I have a problem using Spring WebFlux. Actually my project is composed by
Api wrapper ( basically code that uses WebClient to call a remote service)
private final BinanceServerTimeApi binanceServerTimeApi;
private final WebClient webClient;
#Value("${binance.api.secret}")
private String secret;
#Autowired
public BinanceAccountApi(#Value("${binance.api.baseurl}") String baseUrl,
#Value("${binance.api.key}") String key,
BinanceServerTimeApi binanceServerTimeApi) {
this.binanceServerTimeApi = binanceServerTimeApi;
this.webClient = WebClient.builder()
.baseUrl(baseUrl)
.defaultHeader("X-MBX-APIKEY",key)
.build();
}
public Mono<AccountInformation> getAccountInformation() {
Mono<ResponseServerTime> responseServerTime = binanceServerTimeApi.getServerTime();
String apiEndpoint = "api/v3/account?";
String queryParams = "recvWindow=50000×tamp=" + responseServerTime.block().getServerTime();
String signature = HmacSHA256Signer.sign(queryParams, secret);
String payload = apiEndpoint+queryParams+"&signature="+signature;
log.info("final url for getAccountInformation is {}", payload);
return this.webClient.get().uri(payload).accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.retrieve().bodyToMono(AccountInformation.class).log();
}
the endpoint used by my javascript client
#Autowired
private BinanceAccountApi binanceAccountApi;
public Mono<ServerResponse> getAccountPortfolio(ServerRequest request) {
return binanceAccountApi.getAccountInformation()
.flatMap(accountInformation -> ServerResponse.ok()
.contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.body(fromObject(accountInformation))).log();
}
Here my main class
#Bean
public RouterFunction<ServerResponse> route(AccountHandler handler) {
return RouterFunctions .route(GET("/route/accountInformation").and(accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)),handler::getAccountPortfolio);
}
When I hit a get to this route /route/accountInformation, the first call works fine but the others call are pending (the server never sends the response).
Note that the first call to the endpoint lasts for 2000 ms.
This is my first approach to the WebFlux project and I am trying to figure out how it works.
Without more information it's hard to tell what's happening (the output of your log operator should help here). But using the block operator right in the middle of your handler is suspicious; by doing that, you might be blocking one of the few server threads.
Try something like:
return binanceServerTimeApi.getServerTime().flatMap(responseServerTime -> {
// ...
return this.webClient.get().uri(payload).accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.retrieve().bodyToMono(AccountInformation.class).log();
});
This will chain operations in a non-blocking way. If the situation doesn't improve after that, try adding a few log operators to understand where time is spent.
Related
In my project I have a requirement where I need to call a third party api authentic url to get the the access token. I need to set that access token in every subsequent request header .The access token has some lifetime and when the lifetime expired I need to regenerate the access token.
application.yml
I have hardcoded the client_id,client_secret,auth_url and grant_type .
AuthController.java
here I have created an endpoint to generate the access token.
**`AuthService.java`**
#Services
#Slf4j
public class AuthService{
#Autowired
private WebClient webClient;
static String accessToken="";
public Mono<SeekResponse> getAccessToken(AuthRequest authRequest) throws InvalidTokenException{
Mono<AuthResponse> authResponse=webClient.post()
.bodyValue(authRequest)
.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.retrive()
.bodyToMono(AuthResponse.class);
authResponse.doOnNext(response->{
String value=response.getAccess_token();
accessToken=accessToken+value;
})
}
}
Although I have updated the "accessToken" value but it will return me null. I understand as I have made async call this value coming as null. I can't use blocking mechanism here.
Is there any other way to generate the access token and pass it as a header for the subsequent request for authentication. Or how can I use the accessToken value globally so that I can set those token value to my subsequent api request call.
I have tried with oAuth2 by following the below article:
https://medium.com/#asce4s/oauth2-with-spring-webclient-761d16f89cdd
But when I execute I am getting the below error :
"An expected CSRF token cannot found".
