I am creating a PythonAnalyzer using the following code:
var interpreterFactory = InterpreterFactoryCreator.CreateAnalysisInterpreterFactory(
PythonLanguageVersion.V36.ToVersion());
var analyzer = PythonAnalyzer.Create(interpreterFactory);
Later on I also create and analyze a simple python module, that looks like this:
name = input('What is your name?\n')
print('Hi, %s.' % name)
Then I do module.Analysis.GetValuesByIndex("name", 4).
At this moment I expected the "value" to be 'str', because that's what Visual Studio shows when I open the same file in it. However, I get 'object' instead. So it seems that the PythonAnalyzer when constructed as mentioned above lacks some important information about where to look for standard library and/or its types.
Unfortunately, the documentation on PythonAnalyzer is lacking, so I was hoping the community could help understand how to configure it properly.
Congratulations on getting so far :)
What you're hitting here is the fact that CreateAnalysisInterpreterFactory is really intended for "pure" cases, where you have access to all the code that you're trying to analyze and nothing needs to be looked up. It is mostly used for the unit tests, or as a fallback when no copies of Python are installed. Depending on precisely which version of PTVS you are using, the bare information you're getting is either coming from DefaultDB\v3\python.pyi or CompletionDB\__builtin__.idb, both of which are somewhat lacking (by design).
Assuming you have a copy of Python installed, I would suggest creating an instance of InterpreterConfiguration with all of its details, and passing that to CreateInterpreterFactory (without "Analysis").
If you're on the latest sources (strongly recommended), this may run the interpreter in the background to collect information from it (you can control caching of this info with the DatabasePath and UseExistingCache members of InterpreterFactoryCreationOptions). If you are using the older version still, you'll need to trigger a completion DB regeneration or have one that you've created through VS.
And a final caveat: this part of PTVS is currently under some pretty heavy development at time of writing, so you'll either want to keep updating the version you're working against or stick with a slightly older one. Also feel free to post questions like this on the GitHub site, as while this is technically public API, it's barely documented at all and so the best help will come from the dev team.
Related
As an enthusiasting refactorer, there's an IntelliJ feature that I love: "Refactor --> Change signature".
Basically, you have a function and you can decide to remove a parameter or add a new one, setting a default value. This is so convenient, so beautiful, and I dearly love it.
So when I got involved in an oldschool UFT project with maintenance tasks, I felt jaded.
It there a way to achieve this without changing each and every instance of the function? Please tell me yes. Please!
Well, no. I don´t know of any tool capable of this.
There seem to be people who created a C# adapter for the UFT test object API, enabling them to write their tests in C#, and to use VisualStudio for development of test scripts. In VS, you have the refactoring support you look for. But you don´t create UFT scripts anymore, you´d create C# apps. (Note I am not talking about the API testing aspect of UFT, which uses C# anyways -- I am talking about the VBScript test scripts for GUI tests and BPT components.)
UFT itself is not capable of doing real static code analysis. (Let this statement drown a minute, and you´ll agree: it´s true.)
Adding this to the fact that the UFT´s IDE is, let´s say: sub-optimal, this led to the development of Test Design Studio (TDS), a VisualStudio "feel-alike" subset of VS for UFT (VBScript) scripts. You can check it out here: http://www.patterson-consulting.net/products/test_design_studio/Default.aspx
Among other things, TDS does static code analysis for UFT scripts in a pretty complete way (as far as an interpreted variant-typed language like VBScript allows that at all), and the author of the tool seems to be thinking about adding refactoring features like the one you asked for, but -- this has not happened yet. It will probably come only if demand is high.
Until then, TDS could help you:
You could simply change the signature
If TDS knows all calls (which is usually does), it will list you all locations where you need to edit -- and this happens at design-time, not at runtime
TDS allows you to specify the type of identifiers, for example: formal parameters, variables, and so on. This means you might even get warnings if you change nothing about the pure VBScript signature (which does not include type information), but do change the TDS directive of that signature parameter of which you changed the type.
This is no advertisement. I am not part of the company that developed TDS.
This is just an honest answer to the (slightly offtopic) question that I wish would have gotten years ago, asking questions like yours, and it proved to be a real lifesaver.
In summary, TDS quadrupled (or more) my productivity when creating and maintaining test scripts, especially if a large base framework is used. So I´d recommend checking out the option of using TDS to better handle changes like the ones you outlined.
I have an old MSDOS software realized in magic 5.6 with an btrieve 5.10a database, that should be modernized(completely redone using a modern DB).
For this I would love to just get the table structures and some understanding in the structure of the magic program.
