I am migrating a script that was just using sh to bash, the script originally looked like this:
#!/bin/sh
... a bunch of setup ...
exec "$#"
When I run the script via:
./my_script kill -l
I get a list of available signals:
HUP INT QUIT ILL TRAP ABRT BUS FPE KILL USR1 SEGV USR2 PIPE ALRM TERM STKFLT
CHLD CONT STOP TSTP TTIN TTOU URG XCPU XFSZ VTALRM PROF WINCH POLL PWR SYS
However, I want to use the bash signal names, so I thought I could simply:
#!/bin/bash
exec bash -l "$#"
The problem is now kill is not recognized:
/bin/kill: /bin/kill: cannot execute binary file
Really my script is just a wrapper around another process and I need to make sure a signal of kill -SIGTERM can be sent to it.
You need to add the -c option. Otherwise (see the ARGUMENTS section of the bash man page) "...the first argument is assumed to be the name of a file containing shell commands."
I.e.:
exec bash -lc "$*"
You are telling bash to run a file which it expects to be a bash script but it turns out to be a binary executable file.
Instead of this:
#!/bin/bash
exec bash -l "$#"
Use this:
#!/bin/bash
exec bash -c "$1"
Is there a specific reason you need option -l to run bash as a "login" shell? If not just use option -c to run the string argument.
Updated to use $1 instead of $# as it is more appropriate for a string argument as #chepner commented.
This also requires you to send the argument as a string, not a reference to the binary.
Instead of this:
./my_script kill -l
Do this:
./my_script "kill -l"
I'm having trouble with saving the PID into a variable when I'm using bash -c. For example:
bash -c "PID=$$; echo $PID"
In this case the output is empty. How to save the child PID (the PID of the command inside the double quotes) now in the variable PID
just use simple quotes or you expression is evaluated inside your current command line (too soon) and not in the child bash command, and PID isn't defined yet at this moment and you're actually passing
bash -c "PID=4353; echo"
(where 4353 is the pid of the current bash process)
Someone noted that it's not clear if you want to pass parent pid or child pid
to pass parent pid, fix it like this (only the part within double quotes is evaluated before calling bash child process):
bash -c "PID=$$; "'echo $PID'
to pass child pid, fix it like this (nothing is evaluated in the current shell, same trick used for awk scripts):
bash -c 'PID=$$; echo $PID'
set -x is useful for debugging and will show the actual command you end up running prefixed with +:
$ set -x
$ bash -c "PID=$$; echo $PID"
+ bash -c 'PID=1900; echo '
And indeed, in that command you would expect empty output. This happens because $$ and $PID are substituted before bash is called.
To avoid this, you can single quote the string or escape the "$"s:
$ set -x
$ bash -c 'PID=$$; echo $PID'
+ bash -c 'PID=$$; echo $PID'
1925
$ bash -c "PID=\$\$; echo \$PID"
+ bash -c 'PID=$$; echo $PID'
1929
Let's assume I have 3 shell scripts:
script_1.sh
#!/bin/bash
./script_3.sh
script_2.sh
#!/bin/bash
./script_3.sh
the problem is that in script_3.sh I want to know the name of the caller script.
so that I can respond differently to each caller I support
please don't assume I'm asking about $0 cause $0 will echo script_3 every time no matter who is the caller
here is an example input with expected output
./script_1.sh should echo script_1
./script_2.sh should echo script_2
./script_3.sh should echo user_name or root or anything to distinguish between the 3 cases?
Is that possible? and if possible, how can it be done?
this is going to be added to a rm modified script... so when I call rm it do something and when git or any other CLI tool use rm it is not affected by the modification
Based on #user3100381's answer, here's a much simpler command to get the same thing which I believe should be fairly portable:
PARENT_COMMAND=$(ps -o comm= $PPID)
Replace comm= with args= to get the full command line (command + arguments). The = alone is used to suppress the headers.
See: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604499/utilities/ps.html
In case you are sourceing instead of calling/executing the script there is no new process forked and thus the solutions with ps won't work reliably.
