Please consider the following code:
def a &block_a
define_method :b do |&block_b|
puts "Running in define_method"
instance_exec block_a, &block_b
end
end
a do
puts "In block A"
end
b do |&block|
puts "In block B"
instance_eval &block
end
I'd like the block given to method 'b' to be given as argument the block given to method 'a' (b being created dynamically).
However the following output/error is returned:
Running in define_method
In block B
wrong number of arguments (given 0, expected 1..3)
(repl):14:in `instance_eval'
(repl):14:in `block in <main>'
(repl):4:in `instance_exec'
(repl):4:in `block in a'
(repl):12:in `<main>'
It seems like the '&block' is nil (trying to call 'block.call' instead of 'instance_eval &block' raises 'block is nil' error). The logic seems to be good since the replacing the 'b' block argument with a string does work:
def a s
define_method :b do |&block_b|
puts "Running in define_method"
instance_exec s, &block_b
end
end
a "LOL"
b do |s|
puts "In block B"
puts s
end
Thanks for your help !
It is incredibly hard to understand what you are trying to accomplish and I am 102% positive you are overcomplicating things (read: doing it wrong.)
The issue with your code is you are lost in blocks and their parameters.
For block in b method call to be not nil, b should yield something to it, and yielding blocks is not permitted. Instead of yielding, one might explicitly call the block:
def a &block_a
define_method :b do |&block_b|
# ⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓
block_b.(&block_a)
end
end
a { puts "A" }
b { |&block| puts "B"; instance_eval &block }
other way round might be to accept a normal parameter in b, since what you pass there is block_a, which is a normal proc instance:
def a &block_a
define_method :b do |&block_b|
instance_exec block_a, &block_b
end
end
a { puts "A" }
# ⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓
b { |block| puts "B"; instance_eval &block }
Related
I have a method that prints out a numbered list, yielding to a code block to print a prefix.
arr = %w(a b c)
def print_lines(array)
array.each_with_index do |item, index|
prefix = yield index
puts "#{prefix} #{item}"
end
end
print_lines(arr) do |index|
"(#{index})"
end
This produces the following output:
(0) a
(1) b
(2) c
Now I want to wrap print_lines in another method and call it.
def print_lines_wrapped(array)
puts 'print_lines_wrapped'
print_lines(array)
end
print_lines_wrapped(arr) do |index|
"(#{index})"
end
However, this gives me a LocalJumpError
test_yield.rb:5:in `block in print_lines': no block given (yield) (LocalJumpError)
from test_yield.rb:4:in `each'
from test_yield.rb:4:in `each_with_index'
from test_yield.rb:4:in `print_lines'
from test_yield.rb:16:in `print_lines_wrapped'
from test_yield.rb:19:in `<main>'
Why do I get a LocalJumpError?
How can I implement print_lines_wrapped such that I can call it like this:
print_lines_wrapped(arr) do |index|
"(#{index})"
end
and get the following output:
print_lines_wrapped
(0) a
(1) b
(2) c
?
Your wrapper method also has to accept a block and pass it to the wrapped method. There is no implicit passing of the block:
def print_lines_wrapped(array, &block)
puts 'print_lines_wrapped'
print_lines(array, &block)
end
Example:
def asdf(&block) puts yield(2) end
def qwer(&block)
puts "I am going to call asdf"
asdf &block
end
asdf { |x| x * 3 }
6
=> nil
qwer { |x| x * 5 }
I am going to call asdf
10
=> nil
The & operator converts its operand into a block if possible
qwer &Proc.new { |x| x * 2 }
I am going to call asdf
4
I'm currently doing second week assignment 1 from this metaprogramming tutorial
and have some problems with sending block for using it with define_method. The program simply doesn't see the block, returning false when I call block_given? even though I provide a block.
Here's the file that sends the block:
require_relative 'dog'
lassie, fido, stimpy = %w[Lassie Fido Stimpy].collect{|name| Dog.new(name)}
lassie.can :dance, :poo, :laugh
fido.can :poo
stimpy.can :dance
stimpy.can(:cry){"#{name} cried AHHHH"} # the block that I can't receive
puts lassie.name
p lassie.dance
p lassie.poo
p lassie.laugh
puts
p fido.dance
p fido.poo
p fido.laugh
puts
p stimpy.dance
p stimpy.poo
p stimpy.laugh
p stimpy.cry # method call
And the file that receives:
Dog = Class.new do
MESSAGES = { dance: "is dancing", poo: "is a smelly doggy!", laugh: "finds this hilarious" }
define_method :initialize do |name|
instance_variable_set(:#name, name)
end
define_method :name do
instance_variable_get :#name
end
define_method :can do |*args, &block|
puts block_given? # false
if block_given?
define_method args.to_sym do
yield
end
else
args.each do |ability|
self.class.instance_eval do
define_method "#{ability}".to_sym do
#name + " " + MESSAGES[ability]
end
end
end
end
end
define_method :method_missing do |arg|
puts "#{#name} doesn't understand #{arg}"
end
end
I believe (but haven't checked) block_given? refers to a block being passed to the method defined by the closest lexically enclosing method definition, i.e. def, and does not work inside methods defined with define_method.
I know for a fact that yield only yields to a block being passed to the method defined by the closest lexically enclosing method definition, i.e. def, and does not yield from a block (which, after all, define_method is, it's just a method like any other method which takes a block, and just like any other taking a block, yield yields to the block of the method, not some other block).
