I have a small example with some get/post mappings and JpaRepository calls in Spring Boot.
Firstly I have two entity Classes:
#Entity
#Table(name = "stock")
public class Stock extends BaseEntity
{
#Column(name = "value")
public String value;
public String getValue() {
return value;
}
public void setValue(String value) {
this.value = value;
}
}
#Entity
#Table(name = "stock_item")
public class StockItem extends BaseEntity
{
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "stock_id", insertable = false, updatable = false)
public Stock stock;
#Column(name = "stock_id")
public Long stockId;
#Column(name = "value")
public String value;
}
I have a many-to-one association from StockItem to Stock.
I insert a Stock and have a controller as below:
#Autowired
public Controller(StockItemRepository stockItemRepository) {
this.stockItemRepository = stockItemRepository;
}
#RequestMapping("/")
#Transactional(readOnly = true)
public String get() {
List<StockItem> stockItemList = stockItemRepository.getItemsById(1L);
System.out.println("TX MANAGER: " + TransactionSynchronizationManager.isActualTransactionActive());
for (StockItem stockItem : stockItemList) {
System.out.println(stockItem.getStock().getValue());
}
return "get";
}
#RequestMapping("/fromSave")
#Transactional
public String post() {
StockItem stockItem = new StockItem();
stockItem.setStockId(1L);
stockItemRepository.saveAndFlush(stockItem);
System.out.println("saveCalled");
return get();
}
and getItemsById in the repository is defined as follows:
#Query("FROM StockItem si " +
"JOIN FETCH si.stock stk " +
"WHERE si.stockId = :id")
List<StockItem> getItemsById(#Param("id") Long id);
From my understanding, when I call the post method:
it creates a new item
sets the id of the associated attribute
saves and ends the transaction
Heres where things get strange...
I call get after the post and make the above repository call, which has a join fetch and when I call stockitem.getStock().getValue() I get a null pointer when I expect a LazyInitializationException.
If I call the get() from the mapping, outside the class, it successfully loads the associated object.
I have even removed the #Transaction annotation from the get, as well as
the join-fetch from my query and again, if I call from outside of the class it works and from the post, it crashes with a NullPointerException.
I have put the get inside of a TransactionTemplate.execute() and I still get a NullPointerException when calling from inside the class.
So the main questions are:
Why am I getting a NullPointerException instead of LazyInitializationException?
What is the transaction magic behind having no transaction but successfully fetching a lazy attribute??
The problem here is that you are misusing JPA. As you are seemingly aware judging from the comments on the other answer you have mapped the stock_id column twice. Once as a many-to-one relationship
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "stock_id", insertable = false, updatable = false)
public Stock stock;
and once as a simple column
#Column(name = "stock_id")
public Long stockId;
When you set the simple column and flush the changes as in your post() method the following happens:
the value gets set in the simple column. The reference is still null.
the value gets stored in the database. The reference is still null.
The repository call will find the id of the StockItemin the Persistence Context and return that instance, i.e. the exact same used in the post method, with the reference still null.
What is the transaction magic behind having no transaction but successfully fetching a lazy attribute??
No magic involved here. fetch specifications are only used for object traversal. JPQL queries don't honor these.
The unasked question remains: how to fix the situation?
The obvious fix is to lose the simple column and just use entity references as intended by JPA.
You don't want to do that in order to avoid DB access somewhere. But as long as you only access the id of the referenced Stock it shouldn't get initialized. So it seems that this should be possible with just Lazy Fetching.
Alternatively, I'd suggest removing the many-to-one relationship and creating a repository for Stock and manually loading it when required.
