I want to replace a pattern in Ruby only if the next letter after the pattern is one of the given.
Example: replace "αυ" with "av" ONLY IF next letter after "αυ" is one of the followings: α|γ|δ|λ|μ|ν|ρ|σμ|ω
This code will not work of course, I suppose I need to use a regex more complicate to match one of the letter after the pattern.
string.gsub!("αυ", "av") if string =~ /α|γ|δ|λ|μ|ν|ρ|σμ|ω/
Thanks for any suggestion.
Use a positive lookahead:
string.gsub!(/αυ(?=α|γ|δ|λ|μ|ν|ρ|σμ|ω)/, "av")
See the Rubular demo
Details
αυ - a αυ substring
(?=α|γ|δ|λ|μ|ν|ρ|σμ|ω) - a positive lookahead that requires the presence of one of the alternatives inside it while excluding the alternative inside the match value, i.e. it will be left in the resulting string).
You may also "contract" the single-char alternations into a character class
/αυ(?=[αγδλμνρω]|σμ)/
^^^^^^^^^^
See another Rubular demo. σμ cannot be put inside a character class since it contains 2 chars.
Related
I have a special use case where I want to discard all the contractions from the string and select only words followed by alphabets which do not contain any special character.
For eg:
string = "~ ASAP ASCII Achilles Ada Stackoverflow James I'd I'll I'm I've"
string.scan(/\b[A-z][a-z]+\b/)
#=> ["Achilles", "Ada", "Stackoverflow", "James", "ll", "ve"]
Note: It's not discarding the whole word I'll and I've
Can someone please help how to discard the whole word which contains contractions?
Try this Regex:
(?:(?<=\s)|(?<=^))[a-zA-Z]+(?=\s|$)
Explanation:
(?:(?<=\s)|(?<=^)) - finds the position immediately preceded by either start of the line or by a white-space
[a-zA-Z]+ - matches 1+ occurrences of a letter
(?=\s|$) - The substring matched above must be followed by either a whitespace or end of the line
Click for Demo
Update:
To make sure that not all the letters are in upper case, use the following regex:
(?:(?<=\s)|(?<=^))(?=\S*[a-z])[a-zA-Z]+(?=\s|$)
Click for Demo
The only thing added here is (?=\S*[a-z]) which means that there must be atleast one lowercase letter
I know that there's an accepted answer already, but I'd like to give my own shot:
(?<=\s|^)\w+[a-z]\w*
You can test it here. This regex is shorter and more efficient (157 steps against 315 from the accepted answer).
The explanation is rather simple:
(?<=\s|^)- This is a positive look behind. It means that we want strings preceded by a whitespace character or the start of the string.
\w+[a-z]\w* - This one means that we want strings composed by letters only (word characters) containing least one lowercase letter, thus discarding words which are whole uppercase. Along with the positive look behind, the whole regex ends up discarding words containing special characters.
NOTE: this regex won't take into account one-letter words. If you want to accomplish that, then you should use \w*[a-z]\w* instead, with a little efficiency cost.
I am trying to create a regex that matches a pattern in some part of a string, but not in another part of the string.
I am trying to match a substring that
(i) is surrounded by a balanced pair of one or more consecutive backticks `
(ii) and does not include as many consecutive backticks as in the surrounding patterns
(iii) where the surrounding patterns (sequence of backticks) are not adjacent to other backticks.
This is some variant of the syntax of inline code notation in Markdown syntax.
Examples of matches are as follows:
"xxx`foo`yyy" # => matches "foo"
"xxx``foo`bar`baz``yyy" # => matches "foo`bar`baz"
"xxx```foo``bar``baz```yyy" # => matches "foo``bar``baz"
One regex to achieve this is:
/(?<!`)(?<backticks>`+)(?<inline>.+?)\k<backticks>(?!`)/
which uses a non-greedy match.
I was wondering if I can get rid of the non-greedy match.
