First of all i am new to elastic search. I have field skillName:"Android Sdk". I map this field as keyword in elastic search. But problem is that when i search by something like
POST _search
{
"query": {
"match" : { "skillName" : "Android sdk" }
}
}
sdk is small in search query. It does not give me any result. How can i search ignoring lower or upper case of text when field is mapped as keyword
Yes, it's ignoring the case different from the original, since you used keyword analyzer, which didn't do anything with the token, but rather preserving it as it is. In your case it will do a match only if you query exact same token
So, I would propose to change this behaviour and at least apply lowercase token filter, so you will be able to match terms with different register.
To search case insensitive on a keyword field you need to use a normalizer, which was introduced in 5.2.0. See here for an example.
You can apply different analyzers to same « field » and have one for full text search and another one for sorting, aggregations.
Try the following:
{
"query": {
"query_string": {
"fields": [
"skillName"
],
"query": "Android sdk"
}
}
}
Related
I was following an ES tutorial, and at some point I wrote a query using term in the filter instead the recommended solution using match. My understanding is that match was used in the query part to get scoring, while term was used in the filter part to just remove hits before enter the query part. To my surprise match also works in the filter part.
What is the difference between:
GET blogs/_search
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"filter": {
"match": {
"category.keyword": "News"
}
}
}
}
}
and:
GET blogs/_search
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"filter": {
"term": {
"category.keyword": "News"
}
}
}
}
}
Both returns the same hits, and the score is 0 for all hits.
What is the behaviour or match in a filter clause? I would expect it to yield some score, but it does not.
What I thought:
term : does not analyze either the parameter or the field, and it is a yes/no scenario.
match : analyzes parameter and field and calculates a score of how good they match.
But when using match against a keyword in the filter part of the query, how does it behave?
The match query is a high-level query that resorts to using a term query if it needs to.
Scoring has nothing to do with using match instead of term. Scoring kicks in when you use bool/must/should instead of bool/filter.
Here is how the match query works:
First, it checks the type of the field.
If it's a text field then the value will be analyzed, either with the analyzer specified in the query (if any), or with the search- or index-time analyzer specified in the mapping.
If it's a keyword field (like in your case), then the input is not analyzed and taken "as is"
Since you're using the match query on a keyword field and your input is a single term, nothing is analyzed and the match query resorts to using a term query underneath. This is why you're seeing the same results.
In general, it's always best to use a match query as it is smart enough to know what to do given the field you're querying and the input data you're searching for.
You can read more about the difference between the two here.
We have an Elastic Search structure that specifies fields in a multi_match query like this:
"multi_match": {
"query": "find this string",
"fields": ["*_id^20", "*_name^20", "*"]
}
This works great - except under certain circumstances like when query is "Find NOWAK". This is because "NOW" is a reserved word for date searching and field "*" matches fields that are defined as dates.
So what I would like to do is ignore fields that match "*_at".
Is there way to tell Elastic Search to ignore certain fields in a multi_match query?
If the answer to that is "no" then the follow up question is how to escape the search term so that it won't trigger key words
Running version 6.7
Try this:
Exclude a field on a Elasticsearch query
curl -XGET 'localhost:9200/testidx/items/_search?pretty=true' -d '{
"query" : {
"query_string": {
"fields": ["title", "field2", "field3"], <-- add this
"query": "Titulo"
}},
"_source" : {
"exclude" : ["*.body"]
}
}'
Apparently the answer is "No: there is not a way to tell ElasticSearch to ignore certain fields in a multi_match query"
For my particular issue I found an inexpensive way to find the necessary white-listed fields (this is performed outside the scope of ElasticSearch otherwise I would post it here) and list those in place of the "*" when building the query.
I am hopeful someone will tell me I'm wrong, but I don't think I am.
I am trying to search query and it working fine for exact search but if user enter lowercase or uppercase it does not work as ElasticSearch is case insensitive.
example
{
"query" : {
"bool" : {
"should" : {
"match_all" : {}
},
"filter" : {
"term" : {
"city" : "pune"
}
}
}
}
}
it works fine when city is exactly "pune", if we change text to "PUNE" it does not work.
ElasticSearch is case insensitive.
"Elasticsearch" is not case-sensitive. A JSON string property will be mapped as a text datatype by default (with a keyword datatype sub or multi field, which I'll explain shortly).
A text datatype has the notion of analysis associated with it; At index time, the string input is fed through an analysis chain, and the resulting terms are stored in an inverted index data structure for fast full-text search. With a text datatype where you haven't specified an analyzer, the default analyzer will be used, which is the Standard Analyzer. One of the components of the Standard Analyzer is the Lowercase token filter, which lowercases tokens (terms).
When it comes to querying Elasticsearch through the search API, there are a lot of different types of query to use, to fit pretty much any use case. One family of queries such as match, multi_match queries, are full-text queries. These types of queries perform analysis on the query input at search time, with the resulting terms compared to the terms stored in the inverted index. The analyzer used by default will be the Standard Analyzer as well.
Another family of queries such as term, terms, prefix queries, are term-level queries. These types of queries do not analyze the query input, so the query input as-is will be compared to the terms stored in the inverted index.
In your example, your term query on the "city" field does not find any matches when capitalized because it's searching against a text field whose input underwent analysis at index time. With the default mapping, this is where the keyword sub field could help. A keyword datatype does not undergo analysis (well, it has a type of analysis with normalizers), so can be used for exact matching, as well as sorting and aggregations. To use it, you would just need to target the "city.keyword" field. An alternative approach could also be to change the analyzer used by the "city" field to one that does not use the Lowercase token filter; taking this approach would require you to reindex all documents in the index.
Elasticsearch will analyze the text field lowercase unless you define a custom mapping.