I'm also learning Webflux. Here's my thought. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
We are not going to rely on doOnNext() nor doOnSuccess() nor other similar method to try to work on an pre-defined variable accessToken (That's not a way to let Mono flow). What we should focus on is converting a mono to another mono, for example converting mono response to mono access token.
The way to do that is .flatmap()/.map()/.zipwith()/...
For example,
Mono<string> tokenMono = responseMono.flatmap(
// in the map or flatmap, we get the chance to operate on variables/objects.
resp -> {
string token = response.getAccess_token();
return Mono.just(token); // with Mono.just(), we are able to convert object to Mono again.
}
) // this example is not practical, as map() is better to do the same thing. flatmap with Mono.just() is meaningless here.
Mono<string> tokenMono2 = responseMono.map(
resp -> {
string token = response.getAccess_token();
return token;
}
)
Everything starting from Mono should be always Mono until subscribed or blocked. And they provide us ways to operate on those variables inside Mono<variables>. Those are map() flatmap(), zipwith(), etc.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/60105107/18412317
Referring to a point this author said, doOnNext() is for side effect such as logging.
It's hard to understand provided sample and implementation is not really reactive. The method returns Mono but at the same time throws InvalidTokenException or usage of onNext that is a so-called side-effect operation that should be used for logging, metrics, or other similar use cases.
The way you implement oauth flow for WebClient is to create filter, Client Filters.
Spring Security provides some boilerplates for common oauth flows. Check Spring Security OAuth2 for more details.
Here is an example of simple implementation of the client credential provider
private ServerOAuth2AuthorizedClientExchangeFilterFunction oauth(String clientRegistrationId, ClientConfig config) {
var clientRegistration = ClientRegistration
.withRegistrationId(clientRegistrationId)
.tokenUri(config.getAuthUrl() + "/token")
.clientId(config.getClientId())
.clientSecret(config.getClientSecret())
.authorizationGrantType(AuthorizationGrantType.CLIENT_CREDENTIALS)
.build();
var authRepository = new InMemoryReactiveClientRegistrationRepository(clientRegistration);
var authClientService = new InMemoryReactiveOAuth2AuthorizedClientService(authRepository);
var authClientManager = new AuthorizedClientServiceReactiveOAuth2AuthorizedClientManager(
authRepository, authClientService);
var oauth = new ServerOAuth2AuthorizedClientExchangeFilterFunction(authClientManager);
oauth.setDefaultClientRegistrationId(clientRegistrationId);
return oauth;
}
then you could use it in the WebClient
WebClient.builder()
.filter(oauth)
.build()
UPDATE
Here is an example of the alternative method without filters
AuthService
#Service
public class AuthService {
private final WebClient webClient;
public AuthService() {
this.webClient = WebClient.create("<url>/token");
}
public Mono<String> getAccessToken() {
return webClient.post()
.bodyValue()
.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(AuthResponse.class)
.map(res -> res.getAccessToken());
}
}
ApiService
#Service
public class ApiService {
private final WebClient webClient;
private final Mono<String> requestToken;
public ApiService(AuthService authService) {
this.webClient = WebClient.create("<url>/api");
// cache for token expiration
this.requestToken = authService.getAccessToken().cache(Duration.ofMinutes(10));
}
public Mono<String> request() {
return requestToken
.flatMap(token ->
webClient.get()
.header(HttpHeaders.AUTHORIZATION, "Bearer " + token)
.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(String.class)
);
}
}
i'm trying to send a POST request with body data as described here: https://scrapyrt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api.html#post.
