I am just trying to write some examples with Kotlin. And what I did was to create a Jersey app, and everything was going well until I try to change the Main.java class to Main.kt.
The generated Main.java class has this method;
public static HttpServer startServer() {
final ResourceConfig rc = new ResourceConfig()
.packages("com.kotlinexperiments")
.register(new AbstractBinder() {
#Override
protected void configure() {
bind(new UserService()).to(IUserService.class);
}
});
return GrizzlyHttpServerFactory.createHttpServer(URI.create(BASE_URI), rc);
}
And I try to convert it to a Kotlin file;
fun startServer(): HttpServer {
val resourceConfig = ResourceConfig()
.packages("com.kotlinexperiments")
.register(object: AbstractBinder() {
override fun configure() {
bind(UserService()).to(IUserService::class)
}
})
return GrizzlyHttpServerFactory.createHttpServer(URI.create(baseUri), resourceConfig)
}
The problem is, when you type in IDE with bind(someInstance).to(class) it shows the member function, but when you run/debug it, it is going to infix function which is already defined in Tuples.kt file, which is distributed with kotlin-stdlib.
The question is, is there a way to call the member function? I try to escape the function name etc. but nothing worked actually.
Thnx!
Replace
bind(UserService()).to(IUserService::class)
with
bind(UserService()).to(IUserService::class.java)
Related
I am trying to use quarkus-cache by following the appropriate quarkus doc. I have the below code setup
#ApplicationScoped
class MyClass {
public result doSomething() {
String remoteData = getRemoteData(url);
}
#CacheResult(cacheName = "myCacheName")
public String getRemoteData(String url) {
return remoteCall(url);
}
}
Usage
// Grpc impl class
// call to Myclass.doSomething()
Execution is not proceeding further when getRemoteData() is called the first time. Also, not getting any error.
Am I missing something?
I started implementing authentication and authorization for our applications written in Spring Boot (2.2.6.RELEASE) and Vaadin 14 LTS (14.6.1).
I have followed those resources:
Securing your app with Spring Security
Router Exception Handling
I have code for checking whether logged-in user has access rights to specified resources implemented in beforeEnter method. The problem is with invocation of event.rerouteToError(AccessDeniedException.class);. It tries to create an instance of the specified exception with reflection but fails because it does not contain public no-arg constructor.
private void beforeEnter(final BeforeEnterEvent event) {
if (!AuthView.class.equals(event.getNavigationTarget()) && !AuthUtils.isUserLoggedIn()) {
event.rerouteTo(AuthView.class);
}
if (!AuthUtils.isAccessGranted(event.getNavigationTarget())) {
event.rerouteToError(AccessDeniedException.class);
}
}
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unable to create an instance of 'org.springframework.security.access.AccessDeniedException'. Make sure the class has a public no-arg constructor.
at com.vaadin.flow.internal.ReflectTools.createProxyInstance(ReflectTools.java:519)
at com.vaadin.flow.internal.ReflectTools.createInstance(ReflectTools.java:451)
at com.vaadin.flow.router.BeforeEvent.rerouteToError(BeforeEvent.java:720)
at com.vaadin.flow.router.BeforeEvent.rerouteToError(BeforeEvent.java:704)
What can be the best solution for that case? I am thinking about two possible solutions:
First instantiate AccessDeniedException and then pass it to overloaded method in BeforeEvent: public void rerouteToError(Exception exception, String customMessage) which should skip creating exception object by reflection
Create dedicated ErrorView and use method public void rerouteTo(Class<? extends Component> routeTargetType, RouteParameters parameters) of BeforeEvent
I decided to follow Leif Åstrand's answer. I created custom AccessDeniedException and appropriate error handler. Here is my implementation. Maybe it will be helpful for someone.
