I am implementing spring security in a spring boot application to perform JWT validation where I have a filter and an AuthenticationManager and an AuthenticationProvider. What I want to do is that I want to disable security for certain resource paths (make them unsecure basically).
What I have tried in my securityConfig class (that extends from WebSecuirtyConfigurerAdapater) is below:
protected void configure(HttpSecurity httpSecurity) throws Exception {
httpSecurity.addFilterBefore(buildJwtTokenAuthenticationProcessingFilter(),
UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter.class);
httpSecurity.authorizeRequests().antMatchers("/**").permitAll();
httpSecurity.csrf().disable();
httpSecurity.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS);
}
What I am trying to do right now is that I want to make all my resource paths to be un-secure,
but the above code doesn't work and my authenticate method in my CustomAuthenticationProvider (that extends from AuthenticationProvider) get executed every time
Authentication piece gets executed irrespective of using permitAll on every request. I have tried anyRequest too in place of antMatchers:
httpSecurity.authorizeRequests().anyRequest().permitAll();
Any help would be appreciated.
Override the following method in your class which extends WebSecuirtyConfigurerAdapater:
#Override
public void configure(WebSecurity web) throws Exception {
web.ignoring().antMatchers("/unsecurePage");
}
try updating your code in order to allow requests for specific paths as below
protected void configure(HttpSecurity httpSecurity) throws Exception {
httpSecurity.addFilterBefore(buildJwtTokenAuthenticationProcessingFilter(),
UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter.class);
httpSecurity.authorizeRequests().antMatchers("/").permitAll().and()
.authorizeRequests().antMatchers("/exemptedPaths/").permitAll();
httpSecurity.csrf().disable();
httpSecurity.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS);
}
Related
I'm developing Spring Boot and Spring Security web application with authorization and resource servers enabled. I have defined a set of users with roles assigned to them and trying to implement roles based access to REST endpoints. I was able to implement token based access to endpoints, but can't restrict access to end users, that would be based on their roles.
I have done two endpoints: /rest/products/list and /rest/products/add and trying to restrict access to /rest/products/add endpoint with the user that is of ADMIN role.
My WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter is as follows:
#Configuration
#EnableWebSecurity
#EnableGlobalMethodSecurity(prePostEnabled = true)
public class SecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
#Autowired
private PasswordEncoder passwordEncoder;
#Override
protected void configure(final AuthenticationManagerBuilder auth) throws Exception {
auth
.inMemoryAuthentication()
.passwordEncoder(passwordEncoder)
.withUser("user1")
.password(passwordEncoder.encode("user1Pass"))
.roles("USER")
.and()
.withUser("user2")
.password(passwordEncoder.encode("user2Pass"))
.roles("USER")
.and()
.withUser("admin")
.password(passwordEncoder.encode("adminPass"))
.roles("ADMIN");
}
#Override
protected void configure(final HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers("/rest/products/add").hasAnyRole("ADMIN")
.antMatchers("/rest/products/list").denyAll();
}
#Override
#Bean
public AuthenticationManager authenticationManagerBean() throws Exception {
return super.authenticationManagerBean();
}
}
Therefore, resource /rest/products/add should be accessible to admin / adminPass user only as far as that user has ADMIN role. But if to try to it with user1 / user1Pass, it is still accessible:
Get access token for user1 postman screen
Accessing ADMIN only related endpoint with user1 Postman screen
Also I added (in the testing purpose) in the configuration method the following rule .antMatchers("/products/list").denyAll(); Here is indicated that /products/list shouldn't be accessible to any user. But it still keeps on responding (provided access correct token).
In the similar question here How to fix role in Spring Security? the order of matchers should be from the more specific to the less. But in my case there are two matchers and no matchers that can overlap them.
I'm using Spring Boot with spring-boot-starter-security plugin version 2.5.2.
What additional configuration should be done to make .hasRole("ADMIN") and .denyAll() work as expected?
Finally was able to find the solution with the following:
Here there is an example of ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter class. From this and from your comment, dur, I realized that I confused ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter and WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter, trying to define access restriction matchers in WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter. I changed resource server configuration in the following way:
Method that was in WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter
#Override
public void configure(final HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers("/rest/products/add").hasAnyRole("ADMIN")
.antMatchers("/rest/products/list").denyAll();
}
was moved to
#Configuration
public class ResourceServerConfig extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
public void configure(final HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers("/rest/products/add").hasAnyRole("ADMIN")
.antMatchers("/rest/products/list").denyAll();
}
}
Now restrictions defined by matchers above are working as expected.