Here's what i've tried to do but it gives me HTTP code 500
String uri = "http://localhost:3000";
WebClient webClient = WebClient.builder()
.baseUrl(uri)
.build();
LinkedMultiValueMap map = new LinkedMultiValueMap();
String q = "\"url\": \"https://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence\",\"meta\":{\"latestDate\" : \"18-05-2020\"}}";
map.add("request", q);
map.add("spider_name", "blog");
BodyInserter<MultiValueMap<String, Object>, ClientHttpRequest> inserter2
= BodyInserters.fromMultipartData(map);
Mono<ItemsList> result = webClient.post()
.uri(uriBuilder -> uriBuilder
.path("/crawl.json")
.build())
.body(inserter2)
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(ItemsList.class);
ItemsList tempItems = result.block();
Here's what i've tried to do but it gives me HTTP code 500
Most likely because you're sending the wrong data in a mixture of wrong formats with the wrong type:
You're using multipart form data, not JSON
You're then setting the request parameter as a JSON string (q)
The JSON string you're using in q isn't even valid (it's at least missing an opening curly brace) - and handwriting JSON is almost universally a bad idea, leverage a framework to do it for you instead.
Instead, the normal thing to do would be to create a POJO structure that maps to your request, so:
public class CrawlRequest {
private CrawlInnerRequest request;
#JsonProperty("spider_name")
private String spiderName;
//....add the getters / setters
}
public class CrawlInnerRequest {
private String url;
private String callback;
#JsonProperty("dont_filter")
private String dontFilter;
//....add the getters / setters
}
...then simply create a CrawlRequest, set the values as you wish, then in your post call use:
.body(BodyInserters.fromValue(crawlRequest))
This is a rather fundamental, basic part of using a WebClient. I'd suggest reading around more widely to give yourself a better understanding of the fundamentals, it will help tremendously in the long run.
For me following code worked:
public String wcPost(){
Map<String, String> bodyMap = new HashMap();
bodyMap.put("key1","value1");
WebClient client = WebClient.builder()
.baseUrl("domainURL")
.build();
String responseSpec = client.post()
.uri("URI")
.headers(h -> h.setBearerAuth("token if any"))
.body(BodyInserters.fromValue(bodyMap))
.exchange()
.flatMap(clientResponse -> {
if (clientResponse.statusCode().is5xxServerError()) {
clientResponse.body((clientHttpResponse, context) -> {
return clientHttpResponse.getBody();
});
return clientResponse.bodyToMono(String.class);
}
else
return clientResponse.bodyToMono(String.class);
})
.block();
return responseSpec;
}
I'm trying to replace a resttemplate implementation with a webclient one. The tricky stuff here is that I need to modify a property from an input object, when the response resolves. I don't find the way to achieve it...
This is the resttemplate code:
public Instance login(final Instance instancia, final LoginDTO dto) {
String url = instancia.getBalancer() + API_AUTHENTICATE_PATH;
HttpEntity<LoginDTO> request = generateRequest(dto);
ResponseEntity<JWTToken> token = restTemplate.postForEntity(url, request, JWTToken.class);
instancia.setToken(token.getBody().getIdToken());
return instancia;
}
And this is what I have until now:
#Override
public Mono<Instance> login(Instance instancia, LoginDTO dto) {
Mono<JWTToken> monoToken=webClient.post().uri(url).body((BodyInserters.fromObject(dto))).retrieve()
.bodyToMono(JWTToken.class);
return {....};
}
I'm stucked in that part, because I don't find the way to alter the Instance object...
And there is another point: This is injected in another class, because I need to run this request in parallel against multiple targets. So, a block call is not enough.
Does someone have an idea about how to do it?
Thanks a lot in advance!
It can be achieved easily as following:
#Override
public Mono<Instance> login(Instance instancia, LoginDTO dto) {
return webClient
.post()
.uri(url)
.body((BodyInserters.fromObject(dto)))
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(JWTToken.class)
.map(token -> {
instancia.setToken(token.getBody().getIdToken());
return instancia;
});
}
I'm developing REST service which, in turn, will query slow legacy system so response time will be measured in seconds. We also expect massive load so I was thinking about asynchronous/non-blocking approaches to avoid hundreds of "servlet" threads blocked on calls to slow system.
