I'm using the Google Plus API, and there seems to be no information in the JSON response regarding the collection of the post. I was wondering if there was a way to access which collection a post belongs using the API data.
For example, could we use the URL given to parse the collection from the webpage? Does anyone have any idea how this could be done in a performant way?
The google+ api is a read only api and every limited it gives you access to people, activities and comments.
Activites list returns a list of all activities#resource posts by a user. try it
The only collection you can send is public. the response looks like this.
{
"kind": "plus#activity",
"etag": "\"RKS4-q7QGL10FxltAebpjqjKQR0/82jivrLU7ubQ-fwlLaXGSt3krb8\"",
"title": "",
"published": "2018-06-18T07:03:54.034Z",
"updated": "2018-06-18T07:03:54.034Z",
"id": "z13lu3vowpa5x3aws04chl2brzavs1rplos0k",
"url": "https://plus.google.com/+LindaLawton/posts/STgianNMQwU",
"actor": {
"id": "117200475532672775346",
"displayName": "Linda Lawton",
"url": "https://plus.google.com/117200475532672775346",
"image": {
"url": "https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-a1CWlFnA5xE/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAl1I/UcwPajZOuN4/photo.jpg?sz=50"
},
"verification": {
"adHocVerified": "UNKNOWN_VERIFICATION_STATUS"
}
},
"verb": "post",
"object": {
"objectType": "note",
"actor": {
"verification": {
"adHocVerified": "UNKNOWN_VERIFICATION_STATUS"
}
},
"content": "",
"url": "https://plus.google.com/+LindaLawton/posts/STgianNMQwU",
"replies": {
"totalItems": 0,
"selfLink": "https://content.googleapis.com/plus/v1/activities/z13lu3vowpa5x3aws04chl2brzavs1rplos0k/comments"
},
"plusoners": {
"totalItems": 0,
"selfLink": "https://content.googleapis.com/plus/v1/activities/z13lu3vowpa5x3aws04chl2brzavs1rplos0k/people/plusoners"
},
"resharers": {
"totalItems": 0,
"selfLink": "https://content.googleapis.com/plus/v1/activities/z13lu3vowpa5x3aws04chl2brzavs1rplos0k/people/resharers"
},
"attachments": [
{
"objectType": "article",
"displayName": "leastprivilege/AspNetCoreSecuritySamples",
"content": "AspNetCoreSecuritySamples - Samples for various ASP.NET Core Security Features",
"url": "https://github.com/leastprivilege/AspNetCoreSecuritySamples",
"image": {
"url": "https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/1pdxjC-TsuF0-8yHOZKvfDOXG1pNWAIemDoW7OzrFy8pcckGqr0BTJj-TwgW9KgEuoGLJjfUKLWSCouJwTT7FjoOmZ_xURQwzz4=w506-h910",
"type": "image/jpeg",
"height": 910,
"width": 506
},
"fullImage": {
"url": "https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/1454075?s=400&v=4",
"type": "image/jpeg"
}
}
]
},
"provider": {
"title": "Google+"
},
"access": {
"kind": "plus#acl",
"description": "Public",
"items": [
{
"type": "public"
}
]
}
},
the above post here is actually within one of my collections. But no were in the response does it mention the id of the collection that its in which is olLcVE
As i mentioned this is a very limited api and what you want to do is not available.
Related
I'm trying to find out which files in a shared google drive is shared with someone outside the organisation.
That includes :
shared with a public link
shared in domain
shared to someone by his email.
Here's an example of what I have without any filtering (post formatted)
[
{
"id": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"name": "private but shared to external people",
"permissions": [
{
"id": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"type": "user",
"emailAddress": "john.doe#anonymous.com",
"role": "writer"
},
{
"id": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"type": "user",
"emailAddress": "admin#xxxxxxx.com",
"role": "organizer"
}
]
},
{
"id": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"name": "public domain",
"permissions": [
{
"id": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"type": "domain",
"role": "reader",
"domain": "xxxxxxxx.com"
},
{
"id": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"type": "user",
"emailAddress": "admin#xxxxxxxx.com",
"role": "organizer"
}
]
},
{
"id": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"name": "public",
"permissions": [
{
"id": "anyoneWithLink",
"type": "anyone",
"role": "reader"
},
{
"id": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"type": "user",
"emailAddress": "admin#xxxxxxx.com",
"role": "organizer"
}
]
},
{
"id": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"name": "private",
"permissions": [
{
"id": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"type": "user",
"emailAddress": "admin#xxxxxx.com",
"role": "organizer"
}
]
}
]
To filter, I used the query: q: "visibility != 'limited'" but then the file
"private but shared to external people" isn't caught anymore.