#Entity
#Table(name = "stock_item")
public class StockItem extends BaseEntity
{
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "stock_id", insertable = false, updatable = false) //here is your problem
public Stock stock;
#Column(name = "stock_id")
public Long stockId; // why explicitly define a separate column for foreign key after mapping it above
#Column(name = "value")
public String value;
}
with insertable = false and updatable = false it won't insert in your DB and neither it will allow updation, so you are getting NullPointerException. You should atleast allow insertion in order to run the query based on the foreign key stock_id
UPDATE
Change your Entity class with property-based access:
#Entity
#Table(name = "stock_item")
public class StockItem extends BaseEntity
{
private Stock stock; // variables should always be private since you have getters and setters
private String value;
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "stock_id", updatable = false)
public Stock getStock() {
return stock;
}
public void setStock(Stock stock) {
this.stock = stock;
}
#Basic
#Column(name = "value")
public String getValue() {
return value;
}
public void setValue(String value) {
this.value = value;
}
}
Related
I'm getting an exception:
org.hibernate.TransientPropertyValueException:
object references an unsaved transient instance
- save the transient instance before flushing :
com.example.jpamapstruct.entity.Member.club ->
com.example.jpamapstruct.entity.Club
while saving the member entity:
#Transactional
public MemberDto save(MemberDto memberDto){
Member entity = memberMapper.toEntity(memberDto);
return memberMapper.toDto(repository.save(entity));
}
How to fix this case in a proper way?
Possible solution:
I can get and set a club object before saving a member but is it only one and the best approach in such scenario?
Member entity = memberMapper.toEntity(memberDto);
clubRepository.getReferencedById(memberDto.getClubId()).ifPresent(entity::setClub);
return memberMapper.toDto(repository.save(entity));
Questions:
Should I put this getReferencedById code explicity? I mean what if we have several child objects (unidirectional ManyToOne), for each we need to get data from DB.
Is there any way to handle this by JPA (Spring Data/JPA) "automatically"?
Maybe it is possible to hit DB only one time with f.e join fetch somehow for all childs (with using custom #Query or querydsl or criteria/specification)?
Next, hoow to handle collections (unidirectional manyToMany)? In my case set of events in member object. Also need to loop thru and get all objects one by one before saving member?
Where should I put such logic in a service or maybe better in a mapstuct mapper?
If so, how to use repositories in such mapper?
#Mapper(componentModel = "spring")
public interface MemberMapper extends EntityMapper<MemberDto, Member> {
#AfterMapping
default void afterMemberMapping(#MappingTarget Member m, MemberDto dto) {
var club = clubRepo.findById(m.getClub().getId())
m.setClub(club)
}
Source code:
#Entity
public class Club extends AbstractEntity {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
#Column(name = "id", nullable = false)
private Long id;
}
public class ClubDto extends AbstractDto {
private Long id;
}
#Entity
public class Member {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
#Column(name = "id", unique = true, nullable = false)
private Long id;
// commented out as don't want to save child object as it should already exist
// #ManyToOne(cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
#ManyToOne
Club club;
#ManyToMany
#JoinTable(name = "member_events",
joinColumns = #JoinColumn(name = "member_id"),
inverseJoinColumns = #JoinColumn(name = "event_id")
)
List<Event> events = new ArrayList<>();
}
public class MemberDto {
private Long id;
private ClubDto club;
}
#MappedSuperclass
public abstract class AbstractEntity {
#Version
private Integer version;
}
public abstract class AbstractDto {
private Integer version;
}
//MemberMapper above
I want to load all objects from a table without a lazy objects/children and list them on the page (Thymeleaf template), but I get a LazyInitializationException every time. I tried to convert Hibernate entity objects into a POJO that doesnt contains a lazy/unwanted object but with the same result. I also tried open-in-view parameter set to false...
Simple example:
Parent:
#Entity
public class DocumentDbe implements Serializable {
public DocumentDbe(){
}
#Id
#Column(name = "id", updatable = false, nullable = false)
private Long id;
#OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.PERSIST)
private DocumentFileDbe documentFile;
....
}
Child:
#Entity
public class DocumentFileDbe implements Serializable {
public DocumentFileDbe(){}
#Id
#Column(name = "id", updatable = false, nullable = false)
private Long id;
#Column
#Lob
private byte[] documentData;
...
