I am working with scheduling in Laravel 5.3. Previously, I was using one server to host the laravel application. Now that I am using two servers to run the Laravel App, how do I ensure that both servers are not running the same jobs at the same time?
Recently, I saw an Event method called "withoutOverlapping()". See https://laravel.com/docs/5.3/scheduling#preventing-task-overlaps
In my case, withoutOverlapping() cannot help me as I am working in a clustered environment.
Are there any workarounds or suggestions regarding this?
First of all, define if it is critical or not to avoid running task multiple times.
For example, if your app is using a task to do some sort of cleanup, there is almost no drawback to run it on every server (who care if you try to delete messages with +10 min twice?)
If it is absolutely critical to run every task only one time, you'll need to define a "main server" that will execute tasks, and a slave server that will just answer to requests but not perform any task. This is quite trivial as you just have to give every env a different name in your .env, and test against that when you define the scheduler tasks.
This is the easiest way, seriously don't bother making a database locking mecanism or whatever so you can synchronise tasks accross servers. Even OS's struggle to manage properly synchronisation against threads on the same machine, why do you want to implement the same accross different machines?
Here's what I've done when I ran into the same problems with load balancing:
class MutexCommand extends Command {
private $hash = null;
public function cleanup() {
if (is_string($this->hash)) {
Redis::del($this->hash);
$this->hash = null;
}
}
protected abstract function generateHash();
protected abstract function handleInternal();
public final function handle() {
register_shutdown_function([$this,"cleanup"]);
try {
$this->hash = $this->generateHash();
//Set a value if it does not exist atomically. Will fail if it does exist.
//Essentially setnx is the mechanism to acquire the lock
if (!Redis::setnx($this->hash,true)) {
$this->hash = null; //Prevent it from being cleaned up
throw new Exception("Already running");
}
$this->handleInternal();
} finally {
$this->cleanup();
}
}
}
Then you can write your commands:
class ThisShouldNotOverlap extends MutexCommand {
public function generateHash() {
return "Unique key for mutex, you can just use the class name if you want by doing return static::class";
}
public function handleInternal() { /* do stuff */ }
}
Then whenever you try to run the same command on multiple instances one would successfully acquire the "lock" and the others should fail.
Of course this assumes that you are using a non-clustered redis cache.
If you are not using redis then there's probably similar locking mechanisms you can implement in other caches, if you are using a clustered redis then you may need to use the RedLock locking mechanism
Essentially no, there's no a natural way using Laravel to know if another Laravel app have the same job on the job dispatcher.
We have some options there to find a solution:
Create a intermediate app that manages the jobs from the other apps.
Allow only one app to dispatch jobs.
Use worker queues, you have some packages for this, I would recommend to use Laravel 5 with WebSockets and Queue Asynchronously.
First of all Laravel scheduler isn't designed to work in a clustered environment. It was never intended to be that way.
I would suggest you should have a dedicated cron instance which manages your Laravel scheduler jobs.
Related
I have a requirement like "Only allow cache updates on same cache to run in sequence". Our client node is written in .net.
Every cache has affinity key and we use computeJob.AffinityCallAsync("cacheName", "affinityKey", job) to submit the compute job for execution.
Now If I use collisionSpi then, can I achieve "Sync jobs running on same node for same cache"? What configuration do I need to use?
Do I need to write same configuration for all the nodes(server and client)? I saw collisionSpi has no implementation for .net, so what can I do for .net client node?
Wrap your job logic in a lock to make it run in sequence:
public class MyJob : IComputeFunc<string>
{
private static readonly object SyncRoot = new object();
public string Invoke()
{
lock (SyncRoot)
{
// Update cache
}
}
}
Notes:
ICache.Invoke may be a better fit for your use case
The requirement for sequential update sounds weird and may cause suboptimal performance: Ignite caches are safe to update concurrently. Please make sure this requirement makes sense.
UPDATE
Adding a lock will ensure that one update happens at a time on a given node. Other nodes may perform updates in parallel. The order of updates is not guaranteed as well.
I see withoutOverlapping() mutex for commands, but I don't see it for jobs. How can I protect jobs of the same type from overlapping each other?
Thanks!
