I have this following content in a file named "/rsync/include.txt"
+ /home/**
+ /opt**
- *
I then call the rsync command as follows:
rsync -avr --include-from="/rsync/include.txt" . ../backup
This produces the following output:
sending incremental file list
created directory ../archive
./
opt/
opt/some-file
opt/include-me/
opt/include-me/me-too
opt/include-me/and-me/
sent 299 bytes received 106 bytes 810.00 bytes/sec
total size is 0 speedup is 0.00
The /home directory exists, and contains files.
Why does the + /home/** pattern not work? I do not want to use the + /home** pattern, as that could match other folder names, e.g., /homeopathy.
Can anybody help me understand why this command doesn't work, and point me in the direction of the working command?
EDIT: While I'd still like an answer to this question, I sincerely suggest using rdiff-backup as it uses similar filtering files and patterns, but is substantially easier to use. I've spent a good deal of time today on this issue with rsync, which was resolved in a few minutes using rdiff-backup.
General debugging info
The easiest way to see if your filter rules do what you want, is to use -vv (increase verbosity twice) in combination with -n (dry-run).
With double verbosity you will see which pattern caused which file to be ignored.
You may grep the output to only see the relevant parts.
Example
% rsync -avv --include 'opt/1' --exclude 'opt/*' -n ./ /tmp \
| grep '\[sender\]'
[sender] showing directory opt/1 because of pattern opt/1
[sender] hiding directory opt/2 because of pattern opt/*
[sender] hiding directory opt/3 because of pattern opt/*
Specific answer
Your example fails because + /home/** is excluded by - *.
man rsync states:
Note that, when using the --recursive (-r) option (which is implied by -a), every subdir component of every path is visited left to right, with each directory having a chance for exclusion before its content.
So the pattern /home/** will be evaluated after /home is traversed, but this will never happen, because - * excludes /home.
To include /home/ you just have to insert it before /home/**, so your exclude file becomes:
+ /home/
+ /home/**
+ /opt/
+ /opt/**
- *
Related
When transferring lots of small files in many folders with rsync, it tends to stay around ir-chk=1000/xxxxx, where xxxxx keeps counting up as it discovers new files, and the amount to check stays around 1000 until its on its last few folders.
How can I have it check for the entire file count before copying?
The command I was using to copy was:
rsync -av --progress source dest
rsync -av --progress --dry-run --stats source dest
Option --dry-run doesn't transfer any files but will show how many bytes will be transferred.
Option --stats shows a summary.
a sample output:
...
tests/
tests/__init__.py
tests/test_config.py
Number of files: 5,033 (reg: 2,798, dir: 2,086, link: 149)
Number of created files: 5,032 (reg: 2,798, dir: 2,085, link: 149)
Number of deleted files: 0
Number of regular files transferred: 2,798
Total file size: 26,035,530 bytes
Total transferred file size: 26,032,322 bytes
Literal data: 0 bytes
Matched data: 0 bytes
File list size: 0
File list generation time: 0.004 seconds
File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds
Total bytes sent: 158,821
Total bytes received: 17,284
sent 158,821 bytes received 17,284 bytes 117,403.33 bytes/sec
total size is 26,035,530 speedup is 147.84 (DRY RUN)
Get the number of files will be transferred
rsync -av --progress --dry-run --stats source dest |
fgrep 'Number of files' |
cut -d' ' -f4 |
tr -d ,
Since version 3.0.0, you can use this option to explicitly turn off incremental recursion:
--no-i-r
Details from the rsync man page:
Beginning with rsync 3.0.0, the recursive algorithm used is now an
incremental scan that uses much less memory than before and begins the transfer after the scanning of the first few directories have been completed. This incremental scan only affects our recursion algorithm, and does not change a non-recursive transfer. It is also only possible when both ends of the transfer are at least version 3.0.0.
Some options require rsync to know the full file list, so these options
disable the incremental recursion mode. These include: --delete-before, --delete-after, --prune-empty-dirs, and --delay-updates. Because of this, the default delete mode when you specify --delete is now --delete-during when both ends of the connection are at least 3.0.0 (use --del or --delete-during to request this improved deletion mode explicitly). See also the --delete-delay option that is a better choice than using --delete-after.
Incremental recursion can be disabled using the --no-inc-recursive
option or its shorter --no-i-r alias.
I'm using rsync to backup some data from a remote host.
this is how I'm using the rsync cmd:
rsync --dry-run -avhi -e ssh --include-from=/home/rsync_list/test.txt root#10.10.4.61:/ /mnt/BACKUP/my_BACKUP/
this is the file /home/rsync_list/test.txt
+ /usr/acs/conf/**
+ /usr/acs/bin/**
+ /raid0/opmdps/TEMP_folder/**
- *
I want to copy only the listed folders excluding the remaining files.
I always get
receiving file list ... done
sent 103 bytes received 48 bytes 302.00 bytes/sec
total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 (DRY RUN)
Could you tell me what I'm doing wrong? How should I write the rsync command if I would like to sync, for example, only /raid0/opmdps/TEMP_folder/ without its subfolders?
I wonder if you really only tried with the command you posted?
Not only you are using "--dry-run" option, even the output indicates this:
total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 (DRY RUN)
Please consult the manpage:
-n, --dry-run perform a trial run with no changes made
https://linux.die.net/man/1/rsync
May I suggest you give it a run without --dry-run?
I need to compare two directories to validate a backup.
Say my directory looks like the following:
Filename Filesize Filename Filesize
user#main_server:~/mydir/ user#backup_server:~/mydir/
file1000.txt 4182410737 file1000.txt 4182410737
file1001.txt 8241410737 - <-- missing on backup_server!
