If I have a string like this
str =<<END
7312357006,1.121
3214058234,3456
7312357006,1234
1324958723,232.1
3214058234,43.2
3214173443,234.1
6134513494,23.2
7312357006,11.1
END
If a number in the first value shows up again, I want to add their second values together. So the final string would look like this
7312357006,1246.221
3214058234,3499.2
1324958723,232.1
3214173443,234.1
6134513494,23.2
If the final output is an array that's fine too.
There are lots of ways to do this in Ruby. One particularly terse way is to use String#scan:
str = <<END
7312357006,1.121
3214058234,3456
7312357006,1234
1324958723,232.1
3214058234,43.2
3214173443,234.1
6134513494,23.2
7312357006,11.1
END
data = Hash.new(0)
str.scan(/(\d+),([\d.]+)/) {|k,v| data[k] += v.to_f }
p data
# => { "7312357006" => 1246.221,
# "3214058234" => 3499.2,
# "1324958723" => 232.1,
# "3214173443" => 234.1,
# "6134513494" => 23.2 }
This uses the regular expression /(\d+),([\d.]+)/ to extract the two values from each line. The block is called with each pair as arguments, which are then merged into the hash.
This could also be written as a single expression using each_with_object:
data = str.scan(/(\d+),([\d.]+)/)
.each_with_object(Hash.new(0)) {|(k,v), hsh| hsh[k] += v.to_f }
# => (same as above)
There are likewise many ways to print the result, but here are a couple I like:
puts data.map {|kv| kv.join(",") }.join("\n")
# => 7312357006,1246.221
# 3214058234,3499.2
# 1324958723,232.1
# 3214173443,234.1
# 6134513494,23.2
# or:
puts data.map {|k,v| "#{k},#{v}\n" }.join
# => (same as above)
You can see all of these in action on repl.it.
Edit: Although I don't recommend either of these for the sake of readability, here's more just for kicks (requires Ruby 2.4+):
data = str.lines.group_by {|s| s.slice!(/(\d+),/); $1 }
.transform_values {|a| a.sum(&:to_f) }
...or, to going straight to a string:
puts str.lines.group_by {|s| s.slice!(/(\d+),/); $1 }
.map {|k,vs| "#{k},#{vs.sum(&:to_f)}\n" }.join
Since repl.it is stuck on Ruby 2.3: Try it online!
You could achieve this using each_with_object, as below:
str = "7312357006,1.121
3214058234,3456
7312357006,1234
1324958723,232.1
3214058234,43.2
3214173443,234.1
6134513494,23.2
7312357006,11.1"
# convert the string into nested pairs of floats
# to briefly summarise the steps: split entries by newline, strip whitespace, split by comma, convert to floats
arr = str.split("\n").map(&:strip).map { |el| el.split(",").map(&:to_f) }
result = arr.each_with_object(Hash.new(0)) do |el, hash|
hash[el.first] += el.last
end
# => {7312357006.0=>1246.221, 3214058234.0=>3499.2, 1324958723.0=>232.1, 3214173443.0=>234.1, 6134513494.0=>23.2}
# You can then call `to_a` on result if you want:
result.to_a
# => [[7312357006.0, 1246.221], [3214058234.0, 3499.2], [1324958723.0, 232.1], [3214173443.0, 234.1], [6134513494.0, 23.2]]
each_with_object iterates through each pair of data, providing them with access to an accumulator (in this the hash). By following this approach, we can add each entry to the hash, and add together the totals if they appear more than once.
