Using classes in different .ts files in jasmine - jasmine

I am writting simple test in jasmine framework. I have following files stored in one folder:
maintest.ts
helper.ts
Workflow1.ts
Workflow2.ts
Workflow files have content as following (example):
import {element, by, browser, protractor} from "protractor";
import {Helper} from "../../helper";
export class Workflow1/2
{
static Foo1() {
let element1;
let element2;
describe('check all fields', function () {
it('check foobar', function () {
element1.isVisible();
});
it('check foobar2', function () {
element2.isVisible();
});
}
static Foo2() {
let element3;
let element4;
describe('check all fields', function () {
it('check foobar', function () {
element4.isVisible();
});
it('check foobar2', function () {
element3.isVisible();
});
}
}
And the maintest.ts is:
import {browser} from "protractor";
import {Helper} from "./helper";
import {Workflow1} from "./Workflow1";
import {Workflow2} from "./Workflow2";
describe ('Regression Tests', function() {
beforeAll(function () {
console.log('====================Start');
});
describe('Basic workflow', function () {
Workflow1.Foo1();
Workflow1.Foo2();
Workflow2.Foo2();
Workflow2.Foo2();
});
});
but when I run it, nothing has run correctly - I get this error:
Error: Error while waiting for Protractor to sync with the page: "window.angular is undefined. This could be either because this is a non-angular page or because your test involves client-side navigation, which can interfere with Protractor's bootstrapping. See http://git.io/v4gXM for details"
but if I comment:
//Workflow1.Foo2();
//Workflow2.Foo2();
//Workflow2.Foo2();
the Workflow1.Foo1 works perfectly fine.
Can't I use different methods from different files? It works with helper, where I have login and logout methods...

I think I got this. My code was 'quite' long with different describes, when I minimalized it to 2, it started working :)
EDIT: As I mentioned in comment below, each method in Workflow1 and Workflow2 files must have at least one describe and at least one it inside - having only describe without it throws error

Related

Cypress.io page objects cause 'cy.click() failed because it requires a DOM element.' error

New to cypress, but did a couple projects in Protractor and TestCafe.
I'm aware of the controversy using PO's in cypress, but due to the complexity / nature of our app, we're going with it.
Refactoring the test to remove PO's and include the app ID's works. With the page objects, we get the 'requires a DOM element' error.
// myPo.js
class LoginPage {
loginPageCon() {
return cy.get('#page-login');
}
forgotPasswordLnk() {
return cy.get('#forgotPassword');
}
emailTxt() {
return cy.get('#email');
}
forgotPasswordCon() {
return cy.get('#page-forgot-password');
}
}
export default LoginPage;
// myTest.spec.js
import loginPage from '../pageObjects/myPo.js';
const loginPage = new LoginPage();
describe('Authorization', () => {
it('can direct to the azure instance', () => {
cy.visitHome();
cy.get(loginPage.loginPageCon);
});
describe('Forgot Password', () => {
it('clicking forgot password sends you to the correct screen', () => {
cy.get(loginPage.forgotPasswordLnk).click();
cy.get(loginPage.forgotPasswordCon);
});
});
});
You are returning a function reference to cy.get() when you call cy.get(loginPage.forgotPasswordLink).
Change It to:
loginPage.forgotPasswordLink().click()
Your page object is already returning a chainable of cy.get()

Test case failing in mocha & chai - LitElement

I have started looking at the lit-html and was trying to write some unit test cases using mocha & chai with a simple component file, but it is failing with the below error.
Test case:
var assert = require('chai').assert;
var emp = require('../src/components/employee/emp-component').greeting;
describe('Emp', function () {
it('should return hello', function () {
assert.equal(emp(), 'hello');
});
});
Component:
import {
LitElement,
html
} from 'lit-element';
class EmpComponent extends LitElement {
constructor() {
super();
}
greeting() {
return 'hello';
}
}
customElements.define('emp-component', EmpComponent);
Is there an other way to do this?
you can use open-wc helpers to create lit-element test cases. open-wc helpers
step 1: once., installed open-wc., import fixture
import {fixture, html} from '#open-wc/testing'
step 2: use async & await till your component is loaded. fixture helps understand lit-element
import {fixture, html} from '#open-wc/testing'
describe('test case', () => {
it('case', async () => {
const elem = await fixture(html`<your-component></your-component`);
})
})
Once component is loaded., your test cases starts triggering. For more information on polymer 3 & lit. refer Sabarinath blog on polymer & litElements