After I created a small Spring Boot 2.2.6 application and I configured AWS Cognito as authentication provider, everything work well. When accessing any of application's URLs, I am redirected to Cognito and, after login, the application worked well.
I try to add some public pages (/api/**), which do not require any authentication.
First I tried this:
#Configuration
public class SecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers("/api/**").permitAll(); // This should be permitted for anyone
but, now, everything is open. No security at all. Ooops.
I change it to:
#Configuration
public class SecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers("/api/**").permitAll() // This should be permitted for anyone
.anyRequest().authenticated(); // Everything else should be protected
Now, the whitelisted URL (/api/**) work well, no password. But all other URL (eg. /private), instead of redirecting me to the login page, produce a 403 error:
There was an unexpected error (type=Forbidden, status=403). Access Denied
Does anybody have any idea how to keep the original behaviour (password) but with few URLs accessible anonymously?
The WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter has another method that can be used to ignore certain urls:
#Override
public void configure(WebSecurity web) throws Exception {
web.ignoring().antMatchers("/api/**");
}
I have my Spring REST API secured with Spring Security and OAuth2, I can successfully retrieve a token and access my APIs. My App defines the OAuth2 client itsself.
Now I want users to have anonymous access on some resources. The use case is really simple: I want my app to be usable without login - but if they are logged in, I want to have access to that principal.
Here is my WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter so far:
#Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http.antMatcher("/api1").anonymous().and()
.authorizeRequests().antMatchers("/ap2**").permitAll();
}
As soon as I add a second antMatcher/anonymous, it fails to work though, and it doesn't really express my intent either - e.g. I wan't to have anonymous access on api1 GETs, but authenticated on POSTs (easy to do with #PreAuthorize).
How can I make the OAuth2 authentication optional?
I dropped my #EnableWebSecurity and used a ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter like so:
#Configuration
#EnableResourceServer
protected static class ResourceServer extends ResourceServerConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
public void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers(HttpMethod.GET, "/api/api1", "/api/api2").permitAll()
.and().authorizeRequests()
.anyRequest().authenticated();
}
#Override
public void configure(ResourceServerSecurityConfigurer resources) throws Exception {
resources.resourceId("my-resource-id");
}
}
/api/api1 may now be called with or without authentication.
My application serves both API and browser. I've implemented API Token authentication with all custom providers and filter. The configuration now seems to interfere with the browser version.
I have two questions that I need advice on how to solve, as I'm not getting anywhere after digging through the documentation and other examples.
1) My StatelessAuthenticationFilter is being called despite a request
coming from the browser. I have e.g. specified the request matcher to "/api/**". Why is that?
2) The AuthenticationManager have not registered two AuthenticationProviders. This is my conclusion after debugging my StatelessAuthenticationFilter that's being called wrongly.
Here's the configuration classes that I have
#Configuration
#EnableWebSecurity
public class WebSecurityConfig {
#Order(1)
#Configuration
public static class A extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
#Autowired
TokenAuthenticationProvider tokenAuthenticationProvider;
#Autowired
ApiEntryPoint apiEntryPoint;
#Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
StatelessAuthenticationFilter filter = new StatelessAuthenticationFilter();
AntPathRequestMatcher requestMatcher = new AntPathRequestMatcher("/api/**");
filter.setRequiresAuthenticationRequestMatcher(requestMatcher);
filter.setAuthenticationManager(super.authenticationManager());
http.csrf().disable()
.exceptionHandling().authenticationEntryPoint(apiEntryPoint)
.and()
.sessionManagement().sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
.addFilterBefore(filter, UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter.class);
}
#Override
protected void configure(AuthenticationManagerBuilder auth) throws Exception {
auth.authenticationProvider(tokenAuthenticationProvider);
}
#Override
public void configure(WebSecurity web) throws Exception {
web.ignoring().antMatchers("/api/user/register");
}
}
#Configuration
public static class B extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
protected void configure(AuthenticationManagerBuilder auth) throws Exception {
auth.authenticationProvider(new DaoAuthenticationProvider());
}
}
}
As you can see, B class doesn't specify anything, yet when I access localhost:8080 the StatelessAuthenticationFilter is called. What is going on here?