... ...
file9999.txt 2410418737 file9999.txt 1111111111 <-- size != main_server
Is there a quick one liner that would get me close to output like:
Invalid Backup Files:
file1001.txt
file9999.txt
(with the goal to instruct the backup script to refetch these files)
I've tried to get variations of the following to no avail.
[main_server] $ rsync -n ~/mydir/ user#backup_server:~/mydir
I cannot do rsync to backup the directories itself because it takes way too long (8-24hrs). Instead I run multiple threads of scp to fetch files in batches. This completes regularly <1hr. However, occasionally I find a few files that were somehow missed (perhaps dropped connection).
Speed is a priority, so file sizes should be sufficient. But I'm open to including a checksum, provided it doesn't slow the process down like I find with rsync.
Here's my test process:
# Generate Large Files (1GB)
for i in {1..100}; do head -c 1073741824 </dev/urandom >foo-$i ; done
# SCP them from src to dest
for i in {1..100}; do ( scp ~/mydir/foo-$i user#backup_server:~/mydir/ & ) ; sleep 0.1 ; done
# Confirm destination has everything from source
# This is the point of the question. I've tried:
rsync -Sa ~/mydir/ user#backup_server:~/mydir
# Way too slow
What do you recommend?
By default, rsync uses the quick check method which only transfers files that differ in size or last-modified time. As you report that the sizes are unchanged, that would seem to indicate that the timestamps differ. Two options to handlel this are:
Use -p to preserve timestamps when transferring files.
Use --size-only to ignore timestamps and transfer only files that differ in size.
I have a script that takes in a unique location number from a file. These are formatted like this 7325-05, 5269-09 and 7479-14, for example. The first four numbers are what the folder is called and the second number is the first two characters of the filename unique within each folder.
So I wrote this script to use locate and find to get the full path of the folder and then use a wildcard to download the specific file using rsync. Here's the script that I have right now:
#!/bin/bash
#IFS='
#'
oIFS=$IFS
IFS=$'\n'
while read line;
do
name=$line;
folder=${line:0:4}
track=${line: -2}
folderlocation="$(locate -r '/'$folder'$')"
filelocation="$(find "$folderlocation" -type f -name "$track*")"
rsync -vazhn --progress "$filelocation" /cygdrive/c/
# mkdir /cygdrive/c/test/"$folder"
# cp -rvi "$filelocation" /cygdrive/c/test/"$folder"
echo "";
done < $1
The code using cp that is commented out works just fine. I would just really prefer to use rsync, mainly due to better feedback and more accurate progress reporting, as far as I can tell.
Using the code as pasted above (with rsync) throws this error:
./filelocator classic-locations.txt
sending incremental file list
rsync: change_dir "/home/emil//\\sandrew-nas/SMMUSIC/MMIMUSIC/7001-8000/7201-7300/7252/Unknown Album (29-12-2012 09-52-02)" failed: No such file or directory (2)
sent 20 bytes received 12 bytes 64.00 bytes/sec
total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 (DRY RUN)
rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1165) [sender=3.1.1]
sending incremental file list
rsync: change_dir "/home/emil//\\sandrew-nas/SMMUSIC/MMIMUSIC/7001-8000/7201-7300/7252/Unknown Album (29-12-2012 09-52-02)" failed: No such file or directory (2)
sent 20 bytes received 12 bytes 64.00 bytes/sec
total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 (DRY RUN)
rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1165) [sender=3.1.1]
As you can see, my home folder (where I issue the command) is suddenly included in the script, leading me to believe that a variable or wildcard is being expanded in the local shell, but no amount of escape characters seem to accomplish what I want with rsync.
Why can't I trust rsync to be minimally as fast as cp? (I'm ignoring negligible differences for overhead.)
It seems to me like rsync is fairly slow on files with no content difference, but a changed timestamp.
If I make a file: cp -a testfile-100M destfile
And then I rsync them, I get what you would expect:
$ rsync -av testfile-100M destfile
sending incremental file list
sent 56 bytes received 12 bytes 8.00 bytes/sec
total size is 104857600 speedup is 1542023.53
But that's just because rsync is checking the size and the timestamp and skipping the file. What if I just change the timestamp?
$ touch testfile-100M
$ rsync -av testfile-100M destfile sending incremental file list
testfile-100M
sent 104870495 bytes received 31 bytes 113804.15 bytes/sec
total size is 104857600 speedup is 1.00
Also note that even though the speedup is 1, the inital copy took about 1/4 the time to complete than the final rsync, even though the contents are exactly the same. So what's going on here? Is it just all the overhead of doing the comparisons?
If that's the case, then when does rsync ever provide a performance advantage? Only when files are exactly the same on both sides?
For local files, if the size or mtime have changed, rsync by default just copies the whole thing without using its delta algorithm. You can turn this off with the --no-whole-file option, but for local copies this will typically be slower.
For the specific case of touching a file without changing it:
If you give the --size-only option, it will assume that files that have the same size are unchanged.
If you give the --checksum option, it will first hash the file to see if anything has changed, before copying it.
When the source and destination are both locally mounted filesystems rsync just copies the file(s) if the timestamps or sizes don't match. Rsync wins where you have large files with small differences and they are on machines separated by a low bandwidth link.
EDIT: Since someone felt the need to downvote this ancient answer... As to why rsync on local files might be slower than cp, there does not seem to be any good reason.
It appears the answer is that rsync does some extra steps in order to keep files in a consistent state, and not in a "partial-transferred" state while operating. Using the --inplace option removes this overhead.
Interestingly, for me rsync is about 4× faster than cp for copying to an external USB drive.