How many times Spring is calling single Singleton constructor?
In which cases constructor can be called more than one time (for bean with the same id)?
EDIT:
HERE is an answer that user is telling that can be more than once - I need more explanation for that.
How many times Spring is calling single Singleton constructor?
Only once; The default Bean Scope is singleton.
In which cases constructor can be called more than one time (for bean with same id)?
Take a look at Bean Scopes
Scope Description
singleton
Scopes a single bean definition to a single object instance per Spring IoC container.
prototype
Scopes a single bean definition to any number of object instances.
request
Scopes a single bean definition to the lifecycle of a single HTTP request; that is each and every HTTP request will have its own instance of a bean created off the back of a single bean definition. Only valid in the context of a web-aware Spring ApplicationContext.
session
Scopes a single bean definition to the lifecycle of a HTTP Session. Only valid in the context of a web-aware Spring ApplicationContext.
global session
Scopes a single bean definition to the lifecycle of a global HTTP Session. Typically only valid when used in a portlet context. Only valid in the context of a web-aware Spring ApplicationContext.
What you need is scope prototype
So add a #Scope("prototype") to your bean definition like this:
#Bean
#Scope("prototype") //add this
public MyBean myBean()
{
return new MyBean();
}
Related
In my spring-boot application i have "normal" singleton beans that "autowire" the stuff they need via a private constructor. So it is not possible to call "new" anywhere in the code.
But i also have "prototype" beans that need runtime arguments to be created. To create such beans i could use this approach (lazy instantiated protype beans): Spring bean with runtime constructor arguments
The problem is that the constructor is used and hence must be "visible". Is there any way in Spring to create such prototype beans with a private constructor? I want to enforce the usage of BeanFactory to create them.
You can try to build your prototype beans with an implementation of
factoryBean,public interface FactoryBean<T> {
T getObject() throws Exception;
Class<T> getObjectType();
boolean isSingleton();
}
So you can encapsulate more complexe logic inside,
A full exemple here
I was trying to understand the difference between BeanFactoryPostProcessor and BeanPostProcessor.
I understood that BeanFactoryPostProcessor operates on bean definition i.e. before the bean instance is getting created it gets executed and BeanPostProcessor gets executed after bean is instantiated and lifecycle events are called.
Does this mean BeanFactoryPostProcessor is not a part of spring lifecycle events as it's called before instantiation while BeanPostProcessor is the part of Spring lifecycle events? Kindly verify if my understanding is right.
BeanFactoryPostProcessor is an interface and beans that implement it are actually beans that undergo the Spring lifecycle (Example below) but these beans don't take part of the other declared beans' lifecycle.
public class CustomBeanFactory implements BeanFactoryPostProcessor {
#Override
public void postProcessBeanFactory(ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory) throws BeansException {
for (String beanName : beanFactory.getBeanDefinitionNames()) {
BeanDefinition beanDefinition = beanFactory.getBeanDefinition(beanName);
// Manipulate the beanDefiniton or whatever you need to do
}
}
}
The differences about BeanFactoryPostProcessor and BeanPostProcessor:
A bean implementing BeanFactoryPostProcessor is called when all bean definitions will have been loaded, but no beans will have been instantiated yet. This allows for overriding or adding properties even to eager-initializing beans. This will let you have access to all the beans that you have defined in XML or that are annotated (scanned via component-scan).
A bean implementing BeanPostProcessor operate on bean (or object) instances which means that when the Spring IoC container instantiates a bean instance then BeanPostProcessor interfaces do their work.
BeanFactoryPostProcessor implementations are "called" during startup of the Spring context after all bean definitions will have been loaded while BeanPostProcessor are "called" when the Spring IoC container instantiates a bean (i.e. during the startup for all the singleton and on demand for the proptotypes one)
Here is a flow diagram that might help to understand the spring bean initialisation life cycle.
As we can see, the implementation of theBeanFactoryPostProcessor is executed before any spring bean instantiation, contrary to the BeanPostprocessor, where the implemented method will be executed only when the bean is instantiated.
The source image is from the Spring 5 Design Patterns Book.
I pick the explanation from the book:
After loading the bean definitions from all styles of configurations,
BeanFactoryPostProcessor comes into the picture to modify the
definition of some beans, and then the container instantiates the
beans. Finally, BeanPostProcessor works on the beans, and it can
modify and change the bean object. This is the initialization phase.
Bean Factory Post Procesor (BFPP):
Used when we want to override XML / annotations, because Spring reads XML / annotations to create the beans. If you want to provide a different configuration to Spring during creation (at run time), then you need to use BFPP. Creating the internal dependency graph is a one time process.
Bean Post Processor (BPP):
The above step happened only once. It's like creating the "menu" of beans. After creating the bean, if you want to change the bean properties, you can't make any changes to the XML / annotations. Instead, you can use the BPP for bean configuration change after creation. The BPP has 2 execution areas, one before #postconstruct and one after #postconstruct.