Use bash built-in caller in that case.
$ cat h.sh
#! /bin/bash
function warn_me() {
echo "$#"
caller
}
$
$ cat g.sh
#!/bin/bash
source h.sh
warn_me "Error: You did not do something"
$
$ . g.sh
Error: You did not do something
g.sh
$
Source
The $PPID variable holds the parent process ID. So you could parse the output from ps to get the command.
#!/bin/bash
PARENT_COMMAND=$(ps $PPID | tail -n 1 | awk "{print \$5}")
Based on #J.L.answer, with more in depth explanations, that works for linux :
cat /proc/$PPID/comm
gives you the name of the command of the parent pid
If you prefer the command with all options, then :
cat /proc/$PPID/cmdline
explanations :
$PPID is defined by the shell, it's the pid of the parent processes
in /proc/, you have some dirs with the pid of each process (linux). Then, if you cat /proc/$PPID/comm, you echo the command name of the PID
Check man proc
Couple of useful files things kept in /proc/$PPID here
/proc/*some_process_id*/exe A symlink to the last executed command under *some_process_id*
/proc/*some_process_id*/cmdline A file containing the last executed command under *some_process_id* and null-byte separated arguments
So a slight simplification.
sed 's/\x0/ /g' "/proc/$PPID/cmdline"
If you have /proc:
$(cat /proc/$PPID/comm)
Declare this:
PARENT_NAME=`ps -ocomm --no-header $PPID`
Thus you'll get a nice variable $PARENT_NAME that holds the parent's name.
You can simply use the command below to avoid calling cut/awk/sed:
ps --no-headers -o command $PPID
If you only want the parent and none of the subsequent processes, you can use:
ps --no-headers -o command $PPID | cut -d' ' -f1
You could pass in a variable to script_3.sh to determine how to respond...
script_1.sh
#!/bin/bash
./script_3.sh script1
script_2.sh
#!/bin/bash
./script_3.sh script2
script_3.sh
#!/bin/bash
if [ $1 == 'script1' ] ; then
echo "we were called from script1!"
elsif [ $1 == 'script2' ] ; then
echo "we were called from script2!"
fi
How can I determine the current shell I am working on?
Would the output of the ps command alone be sufficient?
How can this be done in different flavors of Unix?
There are three approaches to finding the name of the current shell's executable:
Please note that all three approaches can be fooled if the executable of the shell is /bin/sh, but it's really a renamed bash, for example (which frequently happens).
Thus your second question of whether ps output will do is answered with "not always".
echo $0 - will print the program name... which in the case of the shell is the actual shell.
ps -ef | grep $$ | grep -v grep - this will look for the current process ID in the list of running processes. Since the current process is the shell, it will be included.
This is not 100% reliable, as you might have other processes whose ps listing includes the same number as shell's process ID, especially if that ID is a small number (for example, if the shell's PID is "5", you may find processes called "java5" or "perl5" in the same grep output!). This is the second problem with the "ps" approach, on top of not being able to rely on the shell name.
echo $SHELL - The path to the current shell is stored as the SHELL variable for any shell. The caveat for this one is that if you launch a shell explicitly as a subprocess (for example, it's not your login shell), you will get your login shell's value instead. If that's a possibility, use the ps or $0 approach.
If, however, the executable doesn't match your actual shell (e.g. /bin/sh is actually bash or ksh), you need heuristics. Here are some environmental variables specific to various shells:
$version is set on tcsh
$BASH is set on bash
$shell (lowercase) is set to actual shell name in csh or tcsh
$ZSH_NAME is set on zsh
ksh has $PS3 and $PS4 set, whereas the normal Bourne shell (sh) only has $PS1 and $PS2 set. This generally seems like the hardest to distinguish - the only difference in the entire set of environment variables between sh and ksh we have installed on Solaris boxen is $ERRNO, $FCEDIT, $LINENO, $PPID, $PS3, $PS4, $RANDOM, $SECONDS, and $TMOUT.
ps -p $$
should work anywhere that the solutions involving ps -ef and grep do (on any Unix variant which supports POSIX options for ps) and will not suffer from the false positives introduced by grepping for a sequence of digits which may appear elsewhere.
