1. Summary
I can't find, how I can automatically prettify my YAML files.
2. Data
Example:
I have SashaPrettifyYAML.yaml file:
sasha_commands:
# Sasha comment
sasha_command_help: {call: sublime.command_help, caption: 'Sasha Command: Command Help'}
3. Expected behavior
I want to delete {braces}:
sasha_commands:
# Sasha comment
sasha_command_help:
call: sublime.command_help
caption: 'Sasha Command: Command Help'
4. Not helped
Pretty YAML (based on PyYAML) and online formatters as YAML Formatter and OnlineYAMLTools delete comments;
I can't find the required option in ruamel.yaml.cmd;
align-yaml align, not prettify YAML file.
There is no option to do this in ruamel.yaml.cmd, but it is fairly straightforward to do this with a small python program and using ruamel.yaml, by loading and dumping in round-trip mode (the default).
The only thing you need to do is make sure the flow-style on the data-structure that is the value for the key sasha_command_help is set to block-style (which is how I interpret your definition of "prettifying YAML"):
import sys
import ruamel.yaml
yaml_str = """\
sasha_commands:
# Sasha comment
sasha_command_help: {call: sublime.command_help, caption: 'Sasha Command: Command Help'}
"""
yaml = ruamel.yaml.YAML()
yaml.preserve_quotes = True
data = yaml.load(yaml_str)
data['sasha_commands']['sasha_command_help'].fa.set_block_style()
yaml.dump(data, sys.stdout)
this will exactly give the output you expect.
A recursive data structure walker can be found in scalarstring.py in the ruamel.yaml source, and adapted to make a generic "make-everything-block-style" routine:
import sys
import ruamel.yaml
def block_style(base):
"""
This routine walks over a simple, i.e. consisting of dicts, lists and
primitives, tree loaded from YAML. It recurses into dict values and list
items, and sets block-style on these.
"""
if isinstance(base, dict):
for k in base:
try:
base.fa.set_block_style()
except AttributeError:
pass
block_style(base[k])
elif isinstance(base, list):
for elem in base:
try:
base.fa.set_block_style()
except AttributeError:
pass
block_style(elem)
yaml = ruamel.yaml.YAML()
yaml.preserve_quotes = True
file_in = sys.argv[1]
file_out = sys.argv[2]
with open(file_in) as fp:
data = yaml.load(fp)
block_style(data)
with open(file_out, 'w') as fp:
yaml.dump(data, fp)
If you store the above in prettifyyaml.py you can call it with:
python prettifyyaml.py SashaPrettifyYAML.yaml Prettified.yaml
Since you are already using single quotes around the scalar that has embedded spaces, you won't see a change if you leave out yaml.preserve_quotes = True. But if you had used a double quoted scalar then that line makes sure the double quotes are preserved.
I had the same problem. I wrote my own YAML beautifier https://github.com/wangkuiyi/yamlfmt. I hope it helps.
I tried top results from Google, but none of them address the requirements of https://sqlflow.org/sqlflow, which I am leading:
https://pypi.org/project/yamlfmt cannot handle a file of multiple YAML documents separated by ---
https://github.com/devopyio/yamlfmt cannot handle multiple files.
https://github.com/miekg/yamlfmt/blob/master/fmt.go cannot replace (inline edit) the input files.
You can use yq tool - it's easy to install and use, and it's well maintained.
Supposing you have example.yml file to format, it can be processed by following ways:
from file: yq r --unwrapScalar -p pv -P example.yml '*'
from stdin: cat example.yml | yq r --unwrapScalar -p pv -P - '*'
Related
I am using python to write in to a YAML file. But I am unable to write it in a specific format as I require
awesome_people:
name: Awesome People
entities:
- device_tracker.dad_smith
- device_tracker.mom_smith
I am getting problem in the entities part, as I am unable to create a list with proper indents as in the above YAML.
How can I create the above exact format?
You can do this with ruamel.yaml, setting the sequence indent from default two to four,
and the offset of the dash+space (which need a minimum indent of two), from zero to two.