The idea comes from when the prohibited pattern is a single character. When I want to match a substring that is surrounded by a single quote ' that does not include a single quote in it, I can do either:
/'.+?'/
/'[^']+'/
The first one uses non-greedy match, and the second one uses an explicit non-matching pattern [^'].
I am wondering if it is possible to have something like the second form when the prohibited pattern is not a single character.
Going back to the original issue, there is negative lookahead syntax(?!), but I cannot restrict its effective scope. If I make my regex like this:
/(?<!`)(?<backticks>`+)(?<inline>(?!.*\k<backticks>).*)\k<backticks>(?!`)/
then the effect of (?!.*\k<backticks>) will not be limited to within (?<inline>...), but will extend to the whole string. And since that contradicts with the \k<backticks> at the end, the regex fails to match.
Is there a regex technique to ensure non-matching of a pattern (not-necessarily a single character) within a certain scope?
You can search for one or more characters which aren't the first character of a delimiter:
/(?<!`)(?<backticks>`+)(?<inline>(?:(?!\k<backticks>).)+)\k<backticks>(?!`)/
So I have a string that looks like this:
#jackie#test.com, #mike#test.com
What I want to do is before any email in this comma separated list, I want to remove the #. The issue I keep running into is that if I try to do a regular \A flag like so /[\A#]+/, it finds all the instances of # in that string...including the middle crucial #.
The same thing happens if I do /[\s#]+/. I can't figure out how to just look at the beginning of each string, where each string is a complete email address.
Edit 1
Note that all I need is the regex, I already have the rest of the stuff I need to do what I want. Specifically, I am achieving everything else like this:
str.gsub(/#/, '').split(',').map(&:strip)
Where str is my string.
All I am looking for is the regex portion for my gsub.
You may use the below negative lookbehind based regex.
str.gsub(/(?<!\S)#/, '').split(',').map(&:strip)
(?<!\S) Negative lookbehind asserts that the character or substring we are going to match would be preceeded by any but not of a non-space character. So this matches the # which exists at the start or the # which exists next to a space character.
Difference between my answer and hwnd's str.gsub(/\B#/, '') is, mine won't match the # which exists in :# but hwnd's answer does. \B matches between two word characters or two non-word characters.
Here is one solution
str = "#jackie#test.com, #mike#test.com"
p str.split(/,[ ]+/).map{ |i| i.gsub(/^#/, '')}
Output
["jackie#test.com", "mike#test.com"]
I want to transform the following text
This is a , here is another 
into
This is a , here is another 
In other words I want to find all the image paths that are enclosed between brackets (the text is in Markdown syntax) and replace them with other paths. The string containing the new path is returned by a separate real_path function.
I would like to do this using String#gsub in its block version. Currently my code looks like this:
re = /!\[.*?\]\((.*?)\)/
rel_content = content.gsub(re) do |path|
real_path(path)
end
The problem with this regex is that it will match  instead of just foto.jpeg. I also tried other regexen like (?>\!\[.*?\]\()(.*?)(?>\)) but to no avail.
My current workaround is to split the path and reassemble it later.
Is there a Ruby regex that matches only the path inside the brackets and not all the contextual required characters?
Post-answers update: The main problem here is that Ruby's regexen have no way to specify zero-width lookbehinds. The most generic solution is to group what the part of regexp before and the one after the real matching part, i.e. /(pre)(matching-part)(post)/, and reconstruct the full string afterwards.
In this case the solution would be
re = /(!\[.*?\]\()(.*?)(\))/
rel_content = content.gsub(re) do
$1 + real_path($2) + $3
end
A quick solution (adjust as necessary):
s = 'This is a '
s.sub!(/!(\[.*?\])\((.*?)\)/, '\1(/folder1/\2)' )
p s # This is a [foto](/folder1/foto.jpeg)
You can always do it in two steps - first extract the whole image expression out and then second replace the link:
str = "This is a , here is another "
str.gsub(/\!\[[^\]]*\]\(([^)]*)\)/) do |image|
image.gsub(/(?<=\()(.*)(?=\))/) do |link|
"/a/new/path/" + link
end
end
#=> "This is a , here is another "
I changed the first regex a bit, but you can use the same one you had before in its place. image is the image expression like , and link is just the path like foto.jpeg.