Try
ps -p $$ -oargs=
or
ps -p $$ -ocomm=
If you just want to ensure the user is invoking a script with Bash:
if [ -z "$BASH" ]; then echo "Please run this script $0 with bash"; exit; fi
or ref
if [ -z "$BASH" ]; then exec bash $0 ; exit; fi
You can try:
ps | grep `echo $$` | awk '{ print $4 }'
Or:
echo $SHELL
$SHELL need not always show the current shell. It only reflects the default shell to be invoked.
To test the above, say bash is the default shell, try echo $SHELL, and then in the same terminal, get into some other shell (KornShell (ksh) for example) and try $SHELL. You will see the result as bash in both cases.
To get the name of the current shell, Use cat /proc/$$/cmdline. And the path to the shell executable by readlink /proc/$$/exe.
There are many ways to find out the shell and its corresponding version. Here are few which worked for me.
Straightforward
$> echo $0 (Gives you the program name. In my case the output was -bash.)
$> $SHELL (This takes you into the shell and in the prompt you get the shell name and version. In my case bash3.2$.)
$> echo $SHELL (This will give you executable path. In my case /bin/bash.)
$> $SHELL --version (This will give complete info about the shell software with license type)
Hackish approach
$> ******* (Type a set of random characters and in the output you will get the shell name. In my case -bash: chapter2-a-sample-isomorphic-app: command not found)
ps is the most reliable method. The SHELL environment variable is not guaranteed to be set and even if it is, it can be easily spoofed.
I have a simple trick to find the current shell. Just type a random string (which is not a command). It will fail and return a "not found" error, but at start of the line it will say which shell it is:
ksh: aaaaa: not found [No such file or directory]
bash: aaaaa: command not found
I have tried many different approaches and the best one for me is:
ps -p $$
It also works under Cygwin and cannot produce false positives as PID grepping. With some cleaning, it outputs just an executable name (under Cygwin with path):
ps -p $$ | tail -1 | awk '{print $NF}'
You can create a function so you don't have to memorize it:
# Print currently active shell
shell () {
ps -p $$ | tail -1 | awk '{print $NF}'
}
...and then just execute shell.
It was tested under Debian and Cygwin.
The following will always give the actual shell used - it gets the name of the actual executable and not the shell name (i.e. ksh93 instead of ksh, etc.). For /bin/sh, it will show the actual shell used, i.e. dash.
ls -l /proc/$$/exe | sed 's%.*/%%'
I know that there are many who say the ls output should never be processed, but what is the probability you'll have a shell you are using that is named with special characters or placed in a directory named with special characters? If this is still the case, there are plenty of other examples of doing it differently.
As pointed out by Toby Speight, this would be a more proper and cleaner way of achieving the same:
basename $(readlink /proc/$$/exe)
My variant on printing the parent process:
ps -p $$ | awk '$1 == PP {print $4}' PP=$$
Don't run unnecessary applications when AWK can do it for you.
Provided that your /bin/sh supports the POSIX standard and your system has the lsof command installed - a possible alternative to lsof could in this case be pid2path - you can also use (or adapt) the following script that prints full paths:
#!/bin/sh
# cat /usr/local/bin/cursh
set -eu
pid="$$"
set -- sh bash zsh ksh ash dash csh tcsh pdksh mksh fish psh rc scsh bournesh wish Wish login