Hope that helps - let me know if you've any questions.
def combine(str)
str.each_line.with_object(Hash.new(0)) do |s,h|
k,v = s.split(',')
h.update(k=>v.to_f) { |k,o,n| o+n }
end.reduce('') { |s,kv_pair| s << "%s,%g\n" % kv_pair }
end
puts combine str
7312357006,1246.22
3214058234,3499.2
1324958723,232.1
3214173443,234.1
6134513494,23.2
Notes:
using String#each_line is preferable to str.split("\n") as the former returns an enumerator whereas the latter returns a temporary array. Each element generated by the enumerator is line of str that (unlike the elements of str.split("\n")) ends with a newline character, but that is of no concern.
see Hash::new, specifically when a default value (here 0) is used. If a hash has been defined h = Hash.new(0) and h does not have a key k, h[k] returns the default value, zero (h is not changed). When Ruby encounters the expression h[k] += 1, the first thing she does is expand it to h[k] = h[k] + 1. If h has been defined with a default value of zero, and h does not have a key k, h[k] on the right of the equality (syntactic sugar1 for h.[](k)) returns zero.
see Hash#update (aka merge!). h.update(k=>v.to_f) is syntactic sugar for h.update({ k=>v.to_f })
see Kernel#sprint for explanations of the formatting directives %s and %g.
the receiver for the expression reduce('') { |s,kv_pair| s << "%s,%g\n" % kv_pair } (in the penultimate line), is the following hash.
{"7312357006"=>1246.221, "3214058234"=>3499.2, "1324958723"=>232.1,
"3214173443"=>234.1, "6134513494"=>23.2}
1 Syntactic sugar is a shortcut allowed by Ruby.
Implemented this solution as hash was giving me issues:
d = []
s.split("\n").each do |line|
x = 0
q = 0
dup = false
line.split(",").each do |data|
if x == 0 and d.include? data then dup = true ; q = d.index(data) elsif x == 0 then d << data end
if x == 1 and dup == false then d << data end
if x == 1 and dup == true then d[q+1] = "#{'%.2f' % (d[q+1].to_f + data.to_f).to_s}" end
if x == 2 and dup == false then d << data end
x += 1
end
end
x = 0
s = ""
d.each do |val|
if x == 0 then s << "#{val}," end
if x == 1 then s << "#{val}\n ; x = 0" end
x += 1
end
puts(s)
Related
I've been practicing some algorithms with ruby for a while, and I'm wondering if it is possible to catch the returned value from within the method.
the code below is to reverse a string without any kind of reverse method and with few local variables...
def rev(a)
i = -1
a.split("").each do |el|
el[0] = a[i]
i = i + (-1)
end.join
end
Note that the result of the 'each' method is not being assigned to any variable. So, 'each' evaluates to an array with a reversed sequence of characters. At the 'end' (literally) I've just 'called' the method 'join' to glue everything together. The idea is to 'catch' the returned value from all this process and check if is true or false that the reversed string is a palindrome.
If the reversed string is equal to the original one then the word is a palindrome. Ex. "abba", "sexes", "radar"...
for example:
def rev(a)
i = -1
a.split("").each do |el|
el[0] = a[i]
i = i + (-1)
end.join
# catch here the returned value from the code above
# and check if its a palindrome or not. (true or false)
end
Thank you guys! I will be very grateful if anyone could help me figure out this!
Just add == a to see if your reversal matches the original string:
def rev(a)
i = -1
a.split("").each do |el|
el[0] = a[i]
i = i + (-1)
end.join == a
end
puts rev("racecar") # => true
puts rev("racecars") # => false
An easier way to check palindromes (rev could be better named palindrome?) is a == a.reverse since .reverse is essentially what your split/each/join does.
If you want back all the information, you can return an array with both the values:
def rev(a)
i = -1
rev = a.split("").each do |el|
el[0] = a[i]
i = i + (-1)
end.join
[rev, rev == a] # or
# return rev, rev == a
end
p rev("abra") #=> ["arba", false]
p rev("abba") #=> ["abba", true]
You can also return a hash:
{ reverse: rev, palindrome: rev == a}
to get
#=> {:reverse=>"arba", :palindrome=>false}
#=> {:reverse=>"abba", :palindrome=>true}
Here are a couple of other ways you could reverse a string.
