I'm having troubles with some could I would like to execute when the service will be uninstalled. I've added the code to both the System.ServiceProcess.ServiceProcessInstaller BeforeUninstall event, and
to the override method OnBeforeUninstall, but that did not work too.
When using my InstallShield msi to uninstall the service this code does not get executed.
How can I force the service to launch some code during uninstall? Do I need to use a different event in my C# service? Do I need to change something in my MSI?
Note:
My problem is identical to the following
https://community.flexerasoftware.com/showthread.php?149176-MSI-Uninstall-NET-Service-does-not-launch-BeforeUninstall-event
Thanks,
sagar
You'll need to be more explicit about everything you've done. For example there is no automatic calling of installer class methods unless they are explicitly added to your setup as custom actions (in your case an uninstall custom action). You should also explain exactly how the service was installed.
Note that installer classes were invented by Visual Studio setups, and there is typically no need to use them because tools like InstallShield usually support the standard ServiceInstall and ServiceControl functionality in Windows Installer. Installer classes are unnecessary. Also, those events are Visual Studio specials, and it's not clear to me if InstallShield supports them. If you are using an Uninstall method to uninstall a service then just add your "before" code to before the Base.Uninstall() call.
If you want code to run when the service is uninstalled, the more usual way is to have a custom action that calls your code, and condition the call on REMOVE="ALL" (for an uninstall) or other conditions depending on your exact requirement. For example, if you do an upgrade MSI to upgrade your existing product do you still want to run that uninstall code?
.NET Installer Class: PhilDW has already said it all, but I just want to add a couple of things. I assume you are using System.Configuration.Install.Installer and the ServiceProcessInstaller Class (there is a sample in the Installshield help file). There used to be (and I think there still is) a flag for each Installshield component called .NET Installer Class. You can set this flag to Yes, and then I believe Installshield itself will take care of running your installer class methods (Install, Commit, Rollback, Uninstall - whichever one is implemented I think, but I have never tested all scenarios. I don't use this feature).
InstallUtil.exe: Running InstallUtil.exe would indeed call these methods. I am not sure how Installshield calls the methods under the hood (during setup execution) - they may actually be calling InstallUtil.exe for all I know, or some more low-level API call.
Conclusion: Just go to the components view and click on the component containing your service.exe file - and set the flag mentioned above. The exe must be a key-file for the component in question - and it must be a .NET assembly. Like PhilDW wrote, I wouldn't use these methods since they are intended to be used during service development only - not during deployment. For one thing you could run into runtime errors when the methods try to run faulting your whole setup (and often unnecessarily so), and there are also likely issues with rollback and potentially other problems. Can we ask what the methods are actually doing? Perhaps you are just deleting some log files? There are other ways to do that - most significantly using the RemoveFile table.
Related
I have created my application's setup in installshield - basic MSI project...
Now when i am installing it, it allows me to run .exe multiple times simultanious...
Please let me know, how can i stop it.....
There is already a safe guard automatically built-into Windows Installer. If two or more of your installs actually try to install only the first one will install. The others will throw a message saying another install is already in progress. This is enforced by the _msiexecute mutex.
If you want to gate the situation earlier, you'll have to write your own custom actions to create your own custom mutex, tear it down when the install is complete and check for it when starting the install. However, I'd mark this problem as Functions as Designed and move on.
I have asked this exact question on the Flexara forum, but got no response up to today, so I want to ask it here.
We currently have a InstallScript project which runs fine. The resulting setup can be made unattended/silent fine.
In this setup we have some features and invoke a number of third-party installations (that are a prerequisite for running our software).
However, we have customers that want an MSI file and therefore we resorted to the Basic MSI project type.
The setup is made without too much hassle (I'm fairly new to InstallShield) and I can generate a .exe and .msi from this project.
However the only issue I have left is invoking one of the third-party installers.
That third-party installer (made with NSIS) on its turn invokes another installer which is MSI based.
This results in having error 1500 - the fact that you cannot run a msi type installation while another is running.