In class A you are configuring the StatelessAuthenticationFilter to use a requestMatcher. Whatever you do with that, spring does not know or care about that.
You must also restrict your security configuration using
http.antMatcher("/api/**")
otherwise its configured for every URI and the StatelessAuthenticationFilter will be invoked for every request, exactly as you described.
You should also annotate class A and B with #Order as shown in the example at multiple-httpsecurity
I am creating a Spring Security configuration to be used as a library by any developer who wants to create a Stormpath Spring application secured by Spring Security.
For that I have sub-classed WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter and defined the Stormpath Access Controls in configure(HttpSecurity) as well as the Stormpath AuthenticationProvider by means of configure(AuthenticationManagerBuilder). All this can be seen in this abstract class and its concrete sub-class:
#Order(99)
public abstract class AbstractStormpathWebSecurityConfiguration extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
//Removed properties and beans for the sake of keeping focus on the important stuff
/**
* The pre-defined Stormpath access control settings are defined here.
*
* #param http the {#link HttpSecurity} to be modified
* #throws Exception if an error occurs
*/
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http, AuthenticationSuccessHandler successHandler, LogoutHandler logoutHandler)
throws Exception {
if (loginEnabled) {
http
.formLogin()
.loginPage(loginUri)
.defaultSuccessUrl(loginNextUri)
.successHandler(successHandler)
.usernameParameter("login")
.passwordParameter("password");
}
if (logoutEnabled) {
http
.logout()
.invalidateHttpSession(true)
.logoutUrl(logoutUri)
.logoutSuccessUrl(logoutNextUri)
.addLogoutHandler(logoutHandler);
}
if (!csrfProtectionEnabled) {
http.csrf().disable();
} else {
//Let's configure HttpSessionCsrfTokenRepository to play nicely with our Controllers' forms
http.csrf().csrfTokenRepository(stormpathCsrfTokenRepository());
}
}
/**
* Method to specify the {#link AuthenticationProvider} that Spring Security will use when processing authentications.
*
* #param auth the {#link AuthenticationManagerBuilder} to use
* #param authenticationProvider the {#link AuthenticationProvider} to whom Spring Security will delegate authentication attempts
* #throws Exception if an error occurs
*/
protected void configure(AuthenticationManagerBuilder auth, AuthenticationProvider authenticationProvider) throws Exception {
auth.authenticationProvider(authenticationProvider);
}
}
#Configuration
public class StormpathWebSecurityConfiguration extends AbstractStormpathWebSecurityConfiguration {
//Removed beans for the sake of keeping focus on the important stuff
#Override
protected final void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
configure(http, stormpathAuthenticationSuccessHandler(), stormpathLogoutHandler());
}
#Override
protected final void configure(AuthenticationManagerBuilder auth) throws Exception {
configure(auth, super.stormpathAuthenticationProvider);
}
}
In short, we are basically defining our login and logout mechanisms and integrating our CSRF code to play nicely with Spring Security's one.
Up to this point everything works OK.
But this is just the "library" and we want users to build their own applications on top of it.
So, we have created a Sample application to demonstrate how a user will use our library.
Basically users will want to create their own WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter. Like this:
#EnableStormpathWebSecurity
#Configuration
#ComponentScan
#PropertySource("classpath:application.properties")
#Order(1)
public class SpringSecurityWebAppConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
/**
* {#inheritDoc}
*/
#Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http.authorizeRequests().antMatchers("/restricted").fullyAuthenticated();
}
}
In case this is actually needed, the WebApplicationInitializer looks like this:
public class WebAppInitializer implements WebApplicationInitializer {
#Override
public void onStartup(ServletContext sc) throws ServletException {
AnnotationConfigWebApplicationContext context = new AnnotationConfigWebApplicationContext();
context.register(SpringSecurityWebAppConfig.class);
context.register(StormpathMethodSecurityConfiguration.class);
sc.addListener(new ContextLoaderListener(context));
ServletRegistration.Dynamic dispatcher = sc.addServlet("dispatcher", new DispatcherServlet(context));
dispatcher.setLoadOnStartup(1);
dispatcher.addMapping("/");
//Stormpath Filter
FilterRegistration.Dynamic filter = sc.addFilter("stormpathFilter", new DelegatingFilterProxy());
EnumSet<DispatcherType> types =
EnumSet.of(DispatcherType.ERROR, DispatcherType.FORWARD, DispatcherType.INCLUDE, DispatcherType.REQUEST);
filter.addMappingForUrlPatterns(types, false, "/*");
//Spring Security Filter
FilterRegistration.Dynamic securityFilter = sc.addFilter(AbstractSecurityWebApplicationInitializer.DEFAULT_FILTER_NAME, DelegatingFilterProxy.class);
securityFilter.addMappingForUrlPatterns(EnumSet.allOf(DispatcherType.class), false, "/*");
}
}
All this code boots up correctly. If I go to localhost:8080 I see the welcome screen. If I go to localhost:8080/login I see the login screen. But, if I go to localhost:8080/restricted I should be redirected to the login page since we have this line: http.authorizeRequests().antMatchers("/restricted").fullyAuthenticated();. However I am seeing the Access Denied page instead.