#1
def esrever(str)
s = str.dup
(str.size/2).times { |i| s[i], s[-1-i] = s[-1-i], s[i] }
s
end
esrever("abcdefg")
#=> "gfedcba"
esrever("racecar")
#=> "racecar"
This uses parallel assignment (sometimes called multiple assignment).
#2
def esrever(str)
a = str.chars
''.tap { |s| str.size.times { s << a.pop } }
end
esrever("abcdefg")
#=> "gfedcba"
esrever("racecar")
#=> "racecar"
I've used Object#tap merely to avoid creating a local variable initialized to an empty string and then having to make that variable the last line of the method.
With both methods a string str is a palindrome if and only if str == esrever(str).
This function should take in two strings "daBcD" and "ABC". It is trying to create the string "b" from the letters in "a". You can only delete or capitalize letters, you cant change them. b will always contain all uppercase letters.
def abbreviation(a, b)
aArray = a.split('')
idx = 0
aArray.each do |char|
#print "char: #{char}\n"
#print "Before loops: #{aArray}\n"
if char.casecmp(b[idx]) == 0
char.upcase!
idx += 1
#print "char: #{char}\nArry: #{aArray}\n"
#print "idx: #{idx}\n siz: #{b.size}\n"
if idx == b.size
aArray.reject! {|i| i == 'delete'}
aArray.slice!(b.size)
break
end
else
aArray[aArray.index(char)] = 'delete'
#print "deleted, now is: #{aArray}\n"
end
end
res = aArray.join('')
if res == b
return 'YES'
else
return 'NO'
end
end
This works for a couple test cases, but fails most of them. Can someone describe a better approach?
I have assumed the problem is to determine whether the characters in b appear in a (case indifferent), in the same order as in b, but not necessarily contiguous in a (see the second example below). If they do I return an array of the indices at which they appear in a. If there is no match, nil is returned.
def doit(a, b)
m = a.match(Regexp.new(b.each_char.map { |c| "(#{c})" }.join('.*'),
Regexp::IGNORECASE))
return nil if m.nil?
(1..b.size).map { |i| m.begin(i) }
end
doit "daBcD", "ABC"
#=> [1, 2, 3]
doit "daXBDecf", "ABC"
#=> [1, 3, 6]
doit "dacBD", "ABC"
#=> nil
For the first example the regular expression is as follows.
Regexp.new("ABC".each_char.map { |c| "(#{c})" }.join('.*'), Regexp::IGNORECASE)
#=> /(A).*(B).*(C)/i
The absolutely easiest way is via regular expression:
def abbreviation(a, b)
re = Regexp.new(b.each_char.map(&Regexp.method(:quote)).join('.*'), Regexp::IGNORECASE)
!!re.match(a)
end
abbreviation("daBcD", "ABC")
# => true
abbreviation("daCbD", "ABC")
# => false
For the input ABC, we'll construct a regular expression /A.*B.*C/i, then test the other string against it. The .* construct will account for "deletion"; the IGNORECASE option for "capitalisation".
EDIT: If the problem is further constrained that only lowercase letters can be deleted, as suggested by the comments,
def abbreviation(a, b)
# (b is uppercase only)
re_pat = b.each_char.map { |c| "[#{c}#{c.downcase}]"}.join('[[:lower:]]*')
re = Regexp.new(re_pat)
!!re.match(a)
end
p abbreviation("daBcD", "ABC") # => true
p abbreviation("daBdcD", "ABC") # => true
p abbreviation("daBDcD", "ABC") # => false
I have built a version of mastermind that checks a user's input and provides feedback based on how close the user's guess was to the winning sequence. If you're not familiar with the game, you get feedback indicating how many of your characters were guessed correctly at the same index and how many characters guessed are in the sequence, but at the wrong index. If there are duplicates in the guess, then you would not count the extra values unless they correspond to the same number of duplicates in the secret code.
Example: If the sequence is ["G","G","G","Y"] and the user guesses ["G", "Y","G","G"] then you'd want to return 2 for items at the same index and 2 for items at different indexes that are included in the secret sequence.
