Oracle Composite Range-Hash Partitioning - oracle

I am trying to partition my table as below
CREATE TABLE ABC(
id VARCHAR2(100) primary key,
datecreated DATE)
PARTITION BY RANGE (datecreated) INTERVAL (NUMTODSINTERVAL(1,'DAY'))
SUBPARTITION BY HASH (ID) SUBPARTITIONS 4
(PARTITION lessthan2018 VALUES LESS THAN (TIMESTAMP' 2018-01-01 00:00:00') );
If I use WHERE clause with column "ID" will the performance improve? Will the performance be the same if I just partition by date. Will it perform the same since ID is already a primary key?

If id is the primary key then you will have a unique global index on that column, and partitioning will not make any difference because the index already takes you to the physical address of the specified row.
Also, dropping, truncating or exchanging a partition will invalidate the index unless you specify the update global indexes clause.
If id was not the PK but something non-unique like a product type, or area code, then a query for just that column without any date would need to check every partition.

Related

partition in oracle

CREATE TABLE temp_stud as select * from STUD_MAST
PARTITION BY RANGE(ADM_DT)
(
PARTITION temp_stud1 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('02/01/2000','MM/DD/YYYY')),
PARTITION temp_stud2 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('03/01/2000','MM/DD/YYYY')),
PARTITION temp_stud3 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('04/01/2000','MM/DD/YYYY')),
PARTITION temp_stud4 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('05/01/2000','MM/DD/YYYY'))
);
I am getting a missing left parenthesis error for above table creation can anyone tell me what is the issue in above creation
Note: ADM_DT is a date column with data type char(8) and storing format YYMMDD
Please use below SQL. The Creation of Partition has be part of Create table.
CREATE TABLE temp_stud
PARTITION BY RANGE(ADM_DT)
(
PARTITION temp_stud1 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('02/01/2000','MM/DD/YYYY')),
PARTITION temp_stud2 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('03/01/2000','MM/DD/YYYY')),
PARTITION temp_stud3 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('04/01/2000','MM/DD/YYYY')),
PARTITION temp_stud4 VALUES LESS THAN(TO_DATE('05/01/2000','MM/DD/YYYY'))
)
as select * from STUD_MAST;

Can I create a growing Interval partitioned table with a default/maxvalue partition?

Summary of the question: To Create table with partitions which are range partitioned. However records which do not know the range value should reside in a different (default) partition and be moved to the correct partition when the value is filled. The default partition would never be dropped while the other partitions would be dropped after a defined retention period via an script.
The whole story:
I have a table where the records have to be placed in a partition based on a date field. This is a growing table and after some time the data from these partitions can be purged. I used to create table with something like the snippet below.
This works fine because we knew the value of the date column based on which we partition (RDATE). However in our new project we do not know this when a record is inserted. The value would eventually be filled in during the course of the application processing.
My initial thought was to create MAXPARTITION (MAXVALUE) which would be a catch-all partition for records which do not have the date filled and enable ROW MOVEMENTS so that when the date is filled it moves into an appropriate partition. However I think it is not possible to have both MAXVALUE partition and interval partitioning together. Is that right?
Also Is there a better way to do this?
PARTITION BY RANGE ("RDATE") INTERVAL (NUMTODSINTERVAL (1,'DAY'))
SUBPARTITION BY HASH ("RKEY")
SUBPARTITION TEMPLATE (
SUBPARTITION "SP01",
SUBPARTITION "SP02",
SUBPARTITION "SP03",
SUBPARTITION "SP04",
SUBPARTITION "SP05",
SUBPARTITION "SP06",
SUBPARTITION "SP07",
SUBPARTITION "SP08",
SUBPARTITION "SP09",
SUBPARTITION "SP10",
SUBPARTITION "SP11",
SUBPARTITION "SP12",
SUBPARTITION "SP13",
SUBPARTITION "SP14",
SUBPARTITION "SP15",
SUBPARTITION "SP16" )
(PARTITION "INITIALPARTITION" VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2016-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
I expect a table with default and range partitions and records to move to the range partitions from the default when a column is filled.
The column you use as partition key cannot be NULL but you can use a workaround like this:
CREATE TABLE ... (
...
RDATE DATE,
PARTITION_KEY DATE GENERATED ALWAYS AS (COALESCE(RDATE, DATE '1969-12-31'))
)
PARTITION BY RANGE (PARTITION_KEY) INTERVAL (NUMTODSINTERVAL (1,'DAY'))
...
(PARTITION INITIAL_PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (DATE '1970-01-01'))
ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
If you insert a record with RDATE = NULL then it will be inserted into partition INITIAL_PARTITION. For the initial data (e.g. 1970-01-01) you must select a values whicc will never fall into the "real" date values. You could also use a date in far future, e.g.
CREATE TABLE ... (
...
RDATE DATE,
PARTITION_KEY DATE GENERATED ALWAYS AS (COALESCE(RDATE, DATE '2999-12-31'))
)
PARTITION BY RANGE (PARTITION_KEY) INTERVAL (NUMTODSINTERVAL (1,'DAY'))
...
(PARTITION INITIAL_PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (DATE '2019-04-01'))
ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
-- Create DEFAULT_PARTITION
INSERT INTO ... (RDATE) VALUES (NULL);
ROLLBACK;
ALTER TABLE ... RENAME PARTITION FOR (TIMESTAMP '2999-12-31 00:00:00') TO DEFAULT_PARTITION;