You should leave the mapping indent unchanged from the default:
import sys
import ruamel.yaml
ent = ['device_tracker.dad_smith', 'device_tracker.mom_smith']
data = dict(awesome_people = dict(name='Awesome People', entities=ent))
yaml_str = """\
"""
yaml = ruamel.yaml.YAML()
yaml.indent(sequence=4, offset=2)
# print(data)
yaml.dump(data, sys.stdout)
which gives:
awesome_people:
name: Awesome People
entities:
- device_tracker.dad_smith
- device_tracker.mom_smith
I've got an input YAML file (test.yml) as follows:
# sample set of lines
foo:
x: 12
y: hello world
ip_range['initial']: 1.2.3.4
ip_range[]: tba
array['first']: Cluster1
array2[]: bar
The source contains square brackets for some keys (possibly empty).
I'm trying to get a line by line list of all the paths in the file, ideally like:
foo.x: 12
foo.y: hello world
foo.ip_range['initial']: 1.2.3.4
foo.ip_range[]: tba
foo.array['first']: Cluster1
array2[]: bar
I've used the yamlpaths library and the yaml-paths CLI, but can't get the desired output. Trying this:
yaml-paths -m -s =foo -K test.yml
outputs:
foo.x
foo.y
foo.ip_range\[\'initial\'\]
foo.ip_range\[\]
foo.array\[\'first\'\]
Each path is on one line, but the output has all the escape characters ( \ ). Modifying the call to remove the -m option ("expand matching parent nodes") fixes that problem but the output is then not one path per line:
yaml-paths -s =foo -K test.yml
gives:
foo: {"x": 12, "y": "hello world", "ip_range['initial']": "1.2.3.4", "ip_range[]": "tba", "array['first']": "Cluster1"}
Any ideas how I can get the one line per path entry but without the escape chars? I was wondering if there is anything for path querying in the ruamel modules?
Your "paths" are nothing more than the joined string representation of the keys (and probably indices) of the
mappings (and potentially sequences) in your YAML document.
That can be trivially generated from data loaded from YAML with a recursive function:
import sys
import ruamel.yaml
yaml_str = """\
# sample set of lines
foo:
x: 12
y: hello world
ip_range['initial']: 1.2.3.4
ip_range[]: tba
array['first']: Cluster1
array2[]: bar
"""
def pathify(d, p=None, paths=None, joinchar='.'):
if p is None:
paths = {}
pathify(d, "", paths, joinchar=joinchar)
return paths
pn = p
if p != "":
pn += '.'
if isinstance(d, dict):
for k in d:
v = d[k]
pathify(v, pn + k, paths, joinchar=joinchar)
elif isinstance(d, list):
for idx, e in enumerate(d):
pathify(e, pn + str(idx), paths, joinchar=joinchar)
else:
paths[p] = d
yaml = ruamel.yaml.YAML(typ='safe')
paths = pathify(yaml.load(yaml_str))
for p, v in paths.items():
print(f'{p} -> {v}')
which gives:
foo.x -> 12
foo.y -> hello world
foo.ip_range['initial'] -> 1.2.3.4
foo.ip_range[] -> tba
foo.array['first'] -> Cluster1
array2[] -> bar
While Anthon's answer certainly produces the output you were after, I think your question was specifically about how to get the yaml-paths command to produce the desired output. I'll address that original question.
As of version 3.5.0, the yamlpath project's yaml-paths command supports a --noescape option which removes the escape symbols from output. Using your input file and the new option, you may find this output more to your liking:
$ yaml-paths --nofile --expand --keynames --noescape --values --search='=~/.*/' test.yml
foo.x: 12
foo.y: hello world
foo.ip_range['initial']: 1.2.3.4
foo.ip_range[]: tba
foo.array['first']: Cluster1
array2[]: bar
Note:
Using the --values option includes the value with each YAML Path.
For interest, I changed the --search expression to match every node in the input file rather than only the "foo" data.
The default output (without setting --noescape) produces YAML Paths which can be used as direct input into other YAML Path parsers and processors; setting --noescape changes this to render human-friendly paths which may not work as downstream YAML Path input.
Disclaimer: I am the author of the yamlpath project. Should you ever run into issues or have questions about it, please visit the project's GitHub project site and engage me via Issues (bugs and feature requests) or Discussions (questions). Thank you!