But unfortunately I was not able to find any documentation on magic nor was I able to get the structure with column names from the tables(.btr but no ddf files).
Any idea on how to get a step further?
Not enough rep to comment, so I'm forced to post this as an answer.
If you can't get hold of any info regarding the data structure you might try:
A. Download and install a try-out version of a more recent Pervasive version and see if that enables you to read the data. In (still more or less current) server versions like V11 there is a DDF Builder utility, which does what the name implies. However, this is no automatic process, but relies on your ability to link the data shown in the application to the hex values on disk.
B. Try to find a BUTIL.EXE version that works with 5.x Btrieve files, run BUTIL -RECOVER and see what that gets you. You might get to parse the data with scripting tools this way - I've done it in the past on 6.x files, but nothing as old as you are dealing with.
The main issue here is whether you'll be able to find compatible tools for a version that old. But then again, maybe 6.x tools might just work.
background
I have designed many tools in the past year or so that is designed to help me program for XPages. These tools include primarily helper java classes, extended logging (making use of OpenLogger and my own stuff), and a few other things that I personally feel I cannot work without. It has been discussed with my employer, and we feel that it might be a good idea to start publishing these items to openNTF. Since these tools are made up of about 3 .nsfs, all designed to use the same java code, key javascript classes, css, and even a custom control or two, I would like to consolidate key items into a plug-in that can be installed at the server and client level. I want to do this consolidation before I even think about publishing any of the work I've done so far. It would just be far too much work to maintain, not just for me, but for potential users. I have not really found any information on how to do such a thing in google searches. I also have to make sure that I am able to make use of the ExtLib libraries, openNTF Domino API, and the Notes API.
my questions
How does one best go about designing such plug-ins? Must a designer
use eclipse, or is this it possible to do this directly in the Notes
Designer?
How does a designer best go about keeping a server and client up to date while designing and updating the plug-in code? Is this why GitHub is often used?
Where is the best place to get material to get started in this direction? I sort of feel lost in the woods, knowing I need to head north, but not having a compass for that first step.
Thank you very much for your input.
In my experience, I found that diving into plug-in development is a huge PITA until you get used to it, but it's definitely worth it overall.
As for whether you can use Designer for plugin development: yes, but you will likely eventually want to not do so. I started out by using Designer for this sort of thing for a while, presumably with the same sentiment as you: why bother installing another instance of Eclipse when I'm already sitting in one all day? However, between Designer's age (it's roughly equivalent to, I think, Eclipse 3.4), oddities when it comes to working sets between the "Applications" and "Project Explorer" views, and, in my case, my desire to use a Mac app, I ended up switching.
There are two major starting points: the XSP Starter Kit (http://www.openntf.org/internal/home.nsf/project.xsp?name=XSP%20Starter%20Kit) and Niklas Heidloff's video on setting up Eclipse for XPages development (http://www.openntf.org/main.nsf/blog.xsp?permaLink=NHEF-8RVB5H). The latter mentions the XPages SDK (http://www.openntf.org/internal/home.nsf/project.xsp?name=XPages%20SDK%20for%20Eclipse%20RCP), which is also useful. In my setup, I found the video largely useful, but some aspects either difficult to find (IBM's downloads are shifting sands) or optional (debugging, which will depend on whether or not you're using Eclipse on Windows).
Those resources should generally get you set up. The main thing to worry about when setting up your Eclipse environment will be making sure your Plug-In Execution Environment is properly done. If you're following the SDK setup instructions, that SHOULD get you where you need to be.
The next thing to know about is the way plugins are structured. Each plugin you want to install in Designer or Domino will also be paired with a feature project (a feature can house several plugins), and potentially an update site - the last one is optional if you just want to import the features into an Update Site NSF. That's how I often do my normal plugin development: export the paired feature to a directory and then import the feature into the server's Update Site NSF and then install in Designer from there using Application -> Install. You can also set things up so that you deploy into the server's plugin/feature directories instead of taking the step of installing into an update site if you'd prefer. GitHub doesn't really come into play for this aspect - it's more about sharing/collaborating with your code and also having a remote storage location for your git repositories (which I highly advise).
And as for the "lost in the woods" feeling: yep, you'll have that for a good while. There are lots of moving parts and esoteric concepts to get a hold of all at once. If you mostly follow the above links and then start with some basics from the XSP Starter Kit (which is itself a plugin project that you can pair with a feature) - say, printing text in the Activator class and making an implicit global variable just to make sure it works - that should help get your feet wet.
