I'm using spring-integration-kafka.
I have an abstract interface Event, which has dozens of concrete implementations, say, AEvent, BEvent, CEvent, etc.. And I want one only consumer listener to handle all incoming Events, such as fun handle(message: Message<>) { message.payload... }
After reading the documentation, I find no way to support auto-deserialization with no explicit type provided in consumer side.
Any suggestion will be appreciated.
Using JdkSerializationRedisSerializer from spring-data-redis meet my requirements.
public class GenericObjectSerializer implements Serializer<Object> {
private final JdkSerializationRedisSerializer serializer =
new JdkSerializationRedisSerializer();
}
public class GenericObjectDeserializer implements Deserializer<Object> {
private final JdkSerializationRedisSerializer serializer =
new JdkSerializationRedisSerializer();
}
Related
I'm new to spring graphql and I was trying to implement my own DataFetcherExceptionHandler so I can wrap all exceptions with my custom one.
I've implemented my custom class that implements DataFetcherExceptionHandler but it seems like it still uses the default one, the SimpleDataFetcherExceptionHandler.
How can I make my custom DataFetcherExceptionHandler the default one for the graphql exceptions?
My class:
#Slf4j
#AllArgsConstructor
#Component
public class GraphqlExceptionHandler implements DataFetcherExceptionHandler {
public DataFetcherExceptionHandlerResult onException(DataFetcherExceptionHandlerParameters handlerParameters) {
Throwable exception = handlerParameters.getException();
SourceLocation sourceLocation = handlerParameters.getSourceLocation();
ResultPath path = handlerParameters.getPath();
MyCustomException error = exposedException(exception, sourceLocation, path);
return DataFetcherExceptionHandlerResult.newResult().error(error).build();
}
#Override
public CompletableFuture<DataFetcherExceptionHandlerResult> handleException(DataFetcherExceptionHandlerParameters handlerParameters) {
return CompletableFuture.completedFuture(this.onException(handlerParameters));
}
Note: I'm not sure if I can use my custom exception like that, but I'm not able to test it while I can't make the exception handler the default one.
With Spring for GraphQL you can implement a DataFetcherExceptionResolver or more specifically a DataFetcherExceptionResolverAdapter that you can for example annotate with #Component to register it automatically.
The DataFetcherExceptionHandler from graphql-java is used by Spring for GraphQL internally to delegate to your DataFetcherExceptionResolver classes.
Inside your own DataFetcherExceptionResolverAdapter, you can get the informations that are available as DataFetcherExceptionHandlerParameters (Path, SourceLocation and so on) in a DataFetcherExceptionHandler from the DataFetchingEnvironment that is passed to DataFetcherExceptionResolverAdapter resolveToSingleError and resolveToMultipleErrors methods.
See here for more informations: https://docs.spring.io/spring-graphql/docs/current/reference/html/#execution-exceptions
You can find an example implementation here: https://github.com/nilshartmann/spring-graphql-training/blob/main/app/publy-backend/src/main/java/nh/publy/backend/graphql/runtime/PublyGraphQLExceptionResolver.java
According to the current doc (5.0.0.RELEASE) Spring Webflux supports validation when working with annotated controllers:
By default if Bean Validation is present on the classpath — e.g.
Hibernate Validator, the LocalValidatorFactoryBean is registered as a
global Validator for use with #Valid and Validated on #Controller
method arguments.
However nothing is said about how to automate it with functional endpoints. In fact, the only example of input processing in the documentation doesn't validate anything:
public Mono<ServerResponse> createPerson(ServerRequest request) {
Mono<Person> person = request.bodyToMono(Person.class);
return ServerResponse.ok().build(repository.savePerson(person));
}
Are we supposed to do this manually or there is some automatic way to do it?
In Spring version 5.0, there is no automatic way to do validation in functional endpoints, and as such validation must be done manually.
Though there are currently no concrete plans to do so, we might add some sort of validation in the future. But even then it will be an explicit method call, and not an automatic mechanism. Overall, the functional endpoint model is designed to be a lot more explicit than the annotation-based model.
As arjen-poutsma said, it seems there is no way of running automated validations on Spring 5 functional endpoints.
Spring documentation is not very clear about this, and it doesn't suggest any approach.
On this Baeldung article, you'll find an idea on how you can run validations using this approach (disclaimer: I'm the writer of the article :) )
In a nutshell, you can follow these steps:
Implement Spring Validators to evaluate your resources
Create an abstract class with the basic procedure that any handler will follow when processing a request, leaving up to the children classes what to do when the data is valid
Make your request handler classes extend this abstract class, implementing this abstract method, stating the body it will be expecting, and what validator needs to be used to validate it
EDIT:
I've been following this related Spring issue, and it seems we now count with official documentation regarding this subject: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/master/src/docs/asciidoc/web/webflux-functional.adoc#validation
The suggested approach is to use validators as explained in the article.
