Iam trying to create simple wireless node for MANET network which can send messages to other nodes in range. Solutions implemented in INET also contains other layers like IP, transport, application which i dont need.
Iam new to omnet++ so iam struggling a bit. I was thinking of creating whole own node with RadioIn input, but i dont know how to implement only in range communication and i will also need node mobility.
Other solutions would be to use only Radiomedium from INET framework but i dont know how to do it.
Can someone please give me some begginer tips how to achieve my goal? As i said i simply need to create mobile host which can send a defined message to all other hosts in range.
EDIT: I tried to take IdealRadioMedium and create my simple module and connect to it. Here is the NED File.
import inet.physicallayer.common.packetlevel.Radio;
import inet.common.figures.DelegateSignalConfigurator;
import inet.networklayer.configurator.ipv4.IPv4NetworkConfigurator;
import inet.node.inet.INetworkNode;
import inet.node.inet.WirelessHost;
import inet.physicallayer.contract.packetlevel.IRadioMedium;
import inet.visualizer.integrated.IntegratedCanvasVisualizer;
import inet.linklayer.contract.IWirelessNic;
import inet.networklayer.common.InterfaceTable;
simple Txc1
{
gates:
input in;
output out;
}
module Pokusny
{
parameters:
#display("i=device/wifilaptop");
int numRadios = default(1);
#networkNode;
gates:
input radioIn[numRadios] #directIn;
submodules:
mynode: Txc1;
wlan[numRadios]: <default("Ieee80211Nic")> like IWirelessNic {
parameters:
#display("p=216,406,row,60;q=queue");
}
interfaceTable: InterfaceTable {
parameters:
#display("p=53,300;is=s");
}
connections allowunconnected:
for i=0..sizeof(radioIn)-1 {
radioIn[i] --> { #display("m=s"); } --> wlan[i].radioIn;
wlan[i].upperLayerOut --> mynode.in;
wlan[i].upperLayerIn <-- mynode.out;
}
}
network WirelessC
{
parameters:
string hostType = default("WirelessHost");
string mediumType = default("IdealRadioMedium");
#display("bgb=650,500;bgg=100,1,grey95");
#figure[title](type=label; pos=0,-1; anchor=sw; color=darkblue);
#figure[rcvdPkText](type=indicatorText; pos=420,20; anchor=w; font=,20; textFormat="packets received: %g"; initialValue=0);
#statistic[rcvdPk](source=hostB_rcvdPk; record=figure(count); targetFigure=rcvdPkText);
#signal[hostB_rcvdPk];
#delegatesignal[rcvdPk](source=hostB.udpApp[0].rcvdPk; target=hostB_rcvdPk);
submodules:
visualizer: IntegratedCanvasVisualizer {
#display("p=580,125");
}
configurator: IPv4NetworkConfigurator {
#display("p=580,200");
}
radioMedium: <mediumType> like IRadioMedium {
#display("p=580,275");
}
//figureHelper: DelegateSignalConfigurator {
// #display("p=580,350");
//}
hostA: Pokusny {
#display("p=50,325");
}
hostB: Pokusny {
#display("p=450,325");
}
}
Txc1.cc
class Txc1 : public cSimpleModule
{
protected:
// The following redefined virtual function holds the algorithm.
virtual void initialize() override;
virtual void handleMessage(cMessage *msg) override;
};
// The module class needs to be registered with OMNeT++
Define_Module(Txc1);
void Txc1::initialize()
{
cMessage *msg = new cMessage("tictocMsg");
send(msg, "out");
}
void Txc1::handleMessage(cMessage *msg)
{
send(msg, "out"); // send out the message
}
And .ini file
network = WirelessC
sim-time-limit = 25s
*.host*.wlan[0].typename = "IdealWirelessNic"
*.host*.wlan[0].mac.useAck = false
*.host*.wlan[0].mac.fullDuplex = false
*.host*.wlan[0].radio.transmitter.communicationRange = 500m
*.host*.wlan[0].radio.receiver.ignoreInterference = true
*.host*.**.bitrate = 1Mbps
When i run the simulation it asks for Interfacetable parameter which i dont know what to type there becuse i havent found it in traversing functioning code ( I had to add it because it throws error that is missing if its not as submodule). Now iam getting
getCointainingNode() node module not found it should have a property name networkNode for module WirelessC.interfaceTable in module .... durint network initialization
EDIT: I added networknode as parameter and now i got Module not found on path '.mobility' defined by par WirelessC.hostA.wlan[0].radio.antenna.Mobilitymodule in module inte::physicallayer:IsotropicAntenna during network initialization
I'd like to point you to the wireless tutorial for INET: https://omnetpp.org/doc/inet/api-current/tutorials/wireless/
It starts with exactly your problem. The only thing left, is to replace the standard UDP host with a host using no protocol at all, maybe even implementing your own. The whole wireless part is explained in the tutorial.
