I am currently paying for a hobby heroku plan and I have already deployed an application, is it possible to have another application (different code and database) running in the same server as mine?
You can run as many Heroku apps as you want in your account. However, you need to configure each app to use either free or paid dynos, add-ons etc. independently.
So if you have a second app with different code and DB, you need to provision it separately with either free or paid plans. It will have its own URL, and will incur its own charges.
Related
I'm using Heroku's Pipeline feature to manage the stages of my application. I received an email about Heroku getting rid of their free plans, so I went ahead and upgraded my plan just now. Currently, I have one app with two database add-ons in Heroku. This is the first time that I've used their Pipeline feature—and I'm by no means a Heroku expert. I have two questions:
Do I need to purchase dynos for every new app that I use Heroku for? The plan that I ended up purchasing was the Production plan (since the app is for a client), and I also purchased two psql database add-ons which are attached to the app.
Since I'm using their pipeline for my one app, I have staging and prod versions of the app assigned to their appropriate branches in the repo. The prod app is where I upgraded to the paid plan. Do I need to purchase any dynos or add-ons for the staging app within the Pipeline? I was able to attach the databases with no issue, but I purchased a dyno for the staging app just to be safe.
Feel free to share any of your favorite Heroku alternatives as well—I'm only using Heroku because that's what I learned how to use in school.
Fellow Heroku user here!
Do I need to purchase dynos for every new app that I use Heroku for?
Yes. Heroku have basically said they’re getting rid of free plans for all applications due to wanting to make more money security reasons. So staging apps will also fall under this.
Basically, it sounds like there’s going to be no free tier dynos or first party add-ons from Heroku going forward. They do suggest for non-production apps (like testing and staging apps) to turn your dynos on when in use, and off when not in use, and you’ll only be billed for the time the dyno is on.
I‘m not sure which plan is the Production plan (I couldn’t see it on the pricing page) but maybe try out Hobby first. I have multiple apps running with paid Hobby-tier dynos and they have ran just fine without really spiking the CPU or memory available in those dynos. But I’m running PHP apps, so your milage may vary if you’re using another tech stack, or do get more load than my apps.
I have $161 platform credits on heroku from GitHub student pack to spend for one hobby dyno:
The Heroku offer is for one (1) free Hobby Dyno for two years, which will be applied on your invoice as a discount of $7 for a Hobby Dyno.
I already deployed one spring app and changed its dyno to hobby. My question is if there is a way I could deploy second Java app and set it to use the same dyno which is assigned for the first app?
Right now I have one app which has hobby dyno and one app which uses free dyno. I read on the internet and people say that there is only one app allowed for one dyno and Heroku will charge me for the second one but there is also this thread How many apps are allowed on a 'Hobby' Heroku plan? which says that I can have more than one app per hobby dyno.
So what's the truth?
No, you can't run multiple apps on a single dyno.
Heroku's model is to run one app per dyno (and often many dynos for a single app). The question you reference discussed the Hobby plan¹, asking how many dynos can be run per account. Keep in mind that Heroku's model is different from the shared or VPS hosting you might be used to. Dynos don't provide an OS that you can put apps onto; they run apps directly.
¹Technically I don't think this makes a ton of sense since accounts don't have these kinds of tiers. One account can run free dynos, hobby dynos, and professional dynos. But there is a difference between unverified accounts, which can run up to five free dynos, and verified accounts which can run many more.
According to this article on the heroku page it is possible but not recommended.
Heroku post
I'm just starting with Heroku, and I'm considering using it to host my app.
The problem is, I'm planning to build my app with a micro services architecture.
As I understand Heroku's pricing, they charge per dyno. When using micro services, there are a bunch of "apps" or "services" working together to provide the functionality of one app.
It seems inevitable to do this without using multiple dynos, and by adding dynos, the price goes up very quickly.
I have three questions:
Is my interpretation of Heroku's pricing correct?
Is there a better way to do a micro services architecture using Heroku?
Or, is there a way to deploy multiple docker containers on a single dyno?
Your Heroku costs will definitely go up as you use more dynos and more apps, but if you are just starting out, the money you spend will be in no way more than the time you would spend setting up something like AWS to perform the same functionality.
You can always save money later, once your app is running and users are loving it. If you goal is to prototype and get it out fast, Heroku is still the best choice.
Did you know about Heroku price calculator?