At the current version(2.0.4.RELEASE) there isn't a way to do automatic validation with handles, however you always could make a manual validation like this:
#Slf4j
#Component
#FieldDefaults(makeFinal = true, level = AccessLevel.PRIVATE)
#RequiredArgsConstructor
public class MyHandlerValidator implements HandlerValidator<MyResource> {
Validator validator;
#Override
public void callValidator(final MyResource fdr) {
final DataBinder binder = new DataBinder(fdr);
binder.setValidator(validator);
binder.validate();
if (binder.getBindingResult().hasErrors()) {
final String reason = binder.getBindingResult().getFieldError().toString();
log.error(reason);
throw new ResponseStatusException(HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST, reason);
}
}
}
The thing with this, its that the you should throw a WebExchangeBindException like automatic validation does, however i could't create a MethodParameter witch is a dependency to create this exception.
UPDATE:
Spring show us a way to do it, which is similar to my solution, but, not enough in my opinion on documentation
Just to demo some working code. If you need simple validation based on the object annotations like:
#Value
#Builder
#Jacksonized
public class SigninRequest {
#NotBlank(message = "The username is mandatory")
#Email(message = "The username should be valid Email")
String username;
#NotBlank(message = "The password is mandatory")
String password;
}
At the handler you need just one simple additional operator doOnNext:
#Component
#RequiredArgsConstructor
public class AuthHandler {
private final AuthService authService;
private final ObjectValidator validator;
public Mono<ServerResponse> signin(ServerRequest request) {
return ok().body(
request.bodyToMono(SigninRequest.class)
.doOnNext(validator::validate) //<-- just one single line
.flatMap(login -> authService.authenticate(login.getUsername(), login.getPassword())),
AuthResult.class);
}
}
The ObjectValidator is doing actual validation and throws the runtime exception with the 4xx error in case of validation errors:
#Component
#RequiredArgsConstructor
public class ObjectValidator {
private final Validator validator;
public <T> T validate(T object) {
var errors = validator.validate(object);
if (errors.isEmpty()) {
return object;
} else {
String errorDetails = errors.stream().map(er -> er.getMessage()).collect(Collectors.joining(", "));
throw new ObjectValidationException(errorDetails);
}
}
}
And the exception:
#ResponseStatus(code = HttpStatus.UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY)
public class ObjectValidationException extends RuntimeException {
public ObjectValidationException(String errorDetails) {
super("Please supply the valid data: " + errorDetails);
}
}
If you properly setup global error handling you can keep you handler code clean and reuse the object validator across all your handlers.
We have implemented an application that should be able to use either JPA, Couchbase or MongoDB. (for now, may increase in the future). We successfully implemented JPA and Couchbase by separating repositories for each e.g. JPA will come from org.company.repository.jpa while couchbase will come from org.company.repository.cb. All repository interfaces extends a common repository found in org.company.repository. We are now targeting MongoDB by creating a new package org.company.repository.mongo. However we are encountering this error:
No property updateLastUsedDate found for type TokenHistory!
Here are our codes:
#Document
public class TokenHistory extends BaseEntity {
private String subject;
private Date lastUpdate;
// Getters and setters here...
}
Under org.company.repository.TokenHistoryRepository.java
#NoRepositoryBean
public interface TokenHistoryRepository<ID extends Serializable> extends TokenHistoryRepositoryCustom, BaseEntityRepository<TokenHistory, ID> {
// No problem here. Handled by Spring Data
TokenHistory findBySubject(#Param("subject") String subject);
}
// The custom method
interface TokenHistoryRepositoryCustom {
void updateLastUsedDate(#Param("subject") String subject);
}
Under org.company.repository.mongo.TokenHistoryMongoRepository.java
#RepositoryRestResource(path = "/token-history")
public interface TokenHistoryMongoRepository extends TokenHistoryRepository<String> {
TokenHistory findBySubject(#Param("subject") String subject);
}
class TokenHistoryMongoRepositoryCustomImpl {
public void updateLastUsedDate(String subject) {
//TODO implement this
}
}
And for Mongo Configuration
#Configuration
#Profile("mongo")
#EnableMongoRepositories(basePackages = {
"org.company.repository.mongo"
}, repositoryImplementationPostfix = "CustomImpl",
repositoryBaseClass = BaseEntityRepositoryMongoImpl.class
)
public class MongoConfig {
}
Setup is the same for both JPA and Couchbase but we didn't encountered that error. It was able to use the inner class with "CustomImpl" prefix, which should be the case base on the documentations.
Is there a problem in my setup or configuration for MongoDB?
Your TokenHistoryMongoRepositoryCustomImpl doesn't actually implement the TokenHistoryRepositoryCustom interface, which means that there's no way for us to find out that updateLastUsedDate(…) in the class found is considered to be an implementation of the interface method. Hence, it's considered a query method and then triggers the query derivation.
I highly doubt that this works for the other stores as claimed as the code inspecting query methods is shared in DefaultRepositoryInformation.
I can't find examples of use of stompSubProtocolHandler and SubProtocolWebSocketHandler?