If you want to check the source files for the used modules you need to walk down the chain of dependency since every compound NED module will (at one point) contain simple modules implemented in C++.
E.g. the module which is responsible for distributing the signals is IdealRadioMedium using RadioMedium. Now you need to find the Node implementation directly communicating with this module.
Starting with the WirelessHost used in the tutorial the underlying modules are
StandardHost -> ApplicationLayerNodeBase -> LinkLayerNodeBase with the later being the first one using actually implemented submodules.
The network adapter used is configured in the omnet.ini with *.host*.wlan[0].typename = "IdealWirelessNic". This module relies on Radio.
With all that found out you just need to look for API calls from Radio.cc made to RadioMedium.cc and you found the actual code responsible for sending data.
Understanding that chain of inheritance you can even hook in with your custom module at a level you find fitting. For example just implementing your own LinklayerNodeBase module.
If you are going for wireless communication and mobility, INET will still be the best framework to use.
Check out the INET Wireless Tutorial. It basically covers all the steps that you need to build a small scenario with moving nodes that communicate wirelessly.
Related
I require an approach that whenever the one of host nodes in the following NED scenario receives a message or packet, a function like handlemessage is called. I want to extend a simple or compound module from AdhocHost in the Inet, for example, called Txc1 with all AdhocHost properties. Is it even possible to extend this mentioned simple module outside the Inet directories and subdirectories?
How can I reach this goal? How to code it in NED file, h, and cc files of this module?
My NED file for the network is as:
import inet.environment.common.PhysicalEnvironment;
import inet.networklayer.configurator.ipv4.Ipv4NetworkConfigurator;
import inet.node.inet.AdhocHost;
import inet.physicallayer.ieee80211.packetlevel.Ieee80211DimensionalRadioMedium;
import inet.visualizer.integrated.IntegratedVisualizer;
network Net80211
{
parameters:
int numHosts;
#display("bgb=600,400;bgi=background/terrain");
#signal[packetSent](type=inet::Packet);
#signal[packetReceived](type=inet::Packet);
#statistic[packetSent](title="packets sent"; source=packetSent; record=count,"sum(packetBytes)","vector(packetBytes)"; interpolationmode=none);
#statistic[packetReceived](title="packets received"; source=packetReceived; record=count,"sum(packetBytes)","vector(packetBytes)"; interpolationmode=none);
#statistic[throughput](title="throughput"; unit=bps; source="throughput(packetReceived)"; record=vector);
#signal[reqStreamBytes](type=long);
#statistic[reqStreamBytes](title="requested stream bytes"; record=count,sum,vector; interpolationmode=none);
#statistic[rcvdPkLifetime](title="received packet lifetime"; source="dataAge(packetReceived)"; unit=s; record=stats,vector; interpolationmode=none);
#statistic[rcvdPkSeqNo](title="received packet sequence number"; source="appPkSeqNo(packetReceived)"; record=vector; interpolationmode=none);
submodules:
visualizer: IntegratedVisualizer {
parameters:
#display("p=640,15;is=s");
}
configurator: Ipv4NetworkConfigurator {
parameters:
#display("p=640,112;is=s");
}
radioMedium: Ieee80211DimensionalRadioMedium {
parameters:
#display("p=638,56;is=s");
}
host[numHosts]: AdhocHost {
parameters:
#display("r=,,#707070;p=300,200;is=s");
}
stModule: StModule {
#display("p=639,169;i=block/cogwheel;is=s");
}
globalListener: GlobalListener {
#display("p=67,128");
}
}
Notes:
stModule is a simple module, for writing results in the finish function.
As an approach, if a new module extends from AdhocHost and it is able to trigger its own handlemessage function, it is replaced instead of AdhocHost.
As my rule, that function should be defined at the network layer. It is better to have a similar function in the data link layer, too.
A similar and simple question is in A new module that inherit from AdhocHost in omnet++. Although I test this approach, it has a problem(not call handlemessage).