So what I want is to create a query to retrieve all files that are shared and all files that are shared to any users that do not belong to the organisation.
I've already coded a manual version of that logic (this is why I can show the permissions array) but I would like to improve performances because it's really long to loop through all files to retrieves their permission and then manually check if the user email belongs to the domain or no.
Thank you :D
I am trying to get geographic location in an Alexa skill.
I have enabled location services in the Alexa console and I have authorized the skill to send geographic location.
The message I receive is the following:
{
"context": {
"Extensions": {
"available": {}
},
"System": {
"application": {
"applicationId": "..."
},
"device": {
"supportedInterfaces": {},
"deviceId": "..."
},
"apiEndpoint": "https://api.eu.amazonalexa.com",
"user": {
"userId": "...",
"permissions": {
"scopes": {
"alexa::devices:all:geolocation:read": {
"status": "GRANTED"
}
},
"consentToken": "..."
}
},
"apiAccessToken": "...",
"unit": {
"unitId": "..."
}
}
},
"version": "1.0",
"session": {
"application": {
"applicationId": "..."
},
"user": {
"userId": "...",
"permissions": {
"scopes": {
"alexa::devices:all:geolocation:read": {
"status": "GRANTED"
}
},
"consentToken": "..."
}
},
"new": true,
"sessionId": "..."
},
"request": {
"requestId": "...",
"locale": "it-IT",
"intent": {
"name": "MyIntent",
"confirmationStatus": "NONE"
},
"type": "IntentRequest",
"timestamp": "2021-01-28T07:39:53Z"
}
}
As you may see, the geographic location is GRANTED but the Geolocation field described here is completely missing.
You're correct on geolocation not being available for most Echo devices. Stationary devices only provide the registered address, not geographic coordinates.
https://developer.amazon.com/en-US/docs/alexa/custom-skills/location-services-for-alexa-skills.html#device-address-as-compared-to-geo-coordinates
You can, however use a "geocoding" service to convert most addresses to coordinates. For example Google Maps has a geocoding API.
When the other person declined the meeting and proposed a new time. In Outlook, you can see the proposed time.
Now I am trying to use Microsoft Graph API to get that proposed time.
For example, the original meeting date is 2018-03-08, and the other person declined and proposed a new date 2018-03-12.
I tried
GET /beta/me/messages/{messageId}=?$expand=microsoft.graph.eventMessage/event
However, I cannot find the proposed time from the result returned. How can I get it? Thanks
{
"#odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/$metadata#users('576552d5-3bc0-42a6-a53d-bfceb405db23')/messages/$entity",
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.eventMessage",
"#odata.etag": "W/\"DAAAABYAAACpTc/InBsuTYwTUBb+VIb4AADoRAyI\"",
"id": "AAMkADBlZTUwNTkxLWVmODgtNDVhNC1iZjhlLTdjNjA1ODZlMDI5MgBGAAAAAACUbnk-iwQZRbXMgkfKtmYhBwCpTc-InBsuTYwTUBb_VIb4AAAAAAEMAACpTc-InBsuTYwTUBb_VIb4AADnwc8mAAA=",
"createdDateTime": "2018-03-06T22:29:10Z",
"lastModifiedDateTime": "2018-03-06T22:29:11Z",
"changeKey": "DAAAABYAAACpTc/InBsuTYwTUBb+VIb4AADoRAyI",
"categories": [],
"receivedDateTime": "2018-03-06T22:29:11Z",
"sentDateTime": "2018-03-06T22:29:05Z",
"hasAttachments": false,
"internetMessageId": "<MWHPR15MB18399806CC97C61817C9A2B18BD90#MWHPR15MB1839.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>",
"subject": "New Time Proposed: Test",
"bodyPreview": "",
"importance": "normal",
"parentFolderId": "AAMkADBlZTUwNTkxLWVmODgtNDVhNC1iZjhlLTdjNjA1ODZlMDI5MgAuAAAAAACUbnk-iwQZRbXMgkfKtmYhAQCpTc-InBsuTYwTUBb_VIb4AAAAAAEMAAA=",
"conversationId": "AAQkADBlZTUwNTkxLWVmODgtNDVhNC1iZjhlLTdjNjA1ODZlMDI5MgAQAOnuCMgoRLdGs-1scw6i7EU=",
"conversationIndex": "AdO1mnWL6e4IyChEt0az/WxzDqLsRQAABO5D",
"isDeliveryReceiptRequested": null,
"isReadReceiptRequested": false,
"isRead": false,
"isDraft": false,