I need extend this SubProtocolWebSocketHandler class?
private static class ProducerStompSessionHandler2 extends SubProtocolWebSocketHandler {
public ProducerStompSessionHandler2(MessageChannel clientInboundChannel,
SubscribableChannel clientOutboundChannel) {
super(clientInboundChannel, clientOutboundChannel);
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
}
}
I'm using a handler for a Sockjs java client that extend of StompSessionHandlerAdapter and is working. I can connect, subscribe and send messages:
private static class ProducerStompSessionHandler extends StompSessionHandlerAdapter {
...
}
But I see another user telling that there are two implementacions: SubProtocolWebSocketHandler and stompSubProtocolHandler.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/28306539/6243317
These are implementation of Java Websocket over STOMP clients? how use? advantages? why use this implementation?
To answer your main question in the title, I think this sample by Spring would be useful to you. The stompSubProtocolHandler is more server side in the sample, but I assume the logic will be the same for client.
I know that the question is very big but I just want to clear the situation i am into.
I am working on an application that consumes the JMS messages from the message broker.
We are using camel route on the consumer side. All the object required in route builder are injected through constructor injection using spring .
I want to mock the behavior of the actual processing, Once the consumer receives the message from the queue. All the classes gets loaded via the spring configuration.
Below are the three classes:
CustomRouteBuilder.java
public CustomRouteBuilder extends RouteBuilder{
private CustomRouteAdapter customAdapter;
public CustomRouteBuilder (CustomRouteAdapter customAdapter){
this.customAdapter = customAdapter
}
public void configure(RouteDefinition route){
route.bean(customAdapter);
}
}
CustomRouteAdapter.java
public class CustomRouteAdapter {
private Orchestrator orchestrator;
public CustomRouteAdapter (Orchestrator orchestrator){
this.orchestrator = orchestrator;
}
#Handler
public void process(String message){
orchestrator.generate(message) ;
}
}
Orchestrator.java
public class Orchestrator{
private Service service;
public Orchestrator(Service service){
this.service = service;
}
public void generateData(String message){
service.process(message);
}
}
As per our requirement we have to load this configuration file and then write the functional test using spock.
Below is my
CustomRouteBuilderTest.groovy file.
import org.springframework.test.util.ReflectionTestUtils
import spock.lang.Specification
#ContextConfiguration(classes=[CustomRouteBuilderTest.Config.class])
class CustomRouteBuilderTest extends Specification{
private static final String message = "Hello";
Orchestrator orchestrator;
#Autowired
CustomRouteAdapter customRouteAdapter;
def setup(){
orchestrator = Mock(Orchestrator)
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(customRouteAdapter,"orchestrator",orchestrator)
orchestrator.generate(message )
}
private String getMessageAsJson() {
//return json string;
}
private String getMessage() {
// return message;
}
private Map<String, Object> doMakeHeaders() {
//Create message headers
}
private void doSendMessage(){
Thread.sleep(5000)
Map<String,Object> messageHeader = doMakeHeaders()
byte [] message = getMessageAsJson().getBytes()
CamelContext context = new DefaultCamelContext()
ConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new ActiveMQConnectionFactory(jmsBrokerUrl)
context.addComponent("activeMQComponent",JmsComponent.jmsComponent(connectionFactory))
ProducerTemplate template = context.createProducerTemplate()
context.start();
template.sendBodyAndHeaders("queueName", message, messageHeader)
}
def "test message consumption"(){
given:
doSendMessage()
}
#Configuration
#Import([FunctionalTestCommonConfig.class,CustomRouteBuilderConfig.class])
#PropertySource(value="classpath:test.properties")
static class Config{
}
}
The problem that here is even though I inject the mocked object to the adapter using ReflectionTestUtils , I am not able to define its behavior correctly.
And when the message is received the orchestrator tries to process it.
My Requirement is that:
Adapter should be called from the camel route automatically which happens but
when the orechestrator.generate is called from the adapter then nothing should happen it should simply return.
But here nothing like that is going on.
Each time I send a message the consumer(RouteBuilder) receives it and calls the handler function which then calls the
orchestrator.generate(message)
function and the orchestrator starts processing and throws an exception from service level.
Any one can please help me on this.
I suppose your beans have been proxified by Spring, and this proxy use cglib (because you see CustomRouteBuilder$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$ad2783ae).
If it's really the case, you didn't #Autowired in your test the real instance of your CustomRouteAdapter but a cglib proxy: Spring creates a new class, extending the realclass, and overriding all the methods of this class. The new method delegate to the real instance.
When you change the orchestrator field, you are in reality changing the orchestrator field of the proxy, which is not used by the real instance.
There are severals ways to achieve what you want to do:
add a setOrchestrator method in CustomRouteAdapter
create the mock in your spring configuration and let spring inject this mock instead of a real instance of Orchestrator
Inject the orchestrator in the real instance (ugly - I didn't recommend you that, it didn't help in the testability of your code!)
customRouteAdapter.targetSource.target.orchestrator = _themock_