I need to generate an unique random number in Golang. I have a simple ruby code for it:
(0...16).map { rand(10).to_s }.join
So, effectively i need to generate a number of length 16 where each digit is randomly picked up from [0-9]. I did not understand how random.Intn(n) function can help me. Any idea how can I do this?
One way is:
s := ""
for i := 0; i < 16; i++ {
s += (string)(rand.Intn(10) + 48)
}
48 is the ascii value for 0.
Or by using #Flimzy's more efficient suggestion:
s := fmt.Sprintf("%016d", rand.Int63n(1e16))
where "%016d" will help pad the number with zeros.
Related
i am new to c language and seeking help in understanding my mistake.
I want to write a program that counts the number of 2 digit numbers in a row of integers and chars, for example " 21c sdhhj 32 fhddhf234 45" here are 3 two digit numbers. I set terminations to my loop (failed scanf %d or EOF) and still get an infinite loop. I understand thet failed scanf of integers should return 0 or -1 at EOF so why i get infinite loop? Thank you in advance! :)
void read(int blue[],int red[],int couple[])
{
int vote=0,rcount=0,bcount=0;
int ok=-2;
while (ok!=EOF)
{
ok=scanf("%d",&vote);
if (ok==0)
continue;
if (vote<TOTAL&&vote>0)
{
rcount=vote%10;
bcount=vote/10;
if (rcount==bcount)
continue;
couple[vote]++;
red[rcount]++;
blue[bcount]++;
}
ok=0;
}
i want to scan and store them as long as they are smaller then TOTAL (99) until the input is over.
type IntSet struct {
words []uint64
}
func (s *IntSet) Has(x int) bool {
word, bit := x/64, uint(x%64)
return word < len(s.words) && s.words[word]&(1<<bit) != 0
}
Lets go through what I think is going on:
A new type is declared called IntSet. Underneath its new type declaration it is unint64 slice.
A method is created called Has(). It can only receive IntSet types, after playing around with ints she returns a bool
Before she can play she needs two ints. She stores these babies on the stack.
Lost for words
This methods purpose is to report whether the set contains the non-negative value x. Here is a the go test:
func TestExample1(t *testing.T) {
//!+main
var x, y IntSet
fmt.Println(x.Has(9), x.Has(123)) // "true false"
//!-main
// Output:
// true false
}
Looking for some guidance understanding what this method is doing inside. And why the programmer did it in such complicated means (I feel like I am missing something).
The return statement:
return word < len(s.words) && s.words[word]&(1<<bit) != 0
Are the order of operations this?
return ( word < len(s.words) && ( s.words[word]&(1<<bit)!= 0 )
And what is the [words] and & doing within:
s.words[word]&(1<<bit)!= 0
edit: Am beginning to see slightly seeing that:
s.words[word]&(1<<bit)!= 0
Is just a slice but don't understand the &
As I read the code, I scribbled some notes:
package main
import "fmt"
// A set of bits
type IntSet struct {
// bits are grouped into 64 bit words
words []uint64
}
// x is the index for a bit
func (s *IntSet) Has(x int) bool {
// The word index for the bit
word := x / 64
// The bit index within a word for the bit
bit := uint(x % 64)
if word < 0 || word >= len(s.words) {
// error: word index out of range
return false
}
// the bit set within the word
mask := uint64(1 << bit)
// true if the bit in the word set
return s.words[word]&mask != 0
}
func main() {
nBits := 2*64 + 42
// round up to whole word
nWords := (nBits + (64 - 1)) / 64
bits := IntSet{words: make([]uint64, nWords)}
// bit 127 = 1 * 64 + 63
bits.words[1] = 1 << 63
fmt.Printf("%b\n", bits.words)
for i := 0; i < nWords*64; i++ {
has := bits.Has(i)
if has {
fmt.Println(i, has)
}
}
has := bits.Has(127)
fmt.Println(has)
}
Playground: https://play.golang.org/p/rxquNZ_23w1
Output:
[0 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0]
127 true
true
The Go Programming Language Specification
Arithmetic operators
& bitwise AND integers
peterSO's answer is spot on - read it. But I figured this might also help you understand.
Imagine I want to store some random numbers in the range 1 - 8. After I store these numbers I will be asked if the number n (also in the range of 1 - 8) appears in the numbers I recorded earlier. How would we store the numbers?
