Rendering the Google Recaptcha in Android Studio 3 - recaptcha

I am using Android Studio 3
I am following this article to learn how to use Google Recaptcha in Android Studio.
Installed the package using this: implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-safetynet:12.0.1'
API keys are also registered.
I saw there is onClick event handler but where is it mentioned about rendering the recaptcha?
Update 1
When I wrote the button click code as mentioned in the link...I got a complication error: inconvertible types cannot cast anonymous android.view.view.onclicklistener to java.util.concurrent.executor
Code as asked in comment
btn_Login.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
#Override
public void onClick(final View view) {
SafetyNet.getClient(this).verifyWithRecaptcha("")
.addOnSuccessListener((Executor) this,
new OnSuccessListener<SafetyNetApi.RecaptchaTokenResponse>() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(SafetyNetApi.RecaptchaTokenResponse response) {
// Indicates communication with reCAPTCHA service was
// successful.
String userResponseToken = response.getTokenResult();
if (!userResponseToken.isEmpty()) {
// Validate the user response token using the
// reCAPTCHA siteverify API.
}
}
})
.addOnFailureListener((Executor) this, new OnFailureListener() {
#Override
public void onFailure(#NonNull Exception e) {
if (e instanceof ApiException) {
// An error occurred when communicating with the
// reCAPTCHA service. Refer to the status code to
// handle the error appropriately.
ApiException apiException = (ApiException) e;
int statusCode = apiException.getStatusCode();
} else {
}
}
});
}
});

I used below code and everything is work fine now.
Make sure to implement Executor in the activity
btn_Login.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
#Override
public void onClick(final View view) {
SafetyNet.getClient(Activity.this).verifyWithRecaptcha("")
.addOnSuccessListener((Activity) MyActivity.this,
new OnSuccessListener<SafetyNetApi.RecaptchaTokenResponse>() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(SafetyNetApi.RecaptchaTokenResponse response) {
// Indicates communication with reCAPTCHA service was
// successful.
String userResponseToken = response.getTokenResult();
if (!userResponseToken.isEmpty()) {
// Validate the user response token using the
// reCAPTCHA siteverify API.
}
}
})
.addOnFailureListener((Activity) MyActivity.this, new OnFailureListener() {
#Override
public void onFailure(#NonNull Exception e) {
if (e instanceof ApiException) {
// An error occurred when communicating with the
// reCAPTCHA service. Refer to the status code to
// handle the error appropriately.
ApiException apiException = (ApiException) e;
int statusCode = apiException.getStatusCode();
} else {
}
}
});
}
});

According to the article, in your button click handler you must call the method SafetyNet.getClient(this).verifyWithRecaptcha(...) to show reCAPTCHA and handle success or error. Passing this, you give the SDK handle to your current view which should be shown after solving reCAPTCHA. Most probably the rendering will be done by the SDK itself given that it’s a part of the OS. And most probably it will be full-screen in a separate top-level view blocking access to your app before solving the riddle.
You should try to implement it in your app as described in the article and see how it goes. Then you can ask a more specific question.
EDIT: You combined 2 techniques in your code: copy-pasting the code from Google and implementing anonymous class from it. So the problem you asked in the comment is that using (Executor) this in line 5 refers now not to your View (as it was there in the original tutorial) but to the instance of the anonymous interface implementation new View.OnClickListener() that you created. Ypu can refer to this answer to see how it can be implemented not interfering with already complex reCAPTCHA code.