[EDIT] Clarification: Ruby does have lookbehinds (and they are used in my answer):
You can create lookbehinds with (?<=regex) for positive and (?<!regex) for negative, where regex is an arbitrary regex expression subject to the following condition. Regexp expressions in lookbehinds they have to be fixed width due to limitations on the regex implementation, which means that they can't include expressions with an unknown number of repetitions or alternations with different-width choices. If you try to do that, you'll get an error. (The restriction doesn't apply to lookaheads though).
In your case, the [foto] part has a variable width (foto can be any string) so it can't go into a lookbehind due to the above. However, lookbehind is exactly what we need since it's a zero-width match, and we take advantage of that in the second regex which only needs to worry about (fixed-length) compulsory open parentheses.
Obviously you can put real_path in from here, but I just wanted a test-able example.
I think that this approach is more flexible and more readable than reconstructing the string through the match group variables
In your block, use $1 to access the first capture group ($2 for the second and so on).
From the documentation:
In the block form, the current match string is passed in as a parameter, and variables such as $1, $2, $`, $&, and $' will be set appropriately. The value returned by the block will be substituted for the match on each call.
As a side note, some people think '\1' inappropriate for situations where an unconfirmed number of characters are matched. For example, if you want to match and modify the middle content, how can you protect the characters on both sides?
It's easy. Put a bracket around something else.
For example, I hope replace a-ruby-porgramming-book-531070.png to a-ruby-porgramming-book.png. Remove context between last "-" and last ".".
I can use /.*(-.*?)\./ match -531070. Now how should I replace it? Notice
everything else does not have a definite format.
The answer is to put brackets around something else, then protect them:
"a-ruby-porgramming-book-531070.png".sub(/(.*)(-.*?)\./, '\1.')
# => "a-ruby-porgramming-book.png"
If you want add something before matched content, you can use:
"a-ruby-porgramming-book-531070.png".sub(/(.*)(-.*?)\./, '\1-2019\2.')
# => "a-ruby-porgramming-book-2019-531070.png"
How can I write a regex in Ruby 1.9.2 that will determine if a string meets this criteria:
Can only include letters, numbers and the - character
Cannot be an empty string, i.e. cannot have a length of 0
Must contain at least one letter
/\A[a-z0-9-]*[a-z][a-z0-9-]*\z/i
It goes like
beginning of string
some (or zero) letters, digits and/or dashes
a letter
some (or zero) letters, digits and/or dashes
end of string
I suppose these two will help you: /\A[a-z0-9\-]{1,}\z/i and /[a-z]{1,}/i. The first one checks on first two rules and the second one checks for the last condition.
No regex:
str.count("a-zA-Z") > 0 && str.count("^a-zA-Z0-9-") == 0
You can take a look at this tutorial for how to use regular expressions in ruby. With regards to what you need, you can use the following:
^[A-Za-z0-9\-]+$
The ^ will instruct the regex engine to start matching from the very beginning of the string.
The [..] will instruct the regex engine to match any one of the characters they contain.
A-Z mean any upper case letter, a-z means any lower case letter and 0-9 means any number.
The \- will instruct the regex engine to match the -. The \ is used infront of it because the - in regex is a special symbol, so it needs to be escaped
The $ will instruct the regex engine to stop matching at the end of the line.
The + instructs the regex engine to match what is contained between the square brackets one or more time.
You can also use the \i flag to make your search case insensitive, so the regex might become something like this:
^[a-z0-9\-]+/i$