Thanks in advance
I have already declared Define_Module(veins:: TraCIDateDissemination) and go through with various suggestions provided but getting this error again. Any suggestion is welcome. please help.
How to register a new class (new application) in Omnet++
Error in module during network setup:
Class "simpleModule" not found in omnetpp
https://doc.omnetpp.org/omnetpp/manual/
In manual I checked -
7.12.3 Class Registration
You should also use the Register_Class() macro to register the new class. It is used by the createOne() factory function, which can create any object given the class name as a string. createOne() is used by the Envir library to implement omnetpp.ini options such as rng-class="..." or scheduler-class="...". (see Chapter [17])
But not able to understand. pls help.
A runtime error occurred:
Class "TraCIDataDissemination" not found -- perhaps its code was not linked in, or the class wasn't registered with Register_Class(), or in the case of modules and channels, with Define_Module()/Define_Channel() -- in module (omnetpp::cModule) RSUExampleScenario.node[0] (id=13), at t=1s, event #2
Launch a debugger with the following command?
nemiver --attach=20070 &
OMNET.INI
##########################################################
# App Layer #
##########################################################
#*.node[*].applType = "TraCIDemo11p"
*.node[*].applType = "TraCIDataDissemination"
*.node[*].appl.headerLength = 80 bit
TraCIDataDissemination.h
namespace veins {
class TraCIDataDissemination : public DemoBaseApplLayer {
public:
{
//my code
}
}
TraCIDataDissemination.cc
#include "veins/modules/application/traci/TraCIDataDissemination.h"
#include<math.h>
using namespace veins;
Define_Module(veins::TraCIDataDissemination);
//code
TraCIDataDissemination.ned
package org.car2x.veins.modules.application.traci;
import org.car2x.veins.modules.application.ieee80211p.DemoBaseApplLayer;
simple TraCIDataDissemination extends DemoBaseApplLayer
{
#class(TraCIDataDissemination);
#display("i=block/app2");
}
Please Help!!
Suppose I have a simple module Client defined in Client.ned along with two subclassed simple modules:
simple Client
{
parameters:
volatile int clientId;
}
simple ClientA extends Client
{
}
simple ClientB extends Client
{
}
Now what I wish to do is define a network Network with 1000 ClientA instances and 1000 Client 2 instances as its submodules. I would like each instantiation to have a clientId one bigger than the last, i.e I would like the clientId parameter to ascend with each instantiation. For example, suppose we have the following Network.ned file:
network Network
{
submodules:
clientA[1000]: ClientA {
clientId = index;
};
clientB[1000]: ClientB {
clientId = 1000 + index;
}
}
What I'm looking for is a general approach, where we don't know the number of clients that are to be instantiated beforehand or even the number of client subclasses, just that if there is an instantiated Client of some sort, it should have a clientId parameter one larger than the last instantiation.
Remove volatile from clientId declaration in Client.ned and your solution will work properly.
The main purpose of using volatile is to guarantee returning a "fresh" value of a parameter when it is reading several times. In your network the clientId is constant, so the volatile is not necessary. The side-effect of using volatile is problem with using index, and parentIndex.
Beside the above, one should be aware that using omnetpp.ini is a very convenient method of control the simulation. For example, your NED files may look like:
simple Client {
parameters:
int clientId;
}
simple ClientA extends Client { }
simple ClientB extends Client { }
network Network {
submodules:
clientA[1000]: ClientA;
clientB[1000]: ClientB;
}
And the parameters may be set in omnetpp.ini:
**.clientA[*].clientId = index()
**.clientB[*].clientId = 1000 + index()
EDIT
When the number of clients is not known sizeof() method may be used to determine this number:
**.clientA[*].clientId = index()
**.clientB[*].clientId = sizeof(clientA) + index()
Since OMNeT++'s simulator assigns an ascending ID's to every module and submodule, utilizing getId(), getIndex(), getVectorSize(), and getParentModule() allows me to access this info for each module.