}
POJO:
public class DocumentDto implements Serializable {
public DocumentDto(){
}
public DocumentDto(DocumentDbe doc){
this.id = doc.getId();
}
....
}
Controller:
#GetMapping("/list")
String getList(Model model) {
List<DocumentDbe> docs;
List<DocumentDto> data = new ArrayList<>();
try (Session ses = sessionFactory.openSession()) {
docs = ses.createQuery("FROM DocumentDbe").list();
docs.forEach(doc -> {
data.add(new DocumentDto(doc));
});
}
model.addAttribute(MODEL_LIST_DATA, data);
return "list";
}
EDIT: Thrown exception:
org.thymeleaf.exceptions.TemplateInputException: An error happened during template parsing (template: "class path resource [templates/list.html]")] with root cause
org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException: could not initialize proxy - no Session
EDIT2:
In DocumentDbe is relation with another object (EAGER this time so I was not paying attention to it) , which has reference to DocumentDbe again.. chained relationship and LazyInitializationException is created...
EDIT3:
Although
This is modified and working controller, without POJO:
#GetMapping("/list")
String getList(Model model) {
List<DocumentDbe> docs;
try (Session ses = sessionFactory.openSession()) {
docs = ses.createQuery("FROM DocumentDbe ORDER BY id DESC").list();
docs.forEach(doc -> {
doc.setDocumentFile(null);
doc.getHistory().forEach(log ->{
log.setDocument(null);
});
});
}
model.addAttribute(MODEL_ADMIN_DATA, docs);
return "list";
}
In class DocumentDbe you have mark relation as Lazy. In default relation #ManyToOne and #OneToOne is as EAGER, so if you don't want Lazy, you have to change
#OneToOne(cascade = CascadeType.PERSIST)
If you want have #lob also as eager:
#Lob
#Basic( fetch = FetchType.EAGER )
I am getting this A collection with cascade="all-delete-orphan" was no longer referenced by the owning entity instance error with my oneToMany relationship when trying to update my child element (report). Although I see this question asked a few times here, I haven't been able to make my code to work with them and I now feel it may be an issue with me using Lombok perhaps, since most of the answers here mention about changes on the hashcode and equals methods, which are abstracted away by Lombok? I tried to remove Lombok to try without it but then I got a bit confused on what to do next. If I could get some guidance on how to fix this issue within my original Lombok implementation please.
#Entity
#Table(name = "category")
#AllArgsConstructor
#NoArgsConstructor
#Data
public class Category {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private UUID id;
#Column(name = "category_title", nullable = false)
private String title;
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "category", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
private Collection<Report> report;
public Category(UUID id, String title) {
this.id = id;
this.title = title;
}
}
#NoArgsConstructor
#AllArgsConstructor
#Entity
#Table(name = "report")
#Data
public class Report {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private UUID id;
#Column(name = "report_title", nullable = false)
private String reportTitle;
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.MERGE)
#JoinColumn(name = "category_id", nullable = false)
private Category category;
public Report(UUID id) {
this.id = id;
}
}
#Override
public ReportUpdateDto updateReport(UUID id, ReportUpdateDto reportUpdateDto) {
if (reportRepository.findById(id).isPresent()) {
Report existingReport = reportRepository.findById(id).get();
existingReport.setReportTitle(reportUpdateDto.getTitle());
Category existingCategory = categoryRepository.findById(reportUpdateDto.getCategory().getId()).get();
Category category = new Category(existingCategory.getId(), existingCategory.getTitle());
existingReport.setCategory(category); // This is needed to remove hibernate interceptor to be set together with the other category properties
Report updatedReport = reportRepository.save(existingReport);
updatedReport.setCategory(category); // This is needed to remove hibernate interceptor to be set together with the other category properties
ReportUpdateDto newReportUpdateDto = new ReportUpdateDto(updatedReport.getId(),
updatedReport.getReportTitle(), updatedReport.getCategory());
return newReportUpdateDto;
} else {
return null;
}
}
Thank you very much.