unset echo env sed ps lsof awk getconf
# getconf _POSIX_VERSION # reliable test for availability of POSIX system?
PATH="`PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin getconf PATH`"
[ $? -ne 0 ] && { echo "'getconf PATH' failed"; exit 1; }
export PATH
cmd="lsof"
env -i PATH="${PATH}" type "$cmd" 1>/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "$cmd not found"; exit 1; }
awkstr="`echo "$#" | sed 's/\([^ ]\{1,\}\)/|\/\1/g; s/ /$/g' | sed 's/^|//; s/$/$/'`"
ppid="`env -i PATH="${PATH}" ps -p $pid -o ppid=`"
[ "${ppid}"X = ""X ] && { echo "no ppid found"; exit 1; }
lsofstr="`lsof -p $ppid`" ||
{ printf "%s\n" "lsof failed" "try: sudo lsof -p \`ps -p \$\$ -o ppid=\`"; exit 1; }
printf "%s\n" "${lsofstr}" |
LC_ALL=C awk -v var="${awkstr}" '$NF ~ var {print $NF}'
My solution:
ps -o command | grep -v -e "\<ps\>" -e grep -e tail | tail -1
This should be portable across different platforms and shells. It uses ps like other solutions, but it doesn't rely on sed or awk and filters out junk from piping and ps itself so that the shell should always be the last entry. This way we don't need to rely on non-portable PID variables or picking out the right lines and columns.
I've tested on Debian and macOS with Bash, Z shell (zsh), and fish (which doesn't work with most of these solutions without changing the expression specifically for fish, because it uses a different PID variable).
If you just want to check that you are running (a particular version of) Bash, the best way to do so is to use the $BASH_VERSINFO array variable. As a (read-only) array variable it cannot be set in the environment,
so you can be sure it is coming (if at all) from the current shell.
However, since Bash has a different behavior when invoked as sh, you do also need to check the $BASH environment variable ends with /bash.
In a script I wrote that uses function names with - (not underscore), and depends on associative arrays (added in Bash 4), I have the following sanity check (with helpful user error message):
case `eval 'echo $BASH#${BASH_VERSINFO[0]}' 2>/dev/null` in
*/bash#[456789])
# Claims bash version 4+, check for func-names and associative arrays
if ! eval "declare -A _ARRAY && func-name() { :; }" 2>/dev/null; then
echo >&2 "bash $BASH_VERSION is not supported (not really bash?)"
exit 1
fi
;;
*/bash#[123])
echo >&2 "bash $BASH_VERSION is not supported (version 4+ required)"
exit 1
;;
*)
echo >&2 "This script requires BASH (version 4+) - not regular sh"
echo >&2 "Re-run as \"bash $CMD\" for proper operation"
exit 1
;;
esac
You could omit the somewhat paranoid functional check for features in the first case, and just assume that future Bash versions would be compatible.
None of the answers worked with fish shell (it doesn't have the variables $$ or $0).
This works for me (tested on sh, bash, fish, ksh, csh, true, tcsh, and zsh; openSUSE 13.2):
ps | tail -n 4 | sed -E '2,$d;s/.* (.*)/\1/'
This command outputs a string like bash. Here I'm only using ps, tail, and sed (without GNU extesions; try to add --posix to check it). They are all standard POSIX commands. I'm sure tail can be removed, but my sed fu is not strong enough to do this.
It seems to me, that this solution is not very portable as it doesn't work on OS X. :(
echo $$ # Gives the Parent Process ID
ps -ef | grep $$ | awk '{print $8}' # Use the PID to see what the process is.
From How do you know what your current shell is?.
This is not a very clean solution, but it does what you want.
# MUST BE SOURCED..
getshell() {
local shell="`ps -p $$ | tail -1 | awk '{print $4}'`"
shells_array=(
# It is important that the shells are listed in descending order of their name length.
pdksh
bash dash mksh
zsh ksh
sh
)
local suited=false
for i in ${shells_array[*]}; do
if ! [ -z `printf $shell | grep $i` ] && ! $suited; then
shell=$i
suited=true
fi
done
echo $shell
}
getshell
Now you can use $(getshell) --version.
This works, though, only on KornShell-like shells (ksh).