Related

Windows 10 version 1903 update (NET Framework 4.8) breaking Prism 6.3

First off, we are well aware that this isn't strictly speaking a Prism 6.3 issue; what we're looking for (in case a solution isn't straightforward) are pointers to a solution to the problem -thanks in advance btw-, which is:
Windows 10 version 1903, via .NET Framework 4.8 inclusion, breaks our otherwise perfectly functioning, tried-and-true, production-deployed Prism 6.3-based commercial software. We're using Prism (Core), Prism.WPF, and Prism.MEF (all v6.3). What we get (source code later) is the following runtime error whenever we try to instantiate a registered View:
Prism.Regions.RegionNavigationService.CreateNewRegionItem(String candidateTargetContract) throws an InvalidOperationException: Cannot create navigation target 'xyzView'. Activation error ocurred while tring to get instance of type Object, key 'xyzView'.
Inner exception stems from Microsoft.Practices.ServiceLocation.ServiceLocatorImplBase.GetInstance(Type serviceType, String key), which throws an ActivationException: Activation error ocurred while tring to get instance of type Object, key 'xyzView'.
Devil's in the details so here's some relevant code (xyzView = ExpedicionView or ExpedicionMaestroView, both trigger the Exception):
[ModuleExport(typeof(ExpedicionModulo))]
[Export(typeof(IMenu))]
public class ExpedicionModulo : IModule, IMenu
{
[Import]
public IRegionManager RegionManager;
[Import]
public ILoggerFacade Logger;
[ImportingConstructor]
public ExpedicionModulo(IRegionManager regionManager, ILoggerFacade logger)
{
Logger = logger;
RegionManager = regionManager;
// irrelevant (for our purposes) code omitted here
}
public void Initialize()
{
// Here's how we register views for main region
RegionManager.RegisterViewWithRegion(RegionNames.MainContentRegion, typeof(ExpedicionView));
RegionManager.RegisterViewWithRegion(RegionNames.MainContentRegion, typeof(MaestroExpedicionView));
// Some more registering for our dialog region
RegionManager.RegisterViewWithRegion(RegionNames.DialogRegion, typeof(ExpedicionDetalleView));
// other views registered in the very same fashion
Logger.Log("Expedition Module initialized", Category.Info, Priority.None);
}
We invoke RequestNavigate in this bit of code here:
[Export]
[PartCreationPolicy(CreationPolicy.Shared)]
public class ShellViewModel : BaseViewModel
{
public IRibbonPrincipal RibbonPrincipal { get; set; }
private readonly InteractionRequest<Confirmation> _confirmationInteractionRequest;
private readonly InteractionRequest<Notification> _notificationInteractionRequest;
private string _seccionActiva;
private string _subseccionActiva;
private IRegionManager _regionManager;
[ImportingConstructor]
public ShellViewModel(IRegionManager regionManager, IEventAggregator eventAggregator, ILoggerFacade logger)
: this(eventAggregator, logger)
{
try
{
_regionManager = regionManager;
_regionManager.RegisterViewWithRegion(RegionNames.MainContentRegion, typeof(PrincipalView));
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
this.LoggerError(ex.Message);
}
}
public ShellViewModel(IEventAggregator eventAggregator, ILoggerFacade logger)
: base(eventAggregator, logger)
{
try
{
// Some irrelevant (to our purposes) initialization code omitted here
New = new DelegateCommand(() => { }, () => { return false; }); // etc.
_confirmationInteractionRequest = new InteractionRequest<Confirmation>();
_notificationInteractionRequest = new InteractionRequest<Notification>();
// Events code omitted for brevity sake
EventAggregator.GetEvent<MessageBoxEvent>().Subscribe(ShowMessageBox, ThreadOption.PublisherThread, false); // etc.
// View loading wireup
CambioSeccion = new DelegateCommand<object>(OnCambioSeccion);
CambioSubseccion = new DelegateCommand<object[]>(OnCambioSubseccion);
// some more irrelevant (to our purposes) code omitted here.
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
this.LoggerError(ex.Message);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// This is where we instantiate the View (WAI in .NET Framework <=4.7.2)
/// </summary>
/// <param name="objeto"></param>
private void OnCambioSeccion(object objeto)
{
// Ribbon menu handling here
RibbonPrincipal.ResetRibbon();
IIdentifyViewModel ivm = null;
// We are passing the View's name via clicked TreeViewItem in this case (param objeto)
TreeViewItem treeViewItem = (TreeViewItem)objeto;
if (treeViewItem != null && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(treeViewItem.Name))
{
_seccionActiva = treeViewItem.Name;
// Now we build the actual RequestNavigate invoke
// In our case, _seccionActiva would equal "Expedicion" or "MaestroExpedicion"
_regionManager.RequestNavigate(RegionNames.MainContentRegion, new Uri("/" + _seccionActiva + "View", UriKind.Relative), (r) =>
{
if (!r.Result.HasValue || !r.Result.Value)
{
// error handling code here
}
else
{
ivm = ((FrameworkElement)_regionManager.Regions[RegionNames.MainContentRegion].ActiveViews.First()).DataContext as IIdentifyViewModel;
}
});
// Some event triggering here
if (ivm != null)
{
Seccion.Cambio(EventAggregator, ivm.ID);
}
}
}
Sorry for the long winded post, and thanks in advance.
#mcandal thanks for the write-up. This looks like a recent issue introduced in .NET Framework 4.8 that we have seen with the patterns and practices activation code. The underlying issue is that in 4.8 the constructors for types were returned in a different order resulting in the patterns and practices choice of the first (eg. ctors[0]) sometimes no longer being correct.
There are a few workarounds as we work through a fix in an upcoming release.
This issue only impacts assemlbies that are ngen'd.
Workarounds:
1) Disable ngen for the assembly containing the type:
<configuration>
<runtime>
<disableNativeImageLoad>
<assemblyIdentity name="assembly_name" />
</disableNativeImageLoad>
</runtime>
</configuration>
2) For the type that is being activated only have 1 ctor (the documentation for the patterns and practices assumes there is only 1 ctor)
3) Choose the other provided activation models where you pass in the types of the parameters, to avoid the ambiguity.
As I mentioned, we are working on a fix and if you would like to discuss further you can submit a VS Feedback item and link to this post and we can continue the discussion there.