It's kind of strange to combine yield and block_given? with explicitly named block-Procs anyway. If you have the name, there is no need for anonymity, you can just say
if block
define_method(args.to_sym) do block.() end
end
Or did you mean to pass the block to define_method to be used as the implementation of the method? Then it would be
if block
define_method(args.to_sym, &block)
end
Not sure if you can pass arguments and block to something that just gets defined. read this
define_method(symbol, method) → symbol
define_method(symbol) { block } → symbol
Instead of define_method :can do |*args, &block| try the explicit def can(*args, &block)
It's weird to do it like that anyway..
I'm currently working on an interface that allows me to wrap arbitrary method calls with a chain of procs. Without going into too much detail, I currently have an interface that accepts something like this:
class Spy
def initialize
#procs = []
end
def wrap(&block)
#procs << block
end
def execute
original_proc = Proc.new { call_original }
#procs.reduce(original_proc) do |memo, p|
Proc.new { p.call &memo }
end.call
end
def call_original
puts 'in the middle'
end
end
spy = Spy.new
spy.wrap do |&block|
puts 'hello'
block.call
end
spy.wrap do |&block|
block.call
puts 'goodbye'
end
spy.execute
What I'd like to do though is remove the |&block| and block.call from my API and use yield instead.
spy.wrap do
puts 'hello'
yield
end
This didn't work and raised a LocalJumpError: no block given (yield) error.
I've also tried creating methods by passing the proc the define_singleton_method in the reduce, but I haven't had any luck.
def execute
original_proc = Proc.new { call_original }
#procs.reduce(original_proc) do |memo, p|
define_singleton_method :hello, &p
Proc.new { singleton_method(:hello).call(&memo) }
end.call
end
Is there another approach I can use? Is there anyway to yield from a Proc or use the Proc to initialize something that can be yielded to?
Using yield in your wrap block does not make much sense unless you passed a block to the caller itself:
def foo
spy.wrap do
puts "executed in wrap from foo"
yield
end
end
If you call foo without a block it will raise the exception since yield can't find a block to execute. But if you pass a block to foo method then it will be invoked:
foo do
puts "foo block"
end
Will output
executed in wrap from foo
foo block
In conclusion I think you misunderstood how yield works and I don't think it is what you want to achieve here.
As we know, wo can pass a method to a iterator method by a &: prefix.
For example:
["a", "b"].map(&:upcase) #=> ["A", "B"]
def rettwo
2
end
["a", "b"].map(&:rettwo) #=> [2, 2]
Here is the problem, when I write a method, pass a method with &: prefix to it, I got a error message: "ArgumentError: no receiver given".
Let me show the code:
def a_simple_method &proc
puts proc.class # it shows `Proc`
proc.call
end
def a_iterator_method
puts yield
end
a_simple_method &:rettwo #=> ArgumentError: no receiver given
a_iterator_method &:rettwo #=> ArgumentError: no receiver given
What do I missing, How the map like method of Array handle it
Here's what works. Explanation below.
class String
def rettwo
self + self
end
end
def a_simple_method &proc
proc.call('a')
end
def a_iterator_method
yield 'b'
end
a_simple_method(&:rettwo) # => "aa"
a_iterator_method(&:rettwo) # => "bb"
The &: construct is called Symbol#to_proc. It turns symbol into a proc. This proc expects a receiver as a first argument. The remaining arguments are used to call the proc. You're not passing any arguments, hence the "receiver not given" error.
Here's a demonstration of additional arguments:
class String
def say name
"#{self} #{name}"
end
end
def a_simple_method &proc
proc.call('hello', 'ruby')
end
a_simple_method(&:say) # => "hello ruby"
Here's a definition of Symbol#to_proc from some blog post from 2008. Modern Symbol#to_proc seems to be implemented in C, but this can still help the understanding.
class Symbol
def to_proc
Proc.new { |*args| args.shift.__send__(self, *args) }
end
end
Assuming I have the following proc:
a = Proc.new do
puts "start"
yield
puts "end"
end
Also assuming I pass a to another method which subsequently calls instance_eval on another class with that block, how can I now pass a block onto the end of that method which gets yielded in a.
For example:
def do_something(a,&b)
AnotherClass.instance_eval(&a) # how can I pass b to a here?
end
a = Proc.new do
puts "start"
yield
puts "end"
end
do_something(a) do
puts "this block is b!"
end
Output should of course should be:
start
this block is b!
end
How can I pass the secondary block to a in the instance_eval?
I need something like this for the basis of a Ruby templating system I'm working on.
You can't use yield in a. Rather, you have to pass a Proc object. This would be the new code:
def do_something(a,&b)
AnotherClass.instance_exec(b, &a)
end
a = Proc.new do |b|
puts "start"
b.call
puts "end"
end
do_something(a) do
puts "this block is b!"
end
yield is only for methods. In this new code, I used instance_exec (new in Ruby 1.9) which allows you to pass parameters to the block. Because of that, we can pass the Proc object b as a parameter to a, which can call it with Proc#call().
a=Proc.new do |b|
puts "start"
b.call
puts "end"
end
def do_something(a,&b)
AnotherClass.instance_eval { a.call(b) }
end