Fast solution (but not recommended)
The error of collection [...] no longer referenced arrises in your code beacuse the synchronization between both sides of the bidiretional mapping category-report was just partially done.
It's important to note that binding the category to the report and vice-versa is not done by Hibernate. We must do this ouserselves, in the code, in order to sync both sides of the relationship, otherwise we may break the Domain Model relationship consistency.
In your code you have done half of the synchronization (binding the category to the report):
existingReport.setCategory(category);
What is missing is the binding of the report to the category:
category.addReport(existingReport);
where the Category.addReport() may be like that:
public void addReport(Report r){
if (this.report == null){
this.report = new ArrayList<>();
}
this.report.add(r);
}
Recommended Solution - Best practice for synchronizing both sides of the mapping
The suggested code above works, but it is error prone as the programmer may forget to call one of the lines when updating the relationship.
A better approach is to encapsulate that sychronization logic in a method in the owning side of the relationship. And that side is the Category as stated here: mappedBy = "category".
So what we do is to encapsulate in the Category.addReport(...) all the logic of cross-reference between Category and Report.
Considering the above version of addReport() method, what is missing is adding r.setCategory(this).
public class Category {
public void addReport(Report r){
if (this.reports == null){
this.reports = new ArrayList<>();
}
r.setCategory(this);
this.reports.add(r);
}
}
Now, in the updateReport() it is enough to call the addReport() and the commented line bellow can be deleted:
//existingReport.setCategory(category); //That line can be removed
category.addReport(existingReport);
It is a good practice including in Category a removeReport() method as well:
public void removeReport(Report r){
if (this.reports != null){
r.setCategory = null;
this.reports.remove(r);
}
}
That is the code of Category.java after the two methods were added:
public class Category {
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "category", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
private Collection<Report> reports;
//Code ommited for brevity
public void addReport(Report r){
if (this.reports == null){
this.reports = new ArrayList<>();
}
r.setCategory(this);
this.reports.add(r);
}
public void removeReport(Report r){
if (this.reports != null){
r.setCategory = null;
this.reports.remove(r);
}
}
}
And the code for updating a report category now is this:
public ReportUpdateDto updateReport(UUID id, ReportUpdateDto reportUpdateDto) {
if (reportRepository.findById(id).isPresent()) {
Report existingReport = reportRepository.findById(id).get();
existingReport.setReportTitle(reportUpdateDto.getTitle());
Category existingCategory = categoryRepository.findById(reportUpdateDto.getCategory().getId()).get();
existingCategory.addReport(existingReport);
reportRepository.save(existingReport);
return new ReportUpdateDto(existingReport.getId(),
existingReport.getReportTitle(), existingReport.getCategory());
} else {
return null;
}
}
A good resource to see a practical example of synchronization in bidirectional associations: https://vladmihalcea.com/jpa-hibernate-synchronize-bidirectional-entity-associations/
Lombok and Hibernate - not the best of the combinations
Though we can not blame Lombok for the error described in your question, many problems may arrise when using Lombok alongside with Hibernate:
Properties being loaded even if marked for lazy loading...
When generating hashcode(), equals() or toString() using Lombok, the getters of fields marked as lazy are very likelly to be called. So the programmer's initial intention of postponing some properties loading will no be respected as they will be retrieved from the database when one of hascode(), equals() or toString() is invoked.
In the best case scenario, if a session is open, this will cause additional queries and slow down your application.
In the worst case scenarios, when no session is available, a LazyInitializationException will be thrown.
Lombok's hashcode()/equals() affecting the bevahior of collections
Hibernate uses hascode() and equals() logic to check if a object is order to avoid inserting the same object twice. The same applies to removing from a list.
The way Lombok generates the methods hashcode() and equals() may affect hibernate and create inconsistent properties (especially Collections).
