We use spring-integration (4.3.12) together with spring-amqp(1.7.4) to send and receive messages between micro services.
To keep out the integration/amqp configuration stuff out of the micro services, we want to use a library containing integration/amqp factories for creation of the objects required.
What I expect:
I create an IntegrationFlow instance with a messageHandler/messageHandler method (see below for the code) and a SimpleMessageHandlerContainer. When I send a message to the bound exchange then IO expect the messageHandler gets called with the message.
What do I get:
An exception: "MessageDispatchingException: Dispatcher has no subscribers"
If I use the MessageListenerContainer directly (set the messageHandler direct at the container) then I get the message as expected.
I guess, the problem lies within the programmatically initialization of the integrationFlow, but I cant find any information what I´m doing wrong.
Can anybody give me a hint?
Thanx
Now the code used:
public IntegrationFlow createMessageNotifierIntegrationFlow(//
String brokerNameSpace, String messageHandlerNameSpace, //
Object messageHandler, String methodName) {
ConnectionFactory cf = createConnectionFactory(brokerNameSpace);
AmqpAdmin amqpAdmin = createAmqpAdmin(brokerNameSpace, cf);
Inbound inbound = createInbound(messageHandlerNameSpace);
Queue queue = createQueue(messageHandlerNameSpace, amqpAdmin, inbound);
MessageNotifierIntegrationFlowBuilder builder = MessageNotifierIntegrationFlowBuilder
.newBuilder(messageHandlerNameSpace, this);
IntegrationFlow integrationFlow = builder//
.withConnectionFactory(cf)//
.withMessageHandler(messageHandler)//
.withMessageHandlerMethod(methodName)//
.withFlowExceptionHandler(new FlowExceptionHandler())//
.withInbound(inbound)//
.withAmqpAdmin(amqpAdmin)//
.withInboundQueue(queue)//
.build();
String beanName = brokerNameSpace + "-" + messageHandlerNameSpace + "-" + inbound.getQueue();
return integrationFlow;
}
public IntegrationFlow build() {
LOGGER.info("creating IntegrationFlow for {}", inbound.getQueue());
validateBuilder();
SimpleMessageListenerContainer receiverContainer = amqpObjectFactory.createMessageListenerContainer(//
inbound, connectionFactory, //
flowExceptionHandler, inboundQueue, messageHandlerNameSpace);
final AmqpInboundChannelAdapterSpec adapter = (AmqpInboundChannelAdapterSpec) Amqp.inboundAdapter(receiverContainer);
StandardIntegrationFlow flow = IntegrationFlows //
.from(adapter) //
.log("receiveData")//
.transform(TO_STRING_TRANSFORMER) //
.handle(messageHandler, messageHandlerMethod) //
.log("to message handler").get();
// flow.start() maybe later?
flow.start();
return flow;
}
public SimpleMessageListenerContainer createMessageListenerContainer(//
final Inbound inbound, //
final ConnectionFactory connectionFactory, //
final FlowExceptionHandler flowExceptionHandler, //
final Queue inboundQueue, String messageHandlerNameSpace) {
final String beanName = messageHandlerNameSpace + "-container-" + inbound.getQueue();
SimpleMessageListenerContainer container = null;
container = new SimpleMessageListenerContainer(connectionFactory);
container.setMaxConcurrentConsumers(inbound.getMaxconsumers());
container.setConcurrentConsumers(inbound.getMinconsumers());
container.setStartConsumerMinInterval(inbound.getMininterval());
container.addQueues(inboundQueue);
container.setAcknowledgeMode(inbound.getAckmode());
container.setDefaultRequeueRejected(inbound.getRequeueRejected());
container.setErrorHandler(flowExceptionHandler);
container.setRecoveryInterval(RECOVERY_INTERVAL);
container.setAutoStartup(false);
return container;
}
Related
We have a Spring Java application using RabbitMQ, and here is the scenario:
There is a consumer receiving messages from a queue and sending them to another one. We are using "SimpleRabbitListenerContainerFactory" as the container factory, but when sending the messages to the other queue inside a "parallelStream" we've got an IllegalStateException "Cannot determine target ConnectionFactory for lookup key" Exception
When we remove the "parallelStream" it works flawlessly.
