I want to set a Global variable through a recipe then reference that variable in another independent recipe
The below code is an example code that sets the variable within the recipe but the variable stays with the initial value if referenced outside the recipe
ACTIVE = a
switch:
ifeq ($(ACTIVE),b)
ACTIVE=$(shell echo 'a')
else
ACTIVE=$(shell echo 'b')
endif
print:
$(info acitve = $(ACTIVE))
I know there are ways to broadcast the value of a target-specific variable to dependent targets, but that's not what I want.
You can use $(eval ...) for this, although it's almost always a bad idea. I have to assume that your real situation is much more complicated because there are many better ways to accomplish what you've actually provided in the sample makefile.
switch:
$(eval ACTIVE=$(if $(filter-out a,$(ACTIVE)),a,b))
Related
I am designing a simple makefile that defines one target which takes an argument, and I would like to define a second target that invokes the first target in a loop, once per every variable defined in an array variable at the top of the Makefile.
my_loop_var = var1 var2
my_thing:
echo $MY_VAR
all:
invoke my_thing once for each value of my_loop_var
What is the right way to solve this?
Note: $MY_VAR will probably expand as Y_VAR because make will try to expand variable M, which is probably undefined, and concatenate Y_VAR to the result. Use $(VARNAME) to expand make variable VARNAME. It is only with single-character variable names that you can expand with $X.
There is not really a "right way". There are many ways. The most straightforward from your specifications (but the less natural) would be something like:
my_loop_var := var1 var2
my_thing:
echo "$(MY_VAR)"
.PHONY: all my_thing
all:
for v in $(my_loop_var); do $(MAKE) my_thing MY_VAR="$$v"; done
The recipe of all is a shell loop that re-invokes make with the my_thing goal and with each value in my_loop_var passed as the value of make variable MY_VAR.
Note the $$v to escape the first expansion that make always performs before passing the recipe to the shell. With just $v make would expand the recipe as ... MY_VAR="" ... and the result would not be what you expect.
Note also the use of the MAKE make variable instead of directly calling make (have a look at the documentation if you want to understand why it is better like this).
all and my_thing are declared as phony because they are not real file names that their recipes create, and make needs to know this kind of things.
But a much more make-ish way would be something like:
my_loop_var := var1 var2
my_thing_targets := $(addprefix my_thing_,$(my_loop_var))
.PHONY: all $(my_thing_targets)
all: $(my_thing_targets)
$(my_thing_targets): my_thing_%:
echo "$*"
Here we define as many my_thing_something targets as there are something values in my_loop_var. And explain make how to build such targets with a static pattern rule. In the recipe of a pattern rule the $* automatic variable expands as the part that matched the % pattern. So, this static pattern rule says that if we need to build my_thing_something, the recipe is echo "something".
We declare all these my_thing_something targets as prerequisites of all such that if you type make or make all, make will build all the my_thing_something targets.
This second solution is better for at least two reasons. First, make is invoked only once, which is better, at least for performance. Second, make can parallelize the build of the my_thing_something if you use the -j N option (to allow make to run up to N jobs in parallel). This also is better for performance.
But it is also a matter of style. Very frequently if you use shell loops in your recipes, especially to invoke make again, it is the sign that you did not really understand what make is intended for and how it works. The make language is not a scripting language (even if the recipes are written in shell language, which is a scripting language); make is designed to "loop" over all targets to build, without the need for explicit loops.
Make can't define multiple target-specific variables.
But there is a macros from this answer that can solve the problem.
assign-vars = $(foreach A,$2,$(eval $1: $A))
But probably it can't set variable that depends on another variable. For example:
assign-vars = $(foreach A,$2,$(eval $1: $A))
multiple_variable = a=10 \
b=$(shell echo $$(( $(a)-1 )) )
$(call assign-vars, print, $(multiple_variable))
print:
#echo a=$(a)
#echo b=$(b)
I expected to see b=9 as a result from print target but I get b=-1.
How can I fix it?
The problem is that the entire contents of multiple_variable is expanded first, before the for-loop runs. So, it's not possible to refer to earlier variables in the assignment of later variables: they won't be set yet.
When you run:
$(call assign-vars, print, $(multiple_variable))
the first thing make does, is expand the variable multiple_variable: That expands to this:
a=10 b=-1
because when make goes to invoke the shell, the make variable a has not been set yet and so it runs echo $(( -1 )).
I don't really know of a good way to do what you appear to want to do... although I'm not sure I understand what you want to do anyway. It seems like you should take a step back and reconsider your requirements.
If you rewrite it to:
define newline
endef
assign-vars = $(eval $1: $(subst $(newline),$(newline)$1 :,$2))
define print_vars :=
a=10
b=$(shell echo $$(( $(a)-1 )) )
endef
that should do the trick.
EDIT: I only see now, that you are trying to calculate a target specific variable from anothen one. I don't think that will work, as I doubt that there is a specified order in which target specific variables are assigned. So a may or may not be defined when b receives its value.
