Following the MDN documentation here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions/manifest.json/options_ui
I have setup the following manifest.json:
{
...
"options_ui": {
"page": "options.html",
"browser_style": true
}
...
}
Along with an options.html which contains this HTML:
<div class="switch">
<input checked id="switch1" type="checkbox" class="visually-hidden">
<label for="switch1"></label>
</div>
I expected my HTML to be decorated with styles similar to the Firefox style guide: http://design.firefox.com/StyleGuide/#/userselections
But there are none. No extra CSS file appears to be loaded.
There is a similar question here but the question is asking for documentation for styles. All I have found is that the styles simply aren't applied.
Does anyone know if I have this setup correctly? I can't tell if it's a bug.
Styles are correctly applied, you are probably just using the wrong classes.
Note that the old style guide is now deprecated in favor of the new Photon Design System.
These are the used stylesheets, just go to these URLs in Firefox to see the full source:
On Windows: chrome://browser/content/extension.css
On Mac: chrome://browser/content/extension-mac.css
Most of the styles assume you use the browser-style class. For example, here are some of the styles for the button element (on Windows):
/* stylelint-disable property-no-vendor-prefix */
/* Buttons */
button.browser-style,
select.browser-style {
background-color: #fbfbfb;
border: 1px solid #b1b1b1;
box-shadow: 0 0 0 0 transparent;
font: caption;
height: 24px;
outline: 0 !important;
padding: 0 8px 0;
transition-duration: 250ms;
transition-property: box-shadow, border;
}
Let's verify if the styles are actually applied.
Example, given an extension with the following manifest.json:
{
"name": "Options page",
"manifest_version": 2,
"version": "0.0.1",
"description": "Sample options page",
"options_ui": {
"page": "options.html",
"browser_style": true
}
}
And the following options.html:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>Just a text example page</div>
<div>
<input checked id="switch1" type="checkbox" class="visually-hidden">
<label for="switch1"></label>
<button class="browser-style">Test button</button>
</div>
</body>
</html>
This is the rendered options page:
Inspect the options page to verify the applied styles:
Paste about:debugging into the address bar
Select "Enable add-on debugging" on top
Click on the Debug link
Click "Ok" when prompted for allowing incoming connection
Now switch back to the Options page and inspect the "Test button" we added
As you can see, the button is correctly styled with the browser stylesheet.
Related
Is it possible to set a margin around fields.
For example in image :
If I want to set lower (separated) checkBox in line with above once, is there a way to do it?
Marko
Start by inspecting the HTML code (with Chrome).
The code corresponding to the Checkbox Field is something like that:
<div class="form-field check-box-field"
data-modelclass="org.eclipse.scout.widgets.client.ui.forms.CheckboxFieldForm$MainBox$ConfigurationBox$CheckboxField"
data-classid="CheckboxField_org.eclipse.scout.widgets.client.ui.forms.CheckboxFieldForm"
id="scout.CheckBoxField[1-49]"
style="left: 0px; top: 14px; width: 1598px; height: 30px;"
>
<div class="field has-inner-alignment halign-left valign-top" style=
"left: 148px; top: 0px; width: 1420px; height: 30px;">
<div class="check-box" tabindex="0"></div>
<div class="label">
Checkbox
</div>
</div>
</div>
With CSS you can do anything possible:
.check-box-field {
background-color: red;
}
Now because you do not want to add some custom CSS style for all CheckBox Fields, you can define a custom Css-Class in your CheckBox:
#Order(4)
public class UnknownCheckBox extends AbstractBooleanField {
#Override
protected String getConfiguredCssClass() {
return "checkbox-under-listbox";
}
// ... Some Code ...
}
And now you add this CSS code:
.checkbox-under-listbox {
margin-left: 20px;
}
I have realized this example with the Widgets Demo Application (org.eclipse.scout.docs repository, releases/5.2.x branch). I added my css code in this file: org.eclipse.scout.widgets.ui.html/src/main/js/widgets/main.css (It is probably not the best approach to have everything in main.css).
You can deduce from this example how you can add an additional CSS/LESS module and macro to your application. This post: Inclusion of additional icons from font-awesome might also be usefull. You will have a main.css instead of a font.css.
WARNING: this is not state of the art.
At the end this is normal HTML development (single page application of course), so you can do what you want...