Then, if I add the login url in the App's access control, like this:
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.formLogin().loginPage("/login")
.and()
.authorizeRequests().antMatchers("/restricted").fullyAuthenticated();
}
It now redirects me to the login page but as soon as I submit the credentials I get an CSRF problem meaning that all our configuration is not actually part of this filter chain.
When I debug it all it seems that each WebApplicationInitializer is having its own instance with its own Filter Chain. I would expect them to be concatenated somehow but it seems that it is not actually happening...
Anyone has ever tried something like this?
BTW: As a workaround users can do public class SpringSecurityWebAppConfig extends StormpathWebSecurityConfiguration instead of SpringSecurityWebAppConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter. This way it works but I want users to have pure Spring Security code and extending from our StormpathWebSecurityConfiguration diverges from that goal.
All the code can be seen here. The Stormpath Spring Security library for Spring is under extensions/spring/stormpath-spring-security-webmvc. The Sample App using the library is under examples/spring-security-webmvc.
It is very simple to run... You just need to register to Stormpath as explained here. Then you can checkout the spring_security_extension_redirect_to_login_not_working branch and start the sample app like this:
$ git clone git#github.com:mrioan/stormpath-sdk-java.git
$ git checkout spring_security_extension_redirect_to_login_not_working
$ mvn install -DskipTests=true
$ cd examples/spring-security-webmvc
$ mvn jetty:run
Then you can go to localhost:8080/restricted to see that you are not being redirected to the login page.
Any help is very much appreciated!
In my experience there are issues with having multiple WebSecurityConfigurers messing with the security configuration on startup.
The best way to solve this is to make your library configuration into SecurityConfigurerAdapters that can be applied where appropriate.
public class StormpathHttpSecurityConfigurer
extends AbstractStormpathWebSecurityConfiguration
implements SecurityConfigurer<DefaultSecurityFilterChain, HttpSecurity> {
//Removed beans for the sake of keeping focus on the important stuff
#Override
protected final void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
configure(http, stormpathAuthenticationSuccessHandler(), stormpathLogoutHandler());
}
}
public class StormpathAuthenticationManagerConfigurer
extends AbstractStormpathWebSecurityConfiguration
implements SecurityConfigurer<AuthenticationManager, AuthenticationManagerBuilder> {
//Removed beans for the sake of keeping focus on the important stuff
#Override
protected final void configure(AuthenticationManagerBuilder auth) throws Exception {
configure(auth, super.stormpathAuthenticationProvider);
}
}
You then have your users apply these in their own configuration:
#EnableStormpathWebSecurity
#Configuration
#ComponentScan
#PropertySource("classpath:application.properties")
#Order(1)
public class SpringSecurityWebAppConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers("/restricted").fullyAuthenticated()
.and()
.apply(new StormPathHttpSecurityConfigurer(...))
;
}
#Override
protected void configure(AuthenticationManagerBuilder auth) throws Exception {
auth.apply(new StormPathAuthenticationManagerConfigurer(...));
}
}
It's definitely the problem regarding either order of your Antmatchers or hasn't specified ROLES of users that you permit to access the URL.
What do you have anything above "/restricted"?
Is something completely blocking anything below that URL? You should specify more specific URLS first then, generalised URLs.
Try configuring above URL properly (or tell me what it is so I can help you out), perhaps apply "fullyAuthenticated" also "permitAll" ROLEs on the parent URL of "/restricted".