As I see this can be implemented using AsyncContext which is present in new servlet API specs. I even developed small prototype and it seems to be working.
On the other hand it looks like I can achieve the same using Spring WebFlux.
Unfortunately I did not find any example where custom "backend" calls are wrapped with Mono/Flux. Most of the examples just reuse already-prepared reactive connectors, like ReactiveCassandraOperations.java, etc.
My data flow is the following:
JS client --> Spring RestController --> send request to Kafka topic --> read response from Kafka reply topic --> return data to client
Can I wrap Kafka steps into Mono/Flux and how to do this?
How my RestController method should look like?
Here is my simple implementation which achieves the same using Servlet 3.1 API
//took the idea from some Jetty examples
public class AsyncRestServlet extends HttpServlet {
...
#Override
protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse resp) throws ServletException, IOException {
String result = (String) req.getAttribute(RESULTS_ATTR);
if (result == null) { //data not ready yet: schedule async processing
final AsyncContext async = req.startAsync();
//generate some unique request ID
String uid = "req-" + String.valueOf(req.hashCode());
//share it to Kafka receive together with AsyncContext
//when Kafka receiver will get the response it will put it in Servlet request attribute and call async.dispatch()
//This doGet() method will be called again and it will send the response to client
receiver.rememberKey(uid, async);
//send request to Kafka
sender.send(uid, param);
//data is not ready yet so we are releasing Servlet thread
return;
}
//return result as html response
resp.setContentType("text/html");
PrintWriter out = resp.getWriter();
out.println(result);
out.close();
}
Here's a short example - Not the WebFlux client you probably had in mind, but at least it would enable you to utilize Flux and Mono for asynchronous processing, which I interpreted to be the point of your question. The web objects should work without additional configurations, but of course you will need to configure Kafka as the KafkaTemplate object will not work on its own.
#Bean // Using org.springframework.web.reactive.function.server.RouterFunction<ServerResponse>
public RouterFunction<ServerResponse> sendMessageToTopic(KafkaController kafkaController){
return RouterFunctions.route(RequestPredicates.POST("/endpoint"), kafkaController::sendMessage);
}
#Component
public class ResponseHandler {
public getServerResponse() {
return ServerResponse.ok().body(Mono.just(Status.SUCCESS), String.class);
}
}
#Component
public class KafkaController {
public Mono<ServerResponse> auditInvalidTransaction(ServerRequest request) {
return request.bodyToMono(TopicMsgMap.class)
// your HTTP call may not return immediately without this
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.single()) // for a single worker thread
.flatMap(topicMsgMap -> {
MyKafkaPublisher.sendMessages(topicMsgMap);
}.flatMap(responseHandler::getServerResponse);
}
}
#Data // model class just to easily convert the ServerRequest (from json, for ex.)
// + ~#constructors
public class TopicMsgMap() {
private Map<String, String> topicMsgMap;
}
#Service // Using org.springframework.kafka.core.KafkaTemplate<String, String>
public class MyKafkaPublisher {
#Autowired
private KafkaTemplate<String, String> template;
#Value("${topic1}")
private String topic1;
#Value("${topic2}")
private String topic2;
public void sendMessages(Map<String, String> topicMsgMap){
topicMsgMap.forEach((top, msg) -> {
if (topic.equals("topic1") kafkaTemplate.send(topic1, message);
if (topic.equals("topic2") kafkaTemplate.send(topic2, message);
});
}
}
Guessing this isn't the use-case you had in mind, but hope you find this general structure useful.
There is several approaches including KafkaReplyingRestTemplate for this problem but continuing your approach in servlet api's the solution will be something like this in spring Webflux.