Real Time Example:
You want to place an online food order from Zomato. While ordering online, you give a list of food (XML/annotations) to the restaurant. But, just before the restaurant starts making the food, you call them and ask them to change the dish (BFPP). Now the food is ready to be delivered and you've received it (Bean is created). But you want to make some modifications (like salt or chilly powder), and you can do this before tasting the food (because you know restaurants never put enough salt), or even after tasting the food (this is before and after #postconstruct). Once the taste is good, then the food is ready (the bean is ready to use).
The BeanFactoryPostProcessor executes before bean Object instantiation (ie at the time Applicationcontext container is initialized)
BeanPostprocessor is executed after the bean object is created, as it can be executed before init() and after init().
I am studying for the Spring Core certification an I have some doubts about how Spring handle the beans lifecycle and in particular about the bean post processor.
So I have this schema:
It is pretty clear for me what it means:
The following steps take place in the Load Bean Definitions phase:
The #Configuration classes are processed and/or #Components are
scanned for and/or XML files are parsed.
Bean definitions added to BeanFactory (each indexed under its id)
Special BeanFactoryPostProcessor beans invoked, it can modify the definition of any bean (for example for the property-placeholder values replacements).
Then the following steps take place in the beans creation phase:
Each bean is eagerly instantiated by default (created in right order with its dependencies injected).
After dependency injection each bean goes through a post-processing
phase in which further configuration and initialization may occur.
After post processing the bean is fully initialized and ready for use (tracked by its id until the context is destroyed)
Ok, this is pretty clear for me and I also know that there are two types of bean post processors which are:
Initializers: Initialize the bean if instructed (i.e. #PostConstruct).
and All the rest: that allow for additional configuration and that may run before or after the initialize step
And I post this slide:
So it is very clear for me what does the initializers bean post processors (they are the methods annotated with #PostContruct annotation and that are automatically called immediately after the setter methods (so after the dependency injection), and I know that I can use to perform some initialization batch (as populate a cache as in the previous example).
But what exactly represents the other bean post processor? What do we mean when we say that these steps are performed before or after the initialization phase?
So my beans are instantiated and its dependencies are injected, so then the initialization phase is completed (by the execution of a #PostContruct annotated method). What do we mean by saying that a Bean Post Processor is used before the initialization phase? It means that it happens before the #PostContruct annotated method execution? Does it means that it could happen before the dependency injection (before that the setter methods are called)?
And what exactly do we mean when we say that it is performed after the initialization step. It means that it happens after that the execution of a #PostContruct annotated method, or what?
I can easily figure into my head why I need a #PostContruct annotated method but I can't figure some typical example of the other kind of bean post processor, can you show me some typical example of when are used?
Spring doc explains the BPPs under Customizing beans using BeanPostProcessor. BPP beans are a special kind of beans that get created before any other beans and interact with newly created beans. With this construct, Spring gives you means to hook-up to and customize the lifecycle behavior simply by implementing a BeanPostProcessor yourself.
Having a custom BPP like
public class CustomBeanPostProcessor implements BeanPostProcessor {
public CustomBeanPostProcessor() {
System.out.println("0. Spring calls constructor");
}
#Override
public Object postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName)
throws BeansException {
System.out.println(bean.getClass() + " " + beanName);
return bean;
}
#Override
public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName)
throws BeansException {
System.out.println(bean.getClass() + " " + beanName);
return bean;
}
}
would be called and print out the class and bean name for every created bean.
To undersand how the method fit the bean's lifecycle, and when exactly the method's get called check the docs
postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) Apply
this BeanPostProcessor to the given new bean instance before any bean
initialization callbacks (like InitializingBean's afterPropertiesSet
or a custom init-method).
postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) Apply
this BeanPostProcessor to the given new bean instance after any bean
initialization callbacks (like InitializingBean's afterPropertiesSet
or a custom init-method).
The important bit is also that
The bean will already be populated with property values.
For what concerns the relation with the #PostConstruct note that this annotation is a convenient way of declaring a postProcessAfterInitialization method, and Spring becomes aware of it when you either by registerCommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor or specify the <context:annotation-config /> in bean configuration file. Whether the #PostConstruct method will execute before or after any other postProcessAfterInitialization depends on the order property
You can configure multiple BeanPostProcessor instances, and you can
control the order in which these BeanPostProcessors execute by setting
the order property.
The typical example for a bean post processor is when you want to wrap the original bean in a proxy instance, e.g. when using the #Transactional annotation.
