I'm developing a logging method, and I'd like to run this log every time an x-screen is opened.
In the log I will check if there is already a log on that day, if there is no saved and if there is only increment ...
But this function I will use in several controllers, what is the best place for me to put this methodo and make it accessible in all controllers?
Note: Using laravel 5.4
Related
I am new in Laravel and want to know such problem
I am running an web application on several server using Laravel.
But I have encountered with an issue.
When there is modification for the project, I need to sync with git on several servers.
But it has different settings for each server (eg: DB name, DB password...)
I have set it manually because I couldn't use .env or configuration file since the file is just pure php file.
The issue I want to solve is how can I get Laravel configuration data from pure PHP file(not controller or whatever).
It will be thankful if someone teach me solution.
You asked:
how can I get Laravel configuration data from pure PHP file
The answer would be this:
You just make some file in config/ folder of laravel app (or use the existing file like config/app.php)
You make an array of your key value pairs
<?php
return [
'some_key' => 'some_value',
...
and you simply call it with this code where ever you need it:
config('config_file.key');
for example
config('app.name');
would give you Laravel by default.
I'm new to Laravel and I am handed an existing application that is composed of two parts:
1 - An admin backend built on Laravel and uses Vueify
2 - The frontend website built on next.js and uses react components
The admin part communicates with Laravel using the "web routes" but also uses the "api routes" as well since the vue components make AJAX requests using those "api routes".
I am now tasked with "connecting" the frontend part to the laravel app. The frontend part will be using AJAX as well to communicate with laravel but I was told I should not use the same "api route" that is used by the admin backend because that has a lot more privileges that should not be accessible by the frontend. Basically it's a security risk and that I should somehow separate the two.
I'm not actually sure which term to use.. I initially thought it was called "channel" but I see that channel is one of the 4 "ways" of connecting to laravel (the other 3 being web, api and console). So I think routes is the term to use and forgive me for the double-quotes.
I have made a simple diagram to show the structure I mean. What I need to know is is there a way to create a second api route that would be used exclusively by the frontend and would include only a limited set of priviledges. I imagine something like /frontapi/ or /webapi/ as opposed to /api/ which is used now by the backend.
Thanks a lot for your help and please correct me if I am using wrong terminology.
EDIT
Thank you all for answering the part regarding separating the route prefix and the api route files.
One part of the question that I realized late that I hadn't made clear was the importance of separating the API Keys for both APIs since I think that is the main security issue and what would really make then two individual API "Channels or ways". I think that is one reason why I was confusing about the terminology because "way" sounded to me more separate that just a "route". I've also edited the question to reflect that. Thank you again for taking the time to help.
You can decompose routes in as many files as you want, you can also give each file its own prefix (like how api.php routes start with /api)
The modification need to be done in App\Providers\RouteServiceProvider
//in map() add $this->mapApiTwoRoutes()
public function map()
{
$this->mapApiRoutes();
$this->mapApiTwoRoutes();//<---this one
$this->mapWebRoutes();
}
//now add the method mapApiTwoRoutes
protected function mapApiTwoRoutes()
{
Route::prefix('api2')//<-- prefix in the url
->middleware('api')//<-- api middleware (throttle and such check App\Http\Kernal.php)
->namespace('App\Http\Controllers') //<-- you can modify the namespace of the controllers
->group(base_path('routes/apiTwo.php'));//<-- file containing the routes
}
And that's it.
You need to define a new route file, firstly add a new entry $this->mapApi2Routes(); in the map() function in app\Providers\RouteServiceProvider.
Then add a new function in that file, basically copying the mapApiRoutes() function, call it mapApi2Routes(). You can use different middleware etc. for the new file.
The last step would be adding a new file api2.php in the routes folder.
I understand how Laravel works but taking a look at Octobercms which is built on Laravel, I believe and understand that plugin when created can be imported and used in multiple static pages in multiple pages, but I still cannot get to understand when and how someone needs to use routes.php in the plugin.
Please help me understand by giving me a use case study. I can't just get this in the documentation.
Route.php is useful to create REST API and external entry point to your application
Exemple from
octobercms Task scheduling not working
use Route;
Route::get('/yourprefix/delete_users', function () {
DB::connection('mydb')->table('u')->whereRaw('u.created_at <= NOW() - INTERVAL 1 DAY')->where('is_activated','=',0)->delete();
});
Create an entry point for an http cron job on a server without command line access.
I have two separate Laravel instances/sites running on a server and want to be able to generate a url to a named route on one from code within the other.
For example the following named route exists in the first instance:
Route::get('users/my_account', array('uses' => 'UsersController#myAccount', 'as' => 'my_account'))
In the second instance I want to generate a url to the route above. Can anyone think of a clean way to do this, without explicitly knowing the url (i.e. only knowing the name of the route 'my_account')?
Basically I want to expose the RouteCollection of one site to the other...
That's a pretty interesting question. There's no natively supported way of doing that and, from what I know, it won't ever.
You could try loading the routes file of the first application, parsing it's configurations (you will need that for reverse routing), construct a Router instance and use it, but I'm sure it won't be simple at all.
If you have a really, I mean really, good reason to use reverse routes, you can try building a small API on the first application. That API should receive the parameters necessary, those used in url($params), and return the full url (with domain and everything). Although, this will introduce some serious performance issues.
IMHO, stick to hard coded my_account, leave a comment on the first application route and/or controller explaining that it's used on another project and move on :)
I may call this a dirty trick. Supposing you have the following structure in your file system, where both paths are Laravel apps:
/path/to/apps/app1
/path/to/apps/app2
And you want to load the routes file from app1 into app2. You can do it as follow:
include "../app1/apps/routes.php";
$url = URL::route('register');
Voilà! But, although it worked for me there are some points to consider.
Include that file, will surely overwrites your current route collection for that process.
If that last is true, then you can have problem generating other URLs, maybe in your views.
The domain name will be of the current Laravel instance. It means that your URLs generated into app2 will hold the domain name of app1. I believe this is not what you want. But you can always generate non-absolute URLs with URL::route('register', null, false).
I am working on a task in which I have used HMVC. In it I have to check each controller name and compare it with database value before it loaded every time. Is there any way to accomplish this task.
You can use hooks to intercept the execution before a controller is created.
see Hooks - Extending the Framework Core for details.
This will be executed on every request, so if you really need to compare this with database values, consider using a cache like APC to store the database entries.
You can use to get the controller name:
$this->uri->segment(1);
But this won't work if you have controller is in sub folder structure.