One, probably obvious, way would be to store them in a slice or maybe a map. Maybe we would choose a map since lookups will be constant time. So we create our map
seen := map[uint8]struct{}{}
Our code might look something like this
type IntSet struct {
seen: map[uint8]struct{}
}
func (i *IntSet) AddValue(v uint8) {
i.seen[v] = struct{}{}
}
func (i *IntSet) Has(v uint8) bool {
_, ok := i.seen[v]
return ok
}
For each number we store we take up (at least) 1 byte (8 bits) of memory. If we were to store all 8 numbers we would be using 64 bits / 8 bytes.
However, as the name implies, this is an int Set. We don't care about duplicates, we only care about membership (which Has provides for us).
But there is another way we could store these numbers, and we could do it all within a single byte. Since a byte provides 8 bits, we can use these 8 bits as markers for values we have seen. The initial value (in binary notation) would be
00000000 == uint8(0)
If we did an AddValue(3) we could change the 3rd bit and end up with
00000100 == uint8(3)
^
|______ 3rd bit
If we then called AddValue(8) we would have
10000100 == uint8(132)
^ ^
| |______ 3rd bit
|___________ 8th bit
So after adding 3 and 8 to our IntSet we have the internally stored integer value of 132. But how do we take 132 and figure out whether a particular bit is set? Easy, we use bitwise operators.
The & operator is a logical AND. It will return the value of the bits common between the numbers on each side of the operator. For example
10001100 01110111 11111111
& 01110100 & 01110000 & 00000001
-------- -------- --------
00000100 01110000 00000001
So to find out if n is in our set we simply do
our_set_value & (1 << (value_we_are_looking_for - 1))
which if we were searching for 4 would yield
10000100
& 00001000
----------
0 <-- so 4 is not present
or if we were searching for 8
10000100
& 10000000
----------
10000000 <-- so 8 is present
You may have noticed I subtracted 1 from our value_we_are_looking for. This is because I am fitting 1-8 into our 8bit number. If we only wanted to store seven numbers then we could just skip using the very first bit and assume our counting starts at bit #2 then we wouldn't have to subtract 1, like the code you posted does.
Assuming you understand all of that, here's where things get interesting. So far we have been storing our values in a uint8 (so we could only have 8 values, or 7 if you omit the first bit). But there are larger numbers that have more bits, like uint64. Instead of 8 values, we can store 64 values! But what happens if the range of values we want to track exceed 1-64? What if we want to store 65? This is where the slice of words comes from in the original code.
Since the code posted skips the first bit, from now on I will do so as well.
We can use the first uint64 to store the numbers 1 - 63. When we want to store the numbers 64-127 we need a new uint64. So our slice would be something like
[ uint64_of_1-63, uint64_of_64-127, uint64_of_128-192, etc]
Now, to answer the question about whether a number is in our set we need to first find the uint64 whose range would contain our number. If we were searching for 110 we would want to use the uint64 located at index 1 (uint64_of_64-128) because 110 would fall in that range.
To find the index of the word we need to look at, we take the whole number value of n / 64. In the case of 110 we would get 1, which is exactly what we want.
Now we need to examine the specific bit of that number. The bit that needs to be checked would be the remainder when dividing 110 by 64, or 46. So if the 46th bit of the word at index 1 is set, then we have seen 110 before.
This is how it might look in code
type IntSet struct {
words []uint64
}
func (s *IntSet) Has(x int) bool {
word, bit := x/64, uint(x%64)
return word < len(s.words) && s.words[word]&(1<<bit) != 0
}
func (s *IntSet) AddValue(x int) {
word := x / 64
bit := x % 64
if word < len(s.words) {
s.words[word] |= (1 << uint64(bit))
}
}
And here is some code to test it
func main() {
rangeUpper := 1000
bits := IntSet{words: make([]uint64, (rangeUpper/64)+1)}
bits.AddValue(127)
bits.AddValue(8)
bits.AddValue(63)
bits.AddValue(64)
bits.AddValue(998)
fmt.Printf("%b\n", bits.words)
for i := 0; i < rangeUpper; i++ {
if ok := bits.Has(i); ok {
fmt.Printf("Found %d\n", i)
}
}
}
OUTPUT
Found 8
Found 63
Found 64
Found 127
Found 998
Playground of above
Note
The |= is another bitwise operator OR. It means combine the two values keeping anywhere there is a 1 in either value
10000000 00000001 00000001
& 01000000 & 10000000 & 00000001
-------- -------- --------
11000000 10000001 00000001 <-- important that we
can set the value
multiple times
Using this method we can reduce the cost of storage for 65535 numbers from 131KB to just 1KB. This type of bit manipulation for set membership is very common in implementations of Bloom Filters
An IntSet represents a Set of integers. The presence in the set of any of a contiguous range of integers can be established by writing a single bit in the IntSet. Likewise, checking whether a specific integer is in the IntSet can be done by checking whether the particular integer corresponding to that bit is set.