The bean post processor will be handed the original instance of the bean, it may call any methods on the target, but it also gets to return the actual bean instance that should be bound in the application context, which means that it can actually return any object it wants. The typical scenario when this is useful is when the bean post processor wraps the target in a proxy instance. All invocations on the bean bound in application context will pass through the proxy, and the proxy then gets to perform some magic before and/or after invocations on the target bean, e.g. AOP or transaction management.
The difference is BeanPostProcessor will hook into context initialization then call postProcessBeforeInitialization and postProcessAfterInitialization for all defined beans.
But #PostConstruct is just used for the specific class you want to customize bean creation after constructor or set method.
When I defined a 'MethodInvokingFactory' bean with 'scope=step', I got an error that the type of the bean can't be determined. It worked fine when I replaced 'scope=step' with 'lazy-init=true'. As per my knowledge, both are used for the late binding of the beans, except for that one difference. Are there any other differences between these two ways? Also, is my usage correct?
Please let me know your thoughts about this.
To answer to your question from low-level perspective:
lazy-init="true" means that bean will not be instantiated when the context is created, but will be created when it is referred e.g. by another bean. I think this is clear, also from #AravindA comment.
Scoped bean works in different manner. When context is created this bean is wrapped into additional proxy object (by default created by CGLIB), which is passed to the bean that refers it (this proxy is by default singleton, e.g. shared). So each time the method is invoked on the proxy in runtime Spring intersects the call, requests the factory to return the instance of the bean and invokes the method on that bean. The factory in its turn may lookup for "real" bean instance e.g. in HTTP request ("request" scope) or HTTP session ("session" scope) and/or create new instance if necessary. Late instantiation allows to initialize the scoped bean with "runtime" (scope) values, e.g. values from HTTP request/session which are obviously undefined when context was created. In particular "step"-scoped beans are bound to thread local (remember that steps are run in parallel for partitioning). So, scoped beans are dereferred when you call a method on them. Finally one can easily break this elegant Spring "ideology" by calling any method on scoped bean just after it is set to another bean (e.g. in the setter) :)
One thing to understand about lazy-initialization is that even though a bean
definition may be marked up as being lazy-initialized, if the lazy-initialized
bean is the dependency of a singleton bean that is not lazy-initialized, when the
ApplicationContext is eagerly pre-instantiating the singleton, it will have to
satisfy all of the singletons dependencies, one of which will be the
lazy-initialized bean!
Using a scope of Step is required in order to use late binding since the bean
cannot actually be instantiated until the Step starts, which allows the
attributes to be found. Because it is not part of the Spring container by
default, the scope must be added explicitly, either by using the batch namespace
or by including a bean definition explicitly for the StepScope (but not both):
<bean class="org.springframework.batch.core.scope.StepScope" />
Read here and here for more info
The scope="step" has nothing to do with Lazy initialization . It is use for late binding of parameters inside a "Step" .
the step scope is specifically for latebinding of job/step attributes and not really for late-binding of beans, meaning the spring bean context/factory will enhance stepscoped beans and look for attributes to set, e.g.
value="#{jobParameters[input.file.name]}
Below are the definitions of prototype and request scope in Spring.
prototype
Scopes a single bean definition to any number of object instances.
request
Scopes a single bean definition to the lifecycle of a single HTTP request; that is each and every HTTP request will have its own
instance of a bean created off the back of a single bean definition. Only valid in the context of a web-aware Spring ApplicationContext.
As per my understanding In case of prototype scope , some pool will be maintained by core container. It will serve the bean instance from that pool.
In case of request scope, new bean will be served for each http request. Please correct me if there is some dicrepency in understanding?
If above statements are true, then if bean is holding some state then the scope should not be defined as prototype rather it should be defined
as request. Correct?
Prototype creates a brand new instance every time you call getBean on the ApplicationContext. Whereas for Request, only one instance is created for an HttpRequest. So in a single HttpRequest, I can call getBean twice on Application and there will only ever be one bean instantiated, whereas that same bean scoped to Prototype in that same single HttpRequest would get 2 different instances.
HttpRequest scope
Mark mark1 = context.getBean("mark");
Mark mark2 = context.getBean("mark");
mark1 == mark2; //This will return true
Prototype scope
Mark mark1 = context.getBean("mark");
Mark mark2 = context.getBean("mark");
mark1 == mark2; //This will return false
Hope that clears it up for you.
You are off. Prototype is described in the docs here as
"The non-singleton, prototype scope of
bean deployment results in the
creation of a new bean instance every
time a request for that specific bean
is made."
Your description of request scoped beans is accurate.
Probably just got the wires crossed vis-a-vis prototype vs singleton.
Prototype scope creates a new instance every time getBean method is invoked on the ApplicationContext. Whereas for request scope, only one instance is created for an HttpRequest.
So in an HttpRequest, if the getBean method is called twice on Application and there will be only one bean instantiated and reused, whereas the bean scoped to Prototype in that same single HttpRequest would get 2 different instances.