I've tried scheduling the CA (that are used to invoke the third-party installers) as the first action and as last, but no success.
Before resorting on the more unorthodox scenarios (like creating a task on Windows Task manager that runs after our installer finishes, or at the next reboot and forcing a reboot - which our customers don't like) or a scenario that we don't bundle the 'faulting' installer (we really like to be able to hand over a single intaller and not multiple), I'd thought I ask your input.
I've tried searching for solutions everywhere on the internet, but either I'm failing due to wrong keywords or I just didn't stumble on the right post yet.
Are there any options left for us to create a single MSI installer that is able to invoke this third-party installer (which invokes a msi installer on its turn)?
Since an EXE bootstrapper is not acceptable, there is only one solution:
store the prerequisite installers in Binary table of your MSI
create some custom actions which extract them from this table and launch them
schedule them in InstallUISequence, for example right before Progress dialog
use searches to detect if the prerequisites are installed or not
condition your custom actions with the search results
Basically, you need to launch them during the installation UI. It won't work if you launch them during InstallExecuteSequence.
I don't think the basic MSI project supports this, but it may be supported by more advanced project types. Other setup authoring tools offer direct support for this.
You can try InstallShield's "Chained .msi Package" feature.
We have an installer solution written in Visual Studio 2005 Installer; that calls a C# custom action and we have hit a known issue, regarding the fact that on an upgrade - the old install code is run and not the new code, because Windows is running a cached version of the custom action dll. We know this and although not over the moon about it - we have moved on.
When we release a new version of the installer and a user runs it, we now want it to check to see if an ealier version is installed - if there is one; we want to display a message telling them that they have to remove the old version via Add/Remove Programs. We know if they do a manual uninstall followed by an install, then all is fine and dandy - BUT it doesn't matter how many times we tell our users, via documentation; that this is what they have to do - they will still try and just run the new installer, without removing the old version first.
Therefore, we would like to put up a message and thus force them to to what they are told !! I've seen some installers do this ( though of course not sure what installer package was used to create these ). We only have VS 2005 and of course orca !!
Cheers,
Chris.
This can be done through a custom launch condition:
create a search which determines if the old version is installed (you can search for a component, registry entry or file)
use the search property as a custom launch condition
For example, if the search property is OLD_VERSION, the launch condition can look like this:
Condition: NOT OLD_VERSION
Description: An older version was found. Please uninstall it using "Programs and Features" in Control Panel.
When OLD_VERSION property is set to a value (an older version is found), this launch condition will show the message and stop the install process.
This doesn't quite make sense. Have you remembered to change the package GUID in your new setup? The package GUID identifies a specific setup file, and if two MSI files have identical GUID they will be treated as the same file regardless of whether they are or not. This could trigger a cached version of the MSI to be invoked and all sorts of hell breaks loose.
I would recommend reading up on "major upgrades" which will allow automatic uninstall of the existing version before the new version is installed. You also need to make sure you understand the basics of the technology before deploying to the wild. You must NEVER use identical package GUIDs for any MSI files. It's practically always wrong, and will lead to very mysterious problems.
I can't write up the whole major upgrade solution here, but basically it involves authoring the "Upgrade" table of your MSI to detect versions to uninstall. You need to change the package code, product code and version number (only 3 digits matter) and keep the same upgrade code (two MSI files with the same upgrade code "know" they are related - i.e they are from the same product family). Check MSDN for samples of major upgrades.
NB! If you have deployed MSI files with duplicate package GUIDs to your developer machine, it could have stray installs that must be cleaned up with MSIZap or similar. Use caution, or better yet test your new installer on a clean test system. Developer systems are full of junk and not generally good for MSI testing.
Dozens of Q&A entries (all but one in stackoverflow!) that I found got close to this question, but didn't teach me what I needed. I have what should be a nearly simple installation: a Windows service and an associated tray icon application. They install fine with the standard VS Setup project. After the files are installed, I need to present a dialog to the user to set some parameters in the service's exe.config file. In that dialog, the user should be able to abort the installation. I've tried two approaches to the Custom Action process and ran into a wall with each when it comes to making the installation roll back.
