I can't seem to find an answer on the web or maybe I'm missing something.
Let's say my laravel application domain is my-laravel.com
Now I want to make requests at api.my-laravel.com which will work just same as my-laravel.com/api/
How do I do that?
Solution: Changed prefix('api') to domain('api.my-laravel.com') in RouteServiceProvider#mapApiRoutes
You may group your routes in a sub-domain, change your routes/api.php
Route::group(["domain" => "api.domain.key"], function() {
// your api routes.
});
Edit:
Check your RouteServiceProvider then remove the api prefix in mapApiRoutes method.
Alternatively(Except DNS and mod_rewrite)
Sub-Domain Routing
Route groups may also be used to handle sub-domain routing. Sub-domains may be assigned route parameters just like route URIs, allowing you to capture a portion of the sub-domain for usage in your route or controller. The sub-domain may be specified by calling the the domain method before defining the group:
Route::domain('{account}.myapp.com')->group(function () {
Route::get('user/{id}', function ($account, $id) {
//
});
});
Source: https://laravel.com/docs/5.4/routing#route-group-sub-domain-routing
Note:
Before this map your subdomain to point your server and point your domain (laravel.com)
Related
Our team is trying to convert an old multitenant architecture over to Laravel and having some difficulty staying DRY in our routes/views.
Our account section contains multiple page views: an account dashboard, edit profile, payment methods, registrations, etc. However, we provide multiple stand-alone websites for a client, and there are multiple URL structures for the user to access their account:
In addition to the standard...
https://clientone.ourdomain.com/account/
...they can also access their account via different standalone websites:
https://clientone.ourdomain.com/event-app-one/account/
https://clientone.ourdomain.com/event-app-two/account/
All of those URLs above give them the exact same information, but with a different layout/theme applied for each standalone website. Right now the routes I set up for those above look like this:
// #### CLIENT ONE - ROOT
Route::domain('{subdomain}.ourdomain.com')->group(function() {
Route::middleware(['setTheme:clientone-account-theme'])->group(function() {
Route::get('/', 'ClientController#index')->name('index');
Route::prefix('account')->group(function() {
Route::get('/', 'AccountController#index')->name('clientone.account.show');
Route::get('/edit', 'AccountController#edit')->name('clientone.account.edit');
...
});
});
// #### CLIENT ONE - EVENT APP ONE
Route::prefix('event-app-one')->group(function() {
Route::middleware(['setTheme:clientone-eventapp-one-theme'])->group(function() {
Route::get('/', 'EventAppController#index')->name('clientone.eventapp.one.index');
...
Route::prefix('account')->group(function() {
Route::get('/', 'AccountController#index')->name('clientone.eventapp.one.account.show');
Route::get('/edit', 'AccountController#edit')->name('clientone.eventapp.one.account.edit');
...
});
});
});
// #### CLIENT ONE - EVENT APP TWO
Route::prefix('event-app-2')->group(function() {
Route::middleware(['setTheme:clientone-eventapp-two-theme'])->group(function() {
Route::get('/', 'EventAppController#index')->name('clientone.eventapp.two.index');
...
Route::prefix('account')->group(function() {
Route::get('/', 'AccountController#index')->name('clientone.eventapp.two.account.show');
Route::get('/edit', 'AccountController#edit')->name('clientone.eventapp.two.account.edit');
...
});
});
});
Those routes all currently work. We don't like including the client or app name in all of our route names because they get rather long and can't be reused, but if we take those out we found out our route URLs will override each other.
However, if we do it this way, our account views that we share across all these URLs can't use named route links for href because we don't know which one to use. For example, we can't do this in blade...
Edit Profile
...because, while that will work while at clientone.ourdomain.com/account/, it won't work while at clientone.ourdomain.com/event-app-one/account/.
Should I just not use route names for links in our views and use a relative link instead? Or am I going about my route naming all wrong? The only other thing I can think of is to copy all the view files and have one version for .com/account/ and another for .com/all-event-apps/account/ and just use a different set of route names for each. Feels wrong to duplicate essentially the same functionality in those views though.
You can use a parameter for the prefix so you are not repeating the same exact routes and creating new names for them. You can then generate routes based on those route names.
You can set defaults for parameters for the UrlGenerator to help deal with this.
I would add a middleware to your group that checks the prefix then will assign that as a default parameter on the UrlGenerator:
// instead of app-one, app-two, etc etc
Route::prefix('{app}')->middleware('handleapp')...