Another example: If the sequence is ["X","R","Y","T"] and the user guesses ["T","T","Y","Y"] then you'd return 1 for items at the same index 1 for the character guessed that is in the sequence but at the wrong index.
Anyway, to me this is not a simple problem to solve. Here's the code I used to get it to work, but it's not elegant. There must be a better way. I was hoping someone can tell me what I'm missing here?? New to Ruby...
def index_checker(input_array, sequence_array)
count = 0
leftover_input = []
leftover_sequence = []
input.each_with_index do |char, idx|
if char == sequence[idx]
count += 1
else
leftover_input << char
leftover_sequence << sequence[idx]
end
end
diff_index_checker(leftover_input, leftover_sequence, count)
end
def diff_index_checker(input, sequence, count)
count2 = 0
already_counted = []
input.each do |char|
if sequence.include?(char) && !already_counted.include?(char)
count2 += 1
already_counted << char
end
end
[count, count2]
end
Here's a clean Ruby solution, written in idiomatic Ruby object-oriented style:
class Mastermind
def initialize(input_array, sequence_array)
#input_array = input_array
#sequence_array = sequence_array
end
def matches
[index_matches, other_matches]
end
def results
[index_matches.size, other_matches.size]
end
private
attr_reader :input_array, :sequence_array
def index_matches
input_array.select.with_index { |e, i| e == sequence_array[i] }
end
def other_matches
non_exact_input & non_exact_sequence
end
def non_exact_input
array_difference(input_array, index_matches)
end
def non_exact_sequence
array_difference(sequence_array, index_matches)
end
# This method is based on https://stackoverflow.com/a/3852809/5961578
def array_difference(array_1, array_2)
counts = array_2.inject(Hash.new(0)) { |h, v| h[v] += 1; h }
array_1.reject { |e| counts[e] -= 1 unless counts[e].zero? }
end
end
You would use this class as follows:
>> input_array = ["G","G","G","Y"]
>> sequence_array = ["G", "Y","G","G"]
>> guess = Mastermind.new(input_array, sequence_array)
>> guess.results
#> [2, 2]
>> guess.matches
#> [["G", "G"], ["G", "Y"]]
Here's how it works. First everything goes into a class called Mastermind. We create a constructor for the class (which in Ruby is a method called initialize) and we have it accept two arguments: input array (the user guess), and sequence array (the answer).
We set each of these arguments to an instance variable, which is indicated by its beginning with #. Then we use attr_reader to create getter methods for #input_array and #sequence_array, which allows us to get the values by calling input_array and sequence_array from any instance method within the class.
We then define two public methods: matches (which returns an array of exact matches and an array of other matches (the ones that match but at the wrong index), and results (which returns a count of each of these two arrays).
Now, within the private portion of our class, we can define the guts of the logic. Each method has a specific job, and each is named to (hopefully) help a reader understand what it is doing.
index_matches returns a subset of the input_array whose elements match the sequence_array exactly.
other_matches returns a subset of the input_array whose elements do not match the sequence_array exactly, but do match at the wrong index.
other_matches relies on non_exact_input and non_exact_sequence, each of which is computed using the array_difference method, which I copied from another SO answer. (There is no convenient Ruby method that allows us to subtract one array from another without deleting duplicates).
Code
def matches(hidden, guess)
indices_wo_match = hidden.each_index.reject { |i| hidden[i] == guess[i] }
hidden_counts = counting_hash(hidden.values_at *indices_wo_match)
guess_counts = counting_hash(guess.values_at *indices_wo_match)
[hidden.size - indices_wo_match.size, guess_counts.reduce(0) { |tot, (k, cnt)|
tot + [hidden_counts[k], cnt].min }]
end
def counting_hash(arr)
arr.each_with_object(Hash.new(0)) { |s, h| h[s] += 1 }
end
Examples
matches ["G","G","G","Y"], ["G", "Y","G","G"]
#=> [2, 2]
matches ["X","R","Y","T"] , ["T","T","Y","Y"]
#=> [1, 1]
Explanation
The steps are as follows.