How to create monthly partition in oracle?

I have a table with 2017 and 2018 year data. Need to create monthly partition on that table.
So I created one non partitioned table and loaded all the data from original table. now I am converting the new table to a monthly partitioned table.
When I am altering getting error as
ORA-14300: partitioning key maps to a partition outside maximum
permitted number of partitions
My Script is
ALTER TABLE ORDERHDR_PART MODIFY
PARTITION BY RANGE (LASTUPDATE) INTERVAL(NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1, 'MONTH'))
(
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_JAN VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-02-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_FEB VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-03-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_MAR VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-04-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_APR VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-05-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_MAY VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-06-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_JUN VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-07-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_JUL VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-08-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_AUG VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-09-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_SEP VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-10-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_OCT VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-11-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_NOV VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-12-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_DEC VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-01-2019','DD-MM-YYYY'))
)ONLINE;
I think your approach is wrong.
First create a partitioned table, e.g.
CREATE TABLE ORDERHDR_PART (....)
PARTITION BY RANGE (LASTUPDATE) INTERVAL (NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1, 'MONTH'))
(
PARTITION ORDERHDR_INITIAL VALUES less than (DATE '2000-01-01')
);
Then transfer existing data to the new table.
Either you use a simple INSERT INTO ORDERHDR_PART SELECT * FROM ORDERHDR_2017;
Oracle will create monthly partitions automatically based on LASTUPDATE value.
With this methods you would duplicate (temporary) your data and/or you may face a performance issue.
The other method is to use Exchanging Partitions, should be like this
ALTER TABLE ORDERHDR_PART
EXCHANGE PARTITION FOR (DATE '2017-01-01')
WITH TABLE ORDERHDR_2017
INCLUDING INDEXES;
I don't know whether "PARTITION FOR (DATE '2017-01-01')" is created automatically, perhaps you have to run INSERT INTO ORDERHDR_PART (LASTUPDATE) VALUES (DATE '2017-01-01'); ROLLBACK; in order to create it first.
You will get one partition for all months, afterwards you can split the partition with Splitting into Multiple Partitions. Should be like this:
ALTER TABLE ORDERHDR_PART SPLIT PARTITION FOR (DATE '2017-01-01') INTO (
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_JAN VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-02-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_FEB VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-03-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_MAR VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-04-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_APR VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-05-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_MAY VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-06-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_JUN VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-07-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_JUL VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-08-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_AUG VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-09-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_SEP VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-10-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_OCT VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-11-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_NOV VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-12-2018','DD-MM-YYYY')),
PARTITION ORDERHDR_PART_DEC VALUES less than (TO_DATE('01-01-2019','DD-MM-YYYY'))
);
Note, by default you cannot drop the inital partition of a RANGE partitioned table. If you face this problem execute:
ALTER TABLE ORDERHDR_PART SET INTERVAL ();
ALTER TABLE ORDERHDR_PART DROP PARTITION ORDERHDR_INITIAL;
ALTER TABLE ORDERHDR_PART SET INTERVAL (NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1, 'MONTH'));

Partitioning a table with one value in one partition and the rest in another partition

