec.htm):
Connection conn = (Connection)Subject.doAs(specificSubject, new PrivilegedExceptionAction({
public Object run() {
Connection con = null;
Properties prop = new Properties();
prop.setProperty(AnoServices.AUTHENTICATION_PROPERTY_SERVICES,"("+AnoServices.AUTHENTICATION_KERBEROS5 + ")");
try {
OracleDriver driver = new OracleDriver();
con = driver.connect(url, prop);
}catch (Exception except){
except.printStackTrace();
}
return con;
}
});
String auth = ((OracleConnection)conn).getAuthenticationAdaptorName();
System.out.println("Authentication adaptor="+auth);
printUserName(conn);
conn.close();
But as it is known to create a new connection is an expensive operation. To solve this problem commonly used connection pooling (like c3p0), but I cant find example, how to combine code above and connection pool. Is there any example?
Under Weblogic 10, I am using Hibernate to store data into several tables with BLOBs. It's always worked fine but the customer found specific circumstances where 15% of the BLOBs have the correct size but only contain null characters. I can't figure out what makes it good or full of emptiness.
The BLOB type I am using does a:
public void nullSafeSet(PreparedStatement st, Object value, int index) throws HibernateException, SQLException {
if (value == null) {
st.setNull(index, sqlTypes()[0]);
return;
}
try {
Connection conn = st.getConnection();
if (conn instanceof org.apache.commons.dbcp.DelegatingConnection) {
log.debug("Delegating connection, digging for actual driver");
conn = ((org.apache.commons.dbcp.DelegatingConnection)st.getConnection()).getInnermostDelegate();
}
OutputStream tempBlobWriter = null;
BLOB tempBlob = BLOB.createTemporary(conn, true, BLOB.DURATION_SESSION);
try {
tempBlob.open(BLOB.MODE_READWRITE);
tempBlobWriter = tempBlob.setBinaryStream(1L);
tempBlobWriter.write((byte[])value);
tempBlobWriter.flush();
} finally {
if (tempBlobWriter != null)
tempBlobWriter.close();
tempBlob.close();
}
st.setBlob(index, (Blob) tempBlob);
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new HibernateException(e);
}
}
I put a log in there and can confirm that the value (byte[]) is good. I tried to change the createTemporary parameters, no success.
I am running this under Weblogic 10.0 (can't upgrade that) with the bundled Oracle Thin driver.
A clue is that the working calls come from the standard web service deployed and managed by WLS. But the problematic calls are done from a thread started along with the component that interfaces with some legacy system with JNI. This thread works like a charm for everything except these BLOBs. I am getting a new Session just before inserting the data and closing it a bit after. (The Session does NOT remain open for the lifetime of the thread)
I have set the Hibernate log level to DEBUG but it does not give me any clue. I'm starting to run out of ideas...
Problem solved.
In fact, I was doing:
open session
open transaction
get first item from legacy system
write first item to database (blob)
close transaction
open transaction
get second item from legacy system
write second item to database (blob)
close transaction
... until the legacy system has nothing more to process
close session
This would typically process between 1 and 5 items per round.
But because the Oracle driver does not use the standard way of handling blobs in JDBC, our custom type has to create a temporary blob that is stored in the session. And apparently when you're inserting blobs in differents transactions within the same session, they tend to interfere and cause my problem.
I solved it by closing the session after each commit. I do not like it but I consider it being the Oracle driver's fault.