public class AccessDeniedException extends RuntimeException {
private final int code;
public AccessDeniedException() {
super("common.error.403.details");
this.code = HttpServletResponse.SC_FORBIDDEN;
}
public int getCode() {
return code;
}
}
#Tag(Tag.DIV)
#CssImport(value = "./styles/access-denied-view.css")
#CssImport(value = "./styles/access-denied-box.css", themeFor = "vaadin-details")
public class AccessDeniedExceptionHandler extends VerticalLayout implements HasErrorParameter<AccessDeniedException> {
private final Details details;
public AccessDeniedExceptionHandler() {
setWidthFull();
setHeight("100vh");
setPadding(false);
setDefaultHorizontalComponentAlignment(Alignment.CENTER);
setJustifyContentMode(JustifyContentMode.CENTER);
setClassName(ComponentConstants.ACCESS_DENIED_VIEW);
this.details = new Details();
this.details.setClassName(ComponentConstants.ACCESS_DENIED_BOX);
this.details.addThemeVariants(DetailsVariant.REVERSE, DetailsVariant.FILLED);
this.details.setOpened(true);
add(this.details);
}
#Override
public final int setErrorParameter(final BeforeEnterEvent event, final ErrorParameter<AccessDeniedException> parameter) {
final int code = parameter.getException().getCode();
this.details.setSummaryText(getTranslation("common.error.403.header", code));
this.details.setContent(new Text(getTranslation(parameter.getException().getMessage())));
return code;
}
}
I would recommend creating a custom exception type instead of reusing AccessDeniedException from Spring. In that way, you don't have to deal with the required error message at all.
As you mentioned in your first solution, you could do:
event.rerouteToError(new AccessDeniedException("Navigation target not permitted"), "");
or maybe also specify the customMessage if you want. If you see the implementation of the rerouteToError(Class) method, it just passes empty customMessage and creates the Exception - which you could do manually and that's completely acceptable. I recommend this solution.
Another solution could be to subclass AccessDeniedException and use that with reflection:
public class RouteAccessDeniedException extends AccessDeniedException {
public RouteAccessDeniedException() {
super("Navigation target not permitted");
}
}
I don't recommend this solution.
I own a spring application and want to add camel routes dynamically during my application startup.End points are configured in property file and are loaded at run time.
Using Java DSL, i am using for loop to create all routes,
for(int i=0;i<allEndPoints;i++)
{
DynamcRouteBuilder route = new
DynamcRouteBuilder(context,fromUri,toUri)
camelContext.addRoutes(route)
}
private class DynamcRouteBuilder extends RouteBuilder {
private final String from;
private final String to;
private MyDynamcRouteBuilder(CamelContext context, String from, String to) {
super(context);
this.from = from;
this.to = to;
}
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
from(from).to(to);
}
}
but getting below exception while creating first route itself
Failed to create route file_routedirect: at: >>> OnException[[class org.apache.camel.component.file.GenericFileOperationFailedException] -> [Log[Exception trapped ${exception.class}], process[Processor#0x0]]] <<< in route: Route(file_routedirect:)[[From[direct:... because of ref must be specified on: process[Processor#0x0]\n\ta
Not sure about it- what is the issue ? Can someone has any suggestion or fix for this. Thanks
Well, to create routes in an iteration it is nice to have some object that holds the different values for one route. Let's call this RouteConfiguration, a simple POJO with String fields for from, to and routeId.
We are using YAML files to configure such things because you have a real List format instead of using "flat lists" in property files (route[0].from, route[0].to).
If you use Spring you can directly transform such a "list of object configurations" into a Collection of objects using #ConfigurationProperties
When you are able to create such a Collection of value objects, you can simply iterate over it. Here is a strongly simplified example.
#Override
public void configure() {
createConfiguredRoutes();
}
void createConfiguredRoutes() {
configuration.getRoutes().forEach(this::addRouteToContext);
}
// Implement route that is added in an iteration
private void addRouteToContext(final RouteConfiguration routeConfiguration) throws Exception {
this.camelContext.addRoutes(new RouteBuilder() {
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
from(routeConfiguration.getFrom())
.routeId(routeConfiguration.getRouteId())
...
.to(routeConfiguration.getTo());
}
});
}
I have been evaluating to adopt spring-data-mongodb for a project. In summary, my aim is:
Using existing XML schema files to generate Java classes.
This is achieved using JAXB xjc
The root class is TSDProductDataType and is further modeled as below:
The thing to note here is that ExtensionType contains protected List<Object> any; allowing it to store Objects of any class. In my case, it is amongst the classes named TSDModule_Name_HereModuleType and can be browsed here
Use spring-data-mongodb as persistence store
This is achieved using a simple ProductDataRepository
#RepositoryRestResource(collectionResourceRel = "product", path = "product")
public interface ProductDataRepository extends MongoRepository<TSDProductDataType, String> {
TSDProductDataType queryByGtin(#Param("gtin") String gtin);
}
The unmarshalled TSDProductDataType, however, contains JAXBElement which spring-data-mongodb doesn't seem to handle by itself and throws a CodecConfigurationException org.bson.codecs.configuration.CodecConfigurationException: Can't find a codec for class java.lang.Class.