Approach 1: An exe for the Custom Action, run at Commit time.
This sort-of works. The application returns a non-zero exit code and the installation rollback occurs. What I don't like is that:
When the app exits (after the user selects to Cancel), the installation displays an error message saying that there was a problem with the installation and the user should contact the vendor. Since that's not the case, I'd prefer a more correct message ("Installation canceled by user") or no message at all.
Both of the project outputs (the service and the tray app) have to be listed under all four Custom Action sections or my dialog won't appear. Instead, an error appears about a missing InstallState file and the installation always fails. Intuitively, this seems wrong.
Approach 2: An Installer as the Custom Action, run at Install or Commit time.
This is cleaner to me (only the one item listed in the Custom Actions), but getting the process to roll back is worse than Approach 1. It seems that I have to throw an exception in the overridden method (Install/Commit), which then gives me several error dialogs before the rollback occurs, and then the rollback doesn't always uninstall the service.
What is the cleanest way to make this work without going to WiX or similar options?
The simple answer is don't use VS Installer Classes. They have a number of fundamental design flaws. I suggest you look at Windows Installer XML's ( WiX ) Deployment Tools Foundation ( DTF ) instead. DTF is a far superior hosting model / interop library for your managed code and outputs DLL's that are compatible ( from an MSI perspective ) with C/C++ custom actions. They can be consumed as Custom Actions by any MSI authoring tool, not just WiX installers.
Deployment Tools Foundation joins the WiX toolset.
Deployment Tools Foundation (DTF) Managed Custom Actions
I recommend this approach:
create a custom installation dialog which asks the user about your options
use the installer properties set by this dialog to modify your service configuration file (you can use a custom action or the XML support of another setup authoring tool)
This way the information is gathered before the install and the user can also abort the install without problems.
This approach is not supported by Visual Studio, but it can be done with free or commercial setup authoring tools.
If you want to stick with a custom action, you can try this:
make sure your custom action is deferred and doesn't run during commit (commit means that the installation was performed and there's no rollback)
use a Win32 DLL to show your custom dialog; this way you can return ERROR_INSTALL_USEREXIT (1602) so a friendlier user exit dialog is shown instead of the fatal error dialog
Our product has several products that customer can install created as separate installation packages (MSI).
We have a requirement to have single package for the installation that will:
Show one UI with progress
Allow user to choose which features/packages to install
Have ability to constrain one feature to another (e.g removing or adding effect other)
Support single elevation (UAC)
nice to have ability to auto update (not must)
support command line + silent installation
the package should be built out of the isolated installations (chain them)
raise error / messages for missing prerequisites
Support patches over time and major upgrades
Today we do almost all of the above using MSI with nested installations which is bad practice and we face too many issues in our solution.
i know that there are several bootstrappers out there (m$ generic bootstrapper which i think is not good, BURN is the WIX version which is not mature enough)
Do you know of other? that work and tested already ?
What is the best method to do (without unification of the MSI into a single MSI)
dotNetInstaller looks promising. I was experimenting with it to install java as a prerequisite. It comes with a GUI editor so you don't have to sort out the xml to create a project. The config file is in xml, and the InstallerLinker can be run from the command line. It could be integrated with a build server, though some msbuild tasks would be nice.
project home:
http://dotnetinstaller.codeplex.com/
tutorial:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/install/dotNetInstaller.aspx
Create an InstallShield InstallScript package. Use the InstallScript package kick off the .MSIs with "-qn" one by one. I do this and am successful with it. I believe it meets your all the requirements you listed.
Until Wix's Burn is ready we really don't have much of a choice when it comes to bootstrappers.
If you are using InstallShield as your msi designer, one thing you could try is making an InstallScript project that contains all the different msi packages. You could then silently install only the desired packages. InstallShield is pretty expensive though, so if you don't already have it, you'll probably have to end up rolling your own bootstrapper.