"webLink": "https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?ItemID=AAMkADBlZTUwNTkxLWVmODgtNDVhNC1iZjhlLTdjNjA1ODZlMDI5MgBGAAAAAACUbnk%2FiwQZRbXMgkfKtmYhBwCpTc%2FInBsuTYwTUBb%2BVIb4AAAAAAEMAACpTc%2FInBsuTYwTUBb%2BVIb4AADnwc8mAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&viewmodel=ReadMessageItem",
"inferenceClassification": "focused",
"unsubscribeData": [],
"unsubscribeEnabled": false,
"meetingMessageType": "meetingDeclined",
"type": "singleInstance",
"isOutOfDate": false,
"isAllDay": false,
"isDelegated": false,
"body": {
"contentType": "html",
"content": "Hi"
},
"sender": {
"emailAddress": {
"name": "Rose",
"address": "rose#example.com"
}
},
"from": {
"emailAddress": {
"name": "Rose",
"address": "rose#example.com"
}
},
"toRecipients": [
{
"emailAddress": {
"name": "Jack",
"address": "jack#example.com"
}
}
],
"ccRecipients": [],
"bccRecipients": [],
"replyTo": [],
"mentionsPreview": null,
"flag": {
"flagStatus": "notFlagged"
},
"startDateTime": {
"dateTime": "2018-03-08T04:00:00.0000000",
"timeZone": "UTC"
},
"endDateTime": {
"dateTime": "2018-03-08T05:00:00.0000000",
"timeZone": "UTC"
},
"location": {
"displayName": "Test",
"locationType": "default",
"uniqueIdType": "unknown"
},
"recurrence": null,
"event#odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/$metadata#users('576552d5-3bc0-42a6-a53d-bfceb405db23')/messages('AAMkADBlZTUwNTkxLWVmODgtNDVhNC1iZjhlLTdjNjA1ODZlMDI5MgBGAAAAAACUbnk-iwQZRbXMgkfKtmYhBwCpTc-InBsuTYwTUBb_VIb4AAAAAAEMAACpTc-InBsuTYwTUBb_VIb4AADnwc8mAAA%3D')/microsoft.graph.eventMessage/event/$entity",
"event": {
"#odata.etag": "W/\"qU3PyJwbLk2ME1AW/lSG+AAA6EQMeA==\"",
"id": "AAMkADBlZTUwNTkxLWVmODgtNDVhNC1iZjhlLTdjNjA1ODZlMDI5MgBGAAAAAACUbnk-iwQZRbXMgkfKtmYhBwCpTc-InBsuTYwTUBb_VIb4AAAAAAENAACpTc-InBsuTYwTUBb_VIb4AADnwkmiAAA=",
"createdDateTime": "2018-03-06T22:28:32.3852279Z",
"lastModifiedDateTime": "2018-03-06T22:29:11.4604154Z",
"changeKey": "qU3PyJwbLk2ME1AW/lSG+AAA6EQMeA==",
"categories": [],
"originalStartTimeZone": "Pacific Standard Time",
"originalEndTimeZone": "Pacific Standard Time",
"iCalUId": "040000008200E00074C5B7101A82E0080000000000000000000000000000000000000000310000007643616C2D5569640100000033324633333433392D433744452D344338362D393046452D44424639314131363444323900",
"reminderMinutesBeforeStart": 15,
"isReminderOn": true,
"hasAttachments": false,
"subject": "Test",
"bodyPreview": "Test",
"importance": "normal",
"sensitivity": "normal",
"isAllDay": false,
"isCancelled": false,
"isOrganizer": true,
"responseRequested": true,
"seriesMasterId": null,
"showAs": "busy",
"type": "singleInstance",
"webLink": "https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?itemid=AAMkADBlZTUwNTkxLWVmODgtNDVhNC1iZjhlLTdjNjA1ODZlMDI5MgBGAAAAAACUbnk%2FiwQZRbXMgkfKtmYhBwCpTc%2FInBsuTYwTUBb%2BVIb4AAAAAAENAACpTc%2FInBsuTYwTUBb%2BVIb4AADnwkmiAAA%3D&exvsurl=1&path=/calendar/item",
"onlineMeetingUrl": null,
"responseStatus": {
"response": "organizer",
"time": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z"
},
"body": {
"contentType": "html",
"content": "Hi"
},
"start": {
"dateTime": "2018-03-08T04:00:00.0000000",
"timeZone": "UTC"
},
"end": {
"dateTime": "2018-03-08T05:00:00.0000000",
"timeZone": "UTC"
},
"location": {
"displayName": "Test",
"locationType": "default",
"uniqueId": "Test",
"uniqueIdType": "private"
},
"locations": [
{
"displayName": "Test",
"locationType": "default",
"uniqueId": "Test",
"uniqueIdType": "private"
}
],
"recurrence": null,
"attendees": [
{
"type": "required",
"status": {
"response": "declined",
"time": "2018-03-06T22:29:05Z"
},
"emailAddress": {
"name": "Rose",
"address": "rose#example.com"
}
}
],
"organizer": {
"emailAddress": {
"name": "Jack",
"address": "jack#example.com"
}
}
}
}
The API doesn't expose this information directly. The related entities just don't have the fields defined to show this information. However, the data is obviously there, you just need to know how to get to it. The answer lies in extended properties.