Saw you run 10*1x dynos, plus some other services, like text messages and such. That will cost you $250-350 this month. That's a lot, sure. But you can get your app running tomorrow, and presumably that is worth a lot more than 250.
I am creating a SaaS application and I plan to commercialise it. I want to know whether shared hosting will suffice or should I go in for a cloud hosting? I see that cloud hosting is very expensive and being a startup we cannot afford a high cost. Following we plan to do:
1) Run a cron job to backup the dbs every 6 hours.
2) Dynamically create a db and use it.
3) Send automated emails to the users.
4) Deploy a payment gateway.
Main thing would be that we will be executing lot of mysql queries. Max. traffic I anticipate for next 1 year is 10,000 per month.
I was thinking about business plan from hostgator for the SaaS app.
Any guidance will be appreciated.
We will be going with cloud (pagodabox.com).
Regular, non-cloud web hosting should suffice. There are a lot of successful e-commerce sites based on PHP, which use payment gateways, cron jobs, email marketing, etc.
Cloud hosting is much more expensive.
I just started learning Ruby on rails and I was wondering what Heroku really is? I know that its a cloud that helps us to avoid using servers? When do we actually use it?
Heroku is a cloud platform as a service. That means you do not have to worry about infrastructure; you just focus on your application.
In addition to what Jonny said, there are a few features of Heroku:
Instant Deployment with Git push - build of your application is performed by Heroku using your build scripts
Plenty of Add-on resources (applications, databases etc.)
Processes scaling - independent scaling for each component of your app without affecting functionality and performance
Isolation - each process (aka dyno) is completely isolated from each other
Full Logging and Visibility - easy access to all logging output from every component of your app and each process (dyno)
Heroku provides very well written tutorial which allows you to start in minutes. Also they provide first 750 computation hours free of charge which means you can have one processes (aka Dyno) at no cost. Also performance is very good e.g. simple web application written in node.js can handle around 60 - 70 requests per second.
Heroku competitors are:
OpenShift by Red Hat
Windows Azure
Amazon Web Services
Google App Engine
VMware
HP Cloud Services
Force.com
It's a cloud-based, scalable server solution that allows you to easily manage the deployment of your Rails (or other) applications provided you subscribe to a number of conventions (e.g. Postgres as the database, no writing to the filesystem).
Thus you can easily scale as your application grows by bettering your database and increasing the number of dynos (Rails instances) and workers.
It doesn't help you avoid using servers, you will need some understanding of server management to effectively debug problems with your platform/app combination. However, while it is comparatively expensive (i.e. per instance when compared to renting a slice on Slicehost or something), there is a free account and it's a rough trade off between whether it's more cost effective to pay someone to build your own solution or take the extra expense.
Heroku Basically provides with webspace to upload your app
If you are uploading a Rails app then you can follow this tutorial
https://github.com/mrkushjain/herokuapp
As I see it, it is a scalable administrated web hosting service, ready to grow in any sense so you don't have to worry about it.
It's not useful for a normal PHP web application, because there are plenty of web hosting services with ftp over there for a simple web without scalability needs, but if you need something bigger Heroku or something similar is what you need.
It is exposed as a service via a command line tool so you can write scripts to automate your deployments. Anyway it is pretty similar to other web hosting services with Git enabled, but Heroku makes it simpler.
That's its thing, to make the administration stuff simpler to you, so it saves you time. But I'm not sure, as I'm just starting with it!
A nice introduction of how it works in the official documentation is:
https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/how-heroku-works
Per DZone: https://dzone.com/articles/heroku-or-amazon-web-services-which-is-best-for-your-startup
Heroku is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) product based on AWS, and is vastly different from Elastic Compute Cloud. It’s very important to differentiate ‘Infrastructure as a Service’ and ‘Platform as a Service’ solutions as we consider deploying and supporting our application using these two solutions.
Heroku is way simpler to use than AWS Elastic Compute Cloud. Perhaps it’s even too simple. But there’s a good reason for this simplicity. The Heroku platform equips us with a ready runtime environment and application servers. Plus, we benefit from seamless integration with various development instruments, a pre-installed operating system, and redundant servers.
Therefore, with Heroku, we don’t need to think about infrastructure management, unlike with AWS EC2. We only need to choose a subscription plan and change our plan when necessary.
That article does a good job explaining the differences between Heroku and AWS but it looks like you can choose other iaas (infrastructure) providers other than AWS. So ultimately Heroku seems to just simplify the process of using a cloud provider but at a cost.