See this article for more info on this subject: https://thorben-janssen.com/lombok-hibernate-how-to-avoid-common-pitfalls/
Lombok/Hibernate integration in a nutshell
Don't use Lombok for entity classes. Lombok annotations you need to avoid are #Data, #ToString, and #EqualsAndHashCode.
Off-topic - Beware of delete-orphan
In Category, the #OneToMany mapping is defined with orphanRemoval=true as bellow:
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "category", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
private Collection<Report> reports;
The orphanRemoval=true means that when deleting a category, all the reports in that category will be deleted as well.
It is important to assess if that is the desired behavior in your application.
See an example of the SQLs hibernate will execute when calling categoryRepository.delete(category):
//Retrieving all the reports associated to the category
select
report0_.category_id as category3_1_0_,
report0_.id as id1_1_0_,
report0_.id as id1_1_1_,
report0_.category_id as category3_1_1_,
report0_.report_title as report_t2_1_1_
from
report report0_
where
report0_.category_id=?
//Deleting all the report associated to the category (retrieved in previous select)
delete from
report
where
id=?
//Deleting the category
delete from
category
where
id=?
Just an update based on the accepted answer to avoid a StackOverflow and circular loop that came up after the changes.
I had to create a new Category object to remove the reports inside it within my return dto, otherwise as the category contains that same report, that again contains that category and so on, the infinite loop could be seen on my response.
#Override
public ReportUpdateDto updateReport(UUID id, ReportUpdateDto reportUpdateDto) {
if (reportRepository.findById(id).isPresent()) {
Report existingReport = reportRepository.findById(id).get();
existingReport.setReportTitle(reportUpdateDto.getTitle());
Category existingCategory = categoryRepository.findById(reportUpdateDto.getCategory().getId()).get();
Category category = new Category(existingCategory.getId(), existingCategory.getTitle());
existingCategory.addReport(existingReport);
reportRepository.save(existingReport);
return new ReportUpdateDto(existingReport.getId(),
existingReport.getReportTitle(), existingReport.getRun_date(),
existingReport.getCreated_date(), category);
} else {
return null;
}
}
So added this part:
Category existingCategory = categoryRepository.findById(reportUpdateDto.getCategory().getId()).get();
Category category = new Category(existingCategory.getId(), existingCategory.getTitle());
existingCategory.addReport(existingReport);
As if I have something like
Category category = new Category(existingCategory.getId(), existingCategory.getTitle(), existingCategory.getReports);
I can see the issue once again, which is what the existingCategory object itself contains.
And here my final entities
#NoArgsConstructor
#AllArgsConstructor
#Entity
#Table(name = "report")
#Data
public class Report {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private UUID id;
#Column(name = "report_title", nullable = false)
private String reportTitle;
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.MERGE)
#JoinColumn(name = "category_id", nullable = false)
private Category category;
#Entity
#Table(name = "category")
#AllArgsConstructor
#NoArgsConstructor
#Data
public class Category {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private UUID id;
#Column(name = "category_title", nullable = false)
private String title;
#OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "category", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
private Collection<Report> reports;
public Category(UUID id, String title) {
this.id = id;
this.title = title;
}
public void addReport(Report r) {
if (this.reports == null) {
this.reports = new ArrayList<>();
}
r.setCategory(this);
this.reports.add(r);
}
public void removeReport(Report r) {
if (this.reports != null) {
r.setCategory(null);
this.reports.remove(r);
}
}
}
I use spring boot 2 and some of my entities have composite key
When I try to save an entity, I get this error
Failed to convert request element:
org.springframework.beans.ConversionNotSupportedException: Failed to
convert property value of type 'java.lang.Integer' to required type
'com.lcm.model.SamplingsPK' for property 'sampling'; nested exception
is java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot convert value of type