Basically since Graph doesn't expose these values, we need to dig into the MAPI properties that store this data. After a little digging through the Exchange server protocol docs I found PidLidAppointmentProposedStartWhole and PidLidAppointmentProposedEndWhole. We just need to translate those MAPI property definitions into the Graph extended property syntax.
From the doc, those are both in the PSETID_Appointment namespace, which uses the GUID {00062002-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}. PidLidAppointmentProposedStartWhole uses id 0x8250, and PidLidAppointmentProposedEndWhole uses id 0x8251. So those should translate to:
PidLidAppointmentProposedStartWhole: 'SystemTime {00062002-0000-0000-C000-000000000046} Id 0x8250'
PidLidAppointmentProposedEndWhole: 'SystemTime {00062002-0000-0000-C000-000000000046} Id 0x8251'
If we use those in an $expand clause as per Get singleValueLegacyExtendedProperty, we get something like:
GET /me/mailfolders/inbox/messages?$expand=singleValueExtendedProperties($filter=id eq 'SystemTime {00062002-0000-0000-C000-000000000046} Id 0x8250' or id eq 'SystemTime {00062002-0000-0000-C000-000000000046} Id 0x8251')
And the response looks something like this (other properties omitted):
{
"subject": "New Time Proposed: Let's meet",
"singleValueExtendedProperties": [
{
"id": "SystemTime {00062002-0000-0000-c000-000000000046} Id 0x8250",
"value": "2018-03-20T20:00:00Z"
},
{
"id": "SystemTime {00062002-0000-0000-c000-000000000046} Id 0x8251",
"value": "2018-03-20T21:00:00Z"
}
]
}
Messages delivered from Bot Framework don't have name property in from object if message was sent by user who doesn't have username and full name. For example if you delete first or last name from profile like that
Here's example of json that I get for messages sent from user that only has first name (look at from object):
{
"channelData": {
"message": {
"chat": {
"all_members_are_administrators": true,
"id": -219911672,
"title": "jlarky-dev",
"type": "group"
},
"date": 1493246056,
"from": {
"first_name": "Test",
"id": 107390199
},
"message_id": 100,
"text": "test"
},
"update_id": 66470785
},
"channelId": "telegram",
"conversation": {
"id": "-219911672",
"isGroup": true,
"name": "jlarky-dev"
},
"entities": [
{
"mentioned": {
"id": "JLarkyTestBot",
"name": "jlarky_test"
},
"text": "JLarkyTestBot",
"type": "mention"
}
],
"from": {
"id": "107390199"
},
"id": "KxBlE8JsLfg",
"recipient": {
"id": "JLarkyTestBot",
"name": "jlarky_test"
},
"serviceUrl": "https://telegram.botframework.com",
"text": "test",
"timestamp": "2017-04-26T22:34:17.4109674Z",
"type": "message"
}
Since #NilsW's comment I tested this again and it looks like from.name only exists when username of telegram profile was set (same can be looked up from channelData.message.from.username), so I guess it makes sense for it not to show username when username was not set :) and not having last_name part was not related here.