I am building an open source project using Ruby for testing HTTP services: https://github.com/Comcast/http-blackbox-test-tool
I want to be able to reference environment variables in my test-plan.yaml file. I could use ERB, however I don't want to support embedding any random Ruby code and ERB syntax is odd for non-rubyists, I just want to access environment variables using the commonly used Unix style ${ENV_VAR} syntax.
e.g.
order-lunch-app-health:
request:
url: ${ORDER_APP_URL}
headers:
content-type: 'application/text'
method: get
expectedResponse:
statusCode: 200
maxRetryCount: 5
All examples I have found for Ruby use ERB. Does anyone have a suggestion on the best way to deal with this? I an open to using another tool to preprocess the YAML and then send that to the Ruby application.
I believe something like this should work under most circumstances:
require 'yaml'
def load_yaml(file)
content = File.read file
content.gsub! /\${([^}]+)}/ do
ENV[$1]
end
YAML.load content
end
p load_yaml 'sample.yml'
As opposed to my original answer, this is both simpler and handles undefined ENV variables well.
Try with this YAML:
# sample.yml
path: ${PATH}
home: ${HOME}
error: ${NO_SUCH_VAR}
Original Answer (left here for reference)
There are several ways to do it. If you want to allow your users to use the ${VAR} syntax, then perhaps one way would be to first convert these variables to Ruby string substitution format %{VAR} and then evaluate all environment variables together.
Here is a rough proof of concept:
require 'yaml'
# Transform environments to a hash of { symbol: value }
env_hash = ENV.to_h.transform_keys(&:to_sym)
# Load the file and convert ${ANYTHING} to %{ANYTHING}
content = File.read 'sample.yml'
content.gsub! /\${([^}]+)}/, "%{\\1}"
# Use Ruby string substitution to replace %{VARS}
content %= env_hash
# Done
yaml = YAML.load content
p yaml
Use it with this sample.yml for instance:
# sample.yml
path: ${PATH}
home: ${HOME}
There are many ways this can be improved upon of course.
Preprocessing is easy, and I recommend you use a YAML loaderd/dumper
based solution, as the replacement might require quotes around the
replacement scalar. (E.g. you substitute the string true, if that
were not quoted, the resulting YAML would be read as a boolean).
Assuming your "source" is in input.yaml and your env. variable
ORDER_APP_URL set to https://some.site/and/url. And the following
script in expand.py:
import sys
import os
from pathlib import Path
import ruamel.yaml
def substenv(d, env):
if isinstance(d, dict):
for k, v in d.items():
if isinstance(v, str) and '${' in v:
d[k] = v.replace('${', '{').format(**env)
else:
substenv(v, env)
elif isinstance(d, list):
for idx, item in enumerate(d):
if isinstance(v, str) and '${' in v:
d[idx] = item.replace('${', '{').format(**env)
else:
substenv(item, env)
yaml = ruamel.yaml.YAML()
yaml.preserve_quotes = True
data = yaml.load(Path(sys.argv[1]))
substenv(data, os.environ)
yaml.dump(data, Path(sys.argv[2]))
You can then do:
python expand.py input.yaml output.yaml
which writes output.yaml:
order-lunch-app-health:
request:
url: https://some.site/and/url
headers:
content-type: 'application/text'
method: get
expectedResponse:
statusCode: 200
maxRetryCount: 5
Please note that the spurious quotes around 'application/text' are preserved, as would be any comments
in the original file.
Quotes around the substituted URL are not necessary, but the would have been added if they were.
The substenv routine recursively traverses the loaded data, and substitutes even if the substitution is in mid-scalar, and if there are more than substitution in one scalar. You can "tighten" the test:
if isinstance(v, str) and '${' in v:
if that would match too many strings loaded from YAML.
I need to remove the tags field from each of the methods in my OpenAPI spec.
The spec must be in YAML format, as converting to JSON causes issues later on when publishing.
I couldn't find a ready tool for that, and my programming skills are insufficient. I tried Python with ruamel.yaml, but could not achieve anything.
I'm open to any suggestions how to approach this - a repo with a ready tool somewhere, a hint on what to try in Python... I'm out of my own ideas.
Maybe a regex that catches all cases all instances of tags so I can do a search and replace with Python, replacing them with nothing? Empty lines don't seem to break the publishing engine.