hidden = ["G","G","G","Y"]
guess = ["G", "Y","G","G"]
Save the indices i for which hidden[i] != guess[i].
indices_wo_match = hidden.each_index.reject { |i| hidden[i] == guess[i] }
#=> [1, 3]
Note that the number of indices for which the values are equal is as follows.
hidden.size - indices_wo_match.size
#=> 2
Now compute the numbers of remaining elements of guess that pair with one of the remaining values of hidden by having the same value. Begin by counting the numbers of instances of each unique element of hidden and then do the same for guess.
hidden_counts = counting_hash(hidden.values_at *indices_wo_match)
#=> {"G"=>1, "Y"=>1}
guess_counts = counting_hash(guess.values_at *indices_wo_match)
#=> {"Y"=>1, "G"=>1}
To understand how counting_hash works, see Hash::new, especially the explanation of the effect of providing a default value as an argument of new. In brief, if a hash is defined h = Hash.new(3), then if h does not have a key k, h[k] returns the default value, here 3 (the hash is not changed).
Now compute the numbers of matches of elements of guess that were not equal to the value of hidden at the same index and which pair with an element of hidden that have the same value.
val_matches = guess_counts.reduce(0) do |tot, (k, cnt)|
tot + [hidden_counts[k], cnt].min
end
#=> 2
Lastly, return the values of interest.
[hidden.size - indices_wo_match.size, val_matches]
#=> [2, 2]
In the code presented above I have substituted out the variable val_matches.
With Ruby 2.4+ one can use Enumerable#sum to replace
guess_counts.reduce(0) { |tot, (k, cnt)| tot + [hidden_counts[k], cnt].min }
with
guess_counts.sum { |k, cnt| [hidden_counts[k], cnt].min }
def judge(secret, guess)
full = secret.zip(guess).count { |s, g| s == g }
semi = secret.uniq.sum { |s| [secret.count(s), guess.count(s)].min } - full
[full, semi]
end
Demo:
> judge(["G","G","G","Y"], ["G","Y","G","G"])
=> [2, 2]
> judge(["X","R","Y","T"], ["T","T","Y","Y"])
=> [1, 1]
A shorter alternative, though I find it less clear:
full = secret.zip(guess).count(&:uniq!)
I prefer my other answer for its simplicity, but this one would be faster if someone wanted to use this for arrays larger than Mastermind's.
def judge(secret, guess)
full = secret.zip(guess).count { |s, g| s == g }
pool = secret.group_by(&:itself)
[full, guess.count { |g| pool[g]&.pop } - full]
end
Demo:
> judge(["G","G","G","Y"], ["G","Y","G","G"])
=> [2, 2]
> judge(["X","R","Y","T"], ["T","T","Y","Y"])
=> [1, 1]
When trying to find the frequency of letters in 'fantastic' I am having trouble understanding the given solution:
def letter_count(str)
counts = {}
str.each_char do |char|
next if char == " "
counts[char] = 0 unless counts.include?(char)
counts[char] += 1
end
counts
end
I tried deconstructing it and when I created the following piece of code I expected it to do the exact same thing. However it gives me a different result.
blah = {}
x = 'fantastic'
x.each_char do |char|
next if char == " "
blah[char] = 0
unless
blah.include?(char)
blah[char] += 1
end
blah
end
The first piece of code gives me the following
puts letter_count('fantastic')
>
{"f"=>1, "a"=>2, "n"=>1, "t"=>2, "s"=>1, "i"=>1, "c"=>1}
Why does the second piece of code give me
puts blah
>
{"f"=>0, "a"=>0, "n"=>0, "t"=>0, "s"=>0, "i"=>0, "c"=>0}
Can someone break down the pieces of code and tell me what the underlying difference is. I think once I understand this I'll be able to really understand the first piece of code. Additionally if you want to explain a bit about the first piece of code to help me out that'd be great as well.