Here is the faulty statement:
TSDProductDataType tsdProductDataType = jaxbElement.getValue();
repository.save(tsdProductDataType);
I tried playing around with Converters for spring-data-mongodb as explained here, however, it seems I am missing something since the exception is about "Codecs" and not "Converters".
Any help is appreciated.
EDIT:
Adding converters for JAXBElement
Note: Works with version 1.5.6.RELEASE of org.springframework.boot::spring-boot-starter-parent. With version 2.0.0.M3, hell breaks loose
It seems that I missed something while trying to add converter earlier. So, I added it like below for testing:
#Component
#ReadingConverter
public class JAXBElementReadConverter implements Converter<DBObject, JAXBElement> {
//#Autowired
//MongoConverter converter;
#Override
public JAXBElement convert(DBObject dbObject) {
Class declaredType, scope;
QName name = qNameFromString((String)dbObject.get("name"));
Object rawValue = dbObject.get("value");
try {
declaredType = Class.forName((String)dbObject.get("declaredType"));
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
if (rawValue.getClass().isArray()) declaredType = List.class;
else declaredType = LinkedHashMap.class;
}
try {
scope = Class.forName((String) dbObject.get("scope"));
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
scope = JAXBElement.GlobalScope.class;
}
//Object value = rawValue instanceof DBObject ? converter.read(declaredType, (DBObject) rawValue) : rawValue;
Object value = "TODO";
return new JAXBElement(name, declaredType, scope, value);
}
QName qNameFromString(String s) {
String[] parts = s.split("[{}]");
if (parts.length > 2) return new QName(parts[1], parts[2], parts[0]);
if (parts.length == 1) return new QName(parts[0]);
return new QName("undef");
}
}
#Component
#WritingConverter
public class JAXBElementWriteConverter implements Converter<JAXBElement, DBObject> {
//#Autowired
//MongoConverter converter;
#Override
public DBObject convert(JAXBElement jaxbElement) {
DBObject dbObject = new BasicDBObject();
dbObject.put("name", qNameToString(jaxbElement.getName()));
dbObject.put("declaredType", jaxbElement.getDeclaredType().getName());
dbObject.put("scope", jaxbElement.getScope().getCanonicalName());
//dbObject.put("value", converter.convertToMongoType(jaxbElement.getValue()));
dbObject.put("value", "TODO");
dbObject.put("_class", JAXBElement.class.getName());
return dbObject;
}
public String qNameToString(QName name) {
if (name.getNamespaceURI() == XMLConstants.NULL_NS_URI) return name.getLocalPart();
return name.getPrefix() + '{' + name.getNamespaceURI() + '}' + name.getLocalPart();
}
}
#SpringBootApplication
public class TsdApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(TsdApplication.class, args);
}
#Bean
public CustomConversions customConversions() {
return new CustomConversions(Arrays.asList(
new JAXBElementReadConverter(),
new JAXBElementWriteConverter()
));
}
}
So far so good. However, how do I instantiate MongoConverter converter;?
MongoConverter is an interface so I guess I need an instantiable class adhering to this interface. Any suggestions?
I understand the desire for convenience in being able to just map an existing domain object to the database layer with no boilerplate, but even if you weren't having the JAXB class structure issue, I would still be recommending away from using it verbatim. Unless this is a simple one-off project, you almost definitely will hit a point where your domain models will need to change but your persisted data need to remain in an existing state. If you are just straight persisting the data, you have no mechanism to convert between a newer domain schema and an older persisted data scheme. Versioning of the persisted data scheme would be wise too.
The link you posted for writing the customer converters is one way to achieve this and fits in nicely with the Spring ecosystem. That method should also solve the issue you are experiencing (about the underlying messy JAXB data structure not converting cleanly).
Are you unable to get that method working? Ensure you are loading them into the Spring context with #Component plus auto-class scanning or manually via some Configuration class.