If you do not want to use the LESS compiler and the File preprocessor, you can simpelly add a normal CSS file in the folder:
<your_project>.ui.html/src/main/resources/WebContent
Let say:
<your_project>.ui.html/src/main/resources/WebContent/my_custom.css
Do not forget to include your CSS File between the <head> and </head> tags in the HTML index file:
<your_project>.ui.html/src/main/resources/WebContent/index.html
Something like:
<head>
<!-- some code -->
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="my_custom.css">
<scout:stylesheet src="res/scout-module.css" />
<!-- some code -->
</head>
You can always use custom CSS: Let your field implement IStyleable and use setCssClass() to apply an appropriate CSS class. I'd try to avoid using such pixel pushing approaches as much as possible.
I am trying to get the effect shown here https://www.kogevitamins.com/
Where you hover over the "learn more" link to get the opacity of the image to also change.
Thanks.
Edit:
Right now I have
for HTML
<img src="/images/pill.png" alt="description" id ="image" />
<p> Daily Essentials </p>
<a id ="button" href="#">Learn More</a>
For jquery
$("#button").hover(function(){
$("#image").animate({opacity:1},300);
}).mouseout(function(){
$("#image").animate({opacity:0.6},300);;
});
It doesn't seem to work so far
Edit:
I have the following code recently updated but the hover on effect doesn't work for me. Heres a link to the thing I'm trying to get to work http://maninkorean.com/
<div class ="product-content">
<img class="imgClass" src="/images/pill.png" alt="description" />
<p> Daily Essentials </p>
<a id ="button" href="#">Learn More</a>
</div>
$("a#button, img").hover(function(){
$("img.imgClass").animate({opacity:1},300);
}).mouseout(function(){
$("img.imgClass").animate({opacity:0.6},300);;
});
img.imgClass{
opacity: 0.6
}
#button {
padding: 10px 24px;
background:#F15951;
border: medium none;
border-radius: 3px 3px 3px 3px;
color:white;
margin-top:50px;
margin-bottom:50px;
font-weight: bold;
}
You should be able to do this using jQuery with the following code:
$('#id of link you want to use to change opacity').hover(function() { $('#id of image that you want to change opacity of').css({ 'opacity' : 0.25 }); });
Combine JQuery and CSS3's opacity features to wire up an "OnHover" event to the images that changes the opacity of the said image.
http://www.css3.info/preview/opacity/
Unless you want to see through those images and show background pattern, there is no need to deal with opacity.
Even though you can prepare semitransparent version of image and change src attribute in onMouseOver event.
But you can achieve the same effect by simply putting a div with 1-pixel semitransparent background above selected image.
Using CSS opacity will cut off older browsers.
Hi You can easily do this by css, with somethings like this:
.img {opacity:0.4; /*some more css*/ } /* (opacity:) is now supported by all browsers */
.img:hover {opacity:0.98; /* Some more css be creative... */ }
That's all!
Here's some html, css, jquery that shows how to do it:
<div></div><a>Hover On Me</a>
div{
width:300px;
height:300px;
display:block;
background:red;
opacity: 0.6
}
a{
display:block;
margin-top:20px;
width:100px;
padding:5px;
height:20px; border-radius:5px;
background:yellow;
}
$("a").hover(function(){
$("div").animate({opacity:1},300);
}).mouseout(function(){
$("div").animate({opacity:0.6},300);
});
http://jsfiddle.net/Rd5Yy/2/
It looks like in the specific example you cite, they've used CSS3 transitions. See here for a tutorial: http://www.w3schools.com/css3/css3_transitions.asp
In a nutshell using these you can do all kind of funky effects without any javascript. CSS3 is supported by modern browsers (but is pretty cutting edge as web technologies go) and isn't yet a W3C standard.
This code should do what you wanted to do (I tested it against your HTML):
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#button").hover(function(){
$("#image").animate({opacity:0.6},300);
}).mouseout(function(){
$("#image").animate({opacity:1},300);;
});
});
Okay, I just checked out your page. Firstly, it looks like jQuery is not working through the $ on your site, so you'll need to either troubleshoot that, or use it by jQuery instead. I pasted this code in on the JavaScript console on your site and it works:
jQuery("a#button, img").hover(function(){
jQuery("img.imgClass").animate({opacity:1},300);
}).mouseout(function(){
jQuery("img.imgClass").animate({opacity:.6},300);;
});
edit: Looks like you got it working as I was typing up this response
We have an HTML5 application (<!DOCTYPE html>) with Twitter Bootstrap and various other JavaScript libraries (including jQuery) - all running on their current versions.
The page contains a text input with the autofocus attribute set.