You can't split this line...
counts[char] = 0 unless counts.include?(char)
... over multiple line the way you did it. The trailing conditional only works on a single line.
If you wanted to split it over multiple lines you would have to convert to traditional if / end (in this case unless / end) format.
unless counts.include?(char)
counts[char] = 0
end
Here's the explanation of the code...
# we define a method letter_count that accepts one argument str
def letter_count(str)
# we create an empty hash
counts = {}
# we loop through all the characters in the string... we will refer to each character as char
str.each_char do |char|
# we skip blank characters (we go and process the next character)
next if char == " "
# if there is no hash entry for the current character we initialis the
# count for that character to zero
counts[char] = 0 unless counts.include?(char)
# we increase the count for the current character by 1
counts[char] += 1
# we end the each_char loop
end
# we make sure the hash of counts is returned at the end of this method
counts
# end of the method
end
Now that #Steve has answered your question and you have accepted his answer, perhaps I can suggest another way to count the letters. This is just one of many approaches that could be taken.
Code
def letter_count(str)
str.downcase.each_char.with_object({}) { |c,h|
(h[c] = h.fetch(c,0) + 1) if c =~ /[a-z]/ }
end
Example
letter_count('Fantastic')
#=> {"f"=>1, "a"=>2, "n"=>1, "t"=>2, "s"=>1, "i"=>1, "c"=>1}
Explanation
Here is what's happening.
str = 'Fantastic'
We use String#downcase so that, for example, 'f' and 'F' are treated as the same character for purposes of counting. (If you don't want that, simply remove .downcase.) Let
s = str.downcase #=> "fantastic"
In
s.each_char.with_object({}) { |c,h| (h[c] = h.fetch(c,0) + 1) c =~ /[a-z]/ }
the enumerator String#each_char is chained to Enumerator#with_index. This creates a compound enumerator:
enum = s.each_char.with_object({})
#=> #<Enumerator: #<Enumerator: "fantastic":each_char>:with_object({})>
We can view what the enumerator will pass to the block by converting it to an array:
enum.to_a
#=> [["f", {}], ["a", {}], ["n", {}], ["t", {}], ["a", {}],
# ["s", {}], ["t", {}], ["i", {}], ["c", {}]]
(Actually, it only passes an empty hash with 'f'; thereafter it passes the updated value of the hash.) The enumerator with_object creates an empty hash denoted by the block variable h.
The first element enum passes to the block is the string 'f'. The block variable c is assigned that value, so the expression in the block:
(h[c] = h.fetch(c,0) + 1) if c =~ /[a-z]/
evaluates to:
(h['f'] = h.fetch('f',0) + 1) if 'f' =~ /[a-z]/
Now
c =~ /[a-z]/
is true if and only if c is a lowercase letter. Here
'f' =~ /[a-z]/ #=> true
so we evaluate the expression
h[c] = h.fetch(c,0) + 1
h.fetch(c,0) returns h[c] if h has a key c; else it returns the value of Hash#fetch's second parameter, which here is zero. (fetch can also take a block.)
Since h is now empty, it becomes
h['f'] = 0 + 1 #=> 1
The enumerator each_char then passes 'a', 'n' and 't' to the block, resulting in the hash becoming
h = {'f'=>1, 'a'=>1, 'n'=>1, 't'=>1 }
The next character passed in is a second 'a'. As h already has a key 'a',
h[c] = h.fetch(c,0) + 1
evaluates to
h['a'] = h['a'] + 1 #=> 1 + 1 => 2
The remainder of the string is processed the same way.
My goal is to find the word with greatest number of repeated letters in a given string. For example, "aabcc ddeeteefef iijjfff" would return "ddeeteefef" because "e" is repeated five times in this word and that is more than all other repeating characters.
