How can I have an entrypoint in a docker run which executes multiple commands?
Something like:
docker run --entrypoint "echo 'hello' && echo 'world'" ... <image>
The image I'm trying to run, has already an entrypoint set in the Dockerfile, so solution like the following seems not to work, because it looks my commands are ignored, and only the original entrypoint is executed
docker run ... <image> bash -c "echo 'hello' && echo 'world'"
In my use-case I must use the docker run command. Solution which change the Dockerfile are not acceptable, since it is not in my hands
As a style point, this gets vastly easier if your image has a CMD that can be overridden. If you only need to run one command with no initial setup, make it be the CMD and not the ENTRYPOINT:
CMD ./some_command # not ENTRYPOINT
If you need to do some initial setup and then launch the main command, make the ENTRYPOINT be a shell script that ends with the special instruction exec "$#". The CMD will be passed into it as parameters, and this line replaces the shell script with that command.
#!/bin/sh
# entrypoint.sh
... do first time setup, run database migrations, set variables ...
exec "$#"
# Dockerfile
...
ENTRYPOINT ["./entrypoint.sh"] # MUST be JSON-array syntax
CMD ./some_command # as before
If you do these things, then you can use your initial docker run form. This will replace the CMD but leave the ENTRYPOINT intact. In the wrapper-script case, your alternate command will be run as the exec "$#" command, so all of the first-time setup will be done first.
# Assuming the image correctly honors the CMD
docker run ... \
image-name \
sh -c 'echo "foo is $FOO" && echo "bar is $BAR"'
If you really can't do this, you can override the docker run --entrypoint. This runs instead of the image's entrypoint (if you want the image's entrypoint you have to run it yourself), and the syntax is awkward:
# Run a shell command instead of the entrypoint
docker run ... \
--entrypoint /bin/sh \
image-name \
-c 'echo "foo is $FOO" && echo "bar is $BAR"'
Note that the --entrypoint option comes before the image name, and its arguments come after the image name.
I have a simple bash script 'test.sh' in the root of mounted folder :
#!/bin/bash
Rscript -e "source('/home/rstudio/mount-folder/src/controller.R')";
However, when i try to mount folder and start the container with docker run as follows:
docker run -d -p 8000:8787 -e ROOT=true -e DISABLE_AUTH=true --name container -v mount-folder/:/home/rstudio/ image_name /home/rstudio/test.sh
above run command starts the container but exits automatically.
I am looking for a docker run command that starts the container , mounts the folder and then executes the bash script which is in the mount-folder without exiting the container.
(** dont want to go with docker exec command as it is not suitable for my use case for other reasons)
Dockerfile:
FROM rocker/rstudio:4.0.2
//some RUN commands to install necessary r packages
EXPOSE 8787
CMD tail -f /dev/null
Other details :
Image that i am using is rstudio server from rocker and container runs on AWS ubuntu machine.
Edit :
have also tried adding CMD tail -f /dev/null at the end of dockerfile as suggested in http://bigdatums.net/2017/11/07/how-to-keep-docker-containers-running/ even then the container exits.
Docker containers shutdown automatically when run in detached mode. I think this article proposes a nice solution:
http://bigdatums.net/2017/11/07/how-to-keep-docker-containers-running/
You could add tail -f /dev/null as the last command in your bash script instead so that the script will never halt unless it is told to do so.
When you do docker run [options] image_name [cmd] the command you specify becomes the command for the container and replaces any the command specified in the dockerfile (that's why adding CMD tail -f /dev/null doesn't do anything). If you ran your container without the /home/rstudio/test.sh at the end, it should stay running.
The solution would be to update your script to add the tail command at the end.
#!/bin/bash
Rscript -e "source('/home/rstudio/mount-folder/src/controller.R')";
exec tail -f /dev/null
If you can't update that script, you could instead add it to the command being passed to the container, with something like:
docker run [options] image_name bash -c '/home/rstudio/test.sh && exec tail -f /dev/null'
I'm trying to create an alias to help debug my docker containers.
I discovered bash accepts a --init-file option which ought to let us run some commands before passing over to interactive mode.
So I thought I could do
docker-bash() {
docker run --rm -it "$1" bash --init-file <(echo "ls; pwd")
}
But those commands don't appear to be running:
% docker-bash c7460dfcab50
root#9c6f64a9db8c:/#
Is it an escaping issue or.. what's going on?
bash --init-file <(echo "ls; pwd")
Alone in a terminal on my host machine works as expected (runs the command starts a new bash instance).
In points:
The <(...) is a bash extension process subtitution.
From the manual above: Process substitution is supported on systems that support named pipes (FIFOs) or the /dev/fd method of naming open files..
The process substitution works like this:
bash creates a fifo in /tmp or creates a new file descriptor in /dev/fd.
The filename, either the /tmp/.something or /dev/fd/<number> is substituted for <(...) when command is executed.
So for example echo <(echo 1) outputs /dev/fd/63.
Docker works by creating a new environment that is separated from the host. That means that:
Processes inside docker do not inherit file descriptors from the host process:
So /dev/fd/* files are not inherited.
Processes inside docker are accessing isolated filesystem tree.
So processes can't access /tmp/* files from the host.
So summarizing docker run -ti --rm alpine cat <(echo 1) will not work, because the filename substituted by <(...) is not available from docker environment.