// handleapp middleware
Url::defaults(['app' => $request->route()->parameter('app')]);
$request->route()->forgetParameter('app'); // if you dont want this passed into controller methods
// where you need to generate a route
route('eventapp.account.edit'); // {app} is handled by the default we set so doesn't have to be passed
I would also have a middleware that will add the default parameter for subdomain as well so you don't have to pass that yourself everywhere.
Basically it all becomes dynamic and based on the current request you can have defaults setup for all these parameters so you don't have to pass them into the route helpers yourself everywhere you need a URL from a route name.
This is just the basic idea in use.
I've read manual of Laravel 5 but still don't find a solution for my problem.
My task: I need to run multiple websites on the one codebase.
What have I done for it? I made one main website and create table "sites" where I can add new satellites. It's all worked fine. But now, in front end part, I need to create middleware which will help me to divorce different parts of my engine.
I start to create middleware but I've only found 2 ways of middleware:
redirect to the correct URL
return $next($request) which means that this middleware will be always working.
I don't need a redirect. I just need one thing:
I need that in my web.php route file I can make routes with my middleware group:
For example:
Route::group(['middleware' => 'site'], function () {
//there will be only routes for my satellites
And
Route::group(['middleware' => 'web'], function () {
//There will be another routes which won't be on satellites
The problem is if I make a redirect on the main site my middleware still working and going into the cycle.
Is there any way to break middleware and don't going into the certain routes?
I've tried with HttpException but I've received only 404 or 500 errors, but I don't need it in this case.
I have an application in which you can create a service and a service can have its own partial view.
So I created a route group with {service} prefix:
Route::group(['prefix' => '{service}', ... ], ... ).
// http://.../my-service/my-url
However, in order to know in which service the user is I need to add the service in every single route I have in my application. So I have done a middleware that shares $service to every view:
view()->share(['service' => $service])
But I don't know how to add $service prefix to every route without explicitly adding it. I would like doing something like
route()->prefix(['service' => $service])
and then every route have the prefix $service:
url("myurl") // -> url("$service/my-url") or
route('my-route')
Any idea?
EDIT:
Finally I decided to create a ServiceType model, create a middleware with a parameter and set to my route groups. Then in view I offer the user to switch between services of the same type.
Not is what I was looking but it's OK for now.
Question is still open if anyone knows the answer.
Put all your routes you want prefixed in a group and then add the prefix
Laravel docs on route prefixes
I have some routes in routes.php in laravel
// Code for rounting admin panel
Route::resource('/admin','Admin\LoginController#index');
Route::resource('/admin/dashboard','Admin\AdminController#index');
Route::resource('/admin/movies','Admin\MovieController#index');
Now when I access url http://localhost/askspidy/admin I want to show login page and it works, but when i access url http://localhost/askspidy/admin/dashboard it should go to dashboard but it's showing me login page only.
I know this is because when it found /admin in any url it's bydefault goes to the route
Route::resource('/admin','Admin\LoginController#index');
I know it's assuming that (/admin) is route to controller and (/dashboard) is the function declared in the controller but I want routing like this only so is there any other solution for this problem.
A RESTful Resource Controller takes over the responsibility of each action. You only need to list the name and the controller:
Route::resource('photo', 'PhotoController');
If you wanted to only use the index method, you’d list it like this:
Route::resource('photo', 'PhotoController', ['only' => [
'index'
]]);
However, it looks like two of your routes are not suitable for resources (login and dashboard), as they should relate to editing a model.
You should instead just use a get() resource instead.
From the docs:
Route::get('user/{id}', 'UserController#showProfile');
So in your case, it would be:
Route::get('/admin','Admin\LoginController#index');
Route::get('/admin/dashboard','Admin\AdminController#index');
Route::resource('/admin/movie','Admin\MovieController');
in my routes file I use a route group with segment like:
Route::group(['prefix' => request()->segment(1) ], function(){
//routes
});
Normally, my routes are in the order they were written at, but when using the group with request()->segment(1) routes just get disarranged (not just inside the group itself, but all of them), I need to use segment so every customer will have their own slug as the first segment in the URL.
so how can I fix this issue?
Use middleware to validate the user and allow them based on their slug
Please Make own middleware like jwt.auth
I developed my own middleware to filter slug based