Can anyone please tell me where the database tables and fields on Community Education are in the Oracle database or in ODS? I've looked through the tables and searched online and through Banner documentation but have found absolutely nothing. Thanks for you help.
I think that Community Education courses are just another academic level definition in SGHE or Ellucian Banner, therefore you will check the list of availables level from STVLEVL table.
The catalog of public courses from SCBCRSE table and join with SCRLEVL table.
The specific course by term or academic period from SSBCRSE.
The student registration course from SFRSTCR table.
Perhaps this can help you, to take a look.
Related
I just started at a company that uses MS Dynamics CRM 2016 extensively and I've been trying to run down a comprehensive answer for how the system handles tasks/cases that have been assigned to employees within my company after those employees have left the company.
It's apparently quite a large problem because the tasks/cases have been explained to me as "falling into the void" and being unfindable once the owner (ex-employee) no longer has access. Is this true?
Is there a way to confidently query all tasks/cases for employees that no longer have access if I 1) don't have a good idea of who those employees might be and 2) don't have a full list of what might have been assigned to them?
I'm still very new to MS Dynamics CRM and am not even sure where to start. I know it's possible to run queries, advanced finds, and searches. Those in my company that have explained to me the situation seem to have tried some form of these methods so far.
Any and all help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!
You should prepare the list of CRM users who left the company (if not query the disabled users and identify them), then do a house keeping by reassigning their records by going to their user profile. Read more
This is kind of an odd situation and I am pretty new to RLS so please forgive me if what I am asking about here might seem a little silly. I am trying to create Row Level Security for a School District. I have a table that has the different schools codes, employee IDs and their position. I have another table that has the employee ID for teachers and their Teacher ID along with the ID if the students they have for the current year with a separate row for each bell period.
I have tried to create a bridge table that contains the Employee ID, Teacher ID as well as the School Codes and connected it with the other two tables.
For testing purposes, I am trying to connect it to the students basic information and set security to see how to give teachers access. I feel like I am almost there but I might be missing something out in here.
Can you please tell me how to go forward from here. Thank you
I'm developing a ADF Fusion Web Application and have some problems with EntityAssociations and ViewLinks.
I have a database table Project with id, name etc. Also I have a table Technology which only contains a id and the name of the technology, for example "ADF".
The relationship between theese two entities is many-to-many. Means one project can have multiple technologies assigned and inverse a technology can be assigned to multiple projects.
This relationship is described trough a join table named Project_Technology. Columns of this table are Project_FK, Technology_FK and Effort. Project_FK and Technology_FK are a composite primary key, Effort is an additional attribute.
Can someone explain me how to map EntityObject and ViewObjects that I can access the Effort, too? "Regular" many-to-many associations aren't that hard to implement but I am really struggling with the additional attribute.
Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Edit:
I could solve my issues. See answer below for details.
I got it working.
The Problem was the composite primary key on my join tables. It seems like ADF doesn't like them. I put a extra column ID on the join tables and now I can insert values by using the CreateInsert Data Controls.
We use CRM 4.0 at our institution and have no plans to upgrade presently as we've spend the last year and a half customising and extending the CRM to work with our processes.
A tiny part of model is a simply hierarchy, we have a group of learning rooms that has a one-to-many relationship with another entity that describes the courses available for that learning room.
Another entity has a list of all potential and enrolled students who have expressed an interest in whichever course.
That bit's all straightforward and works pretty well and is modelled into 3 custom entities.
Now, we've got an Admin application that reads the rooms and then wants to show the courses for that room, but only where there are enrolled students.
In SQL this is simplified to:
SELECT DISTINCT r.CourseName, r.OtherInformation
FROM Rooms r
INNER JOIN Students S
ON S.CourseId = r.CourseId
WHERE r.RoomId = #RoomId
And this indeed is very close to the eventual SQL that CRM generates.
We use a Crm QueryEntity, a Filter and a LinkEntity to represent this same structure.