Do the following to know whether your shell is using Dash/Bash.
ls –la /bin/sh:
if the result is /bin/sh -> /bin/bash ==> Then your shell is using Bash.
if the result is /bin/sh ->/bin/dash ==> Then your shell is using Dash.
If you want to change from Bash to Dash or vice-versa, use the below code:
ln -s /bin/bash /bin/sh (change shell to Bash)
Note: If the above command results in a error saying, /bin/sh already exists, remove the /bin/sh and try again.
I like Nahuel Fouilleul's solution particularly, but I had to run the following variant of it on Ubuntu 18.04 (Bionic Beaver) with the built-in Bash shell:
bash -c 'shellPID=$$; ps -ocomm= -q $shellPID'
Without the temporary variable shellPID, e.g. the following:
bash -c 'ps -ocomm= -q $$'
Would just output ps for me. Maybe you aren't all using non-interactive mode, and that makes a difference.
Get it with the $SHELL environment variable. A simple sed could remove the path:
echo $SHELL | sed -E 's/^.*\/([aA-zZ]+$)/\1/g'
Output:
bash
It was tested on macOS, Ubuntu, and CentOS.
On Mac OS X (and FreeBSD):
ps -p $$ -axco command | sed -n '$p'
Grepping PID from the output of "ps" is not needed, because you can read the respective command line for any PID from the /proc directory structure:
echo $(cat /proc/$$/cmdline)
However, that might not be any better than just simply:
echo $0
About running an actually different shell than the name indicates, one idea is to request the version from the shell using the name you got previously:
<some_shell> --version
sh seems to fail with exit code 2 while others give something useful (but I am not able to verify all since I don't have them):
$ sh --version
sh: 0: Illegal option --
echo $?
2
One way is:
ps -p $$ -o exe=
which is IMO better than using -o args or -o comm as suggested in another answer (these may use, e.g., some symbolic link like when /bin/sh points to some specific shell as Dash or Bash).
The above returns the path of the executable, but beware that due to /usr-merge, one might need to check for multiple paths (e.g., /bin/bash and /usr/bin/bash).
Also note that the above is not fully POSIX-compatible (POSIX ps doesn't have exe).
Kindly use the below command:
ps -p $$ | tail -1 | awk '{print $4}'
This one works well on Red Hat Linux (RHEL), macOS, BSD and some AIXes:
ps -T $$ | awk 'NR==2{print $NF}'
alternatively, the following one should also work if pstree is available,
pstree | egrep $$ | awk 'NR==2{print $NF}'
You can use echo $SHELL|sed "s/\/bin\///g"
And I came up with this:
sed 's/.*SHELL=//; s/[[:upper:]].*//' /proc/$$/environ
Is there any way to set the process name of a shell script? This is needed for killing this script with the killall command.
Here's a way to do it, it is a hack/workaround but it works pretty good. Feel free to tweak it to your needs, it certainly needs some checks on the symbolic link creation or using a tmp folder to avoid possible race conditions (if they are problematic in your case).
Demonstration
wrapper
#!/bin/bash
script="./dummy"
newname="./killme"
rm -iv "$newname"
ln -s "$script" "$newname"
exec "$newname" "$#"
dummy
#!/bin/bash
echo "I am $0"
echo "my params: $#"
ps aux | grep bash
echo "sleeping 10s... Kill me!"
sleep 10
Test it using:
chmod +x dummy wrapper
./wrapper some params
In another terminal, kill it using:
killall killme
Notes
Make sure you can write in your current folder (current working directory).
If your current command is:
/path/to/file -q --params somefile1 somefile2
Set the script variable in wrapper to /path/to/file (instead of ./dummy) and call wrapper like this:
./wrapper -q --params somefile1 somefile2
You can use the kill command on a PID so what you can do is run something in the background, get its ID and kill it
PID of last job run in background can be obtained using $!.
echo test & echo $!
You cannot do this reliably and portably, as far as I know. On some flavors of Unix, changing what's in argv[0] will do the job. I don't believe there's a way to do that in most shells, though.
