I have a third party C library, both in static format (.lib) and in dynamic format (.dll) with its own import library (.lib). It is MKL (Intel Math Kernel Library). I am working with cygiwn 64 on Windows 7.
In brief, I am trying to get a compiler born to work in POSIX world to talk to a lib compiled in Windows world, assuming that is vene possible.
I want to link that library as part of a C++ executable I am compiling with g++ in cygwin and I am trying to link with the DLL using the import library.
My command line, where I omit the file paths for simplicity, results in a undefined reference error.
$ g++ main.obj mkl_intel_lp64_dll.lib mkl_sequential_dll.lib mkl_core_dll.lib -o paper.exe
mkl_intel_lp64_dll.lib: blah, blah, blah: undefined reference to `__GSHandlerCheck'
... and many other similar errors
Anybody knows if it is possible, and, if yes, how to do it?
Thanks
Try rearranging the arguments to g++ so that main.obj precedes the libraries it references.
Related
**Edit: Found my problem. As explained by the following answer, I was not actually doing any linking when making the static library. Instead, I made a shared library and linked libstdc++ statically.
Compile a static library link with standard library (static)**
I am trying to create a method to use c++11 on an ancient arm platform running kernel (2.6.37). Unfortunately the latest cross compile our BSP contains is GCC 4.5.3, which does not support all the c++11 utilites we need.
Initially I tried to use old versions of crosstool-ng to build a cross compiler, but the older versions were too broken. The newer versions did not support the 2.6.37 kernel. I was able to complete one build, however the g++ binary was not built, making the whole endeavor useless (I did check that c++ was enabled in the menuconfig).
Thus my last option was to build gcc natively at version 4.9.4 and create a statically linked library to have my gcc 4.5.3 cross compiler link against. This seems to work for the most part. I create my library on the target with the following:
g++ -std=c++11 --static -c main2.cpp
ar -cvq libmain2.a main2.o
I then copy over the files and try build on the host machine with gcc 4.5.3 and get the following:
arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-g++ simple.cpp -lmain2 -L.
(I cleaned up some of the output)
undefined reference to `std::_Hash_bytes(void const*, unsigned int, unsigned int)'
undefined reference to
std::__throw_regex_error(std::regex_constants::error_type)'
However, when I use nm, I get the following:
$ arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-nm libmain2.a | grep Hash_bytes
U _ZSt11_Hash_bytesPKvjj
U _ZSt11_Hash_bytesPKvjj
$ arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-nm libmain2.a | grep throw_regex
U _ZSt19__throw_regex_errorNSt15regex_constants10error_typeE
U _ZSt19__throw_regex_errorNSt15regex_constants10error_typeE
Does anyone know what the heck is going on? Unfortunately we need to be able to use our cross compiler on the host system for most work, but we are also needing to integrate this specific library which uses c++11.
Also note that if I take out the regex and hash functionality from my code but leave other c++11 concepts like nullptr, type inference, delegation etc, the code compiles and runs on the target fine.
Edit: Okay, so after a little more investigation, it looks like the functions _Hash_bytes and __throw_regex_error are not being statically linked into the static library. I guess I need to know why this is the case in order to fix the issue.
I have 2 shared object libs and one executable.
1 of the libs that I compile has linkage error: Undefined _cxa_pure_virtual.
Why?
Usually we do not need to implement it. Any Ideas?
If I implement it both the libs compile and link OK, but the application that links to both has same linkage issue?
The lib in question is a C++ library and the __cxa_pure_virtual is needed by the C++ runtime. Suggest that you try first linking with g++ command instead of gcc.
Read more under this question: What is the purpose of cxa pure virtual
I am trying to link a C++ module using GCC, essentially like this:
gcc -c hello.c
g++ -c world.cpp
gcc -ohello -lstdc++ hello.o world.o
Note that I use -lstdc++ to link the C++ module in, so that I can use gcc instead of g++. The problem is that I'm getting the error:
undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned long)'
(Assuming that world.cpp contains at least one call to new.)
This error is fixed if I put -lstdc++ at the end of the linker line, like this:
gcc -ohello hello.o world.o -lstdc++
I am aware that this question has been asked many times here, but I have a special requirement. I am not directly calling GCC. I am using a build system for a different programming language (Mercury) which is calling GCC on my behalf, and I can't easily modify the way it calls GCC (though I can specify additional libraries using the LDFLAGS environment variable). So I have two additional requirements:
I cannot use g++ to link (only gcc) -- that is why I am doing the -lstdc++ trick above rather than simply linking with g++).
I don't think that I can control the order of the linker commands -- Mercury will put the .o files on the command-line after any libraries.