Requesting Android permissions in a class (Xamarin)

I'm trying to request a permission at runtime for my app. I use a service provider to talk between the portable class and Android.
I start by calling this code on button press in the PCL:
using (new Busy(this))
{
var locationHelper = scope.Resolve<ILocationHelper>();
locationHelper.GetLocation(this);
}
This calls my Android level service:
public class AndroidLocationHelper : ILocationHelper, ILocationListener
{
readonly string[] PermissionsLocation =
{
Manifest.Permission.AccessCoarseLocation
};
const int RequestLocationId = 0;
public void GetLocation(SearchViewModel viewModel)
{
try
{
const string permission = Manifest.Permission.AccessCoarseLocation;
if (((int)Build.VERSION.SdkInt < 23) || (CheckSelfPermission(permission) == Permission.Granted))
{
}
else
RequestPermissions(PermissionsLocation, RequestLocationId);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Error while getting Location service");
Debug.WriteLine(ex.Message);
Messaging.AlertUser("There was an error with determining your location");
}
}
However, I get two errors on CheckSelfPermission and RequestPermissions. These two methods are only available to activities. The code works fine in MainActivity; however, I want to ask for permissions when the user hits a button, not in OnCreate or OnResume, etc.
Thanks for any help.
In your Android project, You can use this and use the Dependency Service to call it in Xamarin.Forms PCL project later:
var thisActivity = Forms.Context as Activity;
ActivityCompat.RequestPermissions(thisActivity, new string[] {
Manifest.Permission.AccessFineLocation }, 1);
ActivityCompat.RequestPermissions(thisActivity,
new String[] { Manifest.Permission.AccessFineLocation },
1);
You can try with ContextCompat.CheckSelfPermission, passing the application context, like this:
ContextCompat.CheckSelfPermission(Android.App.Application.Context, permission)
Update
In case of ActivityCompat.RequestPermissions, which requires an activity reference, you can keep track of the current activity. There is a very handy lib for that, called "CurrentActivityPlugin". You can find at https://github.com/jamesmontemagno/CurrentActivityPlugin
Rafael came up with a solution but I found another option that is a lot less effort just using MessagingCenter. In the MainActivity's OnCreate add a receiver that runs all the location code, that way you have access to all of the activities methods (and there are a bunch of tutorials on doing location services in MainActivity). Then add the Send inside of your service (the class).
To expound Rafael Steil's answer, I tried the suggested CurrentActivityPlugin and it worked on me. In my case I am trying to execute a voice call which needs CALL_PHONE permission. Here is the code snippet in your case: I used the ContextCompat & ActivityCompat so that I don't need to check the VERSION.SdkInt
using Plugin.CurrentActivity;
public void GetLocation(SearchViewModel viewModel){
var context = CrossCurrentActivity.Current.AppContext;
var activity = CrossCurrentActivity.Current.Activity;
int YOUR_ASSIGNED_REQUEST_CODE = 9;
if (ContextCompat.CheckSelfPermission(context, Manifest.Permission.AccessCoarseLocation) == (int)Android.Content.PM.Permission.Granted)
{
//Permission is granted, execute stuff
}
else
{
ActivityCompat.RequestPermissions(activity, new string[] { Manifest.Permission.AccessCoarseLocation }, YOUR_ASSIGNED_REQUEST_CODE);
}
}
It's dead simple
public bool CheckPermission()
{
const string permission = Manifest.Permission.ReceiveSms;
return ContextCompat.CheckSelfPermission(Forms.Context, permission) == (int) Permission.Granted;
}