The problem now is that the CRM normalizes the a customize entity into a Base Table which has the standard CRM entity data that all share, and then an ExtensionBase Table which has our customisations. To Give a flattened access to this, it creates a view that merges both tables.
This view is what is used by the Generated SQL.
Now the base tables have indices but the view doesn't.
The problem we have is that all we want to do is return Courses where the inner join is satisfied, it's enough to prove there are entries and CRM makes it SELECT DISTINCT, so we only get one item back for Room.
At first this worked perfectly well, but now we have thousands of queries, it takes well over 30 seconds and of course causes a timeout in anything but SMS.
I'm given to believe that we can create and alter indices on tables in CRM and that's not considered to be an unsupported modification; but what about Views ?
I know that if we alter an entity then its views are recreated, which would of course make us redo our indices when this happens.
Is there any way to hint to CRM4.0 that we want a specific index in place ?
Another source recommends that where you get problems like this, then it's best to bring data closer together, but this isn't something I'd feel comfortable in trying to engineer into our solution.
I had considered putting a new entity in that only has RoomId, CourseId and Enrolment Count in to it, but that smacks of being incredibly hacky too; After all, an index would resolve the need to duplicate this data and have some kind of trigger that updates the data after every student operation.
Lastly, whilst I know we're stuck on CRM4 at the moment, is this the kind of thing that we could expect to have resolved in CRM2011 ? It would certainly add more weight to the upgrading this 5 year old product argument.
Since views are "dynamic" (conceptually, their contents are generated on-the-fly from the base tables every time they are used), they typically can't be indexed. However, SQL Server does support something called an "indexed view". You need to create a unique clustered index on the view, and the query analyzer should be able to use it to speed up your join.
Someone asked a similar question here and I see no conclusive answer. The cited concerns from Microsoft are Referential Integrity (a non-issue here) and Upgrade complications. You mention the unsupported option of adding the view and managing it over upgrades and entity changes. That is an option, as unsupported and hackish as it is, it should work.
FetchXml does have aggregation but the query execution plans still uses the views: here is the SQL generated from a simple select count from incident:
'select
top 5000 COUNT(*) as "rowcount"
, MAX("__AggLimitExceededFlag__") as "__AggregateLimitExceeded__" from (select top 50001 case when ROW_NUMBER() over(order by (SELECT 1)) > 50000 then 1 else 0 end as "__AggLimitExceededFlag__" from Incident as "incident0" ...
I dont see a supported solution for your problem.
If you are building an outside admin app and you are hosting CRM 4 on-premise you could go directly to the database for your query bypassing the CRM API. Not supported but would allow you to solve the problem.
I'm going to add this as a potential answer although I don't believe its a sustainable or indeed valid long-term solution.
After analysing the indexes that CRM had defined automatically, I realised that selecting more information in my query would be enough to fulfil the column requirements of an Index and now the query runs in less then a second.
I know EAV logic and I know what is eav_entity_attribute for. (about eav_entity_* - the same).
But I'm not clear about table eav_entity. It is always empty.
Could someone give some comments please.
I would be glad to get any assumption.
Google gives nothing on this question, as usual)
Doing a grep of the Community Edition code, the only time eav_entity is mentioned is in the config file (/app/core/code/Mage/Eav/etc/config.xml) and in the database setup files (/app/code/core/Mage/Eav/sql/eav_setup/mysql4-install-0.7.0.php).
To me this says that it was put in just before a release and then never actually used. The devs possibly decided to go with a slightly different way of storing the data...
I expected to see all records of all entities in the table eav_entity. But I see that Magento has created separate tables for each of the 8 entities ( customer, customer_address, category, product, order, invoice, shipment, creditmemo) with the following table names ( customer_entity, customer_address_entity, catalog_category_entity, catalog_product_entity, sales_flat_order, sales_flat_invoice, sales_flat_shipment, sales_flat_creditmemo). So eav_entity table is empty and you get data for entities directly from their respective tables.. Some level of de-EAVing the database design :-)