I understand the basic reason why the order is important, but what is baffling me is why did this break now? I just updated to Ubuntu 11.10 / GCC 4.6.1. I have been successfully compiling this program for years using precisely the above technique (putting -lstdc++ first). Only now has this error come up. An unrelated program of mine links against OpenGL using -lgl and that too broke when I upgraded and I had to move -lgl to the end of the command-line. I'm probably going to discover that dozens of my programs no longer compile. Why did this change? Is there something wrong with my new system or is that the way it is now? Note that these are ordinary shared libraries, not statically linked.
Is there anything I can do to make GCC go back to the old way, where the order of libraries doesn't matter? Is there any other way I can convince GCC to link libstdc++ properly without moving it after the .o files on the command-line?
If Mercury puts object files after libraries, Mercury is broken. Libraries belong after object files - always. You may sometimes get away with the reverse order, but not reliably. (Static libraries must go after the object files that reference symbols in the static library. Sometimes, a linker will note the symbols defined by a shared library even when none of the symbols are used; sometimes, the linker will only note the shared library symbols if the shared library provides at least one symbol.)
While I am sure that gcc libraries (.a) are incompatible with mingw lubraries (also .a), I want to know. Can I cross-compile a windows executable with mingw using the gcc .a library generated for unix systems?
In code form, keep in mind this is a unix system:
cd mylibrarydirectory/
make #produces mylibrary.a
cd ../myprogramdirectory/
gcc -o UnixExecutable mysrc.c -L../mylibrary.a
#and I get a valid unix executable
i586-mingw32msvc-gcc -o Win32Executable.exe mysrc.c -L../mylibrary.a
#will I get a valid windows executable?
No. You have to recompile the library for Windows.
The second command should give an "incompatible library format" or something error. Or at least undefined references to whatever is linked in.
I have been trying to produce a statically linked "single binary" version of my game for windows. I want to link with sdl, sdl_image and sdl_mixer which in turn pull in a few support libraries. Unfortunately I haven't found a way to get them all to compile and link using cygwin/mingw/gcc. As far as I can tell all existing public versions are only shared libraries / dlls.
Please note that I'm not talking about licencing here. The source will be open thus the GPL/LGPLness of sdl is not relevant.
When compiling your project, you need to make just a couple changes to your makefile.
Instead of sdl-config --libs, use sdl-config --static-libs
Surround the use of the above-mentioned sdl-config --static-libs with -Wl,-Bstatic and -Wl,-Bdynamic. This tells GCC to force static linking, but only for the libraries specified between them.
If your makefile currently looks like:
SDLLIBS=`sdl-config --libs`
Change it to:
SDLLIBS=-Wl,-Bstatic `sdl-config --static-libs` -Wl,-Bdynamic
These are actually the same things you should do on Unix-like systems, but it usually doesn't cause as many errors on Unix-likes if you use the simpler -static flag to GCC, like it does on Windows.
Via this SDL mailing list post it seems that the sdl development tools ship with a sdl-config script that you can use with the --static-libs flag to determine what linker flags you need to use.
Environment: VMWare Virtual Machine with Windows 7 x64 and Equipment we Dev c + + build 7.4.2.569, complilador g+ + (tdm-1) 4.6.1
Once, SDL2-2.0.3 API installed as configuration Dev c ++ is not very clear what I've done as tradition requires command line.
The first problem is that Windows 7 appears to have changed the methodology and they go to his ball. Inventory. Ref. https://stackoverflow.com/users/464581/cheers-and-hth-alf
After the first hurdle, SDL_platform.h is that bad, it's down another, I do not remember where I downloaded, but the next does not work in the indicated version.
We must put SDL2.h ls in the directory of the executable.
D:\prg_desa\zsdl2>g++ bar.cpp main.cpp -o pepe1 -ID:\SDL2-2.0.3\i686-w64-mingw32\include\SDL2 -LD:\SDL2-2.0.3\i686-w64-mingw32\lib -lmingw32 -lSDL2main -lSDL2 -mwindow
I've finally compiled and works SDL2 testing.
That's because the SDL libs are under the LGPL-license.
If you want to static link the libs (you can do that if your recompile them. It needs some hacking into the makefiles though) you have to place your game under some compatible open source license as well.
The SDL-libs come as shared libraries because most programs that use them are closed source. The binary distribution comes in a form that most people need.
On my system (Ubuntu) I have to use the following flags:
-Wl,Bstatic -lSDL_image `sdl-config --libs` -lpng12 -lz -ltiff -ljpeg -lasound -laudio -lesd -Wl,-Bdynamic `directfb-config --libs` -lpulse-simple -lcaca -laa -ldl
That links SDL, SDL_image, and many of their dependencies as static. libdl you never want static, so making a fully-static binary that uses SDL_image is a poor idea. pulse,caca,aa, and directfb can probably be made static. I haven't got far enough to figure them out yet.