EDIT to address your EDIT:
Add the following to each of your converters:
private final MongoConverter converter;
public JAXBElement____Converter(MongoConverter converter) {
this.converter = converter;
}
Try changing your bean definition to:
#Bean
public CustomConversions customConversions(#Lazy MongoConverter converter) {
return new CustomConversions(Arrays.asList(
new JAXBElementReadConverter(converter),
new JAXBElementWriteConverter(converter)
));
}
I have a simple scenario in which am trying to verify some behavior when a method is called (i.e. that a certain method was called with given parameter, a function pointer in this scenario). Below are my classes:
#SpringBootApplication
public class Application {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ConfigurableApplicationContext context = SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
AppBootStrapper bootStrapper = context.getBean(AppBootStrapper.class);
bootStrapper.start();
}
}
#Component
public class AppBootStrapper {
private NetworkScanner networkScanner;
private PacketConsumer packetConsumer;
public AppBootStrapper(NetworkScanner networkScanner, PacketConsumer packetConsumer) {
this.networkScanner = networkScanner;
this.packetConsumer = packetConsumer;
}
public void start() {
networkScanner.addConsumer(packetConsumer::consumePacket);
networkScanner.startScan();
}
}
#Component
public class NetworkScanner {
private List<Consumer<String>> consumers = new ArrayList<>();
public void startScan(){
Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor().submit(() -> {
while(true) {
// do some scanning and get/parse packets
consumers.forEach(consumer -> consumer.accept("Package Data"));
}
});
}
public void addConsumer(Consumer<String> consumer) {
this.consumers.add(consumer);
}
}
#Component
public class PacketConsumer {
public void consumePacket(String packet) {
System.out.println("Packet received: " + packet);
}
}
#RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class AppBootStrapperTest {
#Test
public void start() throws Exception {
NetworkScanner networkScanner = mock(NetworkScanner.class);
PacketConsumer packetConsumer = mock(PacketConsumer.class);
AppBootStrapper appBootStrapper = new AppBootStrapper(networkScanner, packetConsumer);
appBootStrapper.start();
verify(networkScanner).addConsumer(packetConsumer::consumePacket);
verify(networkScanner, times(1)).startScan();
}
}
I want to verify that bootStrapper did in fact do proper setup by registering the packet consumer(there might be other consumers registered later on, but this one is mandatory) and then called startScan. I get the following error message when I execute the test case:
Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
networkScanner bean.addConsumer(
com.spring.starter.AppBootStrapperTest$$Lambda$8/438123546#282308c3
);
-> at com.spring.starter.AppBootStrapperTest.start(AppBootStrapperTest.java:24)
Actual invocation has different arguments:
networkScanner bean.addConsumer(
com.spring.starter.AppBootStrapper$$Lambda$7/920446957#5dda14d0
);
-> at com.spring.starter.AppBootStrapper.start(AppBootStrapper.java:12)
From the exception, clearly the function pointers aren't the same.
Am I approaching this the right way? Is there something basic I am missing? I played around and had a consumer injected into PacketConsumer just to see if it made a different and that was OK, but I know that's certainly not the right way to go.
Any help, perspectives on this would be greatly appreciated.
Java doesn't have any concept of "function pointers"; when you see:
networkScanner.addConsumer(packetConsumer::consumePacket);
What Java actually compiles is (the equivalent of):
networkScanner.addConsumer(new Consumer<String>() {
#Override void accept(String packet) {
packetConsumer.consumePacket(packet);
}
});
This anonymous inner class happens to be called AppBootStrapper$$Lambda$7. Because it doesn't (and shouldn't) define an equals method, it will never be equal to the anonymous inner class that the compiler generates in your test, which happens to be called AppBootStrapperTest$$Lambda$8. This is regardless of the fact that the method bodies are the same, and are built in the same way from the same method reference.
If you generate the Consumer explicitly in your test and save it as a static final Consumer<String> field, then you can pass that reference in the test and compare it; at that point, reference equality should hold. This should work with a lambda expression or method reference just fine.
A more apt test would probably verify(packetConsumer, atLeastOnce()).consumePacket(...), as the contents of the lambda are an implementation detail and you're really more concerned about how your component collaborates with other components. The abstraction here should be at the consumePacket level, not at the addConsumer level.
See the comments and answer on this SO question.