Xamarin "Sorry, this video cannot be played"

How can i handle this error?
please help me out of this situation.
private void previewVideo(){
try{
var path = Android.Net.Uri.Parse(App._file.AbsolutePath);
preview.SetVideoURI (path);
preview.Start ();
}
catch(Exception e){
e.GetBaseException ();
}
}
Your'e lucky that I was following your previous question. Please try to have your questions as detailed as possible so it's easier for us to analyze and possible replicate the error.
To be able to set an error listener on the VideoView, the VideoView needs an object that implements the Android.Media.MediaPlayer.IOnErrorListener interface.
You can accomblish that by letting your Activity implement the previous mentioned interface, and setting the Activity as the ErrorListener for the VideoView
public class MainActivity : Activity, Android.Media.MediaPlayer.IOnErrorListener
{
...
protected override void OnCreate(Bundle bundle)
{
...
preview = FindViewById<VideoView> (Resource.Id.SampleVideoView);
preview.SetOnErrorListener(this); // <- Set the error listener
...
}
...
//The implementation of MediaPlayer.IOnErrorListener
public bool OnError(MediaPlayer player, MediaError error, int extra)
{
// Do Something here because error happened
}
...
}
By doing this, when error occurs in the VideoView the VideoView will call the public OnError method.
From the Android Docs of OnErrorListener you can see what the OnError method should return.
Returns:
True if the method handled the error, false if it didn't. Returning false, or not having an OnErrorListener at all, will cause the OnCompletionListener to be called.

lwuit change UI language

I use codenameone to develop my mobile application. In this application I implement some classes and codes manually for instance create all forms by hard coding not using codenameone designer for some reason.
By the way I wanted to navigate in forms like what codenameone use, so I use one variable from type of Form called it prevForm and when I want to open a form I set it to current form and then I show new form.
Ok, that is main scenario. In this application I wanna implement internationalization too, so I create my own hashtable (Farsi and English) for this application.
This is my problem:
How can I set or change language and apply it to forms that I opened?
Is my method for navigate between forms are good?
Here is my code:
public class BaseForm extends Form implements ActionListener {
public BaseForm(){
this.setLayout(new BoxLayout(BoxLayout.Y_AXIS));
}
Command exit, ok, back;
Form prevForm;
protected void initForm(){
}
protected void showForm(){
}
protected void showForm(final Form prevForm){
//String name = this.getName();
//if("Reminder".equals(name) || "3Transaction".equals(name))
{
this.prevForm = prevForm;
Form f = this;
back = new Command("Back");
//ok = new Command("Ok");
//delete = new Command("Delete");;
Button button = new Button("Button");
f.addCommand(back);
//f.addCommand(ok);
//f.addCommand(delete);
//f.addComponent(button);
f.addCommandListener(new ActionListener() {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ae) {
if (ae.getCommand().equals(back)) {
//Do Exit command code
System.out.println("Back pressed");
prevForm.showBack();
} else if (ae.getCommand().equals(ok)) {
//Do Start command code
System.out.println("Ok pressed");
}
}
});
button.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ae) {
//Do button code
System.out.println("Action performed");
}
});
}
showForm();
}}
for open nested form I use this code:
LanguageUI lang = new LanguageUI();
lang.showForm(this);
change language [form]:
protected boolean onBtnSave() {
if(isRbFarsiSelected()){
UIManager.getInstance().setResourceBundle(new CommonSettings().getFarsi());
}
else {
UIManager.getInstance().setResourceBundle(new CommonSettings().getEnglish());
}
return false;
}
I also hard code my UI on lwuit, and i have a variable parentForm on every class so i can easily show previous form. For language change i know there is Localization in the resource editor that you can make use of. Below is how you can access it. I guess the trick is how to set the content of the L10N in the res file in code? On the other hand you can create your own helper classes that mirror the methods below.
Resources theme = Resources.open("/theme.res");
theme.getL10N(id, locale);
theme.getL10NResourceNames();
theme.isL10N(name);
theme.listL10NLocales(id)