I want to define a variable differently depending on another variables value in a makefile. I thought using conditionals would solve the problem, like this in the makefile:
ifeq ($(BOOT_FLAG),installed)
BOOT_TEST=$(BOOT_FLAG)
else
BOOT_TEST=no
endif
BOOT_DEFINE=$(BOOT_FLAG)
BOOT_FLAG=installed
.PHONY: all
all:
#echo $(BOOT_TEST)
#echo $(BOOT_DEFINE)
I expected the output to be:
installed
installed
but I got this instead:
no
installed
apparently the ifeq does not expand the BOOT_FLAG to installed
but setting of the BOOT_DEFINE variable manages to expand it correctly.
I read in the manual that:
"make evaluates conditionals when it reads a makefile. Consequently, you cannot use automatic variables in the tests of conditionals because they are not defined until commands are run"
but the BOOT_FLAG is not an automatic variable. Also if I move the definition of BOOT_FLAG to before the ifeq, then it works as I want it. However, I want to keep the current order of the definitions (and I don't understand why make does an exception to the order independence of the definitions when using conditions)
The answer is right there in the statement you quoted:
make evaluates conditionals when it reads a makefile.
Since make has evaluated the conditional when it read that line in the makefile, and the variable has not been defined when it read that line, there's no way that variables set after the conditional can take effect.
Just because the documentation lists one consequence of this behavior (the one that most people get confused by) doesn't mean that this is the only consequence of this behavior.
However, I want to keep the current order of the definitions
You can't.
(and I don't understand why make does an exception to the order independence of the definitions when using conditions)
It would be virtually impossible, and even if it could be done the resulting behavior would be almost indecipherable except in the most trivial situations. If you don't believe me, try to write down an algorithm describing how that could work. Remember to consider things like simple variable assignments, nested conditionals, variables used in target and prerequisite lists, variables that are intentionally reset in different parts of makefiles, etc.
ETA You could do it, by putting the ifeq into a define variable then using eval later, after BOOT_FLAG is set, to expand it. Seems gross to me but...
This is because makefile is evaulating the ifeq as it parses the file.
So when it gets to the ifeq..., then BOOT_FLAG is yet not set, so BOOT_TEST = no
Then you set BOOT_FLAG.
Then once all the variables are parsed, makefile will go through and run your rule - so in this case BOOT_DEFINE is evaluated to $(BOOT_FLAG) final value of installed
Try this:
$(info start - BOOT_FLAG=$(BOOT_FLAG))
ifeq ($(BOOT_FLAG),installed)
BOOT_TEST=$(BOOT_FLAG)
else
BOOT_TEST=no
endif
$(info after if - BOOT_FLAG=$(BOOT_FLAG))
BOOT_DEFINE=$(BOOT_FLAG)
BOOT_FLAG=installed
$(info after assignment - BOOT_FLAG=$(BOOT_FLAG))
.PHONY: all
all:
#echo $(BOOT_TEST)
#echo $(BOOT_DEFINE)
You will see various values printed at different times during the makefile parsing. On the first pass it evaluates the variables (and if's) and then on the second pass it can do the target rules.
As others noted the problem is that ifeq is expanded and evaluated in-place.
If you want to postpone the evaluation until some late moment, you must keep the whole expression inside of a recursive variable. Then the conditional could be implemented by $(if ...) function, instead of ifeq (okay, $(eval ifeq...) should also be doable, but... well, gross).
Of course, this is quite an overhead for such simple case, but nonetheless it could be done like this:
BOOT_TEST=$(if $(subst _installed,,_$(BOOT_FLAG)),no,installed)
BOOT_DEFINE=$(BOOT_FLAG)
BOOT_FLAG=installed
.PHONY: all
all:
#echo $(BOOT_TEST)
#echo $(BOOT_DEFINE)
I am trying to build a macro in Makefile which I can expand once but can still work as a macro after being expanded. This is useful to me as the first level expansion will fill in recursive parameters that won't last. Here's an example:
all: aperiod
TGT = hello
hello.TGT = world
world.TGT = period
define CREATE_TARGET
.SECONDARY: $(1)
$(3)$(1): $(4)$(2)
#echo $$$$(#)
$(foreach t,$($(1).TGT),$(call CREATE_TARGET,$(t),$(1),$$(1),$$(1)))
endef
define CREATE
$(call CREATE_TARGET,$(TGT),,$$(1),)
endef
CREATE_EXP := $(call CREATE)
TGT :=
$(eval $(call CREATE_EXP,a))
Error when running make:
make: *** No rule to make target aperiod', needed byall'. Stop.
TGT contains a changing set of values. I want CREATE_EXP to contain the full expanded creation method which accepts a parameter to give prefixes to the targets.
So optimally, I can call make aperiod and get hello world period, or call make bperiod after $(eval $(call CREATE_EXP,b)) and get the same thing
This is a highly reduced test case!