'java.lang.Integer' to required type 'com.lcm.model.SamplingsPK' for
property 'sampling': no matching editors or conversion strategy found
I get my entity with that method
public Samples findById(Integer id, int year, String sampleLetter) {
Optional<Samples> optSamples = samplesRepository.findById(new SamplesPK(new SamplingsPK(year, id), sampleLetter));
if (optSamples.isPresent()) {
return optSamples.get();
}
return null;
}
Samples samples = samplesService.findById(idSeq, year, samplesLetter);
Compressions compressionTest = null;
if (samples.getTestSamples().getAbsorptionTest() != null) {
compressionTest = samples.getTestSamples().getCompressionTest();
} else {
compressionTest = new Compressions();
}
samplesService.save(samples);
My entity
#Entity
#IdClass(SamplesPK.class)
public class Samples extends BaseEntity{
#Id
private String sampleLetter;
#Embedded
private TestSamples testSamples;
#Id
#ManyToOne(optional=false)
#JoinColumns({
#JoinColumn(name = "sampling_id", referencedColumnName = "id"),
#JoinColumn(name = "sampling_year", referencedColumnName = "year")})
private Samplings sampling;
}
#Entity
#IdClass(SamplingsPK.class)
#Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.SINGLE_TABLE)
public class Samplings {
#Id
private Integer year;
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Integer id;
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "sampling", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
private List<Samples> samples = new ArrayList<>();
}
public class SamplingsPK implements Serializable {
private int year;
private Integer id;
public SamplingsPK(int year, Integer id) {
this.id = id;
this.year = year;
}
}
public class SamplesPK implements Serializable {
private SamplingsPK sampling;
private String sampleLetter;
public SamplesPK(SamplingsPK sampling, String sampleLetter) {
this.sampling = sampling;
this.sampleLetter = sampleLetter;
}
}
edit
no problem to save sample, when I pass from sampling
The problem is that since the IDs are set manually and there's no #Version property on these entities then Spring Data has no good way of knowing if the entity is a brand new one or an existing one. In this case it decides it is an existing entity and attempts a merge instead of a persist. This is obviously a wrong conclusion.
You can read more about how Spring Data decides if an entity is new or not here.
The best solution I've found is to always let entity classes with manually set IDs implement Persistable interface. This solves the problem. I make this a rule for myself for any such case. Most of the time I do not have to implement Persistable because my entity either has an auto-generated key or my entity uses a "#Version" annotation. But this is special case.
So, as per the recommendation in the Spring official documentation, for example the Samplings class would become:
#Entity
#IdClass(SamplingsPK.class)
#Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.SINGLE_TABLE)
public class Samplings implements Persistable<SamplingsPK> {
#Transient
private boolean isNew = true;
#Id
private Integer year;
#Id
#GeneratedValue
private Integer id;
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "sampling", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
private List<Samples> samples = new ArrayList<>();
#Override
public boolean isNew() {
return isNew;
}
#PrePersist
#PostLoad
void markNotNew() {
this.isNew = false;
}
#Override
public SamplingsPK getId() {
return new SamplingsPK(year, id);
}
}
This issue is tracked at https://jira.spring.io/browse/DATAJPA-1391 and has to do with the use of #Id #ManyToOne inside of Samples. As a workaround, you can try creating a constructor for Samplings that takes in its two primary keys, or maybe one that takes a java.lang.Integer? That's what worked for a single level of composite primary keys, but it might not work if you have multiple levels.
You also have year in SamplingsPK typed as an int rather than an Integer. This may cause problems with PK recognition, since special consideration is needed to handle autobox-able primitive classes and I doubt it was considered.
I noticed this too. It does not happen on my IDE on Windows but it happens on the Azure build server
I was on org.springframework.data:spring-data-jpa:jar:2.4.5:compile.
I upgraded the BOM to <spring-data-bom.version>2020.0.15</spring-data-bom.version> so I have org.springframework.data:spring-data-jpa:jar:2.4.15:compile
Once I did that it started working correctly.
i really don't know what actually my problem is.