So the code is finding the specific uint64 in the Intset corresponding to the integer:
word := x/64
and then the specific bit in that uint64:
bit := uint(x%64)
and then checking first that the integer being tested is in the range supported by the IntSet:
word < len(s.words)
and then whether the specific bit corresponding to the specific integer is set:
&& s.words[word]&(1<<bit) != 0
This part:
s.words[word]
pulls out the specific uint64 of the IntSet that tracks whether the integer in question is in the set.
&
is a bitwise AND.
(1<<bit)
means take a 1, shift it to the bit position representing the specific integer being tested.
Performing the bitwise AND between the integer in question, and the bit-shifted 1 will return a 0 if the bit corresponding to the integer is not set, and a 1 if the bit is set (meaning, the integer in question is a member of the IntSet).
I am trying to implement socks5 proxy server.
Most things are clear according to the rfc but I'm stuck interpreting client port and writing my port number in bytes.
I made a function that tkes an int and returns 2 bytes. This function first converts number into binary then literally splits the bits as string then converts them back to byte.However this seems wrong because if the right most bits are 0 they are lost.
Here is the function
func getBytesOfInt(i int) []byte {
binary := fmt.Sprintf("%b", i)
if i < 255 {
return []byte{byte(i)}
}
first := binary[:8]
last := binary[9:]
fmt.Println(binary, first, last)
i1, _ := strconv.ParseInt(first, 2, 64)
i2, _ := strconv.ParseInt(last, 2, 64)
return []byte{byte(i1), byte(i2)}
}
Can you please explain me how am i supposed to parse the number and get 2 bytes and most importantly how am i going to cast it back to an integer.
Currently if you give 1024 to this function it will return []byte{0x80, 0x0} which is 128 in decimals but as you see the right bits are lost theres only one 0 which is useless.
Your code has multiple problem. First :8 and 9: miss an element ([8]), see: https://play.golang.org/p/yuhh4ZeJFNL
And also, you should interept the second byte as lowbyte of the int and the first as highbyte, not literally cut the binary string. for example 4 should be interept as [0x0,0x4] instead of [0x4,0x0] which shoulld be 1024.
If you want to keep using strconv you should use:
n := len(binary)
first := binary[:n-8]
last := binary[n-8:]
However it is very unefficient.
I would suggest b[0],b[1] = i >> 8, i & 255, and i = b[0]<<8 + b[1] .
Suppose I have two variables, that only use 6 bits:
var a byte = 31 // 00011111
var b byte = 50 // 00110010
The first (a) have more one bits than the b, however the b is greater than a of course, so is not possible use a > b.
To achieve what I need, I do one loop:
func countOneBits(byt byte) int {
var counter int
var divider byte
for divider = 32; divider >= 1; divider >>= 1 {
if byt & divider == divider {
counter++
}
}
return counter
}
This works, I can use countOneBits(a) > countOneBits(b)...
But I don't think is the best solution for this case, I don't think this need a loop and because of it I'm here.
Have a better alternative (in performance aspect) to count how many 1 have in six bits?
Given that the input is a single byte probably a lookup table is the best option... only takes 256 bytes and you get code like
var count = bitcount[input];
Given that this function will be available in the packagemath/bits in the next Go release (1.9 this August) here is the code for a 32-bit integer.
// OnesCount32 returns the number of one bits ("population count") in x.
func OnesCount32(x uint32) int {
return int(pop8tab[x>>24] + pop8tab[x>>16&0xff] + pop8tab[x>>8&0xff] + pop8tab[x&0xff])
}
Where the pop8tab is defined here. And for your question in particular : 8bits
func OnesCount8(x uint8) int {
return int(pop8tab[x])
}
It is also possible to count bits with binary operations. See this bit twiddling hacks.
func bitSetCount(v byte) byte {
v = (v & 0x55) + ((v>>1) & 0x55)
v = (v & 0x33) + ((v>>2) & 0x33)
return (v + (v>>4)) & 0xF
}
You'll have to benchmark to see if this is faster than the lookup table which is the simplest to implement.
there is POPCNT golang version:
https://github.com/tmthrgd/go-popcount
In this problem we consider only strings of lower-case English letters (a-z).