public void sendMessage(final StagingMessage stagingMessage, final Long timestamp, final String country) {
final List<TransformedMessage> messages = processMessageList(stagingMessage);
messages.parallelStream().forEach(message -> {
final TransformedMessage transformedMessage = buildMessage(timestamp, ApiConstants.POST_METHOD, country);
myMessageSender.sendQueue(country, transformedMessage);
});
}
Connectio Facotory, where the lookup key is set:
#Configuration
#EnableRabbit
public class RabbitBaseConfig {
#Autowired
private QueueProperties queueProperties;
#Bean
#Primary
public ConnectionFactory connectionFactory(final ConnectionFactory connectionFactoryA, final ConnectionFactory connectionFactoryB) {
final SimpleRoutingConnectionFactory simpleRoutingConnectionFactory = new SimpleRoutingConnectionFactory();
final Map<Object, ConnectionFactory> map = new HashMap<>();
for (final String queue : queueProperties.getAQueueMap().values()) {
map.put("[" + queue + "]", connectionFactoryA);
}
for (final String queue : queueProperties.getBQueueMap().values()) {
map.put("[" + queue + "]", connectionFactoryB);
}
simpleRoutingConnectionFactory.setTargetConnectionFactories(map);
return simpleRoutingConnectionFactory;
}
#Bean
public Jackson2JsonMessageConverter jackson2JsonMessageConverter() {
return new Jackson2JsonMessageConverter();
}
}
Welcome to stack overflow!
You should always show the pertinent code and configuration beans when asking questions like this.
I assume you are using the RoutingConnectionFactory.
It uses a ThreadLocal to store the lookup key so the send has to happen on the same thread that set the key.
You generally should never go asynchronous in a listener anyway; you risk message loss. To increase concurrency, use the concurrency properties on the container.
EDIT
One technique would be to convey the lookup key in a message header:
#Bean
public RabbitTemplate template(ConnectionFactory rcf) {
RabbitTemplate rabbitTemplate = new RabbitTemplate(rcf);
Expression expression = new SpelExpressionParser().parseExpression("messageProperties.headers['cfSelector']");
rabbitTemplate.setSendConnectionFactorySelectorExpression(expression);
return rabbitTemplate;
}
#RabbitListener(queues = "foo")
public void listen1(String in) {
IntStream.range(0, 10)
.parallel()
.mapToObj(i -> in + i)
.forEach(val -> {
this.template.convertAndSend("bar", val.toUpperCase(), msg -> {
msg.getMessageProperties().setHeader("cfSelector", "[bar]");
return msg;
});
});
}
I'm pretty new to spring-integration anyway I'm using it in order to receive mails and elaborate them.
I used this spring configuration class:
#Configuration
#EnableIntegration
#PropertySource(value = { "classpath:configuration.properties" }, encoding = "UTF-8", ignoreResourceNotFound = false)
public class MailReceiverConfiguration {
private static final Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(MailReceiverConfiguration.class);
#Autowired
private EmailTransformerService emailTransformerService;
// Configurazione AE
#Bean
public MessageChannel inboundChannelAE() {
return new DirectChannel();
}
#Bean(name= {"aeProps"})
public Properties aeProps() {
Properties javaMailPropertiesAE = new Properties();
javaMailPropertiesAE.put("mail.store.protocol", "imap");
javaMailPropertiesAE.put("mail.debug", Boolean.TRUE);
javaMailPropertiesAE.put("mail.auth.debug", Boolean.TRUE);
javaMailPropertiesAE.put("mail.smtp.socketFactory.fallback", "false");
javaMailPropertiesAE.put("mail.imap.socketFactory.class", "javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory");
return javaMailPropertiesAE;
}
#Bean(name="mailReceiverAE")
public MailReceiver mailReceiverAE(#Autowired MailConfigurationBean mcb, #Autowired #Qualifier("aeProps") Properties javaMailPropertiesAE) throws Exception {
return ConfigurationUtil.getMailReceiver("imap://USERNAME:PASSWORD#MAILSERVER:PORT/INBOX", new BigDecimal(2), javaMailPropertiesAE);
}
#Bean
#InboundChannelAdapter( autoStartup = "true",
channel = "inboundChannelAE",
poller = {#Poller(fixedRate = "${fixed.rate.ae}",
maxMessagesPerPoll = "${max.messages.per.poll.ae}") })
public MailReceivingMessageSource pollForEmailAE(#Autowired MailReceiver mailReceiverAE) {
MailReceivingMessageSource mrms = new MailReceivingMessageSource(mailReceiverAE);
return mrms;
}
#Transformer(inputChannel = "inboundChannelAE", outputChannel = "transformerChannelAE")
public MessageBean transformitAE( MimeMessage mailMessage ) throws Exception {
// amministratore email inbox
MessageBean messageBean = emailTransformerService.transformit(mailMessage);
return messageBean;
}
#Splitter(inputChannel = "transformerChannelAE", outputChannel = "nullChannel")
public List<Message<?>> splitIntoMessagesAE(final MessageBean mb) {
final List<Message<?>> messages = new ArrayList<Message<?>>();
for (EmailFragment emailFragment : mb.getEmailFragments()) {
Message<?> message = MessageBuilder.withPayload(emailFragment.getData())
.setHeader(FileHeaders.FILENAME, emailFragment.getFilename())
.setHeader("directory", emailFragment.getDirectory()).build();
messages.add(message);
}
return messages;
}
}
So far so good.... I start my micro-service and there is this component listening on the specified mail server and mails are downloaded.