Async call in beforeAll

Here are 2 samples of the same test. The only difference is that first one uses a promise in beforeAll block to assign a value to the variable while the second one assigns the value directly.
I raised a similar question Running spec after promise has been resolved with one of the comments pointing to this issue https://github.com/jasmine/jasmine/issues/412 which says that this is not supported in Jasmine. Has somebody figured out any workaround?
This fails with TypeError: Cannot read property 'forEach' of undefined
describe('Async car test', function () {
var cars;
beforeAll(function (done) {
// getCars() is a promise which resolves to ['audi', 'bmw']
getCars().then(function (data) {
cars = data;
console.log(cars) // ['audi', 'bmw']
done();
});
});
cars.forEach(function (car) {
it('car ' + car, function () {
expect(car).toBe(car);
});
});
});
This works fine
describe('Car test', function () {
var cars = ['audi', 'bmw'];
cars.forEach(function (car) {
it('car ' + car, function () {
expect(car).toBe(car);
});
});
});
Posting it as an answer, because I can't see things properly in comments.
I'm actually generating tests in my spec as well, and I'm using https://www.npmjs.com/package/jasmine-data-provider , I think you probably cannot generate it directly from resolved promise. And wrapping in another it doesn't work for you. This should work:
var using = require('jasmine-data-provider');
using(cars.forEach, function (car) {
it(car + ' should be' + car, function () {
expect(car).toBe(car);
});
});
This is not an issue with jasmine, it is an issue with your code.
beforeAll does not block subsequent code below the statement. it blocks code that is defined in it('should ...', (done)=>{...});
it('should have cars', (done) => {
cars.forEach(function (car) {
expect(car).toBe(car);
});
});
Since Jasmine does not support adding tests at runtime, the trick is to request the asynchronous data before starting Jasmine, and then using the retrieved data during runtime instead. This can be achieved with a singleton and programmatically starting Jasmine.
See here for a working example.
// car-collection.js
class CarCollection {
static load() {
return this.request()
then((data) => this.cars = data);
}
static request() {
// in practice this function would do something cooler
return Promise.resolve(['audi', 'bmw']);
}
}
modules.export = CarCollection;
Since CarCollection has methods that are static they will be shared across imports and this.cars will persist.
// launcher.js
const Jasmine = require('jasmine');
const CarCollection = require('./car-collection');
CarCollection.load()
.then(() => {
console.log(`car count is ${CarCollection.cars.length}`); // prints: car count is 2
const jasmine = new Jasmine();
jasmine.loadConfigFile(...); // path to jasmine.json
jasmine.execute();
});
An important step here is configure jasmine to know where to look for the test files. Either by loading a config or passing specifics into the execute function.
// car.spec.js
const CarCollection = require('./car-collection');
describe('test', function () {
CarCollection.cars.forEach((car) => {
it('test' + car, () => {
expect(car).toBe(car);
});
});
});
Now run node ./launcher.js and the tests should run.

Using jasmine to test amplifyjs request call backs

I'm using amplifyjs for AJAX requests. That's working fine. I'm using jasmine to test the code. I'm wondering what the best method is to test the success and error call backs. The current unit test I've written doesn't work because the call back is executed after the jasmine expect. Here's my code under test:
function logout() {
ns.busy.show();
amplify.request({
resourceId: 'logout',
success: _logoutSuccess
});
};
function _logoutSuccess(response) {
ns.busy.hide();
};
Here's the unit test, where I want to validate that a function is called when the request is returned:
it('should hide busy when successful', function () {
// arrange
ns.busy = { show: function () { }, hide: function () { } };
spyOn(ns.busy, 'hide');
amplify.request.define('logout', function (settings) {
settings.success({});
});
// act
ns.accountLogoutViewModel.logout();
// assert
expect(ns.busy.hide).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
Note: ns is just a variable holding the application namespace. If I place break points on the expect and on the ns.busy.hide() in the _logoutSuccess function, jasmine hits the expect and then hits the _logoutSuccess, hence the spyOn fails.
As I say, the code is working, I just want to know how to write a test for it. I've looked into the jasmine done() function, but I'm not sure how to use it in this circumstance (or even if it is a solution).
Thanks
Isn't it always the way, when I finally get round to posting a question, I then immediately find the answer. Here's the test that passes, using the jasmine done() function:
it('should hide busy when successful', function (done) {
// arrange
ns.busy = { show: function () { }, hide: function () { } };
spyOn(ns.busy, 'hide');
amplify.request.define('logout', function (settings) {
settings.success({});
done();
});
// act
ns.accountLogoutViewModel.logout();
// assert
expect(ns.busy.hide).toHaveBeenCalled();
});

