In odoo 9 we create our own template of home page but on this page we are unable to use the editor elements from the editor. It's color change to red when we hover on the structure elements
for this you need to define attribute customize_show="True" while defining the template like this -
<template id="custom_template" inherit_id="optional" customize_show="True">
.
.
.
</template>
you get that error because your wrapper around your entire page is missing and id and a class on your general div, your code should look like this:
<div id="wrap" class="oe_structure oe_empty">
#your page code goes here
</div>
on the other hand customize_show="True" is an option on the templates to give the user the option to enable o disable templates on the frontend, this will display the template name with a toggle/checkbox on the website editor menu "Customize"
best regards.
I am using a form in a front-end view of my website. The labels of the input fields show hints/tooltips when hovering over them with the mouse. I would like to style these tooltips with the css of my front-end template. Therefore I need to know the DOM structure of these tooltips.
Somehow, I can not find any documentation about this and using 'Inspect element' in Google Chrome also doesn't help me, because the tooltip is removed as soon as I do not hover the label anymore while trying to inspect them.
Help is very much appreciated!
Default tooltips in joomla back office have this structure, I'm pretty sure that it is the same in front office :
<div class="popover fade right in">
<div class="arrow"></div>
<h3 class="popover-title">[TITLE]</h3>
<div class="popover-content">[TEXT]</div>
</div>
<a href="#" role="button" >
<span aria-hidden="true"> First</span>
<img src="D:/kk.JPG" alt="First name" width="20px" height="20px"/>
</a>
JAWS reads it as First First name button instead of First name button.
Is this a Firefox issue? How do I resolve this without using aria-label for the outer anchor tag.
The problem, here, is that JAWS does not consider this element itself, but it is used in the calculation of the text alternative for the link.
To solve this, you can try to remove the redundant text from the img alternative name.
I would make a guess on the pertinence of the image alt here as it is inside a link with other text, so you don't have to describe the image but the purpose of the link.
Of course, if you hadn't said so, I would have suggested to use aria-label.
See the following page: webaim.org/blog/alt-text-and-linked-images
In the above example, because text within the link provides the content of the image and the function of the link, the image itself can be given an empty alt value. An image within a link is something very specific: you don't have to consider the image alternative but the link alternative.
According to WCAG, when an image is the only element inside a link, it should describe the purpose of the link. When you use aria-hidden=true on the only other element, you fall in this situation. As a consequence: the alt for this image should describe the purpose of the link and you have to forget about the description of the image. That's being said, as this does not work in Jaws/Firefox, if you can remove the redundant part, it's the best option
I'm completely stuck on this one:
I'm working on a drupal 7 website and I have created a block (view) that should display an image with it. No matter what I try, I cant get the image displayed...
The content type I'm trying to display has 3 fields: "name", "description" and "picture".
The picture simply is an Image that's stored in a folder "myImages".
This is a picture of the block view I'm trying to create:
This does display the fields "title" and "beschrijving" (=description). The "foto" (=picture) however is not displayed... (in chrome it gives the "broken picture" logo, in firefox just nothing).
The wierd thing is: the image appears just for a blink and then disappears, meaning it is actually being rendered.
When I took a look at it with firebug I got following html:
<div class="views-field views-field-field-foto">
<span class="field-content">
<img width="100" height="100" alt="" src="sites/default/files/myImages/imageSource.jpg" typeof="foaf:Image">
</span>
</div>
And when I try to open the image itself (imageSource.jpg) I get an (500) internal server error (but I'm pretty sure this is because of the .gitignore file).
The image path is incorrect. It should look like...
src="/sites/default/files/myImages/imageSource.jpg"
...with the beginning forward slash.
I had issues when displaying images with Views, and it turned out to be the "alt text" option. In order to use "alt text" and not have issues I had to make use of the "Rewrite Results" option in Views.
Rather than add Pin It buttons through our site, I would like to simply control what images show up in Pinterest's "Find Image" results if a user decides to pin one of our URLs.