I think it's possible using the following:
https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/queues#unique-jobs
You can specify a needed key that you can pass to the job to mark its uniqueness. In my case, I need to limit requests to a third-party API that happens in the job so if I have more than one worker handling the queue, it's possible to get 429 from the API. As soon as I have many API-keys (per user of the app), I can use it to have the same type of job being exxecuted independently across the app users but lock the job execution if the current job with a specific key is not completed.
Like this:
//In the class defining you must use ShouldBeUnique interface
class UpdateSpreadsheet implements ShouldQueue, ShouldBeUnique
//some other code
public function __construct($keyValue)
{
//some other constructor code if needed
$this->keyValue= $keyValue;
}
//This function allows to set the unique key
public function uniqueId()
{
return $this->keyValue;
}
//If you don't need to wait until the job is processed, you may also specify
//the time for the force lock removing (so you'll be able to queue another
//job with this key after 10 seconds even if the current job is
//still in process)
public $uniqueFor = 10;
This is a follow up on
Laravel - Running Jobs in Sequence
I decided to go with redis rate limit. Code is below
jobClass {
protected $subscription;
public function __construct(Subscription$subscription) {
$this->subscription= $subscription;
}
public function handle() {
Redis::funnel('mailingJob')->limit(1)->then(function () {
// Job logic...
(new Mailer($this->subscription))->send();
}, function () {
// Could not obtain lock...
return $this->release(10);
});
}
}
And the controller code looks like.
<?php
namespace App\Http\Controllers;
use App\Http\Controllers\Controller;
use App\Models\Subscriptions;
class MailController extends Controller
{
public function sendEmail() {
Subscriptions::all()
->each(function($subscription) {
SendMailJob::dispatch($subscription);
});
}
}
Now, when i run the queue, some of them works rest(around 90%) failed with the below error in horizon.
SendMailJob has been attempted too many times or run too long. The job may have
previously timed out.
What am i missing? Please someone guide me to the right direction.
My goal is to run only one job of a type at one time.
[...] has been attempted too many times or run too long is an error that doesn't tell you why the job failed. It means some other exception has caused your job to fail every time it was attempted by the worker, and the worker has tried it the maximum number of times it was allowed to by your configuration. To understand why it's failing, check your laravel.log file for the exception that caused the job to fail.
In your case, since Mailer is contacting an external system it could be that the system you're connecting to is rate limiting you, or they could be having temporary connection problems or other service downtime. Again, there should be more detail in your log files.
The Laravel documentation has a hint about this:
When using rate limiting, the number of attempts your job will need to run successfully can be hard to determine. Therefore, it is useful to combine rate limiting with time based attempts.
The core of the issue is, the job keeps failing until it can achieve a lock and run.
So I imagine that where you are running your queue worker, you are not setting the --tries flag high enough.
Although you could just set a very high --tries, it is not really scalable.
The best solution, as suggested in the documentation, would be to increase the number of tries as well as using time based attempts
You can also increase return $this->release(10); the release time here. That should have the job wait longer before trying to reacquire a lock, so will use up fewer tries!
i'm feeling confused, which are best practices between laravel observer or MySQL Trigger.
In Laravel, My Code looks like
public function updated(My_Activity $my_activity)
{
$activity = new Activity_Log();
$activity->activity_id = $my_activity->id;
$activity->status = $my_activity->status;
$activity->description = $my_activity->description;
$activity->save();
}
In MySQL,
BEGIN
INSERT INTO Activity_Log
SET id = OLD.id, status = OLD.status, description = OLD.description
END
What is the best practice ? Is there a good impact for one of them in the future?
I prefer Laravel Observer option because it allows you to keep your business logic in your application (source control). Additionally you keep your business logic at the same abstraction level by using Eloquent.
For the same reason Laravel introduced a Task scheduler. It allows you to keep your cron entries under source control.
https://laravel.com/docs/5.5/scheduling
In the past, you may have generated a Cron entry for each task you
needed to schedule on your server. However, this can quickly become a
pain, because your task schedule is no longer in source control and
you must SSH into your server to add additional Cron entries.
Is it possible to use dispatchShell from a Controller?
My mission is to start a shell job when the user has signed up.
I'm using CakePHP 2.0
If you can't mitigate the need to do this as dogmatic suggests then, read on.
