We used #Configuration Spring annotation on an interface used as a root for other configurations (linked with the root via #Import annotation). Like this
#Configuration
#Import({
DatabaseConfituration.class,
JmsConfiguration.class,
FlowConfiguration.class,
SchedulerConfiguration.class
})
public interface RootConfiguration {
}
We specify in this way that RootConfiguration isn't a place for any bean definitions and the such approach worked well.
However, I've just realized that IntelliJ IDEA doesn't recognize RootConfiguration as a Sprint Java configuration. In Configuration annotation JavaDoc there is no any mentions about interfaces but only about classes.
So are there any prohibitions to use interfaces with #Configuration in Java configurations in Spring? Or is the issue actually IntelliJ IDEA problem?
Related
My #SpringBootApplication annotation is present in com.abc.def package.
According to this article , using #SpringBootApplication annotation is equivalent to using #Configuration, #EnableAutoConfiguration, and #ComponentScan with their default attributes :-
https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/2.0.x/reference/html/using-boot-using-springbootapplication-annotation.html
If i supply my own #ComponentScan, does it add new packages to the default value or completely override the default ?
#SpringBootApplication annotation can component scan classes from packages under Application class belong to . Also you can add #ComponentScan to scan classes not under package Application class belongs to.
#ComponentScan("external.pkg")
#SpringBootApplication
class MyApp{
}
the annotation #SpringBootApplication contains #EnableAutoConfiguration annotation, which will scan through your jar, class, and maven dependencies in the classpath to register beans. If you declare beans cross packages and only want to use specific beans from specific packages, then use #ComponentScan
#ComponentScan gives you a fine-grained package or class level control on what beans you declared would be registered.
The #SpringBootApplication annotation doesn't allow all the filter customizations supported by #ComponentScan. We observed in our application that spring boot was automatically loading a #Configuration class from a library outside the package hierarchy of the class annotated with #SpringBootApplication.
If you want more control, one idea is to omit the #SpringBootApplication annotation and just specify the individual annotations #Configuration, #EnableAutoConfiguration, and #ComponentScan with your desired customizations.
More information is available in Spring Boot's Documentation:
18. Using the #SpringBootApplication Annotation
Good luck
I am learning Spring Boot and have a question with one example in the reference documentation.
Following section of the documentation mentions
6. Using the #SpringBootApplication Annotation
A single #SpringBootApplication annotation can be used to enable those
three features, that is:
#EnableAutoConfiguration: enable Spring Boot’s auto-configuration
mechanism
#ComponentScan: enable #Component scan on the package where the
application is located (see the best practices)
#Configuration: allow to register extra beans in the context or import
additional configuration classes
and the following example to replace this single annotation by any of the features that it enables is bit confusing for me . The example
package com.example.myapplication;
import org.springframework.boot.SpringApplication;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScan
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Import;
#Configuration(proxyBeanMethods = false)
#EnableAutoConfiguration
#Import({ MyConfig.class, MyAnotherConfig.class })
public class Application {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
}
}
Explanation for the example
In this example, Application is just like any other Spring Boot
application except that #Component-annotated classes and
#ConfigurationProperties-annotated classes are not detected
automatically and the user-defined beans are imported explicitly (see
#Import).
The only major difference I see in the example code above is that it does not have #ComponentScan annotation. I also read in the comments section of an SO answer (Stephane Nicoll May 5 '17 at 11:07) that #Component annotation is not recommended officially to auto detect #ConfigurationProperties. So my assumption is that Spring framework classes with #ConfigurationProperties are not annotated with #Component.
Also I checked the #SpringBootApplication annotation source and couldn't identify anything that should enable the automatic detection of #ConfigurationProperties annotated classes.
The reference document 2.8.3. Enabling #ConfigurationProperties-annotated types section shows the following way to scan and autodetect #ConfigurationProperties
#SpringBootApplication
#ConfigurationPropertiesScan({ "com.example.app", "org.acme.another" })
public class MyApplication {
}
With all these details , I would like to understand
Why is it explicitly mentioned for this example that #ConfigurationProperties-annotated classes are not detected automatically ? and How is #ConfigurationProperties annotated classes automatically detected when #SpringBootApplication is used.
Additional note : I saw a small difference between the prior version of the documentation and the current one. The following reference is missing the current one
Keep in mind that the #EnableConfigurationProperties annotation is
also automatically applied to your project so that any existing bean
annotated with #ConfigurationProperties is configured from the
Environment
Following is what I understand from my analysis.
#ConfigurationProperties annotated types can be registered to the ApplicationContext by
Annotating the class with #ConfigurationProperties with an
annotation that falls in the scope of #ComponentScan (
#Component, #Service and the like ) . Not recommended as per the comment from Stephane Nicoll , which makes sense to me now.
Using annotation
#EnableConfigurationProperties . For this to
work the class annotated with #EnableConfigurationProperties
should be annotated with an annotation that falls in the scope of
#ComponentScan ( #Component, #Service and the like )
Using annotation #ConfigurationPropertiesScan and by making sure
the classes annotated with #ConfigurationProperties is placed
under its radar. The usage is similar to #ComponentScan .
Now , when we replace #SpringBootApplication with individual annotations that it enables and omit #ComponentScan (as in example) , the #EnableConfigurationProperties way (Point 2) of registering the types with #ConfigurationProperties will not work. This probably answers both my questions on why and how .
