This website says beans registered inside component classes are not cglib proxied and do not go through the spring container. So does this mean if I register a bean inside a component class (snippet below), adding #Scope("request") wont make any difference, and a new instance of AnotherBean will always be created whenever testBean.anotherBean() is called from some external class?
#Component
public class TestBean {
#Bean
#Scope("request")
public AnotherBean anotherBean() {
return new AnotherBean();
}
}
The bean that is not cglib proxied is the #Component itself, not the bean registered using the #Bean annotation. If you are not calling the anotherBean method explicitly, it won't make a difference because the proxy is used to return the bean when the method annotated with #Bean is called. See the example
The bean testBeanComponent is not cglib proxied :
#Component
public class TestBeanComponent {
#Bean
#Scope("request")
public AnotherBeanComponent anotherBeanComponent() {
return new AnotherBeanComponent();
}
}
The bean testBeanConfiguration is cglib proxied :
#Configuration
public class TestBeanConfiguration {
#Bean
#Scope("request")
public AnotherBeanConfiguration anotherBeanConfiguration() {
return new AnotherBeanConfiguration();
}
}
What it mean :
#Service
public class TestService {
#Autowired //Inject a normal bean
private TestBeanComponent testBeanComponent;
#Autowired //Inject a proxy
private TestBeanConfiguration testBeanConfiguration;
public void test() {
//Calling anotherBeanComponent always return a new instance of AnotherBeanComponent
testBeanComponent.anotherBeanComponent()
.equals(testBeanComponent.anotherBeanComponent()); // is false
//Calling anotherBeanConfiguration return the bean managed by the container
testBeanConfiguration.anotherBeanConfiguration()
.equals(testBeanConfiguration.anotherBeanConfiguration()); // is true
}
}
But if you are injecting the bean instead of using the method, everything will work as you expected :
#Service
public class TestService2 {
#Autowired //Inject a proxy with scope request
private AnotherBeanComponent anotherBeanComponent;
#Autowired //Inject a proxy with scope request
private AnotherBeanConfiguration anotherBeanConfiguration;
}
Related
When i try to run a spring boot project, it tolde me that it can not autowire some beans whitch are instanciated in a configuration classes.
I think that spring can not load those configuration classes in order.
The stack trace : no bean found the be autowired Ignite<Long,MyEntity> myEntityCache in MyDao
Here is the source :
The main class
#SpringBootApplication
// The beans in the IgniteConfig have to be loaded before dao, service, and Controller
#ComponentScan(basePackageClasses={IgniteConfig.class,AppConfig.class})
public class DemoIgnite {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(DemoIgnite .class, args);
}
}
Config Class 1
#Configuration
public class IgniteConfig {
#Bean
public SpringContext springContext() {
return new SpringContext();
}
#Bean
public Ignite igniteInstance(#Autowired SpringContext springContext) {
IgniteConfiguration cfg = new IgniteConfiguration();
cfg.setIgniteInstanceName("instance");
List<CacheConfiguration> ccDas = new ArrayList<>();
CacheConfiguration cch = new CacheConfiguration<>("myEntitycache");
cch.setCacheMode(CacheMode.REPLICATED);
cch.setIndexedTypes(Long.class, myEntity.class);
ccDas.add(cch);
cfg.setCacheConfiguration( ccDas.toArray(new CacheConfiguration[0]));
SpringCacheManager springCacheManager = new SpringCacheManager();
springCacheManager.setConfiguration(cfg);
return Ignition.start(cfg);
}
#Bean
public IgniteCache<Long, MyEntity> myEntityCache(#Autowired Ignite igniteInstance) {
return igniteInstance.cache("myEntitycache");
}
Config class 2
#Configuration
#ComponentScan({
"com.demo.repository",
"com.demo.service",
"com.demo.controller"
})
public class AppConfig {
}
Dao class
#Repository
public class MyDao{
#Autowired
private Ignite<Long,MyEntity> myEntityCache;
...
Service class:
#Service
public class MyService{
#Autowird
private MyDao dao;
...
Controller class:
#RestController
#RequestMapping
public class MyController{
#Autowired
private MyService service;
....
This means that you don't have a bean of Ignite<Long,MyEntity> type in your context. Moreover springContext bean seems redundant, it's not used by igniteInstance bean. As pointed out by moilejter it probably should be:
IgniteConfig
#Bean
public Ignite ignite() {
...
}
#Bean
public IgniteCache<Long, MyEntity> myEntityCache() {
return ignite().cache("myEntitycache");
}
MyDao
#Repository
public class MyDao {
#Autowired
private IgniteCache<Long, MyEntity> myEntityCache;
...