Exact values (like numbers, dates, and keywords) have the exact value
specified in the field added to the inverted index in order to make
them searchable.
However, text fields are analyzed. This means that their values are
first passed through an analyzer to produce a list of terms, which are
then added to the inverted index. There are many ways to analyze text:
the default standard analyzer drops most punctuation, breaks up text
into individual words, and lower cases them.
See: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/query-dsl-term-query.html
So if you want to use a term query — analyze the term on your own before querying. Or just lowercase the term in this case.
To Solve this issue i create custom normalization and update mapping to add,
before we have to delete index and add it again
First Delete the index
DELETE PUT http://localhost:9200/users
now create again index
PUT http://localhost:9200/users
{
"settings": {
"analysis": {
"normalizer": {
"lowercase_normalizer": {
"type": "custom",
"char_filter": [],
"filter": ["lowercase", "asciifolding"]
}
}
}
},
"mappings": {
"user": {
"properties": {
"city": {
"type": "keyword",
"normalizer": "lowercase_normalizer"
}
}
}
}
}
I have a keyword/key-phrase field I tokenize using standard analyser. I want this field to match if if there is a search phrase that has all tokens of this field in it.
For example if the field value is "veni, vidi, vici" and the search phrase is "Ceaser veni,vidi,vici" I want this search phrase to match but search phrase "veni, vidi" not match.
I also need "vidi, veni, vici" (weird!) to match. So the positions and ordering of the terms is not really important. A phrase match would not quite work for me I think.
I can use "bool query" with "minimum_should_match" parameter for this specific example but that is not really what I want as minimum should match is about ratio/number of tokens in the search phrase.
Pure ES solution would go like this. You will need two requests.
1) First you need to pass user query through analyze api to get all the search tokens.
curl -XGET 'localhost:9200/_analyze' -d '
{
"analyzer" : "standard",
"text" : "Ceaser veni,vidi,vici"
}'
you will get 4 tokens ceaser, veni, vidi, vici . You need to pass these tokens as an array to next search request.
2) We need to search for documents whose tokens are subset of search tokens.
{
"query": {
"filtered": {
"filter": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"query": {
"match": {
"title": "Ceaser veni,vidi,vici"
}
}
},
{
"script": {
"script": "if(search_tokens.containsAll(doc['title'].values)){return true;}",
"params": {
"search_tokens": [
"ceaser",
"veni",
"vidi",
"vici"
]
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
Here job of first match query inside the filter is to narrow down the documents on which script should run. containsAll method will check if the documents tokens are sublist of search tokens. This will be slow but will do the job with your current set up. One big improvement you can do is store tokens as an array so that doc['title'].values can be replaced with that field which will improve the script.
Hope this helps!
No built-in solution but this works:
Add an extra field with the number of terms in the field for each document. So in your "veni, vidi, vici" example, you would have a field like "field_term_count" : 3.
Perform a separate match search for each token in the search query.
Sum the number of searches that matched for each document with at least one match (e.g. a hashtable with key of document ID and value of count).
Compare the number of matches in 3 to the "field_term_count" field for each of the documents with matches. If they are equal then the document is a match.
Then "Ceaser veni,vidi,vici" will match but the search phrases "veni, vidi" will not, as desired. It should be quite fast for reasonable numbers of matches.
I have been having trouble writing a method that will take in various search parameters in elasticsearch. I was working with queries that looked like this:
body:
{query:
{filtered:
{filter:
{and:
[
{term: {some_term: "foo"}},
{term: {is_visible: true}},
{term: {"term_two": "something"}}]
}
}
}
}
Using this syntax I thought I could chain these terms together and programatically generate these queries. I was using simple strings and if there was a term like "person_name" I could split the query into two and say "where person_name match 'JOHN'" and where person_name match 'SMITH'" getting accurate results.
However, I just came across the "fquery" upon asking this question:
Escaping slash in elasticsearch
I was not able to use this "and"/"term" filter searching a value with slashes in it, so I learned that I can use fquery to search for the full value, like this
"fquery": {
"query": {
"match": {
"by_line": "John Smith"
But how can I search like this for multiple items? IT seems that when i combine fquery and my filtered/filter/and/term queries, my "and" term queries are ignored. What is the best practice for making nested / chained queries using elastic search ?
As in the comment below, yes I can just add fquery to the "and" block like so
{:filtered=>
{:filter=>
{:and=>[
{:term=>{:is_visible=>true}},
{:term=>{:is_private=>false}},
{:fquery=>
{:query=>{:match=>{:sub_location=>"New JErsey"}}}}]}}}
Why would elasticsearch also return results with "sub_location" = "new York"? I would like to only return "new jersey" here.
A match query analyzes the input and by default it is a boolean OR query if there are multiple terms after the analysis. In your case, "New JErsey" gets analyzed into the terms "new" and "jersey". The match query that you are using will search for documents in which the indexed value of field "sub_location" is either "new" or "jersey". That is why your query also matches documents where the value of field "sub_location" is "new York" because of the common term "new".
To only match for "new jersey", you can use the following version of the match query:
{
"query": {
"match": {
"sub_location": {
"query": "New JErsey",
"operator": "and"
}
}
}
}
This will not match documents where the value of field "sub_location" is "New York". But, it will match documents where the value of field "sub_location" is say "York New" because the query finally translates into a boolean query like "York" AND "New". If you are fine with this behaviour, well and good, else read further.
All these issues arise because you are using the default analyzer for the field "sub_location" which breaks tokens at word boundaries and indexes them. If you really do not care about partial matches and want to always match the entire string, you can make use of custom analyzers to use Keyword Tokenizer and Lowercase Token Filter. Mind you, going ahead with this approach will need you to re-index all your documents again.