So far this is what I got, but it has many problems and is not complete:
def LetterCountI(str)
s = str.split(" ")
i = 0
result = []
t = s[i].scan(/((.)\2+)/).map(&:max)
u = t.max { |a, b| a.length <=> b.length }
return u.split(//).count
end
The code I have only finds consecutive patterns; if the pattern is interrupted (such as with "aabaaa", it counts a three times instead of five).
str.scan(/\w+/).max_by{ |w| w.chars.group_by(&:to_s).values.map(&:size).max }
scan(/\w+/) — create an array of all sequences of 'word' characters
max_by{ … } — find the word that gives the largest value inside this block
chars — split the string into characters
group_by(&:to_s) — create a hash mapping each character to an array of all the occurrences
values — just get all the arrays of the occurrences
map(&:size) — convert each array to the number of characters in that array
max — find the largest characters and use this as the result for max_by to examine
Edit: Written less compactly:
str.scan(/\w+/).max_by do |word|
word.chars
.group_by{ |char| char }
.map{ |char,array| array.size }
.max
end
Written less functionally and with less Ruby-isms (to make it look more like "other" languages):
words_by_most_repeated = []
str.split(" ").each do |word|
count_by_char = {} # hash mapping character to count of occurrences
word.chars.each do |char|
count_by_char[ char ] = 0 unless count_by_char[ char ]
count_by_char[ char ] += 1
end
maximum_count = 0
count_by_char.each do |char,count|
if count > maximum_count then
maximum_count = count
end
end
words_by_most_repeated[ maximum_count ] = word
end
most_repeated = words_by_most_repeated.last
I'd do as below :
s = "aabcc ddeeteefef iijjfff"
# intermediate calculation that's happening in the final code
s.split(" ").map { |w| w.chars.max_by { |e| w.count(e) } }
# => ["a", "e", "f"] # getting the max count character from each word
s.split(" ").map { |w| w.count(w.chars.max_by { |e| w.count(e) }) }
# => [2, 5, 3] # getting the max count character's count from each word
# final code
s.split(" ").max_by { |w| w.count(w.chars.max_by { |e| w.count(e) }) }
# => "ddeeteefef"
update
each_with_object gives better result than group_by method.
require 'benchmark'
s = "aabcc ddeeteefef iijjfff"
def phrogz(s)
s.scan(/\w+/).max_by{ |word| word.chars.group_by(&:to_s).values.map(&:size).max }
end
def arup_v1(s)
max_string = s.split.max_by do |w|
h = w.chars.each_with_object(Hash.new(0)) do |e,hsh|
hsh[e] += 1
end
h.values.max
end
end
def arup_v2(s)
s.split.max_by { |w| w.count(w.chars.max_by { |e| w.count(e) }) }
end
n = 100_000
Benchmark.bm do |x|
x.report("Phrogz:") { n.times {|i| phrogz s } }
x.report("arup_v2:"){ n.times {|i| arup_v2 s } }
x.report("arup_v1:"){ n.times {|i| arup_v1 s } }
end
output
user system total real
Phrogz: 1.981000 0.000000 1.981000 ( 1.979198)
arup_v2: 0.874000 0.000000 0.874000 ( 0.878088)
arup_v1: 1.684000 0.000000 1.684000 ( 1.685168)
Similar to sawa's answer:
"aabcc ddeeteefef iijjfff".split.max_by{|w| w.length - w.chars.uniq.length}
=> "ddeeteefef"
In Ruby 2.x, this works as-is because String#chars returns an array. In earlier versions of ruby, String#chars yields an enumerator so you need to add .to_a before applying uniq. I did my testing in Ruby 2.0, and overlooked this until it was pointed out by Stephens.
I believe this is valid, since the question was "greatest number of repeated letters in a given string" rather than greatest number of repeats for a single letter in a given string.
"aabcc ddeeteefef iijjfff"
.split.max_by{|w| w.chars.sort.chunk{|e| e}.map{|e| e.last.length}.max}
# => "ddeeteefef"