I'd like to provide read access for certain properties to all classes/structs that implement a protocol while client classes of the protocol are allowed read+write access. Is there a way to do this in Swift?
protocol WheelsProtocol {
var count: Int {get set}
}
struct Car: WheelsProtocol {
var count: Int = 0
func checkTirePressure() {
// Here, we will iterate over the count of wheels but we should
// not allow the number of wheels to be changed
}
}
struct CarFactory {
var wheels: WheelsProtocol
init(wheels: WheelsProtocol) {
self.wheels = wheels
}
mutating func configureVehicle() {
self.wheels.count = 4
}
}
What about a protocol for car makers and a different one for cars, something like
protocol MakesCars {
var wheelCount: Int {get set}
}
protocol HasWheels{
var wheelCount: Int { get }
}
struct Car: HasWheels {
let wheelCount: Int
init(wheelCount: Int) {
self.wheelCount = wheelCount
}
func checkTirePressure() {
// Here, we will iterate over the count of wheels but we should
// not allow the number of wheels to be changed
wheelCount = 5 //COMPILER ERROR
}
}
struct CarFactory: MakesCars {
...
}
The key is that you have to define a read-only property in the protocol as a var with { get } but in the object that adopts that protocol you have to put let and set it in an initializer.
There is not a way to limit access to a particular method in the way you're describing. From the documentation on Access Control:
Swift provides three different access levels for entities within your
code. These access levels are relative to the source file in which an
entity is defined, and also relative to the module that source file
belongs to.
Public access enables entities to be used within any source file from
their defining module, and also in a source file from another module
that imports the defining module. You typically use public access when
specifying the public interface to a framework.
Internal access enables entities to be used within any source file
from their defining module, but not in any source file outside of that
module. You typically use internal access when defining an app’s or a
framework’s internal structure.
Private access restricts the use of an entity to its own defining
source file. Use private access to hide the implementation details of
a specific piece of functionality.
To accomplish this, you would need to create a separate module (i.e., a Framework) and limit the writes to the internal scope and make the reads of the public scope.
I want to implement the UDPBASICBurst app in Veins, but I am facing problems. I have done as follows but I don't know if I am correct. Can anybody put light on this matter?
import inet.applications.udpapp.UDPBasicBurst;
import org.car2x.veins.base.modules.*;
import org.car2x.veins.modules.nic.Nic80211p;
....
udpBasicBurst: UDPBasicBurst {
#display("p=130,56");
}`enter code here`
connections allowunconnected:
nic.upperLayerOut --> appl.lowerLayerIn;
nic.upperLayerIn <-- appl.lowerLayerOut;
nic.upperControlOut --> appl.lowerControlIn;
nic.upperControlIn <-- appl.lowerControlOut;
veinsradioIn --> nic.radioIn;
udpBasicBurst.udpOut --> nic.upperControlIn;
udpBasicBurst.udpIn <-- nic.upperControlOut;
}
import inet.applications.udpapp.UDPBasicBurst;
import org.car2x.veins.base.modules.*;
import org.car2x.veins.modules.nic.Nic80211p;
module Car
{
parameters:
string applType; //type of the application layer
string nicType = default("Nic80211p"); // type of network interface card
string veinsmobilityType; //type of the mobility module
gates:
input veinsradioIn; // gate for sendDirect
submodules:
appl: <applType> like org.car2x.veins.base.modules.IBaseApplLayer {
parameters:
#display("p=60,50");
}
nic: <nicType> like org.car2x.veins.modules.nic.INic80211p {
parameters:
#display("p=60,166");
}
veinsmobility: <veinsmobilityType> like org.car2x.veins.base.modules.IMobility {
parameters:
#display("p=130,172;i=block/cogwheel");
}
udpBasicBurst: UDPBasicBurst {
#display("p=130,56");
}
connections allowunconnected:
nic.upperLayerOut --> appl.lowerLayerIn;
nic.upperLayerIn <-- appl.lowerLayerOut;
nic.upperControlOut --> appl.lowerControlIn;
nic.upperControlIn <-- appl.lowerControlOut;
veinsradioIn --> nic.radioIn;
udpBasicBurst.udpOut --> nic.upperControlIn;
udpBasicBurst.udpIn <-- nic.upperControlOut;
}
You are importing both inet.applications.udpapp.UDPBasicBurst and org.car2x.veins.modules.nic.Nic80211p in the same module. This will likely not work the way you hope:
Simply speaking, modules in the inet.* namespace only expect to exchange messages with other modules from this namespace. Up to and including Veins 4a2, the same goes for modules in the org.car2x.veins.* namespace - with one notable exception: The Veins 4a2 TraCIScenarioManager will check if an instantiated module uses an inet 2.3.0 TraCIMobility module as their mobility submodule. If it does, it will move the module accordingly.
This allows you to use Veins 4a2 mobility in INET 2.3.0 hosts.