The value of CREATE_EXP is correct, but won't work for me as a macro anymore.
$(info $(value CREATE_EXP))
.SECONDARY: hello
$(1)hello:
#echo $$(#)
.SECONDARY: world
$(1)world: $(1)hello
#echo $$(#)
.SECONDARY: period
$(1)period: $(1)world
#echo $$(#)
I would like to know why Make behaves this way, as well as if there is a better way to accomplish the general gist of what I am trying to do.
EDIT: I found a solution to accomplish this, although I am still curious as to whether a call to $(call) can create a macro that still needs expansion.
define CREATE
define CREATE_EXP
$(call CREATE_TARGET,$(TGT),,$$(1),)
endef
endef
Use $(eval $(call CREATE))
The first time through, make will expand the variables inside. This allows for the recursive expansion as well as the creation of a function macro.
I would have to think more deeply about "a better way" and really understand what you're trying to do, but to answer "why make behaves this way": you are assigning CREATE_EXP as a simply-expanded variable, with :=:
CREATE_EXP := $(call CREATE)
That information is stored along with the variable and when make expands something like $(CREATE_EXP) it knows that the value of CREATE_EXP has already been expanded and it shouldn't be expanded again. That's the entire point, really, of using :=.
Here's an alternate model that might work for you:
$(foreach 1,a,$(eval $(CREATE_EXP)))
(I haven't tried this). The difference here is that first we set the variable 1 as the foreach variable, then we call eval in that context. Although the $(CREATE_EXP) expands to the value without further expansion, then eval will parse it as a makefile and expand it again, with 1=a set.
Just a note: this:
CREATE_EXP := $(call CREATE)
Is absolutely identical to this:
CREATE_EXP := $(CREATE)
If you pass no arguments to call it's the same as a simple macro expansion.
You might be interested to read the set of blog posts here: http://make.mad-scientist.net/category/metaprogramming/ (start from the oldest first).
I want to set a variable if it is empty. I tried in this way:
....
TEST := $(something)
...
TEST ?= $(something else)
The first $(something) may return an empty string, however the conditional assignment ?= works only if the previous variable is not set, not if empty.
Any elegant solution to set the variable if empty?
EDIT
I found this solution:
....
TEST := $(something)
...
TEST += $(something else)
TEST := $(word 1, $(TEST))
but I think that there will be one more elegant.
Any elegant solution to set the variable if empty?
GNU make is hardly known for elegant solutions. Unless you find trapdoors and minefields to be elegant. I know only of the two ways to accomplish what you want:
The standard ifeq/endif solution:
ifeq ($(TEST),)
TEST := $(something else)
endif
Use the $(if) function:
TEST := $(if $(TEST),$(TEST),$(something else))
One can try to package that construct into a function too, but that is inadvisable. The function would have the hidden pitfall of occasionally breaking the $(something else) if it contains the , (for which there are only wayward workarounds). (The built-in functions like $(if) are immune to the , bug.)
Elegance test is up to you.
Here's another alternative that I personally find quite elegant, because it's a one-liner and doesn't need the redundant else-branch:
TEST := $(or $(TEST),$(something else))
From GNU make, chapter 7.2, Syntax of Conditionals:
"Often you want to test if a variable has a non-empty value. When the value results from complex expansions of variables and functions, expansions you would consider empty may actually contain whitespace characters and thus are not seen as empty. However, you can use the strip function to avoid interpreting whitespace as a non-empty value. For example:
ifeq ($(strip $(foo)),)
text-if-empty
endif
will evaluate text-if-empty even if the expansion of $(foo) contains whitespace characters."
Folks, I think there's a simpler solution
KDIR ?= "foo"
From: What is ?= in Makefile
Just in case anyone stumbled upon putting the condition in the rule itself. below how I did it, thought it might help others.
In Makefile, suppose we have the following rule with check target and we need to check whether var was passed.
check:
#[ "${var}" ] && echo "all good" || ( echo "var is not set"; exit 1 )
To test this out, run the following commands
$ make check
var is not set
make: *** [check] Error 1
$ make check var=test
all good
So, Now we can pass the variable value or a default value in case it was not passed to a bash script that will be responsible to do the logic. something like the following:
#[ "${var}" ] && ./b.sh ${var} || ./b.sh 'ss'
Here's below what b.sh might look like, though you can add more logic to it.
#!/bin/sh
echo $1
In case you need to distinguish if a variable is undefined or just has an empty value, use $(origin VARNAME) function:
ifeq ($(origin VARNAME),undefined)
VARNAME := "now it's finally defined"
endif
Note that VARNAME is not surrounded by $() - you literally give the name of the variable.
Setting value to variable in Makefile if value defined
ifdef RELEASE_BRANCH
GIT_TAG=$(shell cat projects/${RELEASE_BRANCH}/GIT_TAG)
else
GIT_TAG=$(shell cat release/DEFAULT_GIT_TAG)
endif