Now I have this requirement: mail server configuration (I mean the string "imap://USERNAME:PASSWORD#MAILSERVER:PORT/INBOX") must be taken from a database and it can be configurable. In any time a system administrator can change it and the mail receiver must use the new configuration.
As far as I understood I should create a new instance of MailReceiver when a new configuration is present and use it in the InboundChannelAdapter
Is there any best practice in order to do it? I found this solution: ImapMailReceiver NO STORE attempt on READ-ONLY folder (Failure) [THROTTLED];
In this solution I can inject the ThreadPoolTaskScheduler if I define it in my Configuration class; I can also inject the DirectChannel but every-time I should create a new MailReceiver and a new ImapIdleChannelAdapter without considering this WARN message I get when the
ImapIdleChannelAdapter starts:
java.lang.RuntimeException: No beanfactory at org.springframework.integration.expression.ExpressionUtils.createStandardEvaluationContext(ExpressionUtils.java:79) at org.springframework.integration.mail.AbstractMailReceiver.onInit(AbstractMailReceiver.java:403)
Is there a better way to satisfy my scenario?
Thank you
Angelo
The best way to do this is to use the Java DSL and dynamic flow registration.
Documentation here.
That way, you can unregister the old flow and register a new one, each time the configuration changes.
It will automatically handle injecting dependencies such as the bean factory.
I'm trying to set up spring JMS for activemq, and I'd like individual DLQs for easier monitoring rather than everything being lumped on one DLQ.
However my bean for this doesn't seem to be picked up. Could anyone point me out what I'm doing wrong as the documentation's pretty vague on how to do this programatically?
My Queue config:
#Bean
public MessageConverter jacksonJmsMessageConverter() {
MappingJackson2MessageConverter converter = new MappingJackson2MessageConverter();
converter.setTargetType(MessageType.TEXT);
converter.setTypeIdPropertyName("_type");
return converter;
}
#Bean
public DeadLetterStrategy deadLetterStrategy() {
IndividualDeadLetterStrategy deadLetterStrategy = new IndividualDeadLetterStrategy();
deadLetterStrategy.setQueueSuffix(".dlq");
return deadLetterStrategy;
}
#Bean
public RedeliveryPolicy redeliveryPolicy() {
RedeliveryPolicy redeliveryPolicy = new RedeliveryPolicy();
redeliveryPolicy.setInitialRedeliveryDelay(5000);
redeliveryPolicy.setBackOffMultiplier(2);
redeliveryPolicy.setUseExponentialBackOff(true);
redeliveryPolicy.setMaximumRedeliveries(5);
return redeliveryPolicy;
}
#Bean
public Queue myQueue() {
ActiveMQQueue queue = new ActiveMQQueue("myQueue");
return queue;
}
You can apply Individual Dead Letter Strategy using configurations something like this
#Bean
DeadLetterStrategy deadLetterStrategy(){
IndividualDeadLetterStrategy dlq = new IndividualDeadLetterStrategy(); //Messages of each will get to their respective Dead Letter Queues. if Original queue = 'x', its DLQ = 'prefix + x'
dlq.setQueueSuffix(".dlq");
dlq.setUseQueueForQueueMessages(true);
return dlq;
}
#Bean
public BrokerService brokerService(#Autowired DeadLetterStrategy strategy) throws Exception {
BrokerService broker = new BrokerService();
TransportConnector connector = new TransportConnector();
connector.setUri(new URI("your broker url")); //default/embedded broker url: vm://localhost?broker.persistent=true
broker.addConnector(connector);
PolicyEntry entry = new PolicyEntry();
entry.setDestination(new ActiveMQQueue("*")); //given DeadLetterStrategy will be applied to all types of Queues; ',' can also be used
entry.setDeadLetterStrategy(strategy);
PolicyMap map = new PolicyMap();
map.setPolicyEntries(Arrays.asList(entry));
broker.setDestinationPolicy(map);
return broker;
}
And finally your queue should look like this:
#JmsListener(destination = "main_queue_name" + ".dlq")
protected void processFailedItem(YourCustomPojo data) {
//do whatever you want
}
this is how i have defined my mqtt connection using spring integration.i am not sure whether this is possible bt can we setup a mqtt subscriber works after getting a 10 load of messages. right now subscriber works after publishing a message as it should.