}
In principle Spring performs the bean setup in few phases as explained in chapter 1.3.2. Instantiating Beans docs:
Bean definition discovery - resources like #Configuration classes or XML files are scanned and bean signatures are collected.
Eager beans instantiation e.g. singletons - from the definitions collected in point 1 while resolving dependencies between definitions. That's why there is no explicit bean instantiation order as the process is driven from dependencies.
Lazy beans instantiation e.g. #Lazy annotated - when the context is already up, this beans will be constructed only when accessed from code.
I would like to use spring transaction management capabilities within a prototype bean. I did the following:
I've used javax.inject.Provider to create my prototype bean.
I've annotated the method of the prototyped bean with the #Transactional annotation.
Is this the right way of doing it?
#Service
public class SomeService {
#Autowired
private Provider<SomePrototype> myPrototypeProvider;
public void execute() {
SomePrototype somePrototype = myPrototypeProvider.get();
somePrototype.someMethod();
}
}
#Component
#Scope(BeanDefinition.SCOPE_PROTOTYPE)
public class SomePrototype {
#Autowired
private SomeSpringBean someSpringBean;
#Autowired
private SomeRepository someRepository;
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRED)
public void someMethod() {
Result result = someSpringBean.doSomething();
someRepository.save(result);
}
}
The initialisation of transaction-scoped bean requires a proxy. Therefore, if we define a transactional bean as prototype, every that bean is requested, a new proxy is created, and that is not efficient.
What is reason behind this requirement (to have transactional prototype bean)
I am using Spring boot. I have some question regarding the spring boot beans.
But I have doubt
I use bean which are default scope that is singleton. So they will have only one instance per application.
#Configuration
public class ...{
#Bean
public void method() {}
}
And
Now i use bean which scope is prototype. So they will have each instance per request.
#Configuration
public class ...{
#Bean
#Scope("prototype")
public void method() {}
}
But
I want single instance per user..? all request use single instance per user.
#Configuration
class Abc {
#Bean
#Scope("session")
public YourBean getYourBean() {
return new YourBean();
}
}
You will need to define one singleton bean with a property using prototype bean:(xml example)
With #bean definition:
#Component
#Scope("singleton")
public class SingletonBean {
// ..
#Autowired
private PrototypeBean prototypeBean;
//..
}
#Component
#Scope("prototype")
public class PrototypeBean {
//.......
}
Example: https://www.baeldung.com/spring-inject-prototype-bean-into-singleton
I have problem in getting Spring bean from JSP. I have a Spring bean configured using annotation:
#Configuration
public class DefaultServiceConfiguration extends AbstractSpringConfiguration {
#Bean
public ExService exService() {
ExServiceImpl service = new ExServiceImpl();
return service;
}
}
And the ExServiceImpl is as below:
public ExServiceImpl implements ExService {
#Override
public String getApprove(Integer x) {
// .....
return approve;
}
}
Now, I want to acccess the Beans method in JSP:
<c:set var="clientApprove" scope="request" value="${ExService .getApprove(1)}"/>
But it is not working.
What you want to do is not good design at all, and you shall avoid it.
But I believe this will help you:
#Bean(scope=DefaultScopes.REQUEST, name="myBean")
public ExService exService() {
ExServiceImpl service = new ExServiceImpl();
return service;
}
But then the bean will not be singleton.
I think we should add #Service annotation above the ExServiceImpl class to create the bean Service
#Service
public ExServiceImpl implements ExService {
}
In xml defined beans you can define two classes like this
<bean id="classA" class="ex.ClassA"/>
<bean id="classB" class="ex.classB"/>
Then in your java implementation you can autowire the constructor of one of the classes in example
public class ClassA {
#autowired
public(ClassB classB){
this.classB = classB;
}
Now how does one do that with java config beans since in example
#Bean
public ClassA classA(){
return new ClassB();
}
#Bean
public ClassB classB(){
return new ClassB()
}
the compiler would warn that Class a does not have any such constructor, how does one do that in java, with autowiring?
Thanks all
See http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/#beans-java-injecting-dependencies
Note that the ClassB bean is implicitly a singleton. The use of the annotation #Configuration on the Config class ensures that Spring returns the singleton instance of the ClassB bean in the classB() call.
#Configuration
public class Config {
#Bean
public ClassA classA(){
return new ClassA( classB() );
}
#Bean
public ClassB classB(){
return new ClassB();
}
}
Or you may prefer this approach (Spring 4.2.1+ required)
#Configuration
#Import(ClassA.class)
public class Config {
#Bean
public ClassB classB(){
return new ClassB();
}
}
#Component
public class ClassA {
#Autowired
public ClassA(ClassB classB) {
...
}
}
Pass the beans you want as parameters to the #Bean method, or use component scanning to create the dependent bean implicitly.