As of now, "Find Images" allows the user to scroll through the images it finds on the page so they can select which image to pin. The "found" images start with the first jpg in the html file, I'm assuming (could that be a bad assumption??). On our site, this forces a user to scroll through about 15 navigation and promotion images before arriving at the featured product image. Is there any way to specify this image to show first in those results? Maybe through a meta tag, or by adding a class or id to the element?
Without a public Pinterest API, this seems like just guesswork, but I wanted to see if anyone else has run into this, or solved this. Thanks.
A lot of search results including the Pinterest Help Center talk about using nopin in HTML elements, which is invalid HTML. What they don't document is a data attribute to the same (well formed) effect.
<img src="foobar" data-pin-nopin="true" />
Adding the nopin attribute will exclude the image from appearing on Pinterest:
<img src="..." nopin>
I solved this by simply loading the image before all others in the page. In this case, I gave it width="0" and height="0" (you could also give it style="position: absolute; left: -9999px; top: 0;" just to be sure).
This won't break the page layout, but will force Pinterest to find this image first. The only downside is that the browser will load the page a few milliseconds slower, but if you're reusing this image later in the page anyway, you should make up for lost time then.
Pinterest will find any images from <img> tags (it will ignore CSS background images) that are at least 80px x 80px.
The order the images show up on in the Pinterest list is determined by the order they are specified in the HTML.
As you have discovered, you can alter the CSS of an image to "hide it" without actually hiding it by either moving it off the page with absolute positioning or 0 height and width. Any images that are set to display: none will not be picked up by Pinterest.
You can instruct the share preview to only grab specific images from the page by using the “image_include” configuration option. First, set image_include to your desired class name (id selectors are not allowed, only class selectors), then add that same class name to each of the images on the page that should be grabbed. For image_include, don’t add the ‘.’ selector. Here’s an example:
<script type="text/javascript">
var addthis_config = {
image_include: "at_include"
}
</script>
Once image_include has been defined with a class, add that class to the desired images on the page. In this example, the only images on the page that will be grabbed, will be the images with the at_include class (img1.jpg and img3.jpg).
<img src="http://www.example.com/img1.jpg" class="at_include" />
<img src="http://www.example.com/img2.jpg" />
<img src="http://www.example.com/img3.jpg" class="at_include" />
I was reading this blog which suggests the following:
Use the global no pin flag to prevent pinning on the whole site
Manually add the Pin It widget to those images you want to make pin-able.
Given Pinterest's webmaster tools appear to only have a blacklist, rather than a whitelist option (that you are seeking), this could be a possible solution. Another stated benefit of this is you can also supply suggested pin text through the Pin It widget.
Only downside to this I guess is that it may break the user's own Pin tools. Pinterest does allow you to supply a custom "denied" message, so I guess you can say "please use our site's pin buttons directly".
I've tried this, and it works. It seems like a decent approach, at least until Pinterest sees fit to add some better tools, such as an image whitelist option. The main drawback is needing to add Pin-it buttons on every image you want to enable for your users & your users may be annoyed that they can't pin anything.
Unfortunately, there is no way to mark several images on your page as preferred, but you can mark one image to stay at the top of your images when someone pin it. Specify this meta-tag in <head>:
<meta property="og:image" content="http://YOUR-DOMAIN.com/IMAGE.jpg"/>
I have not found official confirmation for this feature, but it works great with addthis sharing plugin.
Add this script before the actual call to pinterest. And set images that you do not want to show with a class called 'nopin'
<script type="text/javascript">
var addthis_config =
{
image_exclude:'nopin'
}
</script>
<div id="toolbox" class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style">
<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_tumblr"></a>
<a class="addthis_button_pinterest"></a>
</div>
</div>
If anyone is using AddThis, please check this thread: http://support.addthis.com/customer/portal/questions/1570789
AddThis has some, uh, unique functionality that affects the image picker presented. As in, when there is only one image on the page, it ignores the defined og:image.
If you set that lone image to be excluded, then the image picker won't show any images for selection.