A string is a palindrome if it has exactly the same sequence of characters when traversed left-to-right as right-to-left. For example, the following strings are palindromes:
"kayak"
"codilitytilidoc"
"neveroddoreven"
A string A is an anagram of a string B if it consists of exactly the same characters, but possibly in another order. For example, the following strings are each other's anagrams:
A="mary" B="army" A="rocketboys" B="octobersky" A="codility" B="codility"
Write a function
int isAnagramOfPalindrome(String S);
which returns 1 if the string s is a anagram of some palindrome, or returns 0 otherwise.
For example your function should return 1 for the argument "dooernedeevrvn", because it is an anagram of a palindrome "neveroddoreven". For argument "aabcba", your function should return 0.
'Algorithm' would be too big word for it.
You can construct a palindrome from the given character set if each character occurs in that set even number of times (with possible exception of one character).
For any other set, you can easily show that no palindrome exists.
Proof is simple in both cases, but let me know if that wasn't clear.
In a palindrome, every character must have a copy of itself, a "twin", on the other side of the string, except in the case of the middle letter, which can act as its own twin.
The algorithm you seek would create a length-26 array, one for each lowercase letter, and start counting the characters in the string, placing the quantity of character n at index n of the array. Then, it would pass through the array and count the number of characters with an odd quantity (because one letter there does not have a twin). If this number is 0 or 1, place that single odd letter in the center, and a palindrome is easily generated. Else, it's impossible to generate one, because two or more letters with no twins exist, and they can't both be in the center.
I came up with this solution for Javascript.
This solution is based on the premise that a string is an anagram of a palindrome if and only if at most one character appears an odd number of times in it.
function solution(S) {
var retval = 0;
var sorted = S.split('').sort(); // sort the input characters and store in
// a char array
var array = new Array();
for (var i = 0; i < sorted.length; i++) {
// check if the 2 chars are the same, if so copy the 2 chars to the new
// array
// and additionally increment the counter to account for the second char
// position in the loop.
if ((sorted[i] === sorted[i + 1]) && (sorted[i + 1] != undefined)) {
array.push.apply(array, sorted.slice(i, i + 2));
i = i + 1;
}
}
// if the original string array's length is 1 or more than the length of the
// new array's length
if (sorted.length <= array.length + 1) {
retval = 1;
}
//console.log("new array-> " + array);
//console.log("sorted array-> " + sorted);
return retval;
}
i wrote this code in java. i don't think if its gonna be a good one ^^,
public static int isAnagramOfPalindrome(String str){
ArrayList<Character> a = new ArrayList<Character>();
for(int i = 0; i < str.length(); i++){
if(a.contains(str.charAt(i))){
a.remove((Object)str.charAt(i));
}
else{
a.add(str.charAt(i));
}
}
if(a.size() > 1)
return 0;
return 1;
}
Algorithm:
Count the number of occurrence of each character.
Only one character with odd occurrence is allowed since in a palindrome the maximum number of character with odd occurrence can be '1'.
All other characters should occur in an even number of times.
If (2) and (3) fail, then the given string is not a palindrome.
This adds to the other answers given. We want to keep track of the count of each letter seen. If we have more than one odd count for a letter then we will not be able to form a palindrome. The odd count would go in the middle, but only one odd count can do so.
We can use a hashmap to keep track of the counts. The lookup for a hashmap is O(1) so it is fast. We are able to run the whole algorithm in O(n). Here's it is in code:
if __name__ == '__main__':
line = input()
dic = {}
for i in range(len(line)):
ch = line[i]
if ch in dic:
dic[ch] += 1
else:
dic[ch] = 1
chars_whose_count_is_odd = 0
for key, value in dic.items():
if value % 2 == 1:
chars_whose_count_is_odd += 1
if chars_whose_count_is_odd > 1:
print ("NO")
else:
print ("YES")
I have a neat solution in PHP posted in this question about complexities.
class Solution {
// Function to determine if the input string can make a palindrome by rearranging it
static public function isAnagramOfPalindrome($S) {
// here I am counting how many characters have odd number of occurrences
$odds = count(array_filter(count_chars($S, 1), function($var) {
return($var & 1);
}));
// If the string length is odd, then a palindrome would have 1 character with odd number occurrences
// If the string length is even, all characters should have even number of occurrences
return (int)($odds == (strlen($S) & 1));
}
}
echo Solution :: isAnagramOfPalindrome($_POST['input']);
It uses built-in PHP functions (why not), but you can make it yourself, as those functions are quite simple. First, the count_chars function generates a named array (dictionary in python) with all characters that appear in the string, and their number of occurrences. It can be substituted with a custom function like this:
$count_chars = array();
foreach($S as $char) {
if array_key_exists($char, $count_chars) {
$count_chars[$char]++;
else {
$count_chars[$char] = 1;
}
}
Then, an array_filter with a count function is applied to count how many chars have odd number of occurrences:
$odds = 0;
foreach($count_chars as $char) {
$odds += $char % 2;
}
And then you just apply the comparison in return (explained in the comments of the original function).