Running into Error while waiting for Protractor to sync with the page with basic protractor test

describe('my homepage', function() {
var ptor = protractor.getInstance();
beforeEach(function(){
// ptor.ignoreSynchronization = true;
ptor.get('http://localhost/myApp/home.html');
// ptor.sleep(5000);
})
describe('login', function(){
var email = element.all(protractor.By.id('email'))
, pass = ptor.findElement(protractor.By.id('password'))
, loginBtn = ptor.findElement(protractor.By.css('#login button'))
;
it('should input and login', function(){
// email.then(function(obj){
// console.log('email', obj)
// })
email.sendKeys('josephine#hotmail.com');
pass.sendKeys('shakalakabam');
loginBtn.click();
})
})
});
the above code returns
Error: Error while waiting for Protractor to sync with the page: {}
and I have no idea why this is, ptor load the page correctly, it seem to be the selection of the elements that fails.
TO SSHMSH:
Thanks, your almost right, and gave me the right philosophy, so the key is to ptor.sleep(3000) to have each page wait til ptor is in sync with the project.
I got the same error message (Angular 1.2.13). My tests were kicked off too early and Protractor didn't seem to wait for Angular to load.
It appeared that I had misconfigured the protractor config file. When the ng-app directive is not defined on the BODY-element, but on a descendant, you have to adjust the rootElement property in your protractor config file to the selector that defines your angular root element, for example:
// protractor-conf.js
rootElement: '.my-app',
when your HTML is:
<div ng-app="myApp" class="my-app">
I'm using ChromeDriver and the above error usually occurs for the first test. I've managed to get around it like this:
ptor.ignoreSynchronization = true;
ptor.get(targetUrl);
ptor.wait(
function() {
return ptor.driver.getCurrentUrl().then(
function(url) {
return targetUrl == url;
});
}, 2000, 'It\'s taking too long to load ' + targetUrl + '!'
);
Essentially you are waiting for the current URL of the browser to become what you've asked for and allow 2s for this to happen.
You probably want to switch the ignoreSynchronization = false afterwards, possibly wrapping it in a ptor.wait(...). Just wondering, would uncommenting the ptor.sleep(5000); not help?
EDIT:
After some experience with Promise/Deferred I've realised the correct way of doing this would be:
loginBtn.click().then(function () {
ptor.getCurrentUrl(targetUrl).then(function (newURL){
expect(newURL).toBe(whatItShouldBe);
});
});
Please note that if you are changing the URL (that is, moving away from the current AngularJS activated page to another, implying the AngularJS library needs to reload and init) than, at least in my experience, there's no way of avoiding the ptor.sleep(...) call. The above will only work if you are staying on the same Angular page, but changing the part of URL after the hashtag.
In my case, I encountered the error with the following code:
describe("application", function() {
it("should set the title", function() {
browser.getTitle().then(function(title) {
expect(title).toEqual("Welcome");
});
});
});
Fixed it by doing this:
describe("application", function() {
it("should set the title", function() {
browser.get("#/home").then(function() {
return browser.getTitle();
}).then(function(title) {
expect(title).toEqual("Welcome");
});
});
});
In other words, I was forgetting to navigate to the page I wanted to test, so Protractor was having trouble finding Angular. D'oh!
The rootElement param of the exports.config object defined in your protractor configuration file must match the element containing your ng-app directive. This doesn't have to be uniquely identifying the element -- 'div' suffices if the directive is in a div, as in my case.
From referenceConf.js:
// Selector for the element housing the angular app - this defaults to
// body, but is necessary if ng-app is on a descendant of <body>
rootElement: 'div',
I got started with Protractor by watching the otherwise excellent egghead.io lecture, where he uses a condensed exports.config. Since rootElement defaults to body, there is no hint as to what is wrong with your configuration if you don't start with a copy of the provided reference configuration, and even then the
Error while waiting for Protractor to sync with the page: {}
message doesn't give much of a clue.
I had to switch from doing this:
describe('navigation', function(){
browser.get('');
var navbar = element(by.css('#nav'));
it('should have a link to home in the navbar', function(){
//validate
});
it('should have a link to search in the navbar', function(){
//validate
});
});
to doing this:
describe('navigation', function(){
beforeEach(function(){
browser.get('');
});
var navbar = element(by.css('#nav'));
it('should have a link to home in the navbar', function(){
//validate
});
it('should have a link to search in the navbar', function(){
//validate
});
});
the key diff being:
beforeEach(function(){
browser.get('');
});
hope this may help someone.
I was getting this error:
Failed: Error while waiting for Protractor to sync with the page: "window.angular is undefined. This could be either because this is a non-angular page or because your test involves client-side navigation, which can interfere with Protractor's bootstrapping. See http://git.io/v4gXM for details"
The solution was to call page.navigateTo() before page.getTitle().
Before:
import { AppPage } from './app.po';
describe('App', () => {
let page: AppPage;
beforeEach(() => {
page = new AppPage();
});
it('should have the correct title', () => {
expect(page.getTitle()).toEqual('...');
})
});
After:
import { AppPage } from './app.po';
describe('App', () => {
let page: AppPage;
beforeEach(() => {
page = new AppPage();
page.navigateTo();
});
it('should have the correct title', () => {
expect(page.getTitle()).toEqual('...');
})
});
If you are using
browser.restart()
in your spec some times, it throws the same error.
Try to use
await browser.restart()

Resources