It's best done in Eclipse. You can debug your code running on the server from there, as well as run it directly from there. The editors are also more up-to-date. You want:
Eclipse for RCP and RAP developers
XPages SDK for Eclipse RCP (from OpenNTF)
XPages Debug Plugin (from OpenNTF - basically allows you to load the plugins to the Domino server dynamically, rather than exporting to an Update Site all the time)
XSP Starter Kit on OpenNTF is a good starting point for a plugin. There are various references to the library id, which has to be unique for your plugin. Basically, references to org.openntf.xsp.starter need changing to whatever you want to call your plugin. You're also best advised to remove what you don't need. I tend to work in a copy of the Starter, remove stuff, build and if there are errors with required classes (Activator.java obviously will be required and some others), then paste them back in from the Starter.
XPages OpenLog Logger is a good cross-reference, that was built from XPages Starter Kit. It's pretty much stripped down and you'll be able to see what had to be changed. A lot of the elements of the XSP Starter Kit correspond to Java classes you'll probably be familiar with from your XPages Java development.
GitHub etc tend to be used as source control, which is useful for working out what's changed from time to time.
from here, I want to download GDAL library. I mean I want to download .h, .lib, .dll files. I'm working in visual studio 2010 and using visual C++:
Solution Configurations : Debug
Solution Platforms : Win32
In fact I don't understand what's the difference between Developement and stable libraries?
And which one should I download?
Even I don't know what other information you need to post here?
The "stable" library is one that's been tested so they believe it to be reasonably bug-free.
The "development" library is one they're currently working on. It's probably had some new features added. It may also have had some bugs added, the documentation may be somewhat out of date, etc.
As to which to download: especially at first you typically want the stable version. It has a much better chance of working as documented (and, for that matter, of just plain working).
The development version is primarily for one of two situations: either when/if you think you might want to contribute some work to the library itself, or if it includes a new feature that happens to be really crucial to your work, so you're willing to put up with possible shortcomings elsewhere to get that addition.
I want to step into extension development for Gnome Shell, but I can't seem to understand how I do a few tasks in Looking Glass lg to actually debug my stuff.
When I type global.log("hi"); into LG, it throws me back r(...) = undefined. Why?
When I want to debug an extensions that doesn't load, how do I do that?
It would be nice to see why an extension can't be loaded.
I tried Main.ExtensionSystem.loadExtension() but it returns undefined no matter if I give it the extension's name string or the extension's object.
Where do I find documentation for classes, objects and member methods?
(The LG inspector does not seem to be able to inspect functions.)
If I had these resources I could at least start to work on updating some extensions for newer Gnome versions. I would not ask these simple questions if they would be nicely explained somewhere but getting all the info seems really tough (I've googled for hours).
1: LookingGlass is basically a GJS console. It allows you to execute and test lines of GJS, grab and manipulate objects and use r(...) to use results in following commands.
The reason you get r(...) = undefined is because log(String); does not return anything, thus the result is undefined.
2: Either log throughout init() and enable(), then check where it breaks and try to pinpoint the breaking line using log or commenting out lines of code (although the culprit is probably defined in the general logging, described in the section at the bottom).
3: There is no official documentation. They have some outdated tutorials for GNOME Shell 3.4 with a small difference explanation to 3.6, a few pages on the C(++) ends of the libraries you use (most of the functions, variables and constants use the same names though), but for any real info you'd need experience, digging through other GNOME and shell extension code or some unofficial sources. Unofficial sources aren't always up to date, however.
Up to date generated docs at RooJS, although at least events are off as they are separated with - (minus) rather than _ (underscore).
Old, but mostly useful documentation, MathematicalCoffee has more useful things, like in depth explained code that is quite a solid learning source.
Generated docs, almost everything is there, very extensive, but sometimes the site drops offline for a few days. You could try to clone the git repo to run it locally, but the readme.md is a verbatim copy of what they forked...
More recent reference made by a user, although this is quite extensive, it's not of much use if you're on an older version of GNOME Shell, as deprecated and old is more likely to work than next gen stuff.
I recommend checking the official extensions website and go through whatever interesting extensions' source code you can get, as that is your best bet to learn anything.
Generally Debugging gnome can be done in several ways.
- use the log() function and follow journalctl in a commandline, check either GNOME or JS, use journalctl -f | grep -i js (or use grep -i gnome). You will see some warnings no matter what, but most mention what extension they're from. This is nice and works on all distros implementing systemd
- Or log a specific process that is a part of GNOME like journalctl /usr/bin/gnome-session -f -o cat, just beware that some distros and versions log to different files and old GNOME versions often log to whatever your display manager logs to.
- use the official (albeit tricky) manner of logging: GNOME on debugging.
I personally couldn't get this to work.