An easy workaround would be to just:
docker run -ti --rm alpine sh -c 'ls; pwd; exec sh'
Or use a temporary file:
echo "ls; pwd" > /tmp/tempfile
docker run -v /tmp/tempfile:/tmp/tempfile bash bash --init-file /tmp/tempfile
For my use-case I wanted to set an alias which won't persist if we re-exec the shell. However, aliases can be written to ~/.bashrc which will be reloaded on the subsequent exec. Ergo,
docker-bash() {
docker run --rm -it "$1" bash -c $'set -o xtrace; echo "alias ll=\'ls -lAhtrF --color=always\'" >> ~/.bashrc; exec "$0"'
}
Works. --rm should clean up any files we create anyway if I understand properly how docker works.
Or perhaps this is a nicer way to write it:
docker-bash() {
read -r -d '' BASHRC << EOM
alias ll='ls -lAhtrF --color=always'
EOM
docker run --rm -it "$1" bash -c "echo \"$BASHRC\" >> ~/.bashrc; exec \"\$0\""
}
I'm trying to run MULTIPLE commands like this.
docker run image cd /path/to/somewhere && python a.py
But this gives me "No such file or directory" error because it is interpreted as...
"docker run image cd /path/to/somewhere" && "python a.py"
It seems that some ESCAPE characters like "" or () are needed.
So I also tried
docker run image "cd /path/to/somewhere && python a.py"
docker run image (cd /path/to/somewhere && python a.py)
but these didn't work.
I have searched for Docker Run Reference but have not find any hints about ESCAPE characters.
To run multiple commands in docker, use /bin/bash -c and semicolon ;
docker run image_name /bin/bash -c "cd /path/to/somewhere; python a.py"
In case we need command2 (python) will be executed if and only if command1 (cd) returned zero (no error) exit status, use && instead of ;
docker run image_name /bin/bash -c "cd /path/to/somewhere && python a.py"
You can do this a couple of ways:
Use the -w option to change the working directory:
-w, --workdir="" Working directory inside the container
https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/run/#set-working-directory--w
Pass the entire argument to /bin/bash:
docker run image /bin/bash -c "cd /path/to/somewhere; python a.py"
You can also pipe commands inside Docker container, bash -c "<command1> | <command2>" for example:
docker run img /bin/bash -c "ls -1 | wc -l"
But, without invoking the shell in the remote the output will be redirected to the local terminal.
bash -c works well if the commands you are running are relatively simple. However, if you're trying to run a long series of commands full of control characters, it can get complex.
I successfully got around this by piping my commands into the process from the outside, i.e.
cat script.sh | docker run -i <image> /bin/bash
Just to make a proper answer from the #Eddy Hernandez's comment and which is very correct since Alpine comes with ash not bash.
The question now referes to Starting a shell in the Docker Alpine container which implies using sh or ash or /bin/sh or /bin/ash/.
Based on the OP's question:
docker run image sh -c "cd /path/to/somewhere && python a.py"
If you want to store the result in one file outside the container, in your local machine, you can do something like this.
RES_FILE=$(readlink -f /tmp/result.txt)
docker run --rm -v ${RES_FILE}:/result.txt img bash -c "grep root /etc/passwd > /result.txt"
The result of your commands will be available in /tmp/result.txt in your local machine.
For anyone else who came here looking to do the same with docker-compose you just need to prepend bash -c and enclose multiple commands in quotes, joined together with &&.
So in the OPs example docker-compose run image bash -c "cd /path/to/somewhere && python a.py"
If you don't mind the commands running in a subshell, just put a set of outer parentheses around the multiple commands to run:
docker run image (cd /path/to/somewhere && python a.py)
TL;DR;
$ docker run --entrypoint /bin/sh image_name -c "command1 && command2 && command3"
A concern regarding the accepted answer is below.
Nobody has mentioned that docker run image_name /bin/bash -c just appends a command to the entrypoint. Some popular images are smart enough to process this correctly, but some are not.
Imagine the following Dockerfile:
FROM alpine
ENTRYPOINT ["echo"]
If you try building it as echo and running:
$ docker run echo /bin/sh -c date
You will get your command appended to the entrypoint, so that result would be echo "/bin/sh -c date".
Instead, you need to override the entrypoint:
$ docker run --entrypoint /bin/sh echo -c date
Docker run reference
In case it's not obvious, if a.py always needs to run in a particular directory, create a simple wrapper script which does the cd and then runs the script.
In your Dockerfile, replace
CMD [ 'python', 'a.py' ]
or whatever with
CMD [ '/wrapper' ]
and create a script wrapper in your root directory (or wherever it's convenient for you) with contents like
#!/bin/sh
set -e
cd /path/to/somewhere
python a.py
In many situations, perhaps also consider rewriting a.py so that it doesn't need a wrapper. Either make it os.chdir() where it needs to be, or have it look for its data files in a directory you configure in its environment or similar.
I have a file with couple of functions inside a docker container. I want to run:
docker run -it 06b68ae1c601 bash -c 'function1'
but the output is '/bin/bash: function1: command not found"
I have placed 'source /pathtofile' in /root/.bashrc, /root/.profile /etc/bash.bashrc but the file is still not sourced.
Also tried to run bash --login option, again command not found
The OS of the container is Ubuntu 14.04.
I dont want to run bash -c 'source /file; function1'.
Any idea where should i put the source command?