Assuming models like this:
Student
has_many :assignments
Assignment
belongs_to :student
Assignments have a date field "date" representing the date the Assignment was submitted.
How would I, using ActiveRecord query with .where(), retrieve all the Student objects that have no Assignments after date = mm/dd/yyyy? I prefer to do this with straight ActiveRecord and no database-specific SQL.
Thanks!
This is an anti-join:
Student.where("not exists (select 1 from assignments where created_at > ? and assignments.student_id = students.id)", some_date)
You can do this with less SQL using the where_exists gem:
Student.where_not_exists(:assignments, "created_at > '#{some_date}'")
Related
I can't figure out the right syntax to use when including several models and using AND or OR clauses.
For example, there Shop model that has_one relation with Address model and belongs_to with Country.
How for example add OR to the below query:
Shop.includes(:address, :country)
Trying like this:
Shop.includes(:address, :country).where('countries.code'=> 'FR').and('counties.updated_at > ?', Date.today.days_ago(7))
raises the error:
NoMethodError: undefined method `and' for #<Shop::ActiveRecord_Relation:0x00007fb90d0ea3f8>
I found this thread at SO, but in this case, I have to repeat the same where clause before each OR statement? - looks not so DRY :(
What am I missing ?
Don't kick yourself... you don't need to use and at all, just string another where in:
Shop.includes(:address, :country).where('countries.code'=> 'FR').where('counties.updated_at > ?', Date.today.days_ago(7))
There is a better solution if you need to add multiple OR clause to AND clause. To get around it, there is arel_table method that can be used as follows.
Let's say we have the following models
Shop -> has_one :address
Shop -> belongs_to :country
and we would like to find all the shops by country code and address updated_at or country updated_at should be greater then a date you pass in:
some_date = Date.today
countries = Country.arel_table
addresses = Address.arel_table
# creating a predicate using arel tables
multi_table_predicate = countries[:updated_at].gt(some_date).or(addresses[:updated_at].gt(some_date))
# building the query
shops = Shop.includes(:address, :country).where(countries: {code: 'FR'}).where(multi_table_predicate)
This will execute a LEFT OUTER JOIN and here is where clause:
WHERE "countries"."code" = $1 AND ("countries"."updated_at" > '2019-03-12' OR "addresses"."updated_at" > '2019-03-12')
Sure, you can chain more tables and multiply OR conditions if you want.
Hope this helps.
I have two models with the appropriate foreign key created in the people table:
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :family
class Family < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :people
If I do the following I get an object - #family_members - as an instance variable and I have no problems:
#family_members = Family.find(1)
I can access the 'child' people table fields easily in my view:
#family_members.people.first_name
However, if I use the arel way with "where" etc. I get an "ActiveRecord::Relation", not a normal object, which leaves me stumped as to how to access the same "first_name" field form the people table like I accessed above:
#family_members = Family.where(:id => 1)
or even
#family_members = Family.joins(:people).where(:id => 1)
(is the "joins" even required??)
I understand that using ".first" will cause the query to run:
#family_members = Family.where(:id => 1).first
But it returns an array, not an object, so if I use in my view:
#family_members.people.first_name
I get a "method 'people' unknown" error.
How can I access the 'first_name' field of the people table like I did with the object created by "find" but using an ActiveRecord relation?
* added information 7/15 ********
To clarify what I am looking for -- here is what I would have written if I were writing SQL instead of Arel:
SELECT f.home_phone, f.address, p.first_name, p.last_name, p.birthday
FROM families f INNER JOIN people p ON p.family.id = f.id WHERE family_id = 1
With that query's results loaded into a result set I could access:
myResultSet("home_phone") -- the home_phone from the families table
myResultSet("address") -- the address from the families table
myResultSet("first_name") -- the first_name from the people table
myResultSet("birthdate") -- the birthdate from the people table
If the two tables in the query have a same-named field I would just use "AS" to request one of the fields by another name.
I have used this kind of query/result set for many years in web apps and I am trying to deduce how to do the same in Rails and ActiveRecord.
#family_members.people.first_name shouldn't ever work so I'm surprised you find it working ... #family_members contains a Family object, #family_members.people is an array of Person objects.
The fact that you're calling it #family_members seems to make me think you're expecting it to be an array of Persons... in which case the correct code would be...
#family_members = Family.find(1).people # finds people in first Family object
If you expect #family_members to contain just the first family member, then...
#family_members = Family.find(1).people.first
If you want an array of first names of all family members, then...
#family_members = Family.find(1).people # finds people in 1st Family object
#family_members.map {|member| member.first_name} # array of first_name
#family_members = Family.find(1) and #family_members = Family.where(:id => 1) are functionally identical.. both retrieve the first Family object in the database in each case may contain zero, one, or multiple people.