Your Controller method looks like this:
#RequestMapping(path = "/completable-future", method = RequestMethod.POST)
Mono<Response> asyncTransaction(#RequestBody RequestDto requestDto, #RequestHeader Map<String, String> requestHeaders) {
String internalTransactionId = UUID.randomUUID().toString();
kafkaSender.send(Request.builder()
.transactionId(requestHeaders.get("transactionId"))
.internalTransactionId(internalTransactionId)
.sourceIban(requestDto.getSourceIban())
.destIban(requestDto.getDestIban())
.build());
CompletableFuture<Response> completableFuture = new CompletableFuture();
taskHolder.pushTask(completableFuture, internalTransactionId);
return Mono.fromFuture(completableFuture);
}
Your taskHolder component will be something like this:
#Component
public class TaskHolder {
private Map<String, CompletableFuture> taskHolder = new ConcurrentHashMap();
public void pushTask(CompletableFuture<Response> task, String transactionId) {
this.taskHolder.put(transactionId, task);
}
public Optional<CompletableFuture> remove(String transactionId) {
return Optional.ofNullable(this.taskHolder.remove(transactionId));
}
}
And finally your Kafka ResponseListener looks like this:
#Component
public class ResponseListener {
#Autowired
TaskHolder taskHolder;
#KafkaListener(topics = "reactive-response-topic", groupId = "test")
public void listen(Response response) {
taskHolder.remove(response.getInternalTransactionId()).orElse(
new CompletableFuture()).complete(response);
}
}
In this example I used internalTransactionId as CorrelationId but you can use "kafka_correlationId" that is a known kafka header.
Hello I am testing Jersey Client 1.19 version using JUnit and Mockito. I am struggling on getting or reading the entity. I don't know how to proceed from there and i am also getting IllegalStateException.
Below is the code that i am using to create mock objects for client response.
public class MockJerseyClient {
private ClientConfiguration clientConfig;
private Client client;
private WebTarget webTarget;
private Invocation.Builder invocationBuilder;
private Response response;
private RetrieveBillingResponseXMLReader xmlReader;
private ResponseBuilder responseBuilder;
public MockJerseyClient(String uri, int status, String contentType, String content) {
// Mock Objects
clientConfig = Mockito.mock(ClientConfiguration.class);
client = Mockito.mock(Client.class);
clientConfig.createClient();
webTarget = Mockito.mock(WebTarget.class);
clientConfig.createWebResource(uri);
invocationBuilder = Mockito.mock(Invocation.Builder.class);
xmlReader = new RetrieveBillingResponseXMLReader();
responseBuilder = Response.accepted();
response = responseBuilder.build();
// Rule for Client...
Mockito.when(client.target(uri)).thenReturn(webTarget);
// Rule for ClientConfiguration...
Mockito.when(clientConfig.createWebResource(Mockito.anyString())).thenReturn(webTarget);
// Rules for WebTarget...
Mockito.when(webTarget.path(Mockito.anyString())).thenReturn(webTarget);
Mockito.when(webTarget.register(xmlReader.getClass())).thenReturn(webTarget);
Mockito.when(webTarget.queryParam(Mockito.anyString(), Mockito.anyObject())).thenReturn(webTarget);
Mockito.when(webTarget.request()).thenReturn(invocationBuilder);
// Rules for Invocation.Builder...
Mockito.when(invocationBuilder.header(Mockito.anyString(), Mockito.anyObject())).thenReturn(invocationBuilder);
Mockito.when(invocationBuilder.accept(Mockito.anyString())).thenReturn(invocationBuilder);
Mockito.when(invocationBuilder.get(Response.class)).thenReturn(response);
Mockito.when(response.readEntity(String.class)).thenReturn(content);
// String entity = response.readEntity(String.class);
response.close();
} // end of constructor...
public ClientConfiguration getClientConfiguration() {
return clientConfig;
} // end of method...
If someone could help me how to read the entity based on different content types.
Thanks
Tests like this are extremely brittle, as they are too low-level... and in this case you don't assert a lot of things, so you're not testing good enough. It's generally better not to repeat the calls you'll have to make in your client, but instead mock the resource you want to access.
An easy way to do so, is to use a DropwizardClientRule. There's an example in the tests.