#Autowired
ConnectorConfig config;
#Bean
public MqttPahoClientFactory mqttClientFactory() {
DefaultMqttPahoClientFactory factory = new DefaultMqttPahoClientFactory();
factory.setServerURIs(config.getUrl());
factory.setUserName(config.getUser());
factory.setPassword(config.getPass());
return factory;
}
#Bean
public MessageProducer inbound() {
MqttPahoMessageDrivenChannelAdapter adapter =
new MqttPahoMessageDrivenChannelAdapter(config.getClientid(), mqttClientFactory(), "ALERT", "READING");
adapter.setCompletionTimeout(5000);
adapter.setConverter(new DefaultPahoMessageConverter());
adapter.setQos(1);
adapter.setOutputChannel(mqttRouterChannel());
return adapter;
}
/**this is router**/
#MessageEndpoint
public class MessageRouter {
private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MessageRouter.class);
static final String ALERT = "ALERT";
static final String READING = "READING";
#Router(inputChannel = "mqttRouterChannel")
public String route(#Header("mqtt_topic") String topic){
String route = null;
switch (topic){
case ALERT:
logger.info("alert message received");
route = "alertTransformerChannel";
break;
case READING:
logger.info("reading message received");
route = "readingTransformerChannel";
break;
}
return route;
}
}
i need to batch up groups of 10 messages at a time
That is not a MqttPahoMessageDrivenChannelAdapter responsibility.
We use there MqttCallback with this semantic:
* #param topic name of the topic on the message was published to
* #param message the actual message.
* #throws Exception if a terminal error has occurred, and the client should be
* shut down.
*/
public void messageArrived(String topic, MqttMessage message) throws Exception;
So, we can't batch them there on this Channel Adapter by nature of the Paho client.
What we can suggest you from the Spring Integration perspective is an Aggregator EIP implementation.
In your case you should add #ServiceActivator for the AggregatorFactoryBean #Bean before that mqttRouterChannel, before sending to the router.
That maybe as simple as:
#Bean
#ServiceActivator(inputChannel = "mqttAggregatorChannel")
AggregatorFactoryBean mqttAggregator() {
AggregatorFactoryBean aggregator = new AggregatorFactoryBean();
aggregator.setProcessorBean(new DefaultAggregatingMessageGroupProcessor());
aggregator.setCorrelationStrategy(m -> 1);
aggregator.setReleaseStrategy(new MessageCountReleaseStrategy(10));
aggregator.setExpireGroupsUponCompletion(true);
aggregator.setSendPartialResultOnExpiry(true);
aggregator.setGroupTimeoutExpression(new ValueExpression<>(1000));
aggregator.setOutputChannelName("mqttRouterChannel");
return aggregator;
}
See more information in the Reference Manual.
I am struggling hard to find out the way for scheduled/Delaying messages in Spring AMQP/Rabbit MQ and found solution in here.But i still with a prolem
about Spring AMQP/Rabbit MQ which can not received any message.