Adding profile values for auto-generated user

I'm creating a ASP.NET MVC 3.0 website, and have a couple of different database initializations based on whether the site is intended for development, testing, or production. I'm stuck on the testing initialization, as I'm trying to get a test user created. I can get the user to create just fine, however when I try to add some profile values, I get: System.Web.HttpException: Request is not available in this context. Is there a way to add Profile values in a situation where the request isn't going to be available?
Following code is what is being run:
protected void Application_Start()
{
AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();
RegisterGlobalFilters(GlobalFilters.Filters);
RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
if (ApplicationServices.GetInitialCatalog() != "tasktracker")
{
Database.SetInitializer(new TaskTrackerDropCreateDatabaseIfModelChanges());
}
else
{
Database.SetInitializer(new TaskTrackerCreateDatabaseIfNotExists());
}
using (var db = new TaskTrackerContext())
{
db.Database.Initialize(false);
}
}
public class TaskTrackerDropCreateDatabaseIfModelChanges : DropCreateDatabaseIfModelChanges<TaskTrackerContext>
{
protected override void Seed(TaskTrackerContext context)
{
// Set up the membership, roles, and profile systems.
ApplicationServices.InstallServices(SqlFeatures.Membership | SqlFeatures.Profile | SqlFeatures.RoleManager);
// Create the default accounts and roles.
if (ApplicationServices.GetInitialCatalog() == "tasktracker_testing")
{
if (Membership.GetUser("testuser", false) == null)
{
Membership.CreateUser("testuser", "password", "testuser#test.com");
MembershipUser user = Membership.GetUser("testuser", false);
user.IsApproved = true;
var profile = ProfileBase.Create("testuser");
profile.SetPropertyValue("FirstName", "test");
profile.SetPropertyValue("LastName", "user");
profile.SetPropertyValue("TimeZone", "US Mountain Standard Time");
profile.Save();
}
}
}
}
Interesting question. Have you looked at using the new Universal Providers? Dunno if you will run into the same httpcontext issue but may be worth a look: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/IntroducingSystemWebProvidersASPNETUniversalProvidersForSessionMembershipRolesAndUserProfileOnSQLCompactAndSQLAzure.aspx
Did you try to do a call of "Initialize()" :
profile.Initialize(username, true)
after your create action to see if the context should be Initialized.
By using Reflector i saw the ProfileBase of Initialize (see below) creates this kind of context from the settings:
public void Initialize(string username, bool isAuthenticated)
{
if (username != null)
{
this._UserName = username.Trim();
}
else
{
this._UserName = username;
}
SettingsContext context = new SettingsContext();
context.Add("UserName", this._UserName);
context.Add("IsAuthenticated", isAuthenticated);
this._IsAuthenticated = isAuthenticated;
base.Initialize(context, s_Properties, ProfileManager.Providers);
}
It seems working here, the SettingsContext() seems taking account of my custom properties declared in the web.config.
Regards,
I come back again because the solution I added with the "Initialize()" function in fact not run really after an other test. So in fact I found a way which runs correctly.
The problem of "request is not available in this context" in application_start in your case could be due to the application mode "Integrated" which is new from II7 instead of the Classic mode.
To see a good explain you ca go on the Mike Volodarsky's blog IIS7 Integrated mode: Request is not available in this context exception in Application_Start .
I copy/paste an extract which could indicate the main reason:
" *This error is due to a design change in the IIS7 Integrated pipeline that makes the request context unavailable in Application_Start event. When using the Classic mode (the only mode when running on previous versions of IIS), the request context used to be available, even though the Application_Start event has always been intended as a global and request-agnostic event in the application lifetime. Despite this, because ASP.NET applications were always started by the first request to the app, it used to be possible to get to the request context through the static HttpContext.Current field.* "
To solve this you can use a workaround that moves your first-request initialization from Application_Start to BeginRequest and performs the request-specific initialization on the first request.
A good example of code is done in his blog :
void Application_BeginRequest(Object source, EventArgs e)
{
HttpApplication app = (HttpApplication)source;
HttpContext context = app.Context;
// Attempt to peform first request initialization
FirstRequestInitialization.Initialize(context);
}
class FirstRequestInitialization
{
private static bool s_InitializedAlready = false;
private static Object s_lock = new Object();
// Initialize only on the first request
public static void Initialize(HttpContext context)
{
if (s_InitializedAlready)
{
return;
}
lock (s_lock)
{
if (s_InitializedAlready)
{
return;
}
// Perform first-request initialization here
//
// You can use your create profile code here....
//---
s_InitializedAlready = true;
}
}
}

Resources