Foe search interactions, while there is support for specifying the number of items expected in the response using the _count parameter, we are not able to find any reference to a parameter to specify the page number.
The _query parameter can be used for custom queries, but is that an option or is there a better alternative.
For example, what is the standard way to request for the second page of a patient resultset with each page having 10 records? -
GET Patient?_count=10&[pagenumber?]=2
There's no mechanism to navigate to a specific page. You use the URLs provided in Bundle.link (e.g. previous, next, first, last) to navigate through the search result set.
Related
I'm using Google Data Studio to visualize results from various queries (from different tables within the same BigQuery-database).
For this reason, I created and use multiple data-sources-connectors. Each one of them has a SQL query included and makes use of an defined input parameter (which can be changed by report editors) - called "userid". It is the same id for all queries and resulting charts.
However, when I click "Manage URL parameters", I'm not allowed to use the same URL parameter for more than one data source (instead they are called ds0, ds1, ds2 etc - although they all end up being used as "userid").
If I add a data source under File - Report Settings, a new field "userid" appears, which I can alter - this will update ALL charts in the report with the very same userid (as expected). This works, but I do want to make use of an url which delivers an report with all updated queries depending on ONE userid.
Therefore, I guess I'm overseeing something - it should be possible to just use one query parameter to update the same "userid" for all queries in all data connectors? Or have I overlooked the possibility to fire multiple queries within one data source connector? Or is it expected to create a looong url full of redundant query parameters in this case?
I'm curious for your input!
Best regards :)
There does not seem to be any good solution for this.
For now the best workaround seems to be to just repeat the parameter multiple times -- it's ugly but it works. For example, use the URL parameter mapping screen to call the parameter u1, u2, etc., and then just pass all of them:
?params={"u1":"foo","u2":"foo"}
(URL encoded of course)
The ugliness is mostly for us developers: it violates our sense of DRY and clean code, and makes the URL much longer than it needs to be. However, most people don't care or know about the URL parameters so its irrelevant to them.
The bigger downside is that when the URL is distributed to clients (bookmarks, mobile apps), every time new data sources are added that require the same URL parameters, a new URL has to be distributed to clients for no good reason. A workaround for this is to build the URL dynamically via a simple redirector function.
This issue https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/180705297 is a feature request to implement this capability.
If you group the elements that you want to control with the same parameter (select and then shift G) then it will give you options to select the data source and the params box to apply to the group.
Is it possible with a FHIR search procedure to search for TWO resource types and sort them according to the date? I'd like a list of Observation and QuestionnareResponses, in a single response, returning the newest 10 regardless of resource type.
Searching for one would be:
http://apps.ehelselab.com/baseDstu2/Observation?_sort:desc=date
Any query using the standard "search" capability is always against exactly one resource type. You can include referencing and referenced resources, but filtering and sorting are always done against the "base" resource for the search. To do what you're interested in doing, you have a few options:
define a custom query using the OperationDefinition mechanism (only works if you've got a direct relationship between client and server systems so you can ensure all participants support the operation
Use a "Batch" to execute queries against both, then interpolate the results as you page through both result sets
You can do a query just on the "base", however there isn't presently a way to constrain the types of resources returned - you'd need a custom search criteria
You might be able to use the _filter mechanism - I haven't dived into it very deeply. But I suspect that it also uses the "single target resource type" approach.
The best bet is probably #3. If you submit a request to add a search criteria to "Resource" allowing constraining the resource type, that would probably let you do what you wanted.
When I call communityService.getMyCommunities(params) or communityService.getPublicCommunities(params) or communityService.getSubCommunities(parentCommunity, params) I would expect that filling params with e. g. tags=[mytag,yourtag] the call would only lookup communities having at least one of these tags (or both, however).
But to me it looks like this param ("tags") is simply ignored, and I always receive all communities of the given category (my / public / sub).
In case of having lots of communities of the requested category this massively slows down performance when I only want to retrieve communities with e. g. one certain tag: I receive all data over the net and must filter / lookup the received object list locally.
What am I doing wrong?
Is there something missing in the SDK implementation?
As part of the communities/my api, you cannot do any filtering... you need to use Search APIs.
In order to get a filtered list of communities based on the tags, you need to make a request to the following URL.
https://apps.na.collabserv.com/search/atom/mysearch?scope=personalOnly&scope=communities&query=&constraint={%22type%22%3A%22category%22%2C%22values%22%3A[%22Tag%2Fprb%22]}&page=1&pageSize=10
Yes, it is URL encoded, you can then change prb to match your tag, and you can repeat the constraints for each tag
You can also reference Link to Search API Constraints
Let's imagine we have simple data and want to make pagination of it. It's not hard to do, simple _GET var with page number others doctrine with offset will allow us to do it in easy way, BUT How should it look like in search page? Let me explain.
For example we have simple route with /search url. Where we have form for our search. When use input string we user POST method on same page and will get result. Simple enough but if we add pagination here it become a problem with storing "inputed string".
If we store in session on search query it will be solution BUT... it's not. Why? User input search string - get result with pagination (here search string already in session) after that leave the page (or close browser, or left to another page). When he will return data from session will show him 'result of old query'...
So question is, what is the best practice for such situation? I want simple search query + pagination of it but if user left page - clear result.
Using POST instead of GET for search query is kinda unusual and not really safe. Since search query operations are read-only you should use GET to access/get the data. POST is used for updating or creating resources.
And how you will go back/forward in the pagination (using browser's buttons)? You always will be getting an alert box. AND you cannot share/bookmark the search query url.
BTW to answer your question, sessions and hidden input fields would be the way to go. You also can use a combination of get and post
When should I use GET or POST method? What's the difference between them?
I am building a results filtering page using AJAX requests. I would like to reflect the filters in the URL. For example: for price_from I want to add ?price_from=VAL to the URL.
I have a backend that is capable of rendering the page with URL parameters.
After some googling I would a Backbone.router solution which has a hash fallback for the IE that does not support HTML5 history API.
I have a problem with setting a good philosophy of routes. I have a set of filtering parameters (price_from, price_to, color, ...) and I would like to attach each parameter to one route.
Is that possible to chain the routes to match for example: ?price_from=0&price_to=1&color=red? (the item order can change)
It means: call all the routes at the same time and keep the ie backwards compatibility?
Your best bet would be to have a query portion of the URL rather than using GET parameters to denote the search criteria. For example:
Push state: /search/query/price_from=0&price_to=1&color=red
Hash based: #search/query/price_from=0&price_to=1&color=red
Your backend would of course need to change a bit to be able to parse the new URL structure.