For example, I have a table name Emp and it has empname, designation, salary as columns. I would like this table to have 2 partitions, like list of employees who are managers in one partition and rest(engineer, peon, clerk) in one partition.
can someone help on how to create it
In this case you will have to use LIST based partition. Create a pertition where ROLE = MANAGER and create another partition which is default. Here is an example which will help you.
Exclude values from oracle partition
Example
CREATE TABLE EMPLOYEE (EMP_ID VARCHAR2(25),
EMP_NAME VARCHAR2(250),
ROLE VARCHAR2(100)
)
PARTITION BY LIST (ROLE)
(
PARTITION part_managers
VALUES ('MANAGER'),
PARTITION part_others
VALUES (DEFAULT)
);
Please refer the following URL and example:
For example, the following SQL statement splits the sales_Q4_2007 partition of the partitioned by range table sales splits into five partitions corresponding to the quarters of the next year. In this example, the partition sales_Q4_2008 implicitly becomes the high bound of the split partition.
ALTER TABLE sales SPLIT PARTITION sales_Q4_2007 INTO
( PARTITION sales_Q4_2007 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-JAN-2008','dd-MON-yyyy')),
PARTITION sales_Q1_2008 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-APR-2008','dd-MON-yyyy')),
PARTITION sales_Q2_2008 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-JUL-2008','dd-MON-yyyy')),
PARTITION sales_Q3_2008 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-OCT-2008','dd-MON-yyyy')),
PARTITION sales_Q4_2008);
For the sample table customers partitioned by list, the following statement splits the partition Europe into three partitions.
ALTER TABLE list_customers SPLIT PARTITION Europe INTO
(PARTITION western-europe VALUES ('GERMANY', 'FRANCE'),
PARTITION southern-europe VALUES ('ITALY'),
PARTITION rest-europe);
https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/VLDBG/GUID-01C14320-0D7B-48BE-A5AD-003DDA761277.htm
You will get some idea about this.

Partitioning a table refenceing other

I have a target table T1 which doesn't have a Date field. The current size is increasing rapidly. Hence I need to add a Date field and also perform table partitioning on this target table.
T1 has PRIMARY KEY (DOCID, LABID)
and has CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY (DOCID) REFERENCES T2
Table T2 is also complex table and has many rules in it.
T2 has PRIMARY KEY (DOCID)
My question is, as I need to partition T1. Is it possible NOT TO perform any step for T2 before T1 is partition? DBA told me that I need to partition T2 first before I touch T1??
There is no need to partition T2 before partitioning T1. Foreign key constraints do not care in the slightest bit about partitioning.
Best of luck.
You have – as proposed by others - two options. The first one is to add a redundant column DATE to the table T1 (child) and introduce the range partitioning on this column.
The second option is to use reference partitioning. Below is the simplified DDL for those options.
Range partitioning on child
create table T2_P2 /* parent */
(docid number not null,
trans_date date not null,
pad varchar2(100),
CONSTRAINT t2_p2_pk PRIMARY KEY(docid)
);
create table T1_P2 /* child */
(docid number not null,
labid number not null,
trans_date date not null, /** redundant column **/
pad varchar2(100),
CONSTRAINT t1_p2_pk PRIMARY KEY(docid, labid),
CONSTRAINT t1_p2_fk
FOREIGN KEY(docid) REFERENCES T2_P2(docid)
)
PARTITION BY RANGE(trans_date)
( PARTITION Q1_2016 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-APR-2016','DD-MON-YYYY'))
);
Reference partition
create table T2_RP /* parent */
(docid number not null,
trans_date date not null,
pad varchar2(100),
CONSTRAINT t2_rp_pk PRIMARY KEY(docid)
)
PARTITION BY RANGE(trans_date)
( PARTITION Q1_2016 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-APR-2016','DD-MON-YYYY'))
);
create table T1_RP /* child */
(docid number not null,
labid number not null,
pad varchar2(100),
CONSTRAINT t1_rp_pk PRIMARY KEY(docid, labid),
CONSTRAINT t1_rp_fk
FOREIGN KEY(docid) REFERENCES T2_RP(docid)
)
PARTITION BY REFERENCE(t1_rp_fk);
Your question is basically if the first option is possible, so the answer is YES.
To decide if the first option is preferable I’d suggest checking three criteria:
Migration
The first option requires a new DATE column in the child table that must be initialized during the migration (and of course correct maintained by the application).
Lifecycle
It could be that the lifecycle of both tables is the same (e.g. both parent and child records are kept for 7 year). In this case is preferable if both tables are partitioned (on the same key).
Access
For queries such as below you will profit from the reference partitioning (both tables are pruned - i.e. only the partitions with the accessed date are queried).
select * from T2_RP T2 join T1_RP T1 on t2.docid = t1.docid
where t2.trans_date = to_date('01012016','ddmmyyyy');
In the first option you will (probalbly) end with FTS on T2 and to get pruning on T1 you need to add predicate T2.trans_date = t1.trans_date
Having said that, I do not claim that the reference partition is superior. But I think it's worth to examine both options in your context and see which one is better.

Resources