return ($odds == strlen($char) % 2)
This runs in O(n). For all chars but one, must be even. the optional odd character can be any odd number.
e.g.
abababa
def anagram_of_pali(str):
char_list = list(str)
map = {}
nb_of_odds = 0
for char in char_list:
if char in map:
map[char] += 1
else:
map[char] = 1
for char in map:
if map[char] % 2 != 0:
nb_of_odds += 1
return True if nb_of_odds <= 1 else False
You just have to count all the letters and check if there are letters with odd counts. If there are more than one letter with odd counts the string does not satisfy the above palindrome condition.
Furthermore, since a string with an even number letters must not have a letter with an odd count it is not necessary to check whether string length is even or not. It will take O(n) time complexity:
Here's the implementation in javascript:
function canRearrangeToPalindrome(str)
{
var letterCounts = {};
var letter;
var palindromeSum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < str.length; i++) {
letter = str[i];
letterCounts[letter] = letterCounts[letter] || 0;
letterCounts[letter]++;
}
for (var letterCount in letterCounts) {
palindromeSum += letterCounts[letterCount] % 2;
}
return palindromeSum < 2;
}
All right - it's been a while, but as I was asked such a question in a job interview I needed to give it a try in a few lines of Python. The basic idea is that if there is an anagram that is a palindrome for even number of letters each character occurs twice (or something like 2n times, i.e. count%2==0). In addition, for an odd number of characters one character (the one in the middle) may occur only once (or an uneven number - count%2==1).
I used a set in python to get the unique characters and then simply count and break the loop once the condition cannot be fulfilled. Example code (Python3):
def is_palindrome(s):
letters = set(s)
oddc=0
fail=False
for c in letters:
if s.count(c)%2==1:
oddc = oddc+1
if oddc>0 and len(s)%2==0:
fail=True
break
elif oddc>1:
fail=True
break
return(not fail)
def is_anagram_of_palindrome(S):
L = [ 0 for _ in range(26) ]
a = ord('a')
length = 0
for s in S:
length += 1
i = ord(s) - a
L[i] = abs(L[i] - 1)
return length > 0 and sum(L) < 2 and 1 or 0
While you can detect that the given string "S" is a candidate palindrome using the given techniques, it is still not very useful. According to the implementations given,
isAnagramOfPalindrome("rrss") would return true but there is no actual palindrome because:
A palindrome is a word, phrase, number, or other sequence of symbols or elements, whose meaning may be interpreted the same way in either forward or reverse direction. (Wikipedia)
And Rssr or Srrs is not an actual word or phrase that is interpretable. Same with it's anagram. Aarrdd is not an anagram of radar because it is not interpretable.
So, the solutions given must be augmented with a heuristic check against the input to see if it's even a word, and then a verification (via the implementations given), that it is palindrome-able at all. Then there is a heuristic search through the collected buckets with n/2! permutations to search if those are ACTUALLY palindromes and not garbage. The search is only n/2! and not n! because you calculate all permutations of each repeated letter, and then you mirror those over (in addition to possibly adding the singular pivot letter) to create all possible palindromes.
I disagree that algorithm is too big of a word, because this search can be done pure recursively, or using dynamic programming (in the case of words with letters with occurrences greater than 2) and is non trivial.
Here's some code: This is same as the top answer that describes algorithm.
1 #include<iostream>
2 #include<string>
3 #include<vector>
4 #include<stack>
5
6 using namespace std;
7
8 bool fun(string in)
9 {
10 int len=in.size();
11 int myints[len ];
12
13 for(int i=0; i<len; i++)
14 {
15 myints[i]= in.at(i);
16 }
17 vector<char> input(myints, myints+len);
18 sort(input.begin(), input.end());
19
20 stack<int> ret;
21
22 for(int i=0; i<len; i++)
23 {
24 if(!ret.empty() && ret.top()==input.at(i))
25 {
26 ret.pop();
27 }
28 else{
29 ret.push(input.at(i));
30 }
31 }
32
33 return ret.size()<=1;
34
35 }
36
37 int main()
38 {
39 string input;
40 cout<<"Enter word/number"<<endl;
41 cin>>input;
42 cout<<fun(input)<<endl;
43
44 return 0;
45 }