<input type="text" autofocus="autofocus" />
The page contains more than one 'screen' of content, meaning there will always be a vertical scrollbar on the page. The text input is located within the first 'fold' of the page, approx. 250px from the top of the page.
On Chrome, Safari and Opera the page works as expected. When the page loads, the element is on screen and focused.
On FireFox (current version - 18.0.1) the element has focus, but the page has scrolled to 1533px (determined via window.pageYOffset). The same page with differing lengths of content will always scroll to the same position, and the element will be rendered offscreen.
There is definitely only one element with the autofocus attribute set ($("[autofocus]").length).
Removing the autofocus attribute from the element does not cause the page to scroll at all (i.e. the page remains scrolled to the top - as expected).
Can anyone offer any help or insight?
Things we've tried
The following test works correctly:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head> </head>
<body>
<div style="height: 200px">
<h1>Test</h1>
</div>
<div style="height: 2000px">
test
<br />
<input autofocus type="text" />
</div>
</body>
</html>
We've recently retried this with Firefox and can't replicate the issue.
Closing...
You need css code to say this:
.focusedInput {
border-color: rgba(82,168,236,.8);
outline: 0;
outline: thin dotted \9;
-moz-box-shadow: 0 0 8px rgba(82,168,236,.6);
box-shadow: 0 0 8px rgba(82,168,236,.6) !important;
}
Then the text input code to be this:
<input class="form-control focusedInput" type="text">
Sorry, total Juice UI newbie, and really a web app newbie as well. Having trouble getting the simple example working from the Juice UI website. It is supposed to illustrate how easy it is to make a drag-drop example, but I get a lot of errors which makes me think I'm missing something really basic. I'm trying to use the Droppable control, documented here:
http://juiceui.com/controls/droppable
The draggable example worked fine, so I've gotten that far, but when I paste the droppable example text into my C# web application, I get errors that the style needs to be outside the form, outside the body, etc - I keep moving it up the chain. Eventually it says "element style needs to be in a parent element" - not sure where to put it if I can't put it on the page. I suppose in a .css file? Also, it says the tag is missing a required attribute 'type'.
Any help would be much appreciated!
<style>
.draggable { width: 100px; height: 100px; padding: 0.5em; float: left; margin: 10px 10px 10px 0; }
.droppable { width: 150px; height: 150px; padding: 0.5em; float: left; margin: 10px; }
</style>
<script>
$(function(){
$( "#_Default" ).droppable( "option", "drop", function( event, ui ) {
$( this )
.addClass( "ui-state-highlight" )
.find( "p" )
.html( "Dropped!" );
}
);
});
</script>
<asp:panel ID="_Draggable" CssClass="draggable ui-widget-content" runat="server">
<p>Drag me to my target</p>
</asp:panel>
<juice:draggable TargetControlID="_Draggable" runat="server"/>
<asp:panel ID="_Default" CssClass="droppable ui-widget-header" runat="server" ClientIDMode="Static">
<p>Drop here</p>
</asp:panel>
<juice:droppable TargetControlID="_Default" runat="server"/>
The document you're reviewing is a partial document. I believe it assumes you have the rest of the document already authored:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Droppable Example</title>
</head>
<body>
<!-- Your Code Here -->
</body>
</html>
Okay, a little research revealed:
element always goes inside the section - duh
the type attribute for always needs to be type="text/css",
so I added that
Added the type attribute for the (type="text/javascript")
Another error popped up, conflict with the _Default id in the
example, same as the Default class name when you create a new web
application. Bad choice of element ID for an example in which the
user will likely be doing exactly what I was doing, creating a
default web app and pasting in the code and expecting it to run.
Don't know why none of these errors were caught when this example was written, but kind of frustrating first experience with Juice UI. Thanks all for your time and responses.
I am currently working with a page that has a few hidden divs, being called on to be displayed later.
This is the code I have on the page itself causing the problem.
<div align="center" id="check">
Block of plain text right here.<br />
Checking...<br />
<img src="http://sw6.us/template/images/loading.gif" /><br />
<?php
require("databasetest.php");
?>
echo "check_data shown";
</div>
This code here is what I have modifying the "check" div on a style page
.check {
padding-top: 25px;
padding-left: 0px;
color: white;
align: center;
display:none;
}
As you can see the div is instructed to be hidden on page load via the style code. Everything is hidden except for the picture.
I don't believe the PHP is the issue because I included an echo displaying text which is properly hidden along with the HTML before it. I also took out that require command and the image was still not hidden. The image being a .GIF is not the issue either, I have tried using a .png and got the same problem!
Thanks for the help! It is greatly appreciated!