This was explicitly mentioned probably because the connection between #EnableConfigurationProperties and #ComponentScan is not that obvious for people like me.
Additional details.
The registration of #ConfigurationProperties annotated types when we use #EnableConfigurationProperties happens through of the EnableConfigurationPropertiesRegistrar class that is imported by the annotation
#Target(ElementType.TYPE)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Documented
#Import(EnableConfigurationPropertiesRegistrar.class)
public #interface EnableConfigurationProperties {..}
I know that when we annotate a java class as #SpringBootApplication we will have internally annotations #EnableAutoConfiguration and #SpringBootConfiguration but i'm confused what is the difference between them.
I am very much new to spring boot, Can someone please elaborate on this.
public #interface SpringBootConfiguration
Indicates that a class provides Spring Boot application
#Configuration. Can be used as an alternative to the Spring's standard
#Configuration annotation so that configuration can be found
automatically (for example in tests).
from: SpringBootConfiguration docs
public #interface EnableAutoConfiguration
Enable auto-configuration of the Spring Application Context,
attempting to guess and configure beans that you are likely to need.
from: EnableAutoConfiguration docs
So what is the difference?
#SpringBootConfiguration annotation tells us that a class is a configuration class, and #EnableAutoConfiguration automatically configures the Spring application based on its included jar files.
it is meta annotation #SpringBootApplication will have other annotations
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/blob/master/spring-boot-project/spring-boot-autoconfigure/src/main/java/org/springframework/boot/autoconfigure/SpringBootApplication.java
if #SpringBootApplication is not there applications need to use other annotations on Main class
I tried to use #PropertySource in a #Component like:
#Component
#PropertySource("somepropertiesfile.properties")
public class Student {
...
}
It worked fine.
I want to understand, what is the different between using #PropertySource with #Component and #PropertySource with #Configuration.
Is there any difference or impact of using #PropertySource with #Component.
Configuration is itself a Component type, look into the #Configuration annotation implementation below.
#Target(ElementType.TYPE)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Documented
#Component
public #interface Configuration {
}
From API
Component: Indicates that an annotated class is a "component". Such classes are considered as candidates for auto-detection when using annotation-based configuration and classpath scanning.
Configuration: Indicates that a class declares one or more #Bean methods and may be processed by the Spring container to generate bean definitions and service requests for those beans at runtime.
The #Bean annotation is used to indicate that a method instantiates, configures and initializes a new object to be managed by the Spring IoC container. These are same as Spring’s XML configuration. You can use #Bean annotated methods with any Spring #Component, however, they are most often used with #Configuration beans.
Here also you can use #PropertySource in #Component class but these are most suitable for #Configuration classes as it is a configuration related task.
You can refer Doc for detailed information.
I recently started exploring Spring Boot. I see that there are 2 ways to define Beans in Spring Boot.
Define #Bean in the class annotated with #SprinBootApplication
Define #Bean in a class annotated with #Configuration
I am also confused about stereo-type annotation #Repository #Service #Controller etc.
Can someone please explain how dependency-injection works with these annotations?
Yes it is possible.
Either you use #Bean in any of your #Configuration or #SpringBootApplication class or mark the bean classes explicitly with annotations like #Service, #Component #Repository etc.
#Service or #Component
When you mark a class with #Service or #Compoenent and if spring's annotation scanning scope allows it to reach to the package, spring will register the instances of those classes as spring beans.
You can provide the packages to be included/excluded during scan with #ComponentScan
#Bean
#Beans are marked on factory methods which can create an instance of a particular class.
#Bean
public Account getAccount(){
return new DailyAccount();
}
Now in you application you can simply #Autowire Account and spring will internally call its factory method getAccount, which in turn returns an instance of DailyAccount.
There is a simple difference of using #Bean vs #Service or #Compoenent.
The first one makes your beans loosely coupled to each other.
In the #Bean, you have flexibility to change the account implementation without even changing any of the account classes.
Consider if your classes instantiation is a multi-step operation like read properties values etc then you can easily do it in your #Bean method.
#Bean also helps if you don't have source code access to the class you are trying to instantiate.
Spring Boot auto-configuration attempts to automatically configure your Spring application based on the jar dependencies that you have added.
You need to opt-in to auto-configuration by adding the #EnableAutoConfiguration or #SpringBootApplication annotations to one of your #Configuration classes.
You are free to use any of the standard Spring Framework techniques to define your beans and their injected dependencies. For simplicity, we often find that using #ComponentScan (to find your beans) and using #Autowired (to do constructor injection) works well.
One way is to define #Bean in the class annotated with
#SprinBootApplication
If you see #SprinBootApplication it is combination of many annotation, and one of them is #Configuration. So when you define #Bean in the Main class, it means it's inside #Configuration class.
According to Configuration docs :
Indicates that a class declares one or more #Bean methods and may be
processed by the Spring container to generate bean definitions and
service requests for those beans at runtime.
class annotated with #Configuration
When you define #Bean is a class annotated with #Configuration class, it means it is the part of spring configuration all the Beans define in it all available for Dependency-Injection.
I have also seen some code where neither of the 2 above approaches
have been used and yet dependency injection works fine. I have tried
to research a lot on this but could not find any concrete answer to
this. Is this possible?
I am assuming you are talking about Sterio-type annotation. Every sterio type annotation has #Component, according to docs :
Indicates that an annotated class is a "component". Such classes are
considered as candidates for auto-detection when using
annotation-based configuration and classpath scanning.