when I upload a photo using the arrowdb dashboard on https://platform.appcelerator.com
Cloud.Users.query only shows the photo_id
but whne I created a new user using the dashboard and attached a phot it is showing in the Cloud.Users.query
eg . photo uploaded after user created
{
"id": "563019f18cb04aede69e2111",
"first_name": "store1",
"last_name": "123",
"created_at": "2015-10-28T00:42:25+0000",
"updated_at": "2016-01-22T08:59:44+0000",
"external_accounts": [],
"confirmed_at": "2015-10-28T00:42:25+0000",
"username": "user",
"admin": "false",
"stats": {
"photos": {
"total_count": 0
},
"storage": {
"used": 0
}
},
"photo_id": "56a1dc083a654d090d126792",
"friend_counts": {
"requests": 0,
"friends": 0
}
}
eg. photo uploaded while creating user
{
"id": "56a1f0333a65234234390d7",
"first_name": "qqqq",
"last_name": "wwwe",
"created_at": "2016-01-22T09:02:43+0000",
"updated_at": "2016-01-22T09:07:18+0000",
"external_accounts": [],
"confirmed_at": "2016-01-22T09:02:43+0000",
"username": "qwe",
"admin": "false",
"stats": {
"photos": {
"total_count": 0
},
"storage": {
"used": 0
}
},
"photo": {
"id": "56a1f0333a654d090d0390d8",
"filename": "userPhoto.jpg",
"size": 25394,
"md5": "e20f4fcadf6cde9fccfb458dd11951d4",
"created_at": "2016-01-22T09:02:43+0000",
"updated_at": "2016-01-22T09:02:43+0000",
"processed": true,
"urls": {
"original": "https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/storage-platform.cloud.appcelerator.com/xmqh1djNEIChtQFP6d37HNH5DQNCXQoX/photos/51/d4/56a1f0333a654d090d0390d9/userPhoto_original.jpg"
},
"content_type": "image/jpeg",
"user": {
"id": "56a1f0333a65234234390d7",
"first_name": "qqqq",
"last_name": "wwwe",
"created_at": "2016-01-22T09:02:43+0000",
"updated_at": "2016-01-22T09:07:18+0000",
"external_accounts": [],
"confirmed_at": "2016-01-22T09:02:43+0000",
"username": "qwe",
"admin": "false",
"stats": {
"photos": {
"total_count": 0
},
"storage": {
"used": 0
}
},
"photo_id": "56a1f0333a654d090d0390d8",
"friend_counts": {
"requests": 0,
"friends": 0
}
}
},
"friend_counts": {
"requests": 0,
"friends": 0
}
}
basically the user which had photo uploaded during creation shows this extra info
"photo": {
"id": "56a1f0333a654d090d0390d8",
"filename": "userPhoto.jpg",
"size": 25394,
"md5": "e20f4fcadf6cde9fccfb458dd11951d4",
"created_at": "2016-01-22T09:02:43+0000",
"updated_at": "2016-01-22T09:02:43+0000",
"processed": true,
"urls": {
"original": "https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/storage-platform.cloud.appcelerator.com/xmqh1djNEIChtQFP6d37HNH5DQNCXQoX/photos/51/d4/56a1f0333a654d090d0390d9/userPhoto_original.jpg"
},
"content_type": "image/jpeg",
"user": {
"id": "56a1f0333a65234234390d7",
"first_name": "qqqq",
"last_name": "wwwe",
"created_at": "2016-01-22T09:02:43+0000",
"updated_at": "2016-01-22T09:07:18+0000",
"external_accounts": [],
"confirmed_at": "2016-01-22T09:02:43+0000",
"username": "qwe",
"admin": "false",
"stats": {
"photos": {
"total_count": 0
},
"storage": {
"used": 0
}
},
I've been experiencing also that kind of problem, plus I've noticed that the images won't show up from the ArrowDB user interface (not sure if related).
The API returns only an empty object when you query the model:
photo: {}
I've been creating a ticket for the ArrowDB user interface https://jira.appcelerator.org/browse/API-1277.
sachinmw did you create a ticket for the initial problem yet?
A workaround could be to use the photo_id and run another separate query to retrieve the photo model but this is not good for network optimisation purposes.
EDIT
Ok after dealing with Appcelerator directly about having an empty photo: {} Object return the answer is pretty simple:
Whenever you use the query() function like Cloud.Objects.query() from ti.cloud on any ArrowDB object, there is a parameter called response_json_depth which is set to 1 by default and will only return one level of the JSON Object returned by the API.
Without touching that parameter I was seeing:
{
"Vehicle": [
{
"name": "foo",
"photo: {}
}
]
}
By setting response_json_depth to 3 I managed to have:
{
"Vehicle": [
{
"name": "foo",
"photo: {
"urls": {
"original": "http://bar.com"
}
}
}
]
}
Hope that will help someone. The also applies for the Cloud.Objects.show() method for any ArrowDB object.