Here are some references on the topic.
Howto change a UNIX process and child process name by modifying argv0
Is there a way to change the effective process name in Python?
This is an extremely old post. Pretty sure the original poster got his/her answer long ago. But for newcomers, thought I'd explain my own experience (after playing with bash for a half hour). If you start a script by script name w/ something like:
./script.sh
the process name listed by ps will be "bash" (on my system). However if you start a script by calling bash directly:
/bin/bash script.sh
/bin/sh script.sh
bash script.sh
you will end up with a process name that contains the name of the script. e.g.:
/bin/bash script.sh
results in a process name of the same name. This can be used to mark pids with a specific script name. And, this can be useful to (for example) use the kill command to stop all processes (by pid) that have a process name containing said script name.
You can all use the -f flag to pgrep/pkill which will search the entire command line rather than just the process name. E.g.
./script &
pkill -f script
Include
#![path to shell]
Example for path to shell -
/usr/bin/bash
/bin/bash
/bin/sh
Full example
#!/usr/bin/bash
On Linux at least, killall dvb works even though dvb is a shell script labelled with #!. The only trick is to make the script executable and invoke it by name, e.g.,
dvb watch abc write game7 from 9pm for 3:30
Running ps shows a process named
/usr/bin/lua5.1 dvb watch ...
but killall dvb takes it down.
%1, %2... also do an adequate job:
#!/bin/bash
# set -ex
sleep 101 &
FIRSTPID=$!
sleep 102 &
SECONDPID=$!
echo $(ps ax|grep "^\(${FIRSTPID}\|${SECONDPID}\) ")
kill %2
echo $(ps ax|grep "^\(${FIRSTPID}\|${SECONDPID}\) ")
sleep 1
kill %1
echo $(ps ax|grep "^\(${FIRSTPID}\|${SECONDPID}\) ")
I put these two lines at the start of my scripts so I do not have to retype the script name each time I revise the script. It won't take $0 of you put it after the first shebang. Maybe someone who actually knows can correct me but I believe this is because the script hasn't started until the second line so $0 doesn't exist until then:
#!/bin/bash
#!/bin/bash ./$0
This should do it.
My solution uses a trivial python script, and the setproctitle package. For what it's worth:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from sys import argv
from setproctitle import setproctitle
from subprocess import run
setproctitle(argv[1])
run(argv[2:])
Call it e.g. run-with-title and stick it in your path somewhere. Then use via
run-with-title <desired-title> <script-name> [<arg>...]
Run bash script with explicit call to bash (not just like ./test.sh). Process name will contain script in this case and can be found by script name. Or by explicit call to bash with full path as
suggested in display_name_11011's answer:
bash test.sh # explicit bash mentioning
/bin/bash test.sh # or with full path to bash
ps aux | grep test.sh | grep -v grep # searching PID by script name
If the first line in script (test.sh) explicitly specifies interpreter:
#!/bin/bash
echo 'test script'
then it can be called without explicit bash mentioning to create process with name '/bin/bash test.sh':
./test.sh
ps aux | grep test.sh | grep -v grep
Also as dirty workaround it is possible to copy and use bash with custom name:
sudo cp /usr/bin/bash /usr/bin/bash_with_other_name
/usr/bin/bash_with_other_name test.sh
ps aux | grep bash_with_other_name | grep -v grep
Erm... unless I'm misunderstanding the question, the name of a shell script is whatever you've named the file. If your script is named foo then killall foo will kill it.
We won't be able to find pid of the shell script using "ps -ef | grep {scriptName}" unless the name of script is overridden using shebang. Although all the running shell scripts come in response of "ps -ef | grep bash". But this will become trickier to identify the running process as there will be multiple bash processing running simultaneously.
So a better approach is to give an appropriate name to the shell script.
Edit the shell script file and use shebang (the very first line) to name the process e.g. #!/bin/bash /scriptName.sh
In this way we would be able to grep the process id of scriptName using
"ps -ef | grep {scriptName}"