Just to be clear, the "1" in all examples above refer to which Family object is retrieved, not which Person in the Family.
In a project of mine, I'm using the Ruby ActiveRecord (not a Rails application, though) and I use the following structure:
class Customer < ::ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :categories
end
class Categories < ::ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :customers
end
In one part of the application, I load all the customers to process them and I try to eager-load their relevant categories (within a ActiveRecord::IdentityMap.use block):
Customer.includes(:categories).all
This does what I need to do, but when I look at the resulting eager-load query, it reads like:
SELECT "categories".*, "t0"."customer_id" AS ar_association_key_name_customer_id
FROM "categories" INNER JOIN "customers_categories" "t0"
ON "categories"."id" = "t0"."category_id" WHERE
((("t0"."customer_id" = 1) OR ("t0"."customer_id" = 2) OR ("t0"."customer_id" = 3) OR ... ))
I am loading all the customers and there is no need to filter them on the join table. There are only several categories, but many customers and the resulting query has thousands of unneeded OR statements.
Is there a way to simplify the query (in the ActiveRecord way) to not include the WHERE conditions in form of customer_id = X ?
I am trying to retrieve a child object based on the key in its parent's table. For instance, I have the Customer class which contains a "store_id" key to the Stores tables. If a customer has a "store_id" key, I would like to bring back that Store object and not the parent Customer object.
EDIT: Here is a sql statement showing what I am trying to do.
So the SQL statement would look something like this.
"SELECT storeS.* FROM customers INNER JOIN stores ON customers.store_id = storeS.id WHERE customers.id = '9'"
I know the sql is probably wrong, but thats a very concise way to show it.
I am assuming you are using rails with the out-of-the-box configuration (using ActiveRecord).
By convention, the "store_id" key in the "customers" table should match an "id" field in the "stores" table. You should also have the following class models setup:
class Store < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :customers # this is not required for what you want to do here, but recommended
end
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :store
end
Assuming this is true, you can either do this if you have the store key:
# assuming we have store key == 9
Store.find(key)
Or you could do this if you already have the customer:
# assuming we have customer.store_id == 9
customer.store
Or if you only have the customer key:
# assuming we have a customer key == 9
customer = Customer.find(9)
store = customer.store
I don't use ActiveRecord a lot, but I think it's this:
Store.find(customer.store_id)
I always wondered how to query and get results that doesn't fit in a model. Similar how it's done using LINQ and projecting into anonymous objects.
So here's the simple schema:
# Product.rb
class Product < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :product_views
# attributes: id, name, description, created_at, updated_at
end
# ProductView.rb
class ProductView < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :product
# attributes: id, product_id, request_ip, created_at, updated_at
end
Basically I need to get a list of Products (preferably just id and name) along with the count of views it had. Obviously ordered by view count desc.
This is the SQL I want to get:
select
p.id,
p.name,
count(pv.product_id) as views
from
product_views pv
inner join
products p on pv.product_id = p.id
group by
pv.product_id
order by
count(product_id) desc
I tried the following and similar, but I'm getting ProductView objects, and I would like to get just an array or whatever.
ProductView.includes(:product)
.group('product_id')
.select("products.id, products.name, count(product_id)")
This kind of thing are trivial using plain SQL or LINQ, but I find myself stucked with this kind of queries in Rails. Maybe I'm not thinking in the famous 'rails way', maybe I'm missing something obvious.
So how do you do this kind of queries in Rails 3, and specifically this one? Any suggestions to improve the way I'm doing this are welcome.
Thank you
You can use Arel to do what you're looking for:
products = Product.arel_table
product_views = ProductView.arel_table
# expanded for readability:
sql = products.join(product_views)
.on(product_views[:product_id].eq(product[:id]))
.group(product_views[:product_id])
.order('views DESC')
.project(products[:id],
products[:name],
product_views[:id].count.as('views'))
products_with_views = Product.connection.select_all(sql.to_sql) # or select_rows to just get the values
Yes, it is long, but Arel is a very smart way to deal with creating complex queries that can be reused regardless of the database type.
Within a class method in the Product class:
Product.includes(:product_views).all.map { |p| [p.id, p.name, p.product_views.size] }
Then sort it however you want.
I don't know if there's a way to do it using your models. I would probably resort to:
Product.connection.select_rows(sql)
Which will give you an array of arrays. You can use select_all if you'd rather have an array of hashes.
Try this:
#product = Product.find(#product_id)
#product_views = #product.product_views.count
(Source - http://ar.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Calculations/ClassMethods.html#M000292)
Hope this helps!