So you have a (potentially) long-running job you want to perform and you don't want the user to wait.
As the PHP code your user is executing happens during a request that has been started by Apache, any code that is executed will stall that request until it completion (unless you hit Apache's request timeout).
If the above isn't acceptable for your application then you will need to trigger PHP outwith the Apache request (ie. from the command line).
Usability-wise, at this point it would make sense to notify your user that you are processing data in the background. Anything from a message telling them they can check back later to a spinning progress bar that polls your application over ajax to detect job completion.
The simplest approach is to have a cronjob that executes a PHP script (ie. CakePHP shell) on some interval (at minimum, this is once per minute). Here you can perform such tasks in the background.
Some issues arise with background jobs however. How do you know when they failed? How do you know when you need to retry? What if it doesn't complete within the cron interval.. will a race-condition occur?
The proper, but more complicated setup, would be to use a work/message queue system. They allow you to handle the above issues more gracefully, but generally require you to run a background daemon on a server to catch and handle any incoming jobs.
The way this works is, in your code (when a user registers) you insert a job into the queue. The queue daemon picks up the job instantly (it doesn't run on an interval so it's always waiting) and hands it to a worker process (a CakePHP shell for example). It's instant and - if you tell it - it knows if it worked, it knows if it failed, it can retry if you want and it doesn't accidentally handle the same job twice.
There are a number of these available, such as Beanstalkd, dropr, Gearman, RabbitMQ, etc. There are also a number of CakePHP plugins (of varying age) that can help:
cakephp-queue (MySQL)
CakePHP-Queue-Plugin (MySQL)
CakeResque (Redis)
cakephp-gearman (Gearman)
and others.
I have had experience using CakePHP with both Beanstalkd (+ the PHP Pheanstalk library) and the CakePHP Queue plugin (first one above). I have to credit Beanstalkd (written in C) for being very lightweight, simple and fast. However, with regards to CakePHP development, I found the plugin faster to get up and running because:
The plugin comes with all the PHP code you need to get started. With Beanstalkd, you need to write more code (such as a PHP daemon that polls the queue looking for jobs)
The Beanstalkd server infrastructure becomes more complex. I had to install multiple instances of beanstalkd for dev/test/prod, and install supervisord to look after the processes).
Developing/testing is a bit easier since it's a self-contained CakePHP + MySQL solution. You simply need to type cake queue add user signup and cake queue runworker.
I was able to run consolle from controller/action, see the example below.
App::uses('ShellDispatcher', 'Console');
...
public function aco_sync() {
$command = '-app '.APP.' AclExtras.AclExtras aco_sync -r adminControllers -p UserAdmin';
$args = explode(' ', $command);
$dispatcher = new ShellDispatcher($args, false);
if($dispatcher->dispatch()) {
$this->Session->flash('OK');
} else {
$this->Session->flash('Error');
}
return $this->redirect(array('action' => 'index'));
}
In CakePHP-3 you can dispatch shells from the controller & do it almost the same as in CakePHP-2. The documentation does not mention this.
// in your controller:
$shell = new \Cake\Console\Shell;
$shell->dispatchShell('shell_class param1 param2');
// or how the docs suggest
$shell->dispatchShell('shell_class', 'param1', 'param2');
Beware of stdout & stderr in unit tests.
Dispatching a shell turns on stdout and stderr logging with ConsoleLogger, and will give you all the logging in your console if you have something like the code snippet above in code that you are testing from phpunit.
function getEbayOrder(){
$this->autoRender = false;
App::import('Console/Command', 'AppShell');
App::import('Console/Command', 'EbayShell');
$job = new EbayShell();
$job->dispatchMethod('get_orders');
echo "REPONSE";
}
anything is possible, but why would you want to. If you find you need to do something in a shell and the actual application look at using libs.
you stick the code in the lib and then call the lib from both your app and the shell.
If this is to intialize AclExtras the best way is:
App::import('Console/Command', 'AppShell');
App::import('Plugin/AclExtras/Console/Command', 'AclExtrasShell');
$job = new AclExtrasShell();
$job->startup();
$job->dispatchMethod('aco_sync');
But avoid this unless you have no possibilities to run the console script.