My source as the following:
#Configuration
public class AmqpConfig {
#Bean
public ConnectionFactory connectionFactory() {
CachingConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new CachingConnectionFactory();
connectionFactory.setAddresses("172.16.101.14:5672");
connectionFactory.setUsername("admin");
connectionFactory.setPassword("admin");
connectionFactory.setPublisherConfirms(true);
return connectionFactory;
}
#Bean
#Scope("prototype")
public RabbitTemplate rabbitTemplate() {
RabbitTemplate template = new RabbitTemplate(connectionFactory());
return template;
}
#Bean
CustomExchange delayExchange() {
Map<String, Object> args = new HashMap<String, Object>();
args.put("x-delayed-type", "direct");
return new CustomExchange("my-exchange", "x-delayed-message", true, false, args);
}
#Bean
public Queue queue() {
return new Queue("spring-boot-queue", true);
}
#Bean
Binding binding(Queue queue, Exchange delayExchange) {
return BindingBuilder.bind(queue).to(delayExchange).with("spring-boot-queue").noargs();
}
#Bean
public SimpleMessageListenerContainer messageContainer() {
SimpleMessageListenerContainer container = new SimpleMessageListenerContainer(connectionFactory());
container.setQueues(queue());
container.setExposeListenerChannel(true);
container.setMaxConcurrentConsumers(1);
container.setConcurrentConsumers(1);
container.setAcknowledgeMode(AcknowledgeMode.MANUAL);
container.setMessageListener(new ChannelAwareMessageListener() {
public void onMessage(Message message, Channel channel) throws Exception {
byte[] body = message.getBody();
System.err.println("receive msg : " + new String(body));
channel.basicAck(message.getMessageProperties().getDeliveryTag(), false); //确认消息成功消费
}
});
return container;
}
}
#Component
public class Send implements RabbitTemplate.ConfirmCallback{
private RabbitTemplate rabbitTemplate;
#Autowired
public Send(RabbitTemplate rabbitTemplate) {
this.rabbitTemplate = rabbitTemplate;
this.rabbitTemplate.setConfirmCallback(this);
rabbitTemplate.setMandatory(true);
}
public void sendMsg(String content) {
CorrelationData correlationId = new CorrelationData(UUID.randomUUID().toString());
rabbitTemplate.convertAndSend("my-exchange", "", content, new MessagePostProcessor() {
#Override
public Message postProcessMessage(Message message) throws AmqpException {
message.getMessageProperties().setHeader("x-delay", 6000);
return message;
}
},correlationId);
System.err.println("delay message send ................");
}
/**
* 回调
*/
#Override
public void confirm(CorrelationData correlationData, boolean ack, String cause) {
System.err.println(" callback id :" + correlationData);
if (ack) {
System.err.println("ok");
} else {
System.err.println("fail:" + cause);
}
}
}
Is there someone could give a help.
Thanks all.
Delay messaging is nothing to do with Spring amqp, it's a library which will reside with your code, so the library can't hold any message as such. There are two approaches you can try:
Old Approach:
Set the TTL(time to live) header in each message/queue(policy) and then introduce a DLQ to handle it. once the ttl expired your messages will move from DLQ to main queue so that your listener can process it.
Latest Approach:
Recently RabbitMQ came up with RabbitMQ Delayed Message Plugin , using which you can achieve the same and this plugin support available since RabbitMQ-3.5.8.
You can declare an exchange with the type x-delayed-message and then publish messages with the custom header x-delay expressing in milliseconds a delay time for the message. The message will be delivered to the respective queues after x-delay milliseconds
Details:
To use the delayed-messaging feature, declare an exchange with the type x-delayed-message:
Map<String, Object> args = new HashMap<String, Object>();
args.put("x-delayed-type", "direct");
channel.exchangeDeclare("my-exchange", "x-delayed-message", true, false, args);
Note that we pass an extra header called x-delayed-type, more on it under the Routing section.
Once we have the exchange declared we can publish messages providing a header telling the plugin for how long to delay our messages:
byte[] messageBodyBytes = "delayed payload".getBytes("UTF-8");
Map<String, Object> headers = new HashMap<String, Object>();
headers.put("x-delay", 5000);
AMQP.BasicProperties.Builder props = new AMQP.BasicProperties.Builder().headers(headers);
channel.basicPublish("my-exchange", "", props.build(), messageBodyBytes);
byte[] messageBodyBytes2 = "more delayed payload".getBytes("UTF-8");
Map<String, Object> headers2 = new HashMap<String, Object>();
headers2.put("x-delay", 1000);
AMQP.BasicProperties.Builder props2 = new AMQP.BasicProperties.Builder().headers(headers2);
channel.basicPublish("my-exchange", "", props2.build(), messageBodyBytes2);
In the above example we publish two messages, specifying the delay time with the x-delay header. For this example, the plugin will deliver to our queues first the message with the body "more delayed payload" and then the one with the body "delayed payload".
If the x-delay header is not present, then the plugin will proceed to route the message without delay.
More here: git