I have two models in my Project.
model-package
Ansprechpartner
Lieferant
Ansprechpartner.java
#Entity
#Table(name = "ANSPRECHPARTNER")
#EntityListeners(AuditingEntityListener.class)
#JsonIgnoreProperties(value = {"anlageAm", "updatedAt"}, allowGetters = true)
public class Ansprechpartner {
...
#NotNull
#ManyToOne
#JoinColumn(name = "lief_code", foreignKey=#ForeignKey(name = "APART_LIEF_FK"))
private Lieferanten liefCode;
public Lieferanten getLiefCode() {
return liefCode;
}
public void setLiefCode(Lieferanten liefCode) {
this.liefCode = liefCode;
}
...
}
Lieferant.java
#Entity
#Table(name = "LIEFERANTEN")
#EntityListeners(AuditingEntityListener.class)
#JsonIgnoreProperties(value = {"anlageAm"}, allowGetters = true)
public class Lieferanten {
...
#Id
private String code;
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "liefCode")
private Set<Ansprechpartner> apart;
public String getCode() {
return code;
}
public void setCode(String code) {
this.code = code;
}
public Set<Ansprechpartner> getApart() {
return apart;
}
public void setApart(Set<Ansprechpartner> apart) {
this.apart = apart;
}
...
}
My Controller:
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/apart")
public class AnsprechpartnerController {
...
#GetMapping("/all/{id}")
public Ansprechpartner getApartWithId(#PathVariable("id") long id) {
Ansprechpartner apart = apartRepository.findOne(id);
return apartRepository.findOne(id);
}
}
When i try to get the json data i get the following problem. Ansprechpartner gets data from Lieferant (because of that join). But then Lieferant again shows data from Ansprechpartner and so on.
Maybe better described with the following picture:
Image with explanation
EDIT:
I finally solved it with the #JsonIgnoreProperties annotation:
In my Ansprechpartner.java i did it this way:
#NotNull
#JsonIgnoreProperties("apart")
// #JsonManagedReference
#ManyToOne
#JoinColumn(
name = "lief_code",
foreignKey=#ForeignKey(name = "APART_LIEF_FK")
)
private Lieferanten liefCode;
And in my Lieferanten.java i did it this way:
// #JsonBackReference
#JsonIgnoreProperties("liefCode")
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "liefCode", fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
private Set<Ansprechpartner> apart;
To avoid infinite recursions you can use #JsonManagedReference & #JsonBackReference
Json Infinite Recursion is one of the most common problems when we serialize Java objects which having Bidirectional-Relationships.
#JsonManagedReference: a part with the annotation will be serialized normally.
#JsonBackReference: a part with the annotation will be omitted from serialization.
like:
#JsonBackReference
private Set<Ansprechpartner> apart;
You can check details in solution-2
Strange behaviour. Possibly you could try:
1) Make sure in the Lieferanten entity, in the equals / hashCode you do not use the Set<Ansprechpartner> apart.
2) You can explicitly detach the entities from the persistence context:
#NotNull
#ManyToOne
#JoinColumn(name = "lief_code"
, foreignKey=#ForeignKey(name = "APART_LIEF_FK")
, cascade={CascadeType.DETACH})
private Lieferanten liefCode;
and then in the controller:
#GetMapping("/all/{id}")
public Ansprechpartner getApartWithId(#PathVariable("id") long id) {
Ansprechpartner apart = apartRepository.findOne(id);
apartRepository.detach(apart);
return apart;
}
you would need to implement a bit -> link, in repository in order to have that available.
3) explicitly add lazy loading: #OneToMany(mappedBy = "liefCode", fetch = FetchType.LAZY).
The root cause is jackson trying to serialize object when object has Bidirectional-Relationships.
You can fixed it by this way
Short way
Better way :
Returning entities directly to view layer is not a good practice.
You should convert entities to DTOs (Data Transfer Object) and pass the DTOs to view