Here's a sample YAML piece (I know this is not a proper spec, just want to show where in the YAML tags sits)
openapi: 3.0.0
info:
title: ""
description: ""
paths:
/endpoint
get:
tags:
-
tag1
-
tag3
#rest of GET definition
post:
tags:
- tag2
/anotherEndpoint
post:
tags:
- tag1
I need to get rid of all tags arrays entirely (not just make them empty)
I am not sure why you couldn't achieve anything with Python + ruamel.yaml. Assuing your spec
is in a file input.yaml:
import sys
from pathlib import Path
import ruamel.yaml
in_file = Path('input.yaml')
out_file = Path('output.yaml')
yaml = ruamel.yaml.YAML()
yaml.indent(mapping=4, sequence=4, offset=2)
yaml.preserve_quotes = True
data = yaml.load(in_file)
# if you only have the three instances of 'tags', you can hard-code them:
# del data['paths']['/endpoint']['get']['tags']
# del data['paths']['/endpoint']['post']['tags']
# del data['paths']['/anotherEndpoint']['post']['tags']
# generic recursive removal of any key names 'tags' in the datastructure:
def rm_tags(d):
if isinstance(d, dict):
if 'tags' in d:
del d['tags']
for k in d:
rm_tags(d[k])
elif isinstance(d, list):
for item in d:
rm_tags(item)
rm_tags(data)
yaml.dump(data, out_file)
which gives as output.yaml:
openapi: 3.0.0
info:
title: ""
description: ""
paths:
/endpoint:
get: {}
post: {}
/anotherEndpoint:
post: {}
You can write back data to input.yaml if you need that.
Please note that normally the comment #rest of GET definition would be preserved, but
not now as it is associated during loading with the key before it and that key gets deleted.
I have yaml data like the input below and i need output as key value pairs
Input
a="""
--- !ruby/hash:ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess
code:
- '716'
- '718'
id:
- 488
- 499
"""
ouput needed
{'code': ['716', '718'], 'id': [488, 499]}
The default constructor was giving me an error. I tried adding new constructor and now its not giving me error but i am not able to get key value pairs.
FYI, If i remove the !ruby/hash:ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess line from my yaml then it gives me desired output.
def new_constructor(loader, tag_suffix, node):
if type(node.value)=='list':
val=''.join(node.value)
else:
val=node.value
val=node.value
ret_val="""
{0}
""".format(val)
return ret_val
yaml.add_multi_constructor('', new_constructor)
yaml.load(a)
output
"\n [(ScalarNode(tag=u'tag:yaml.org,2002:str', value=u'code'), SequenceNode(tag=u'tag:yaml.org,2002:seq', value=[ScalarNode(tag=u'tag:yaml.org,2002:str', value=u'716'), ScalarNode(tag=u'tag:yaml.org,2002:str', value=u'718')])), (ScalarNode(tag=u'tag:yaml.org,2002:str', value=u'id'), SequenceNode(tag=u'tag:yaml.org,2002:seq', value=[ScalarNode(tag=u'tag:yaml.org,2002:int', value=u'488'), ScalarNode(tag=u'tag:yaml.org,2002:int', value=u'499')]))]\n "
Please suggest.
This is not a solution using PyYAML, but I recommend using ruamel.yaml instead. If for no other reason, it's more actively maintained than PyYAML. A quote from the overview
Many of the bugs filed against PyYAML, but that were never acted upon, have been fixed in ruamel.yaml
To load that string, you can do
import ruamel.yaml
parser = ruamel.yaml.YAML()
obj = parser.load(a) # as defined above.
I strongly recommend following #Andrew F answer, but in case you
wonder why your code did not get the proper result, that is because
you don't correctly process the node under the tag in your tag
handling.
Although the node's value is a list (of tuples with key value pairs),
you should test for the type of the node itself (using isinstance)
and then hand it over to the "normal" mapping processing routine as
the tag is on a mapping:
import yaml
from yaml.loader import SafeLoader
a = """\
--- !ruby/hash:ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess
code:
- '716'
- '718'
id:
- 488
- 499
"""
def new_constructor(loader, tag_suffix, node):
if isinstance(node, yaml.nodes.MappingNode):
return loader.construct_mapping(node, deep=True)
raise NotImplementedError
yaml.add_multi_constructor('', new_constructor, Loader=SafeLoader)
data = yaml.load(a, Loader=SafeLoader)
print(data)
which gives:
{'code': ['716', '718'], 'id': [488, 499]}
You should not use PyYAML's yaml.load(), it is documented to be potentially unsafe
and above all it is not necessary. Just add the new constructor to the SafeLoader.