When I use spring task handle a simple sync job! But when I deploy multi-node, how I make sure the cron job just run one time.
Maybe you say that:
1. Use distributed-lock control a flag before the crob job run.
2. Integrated quartz cluster function.
But I hope spring task #EnableScheduling can add a flag argument, so as we can set a flag when launch app.
We are using https://github.com/lukas-krecan/ShedLock with success, zookeeper provider in particular.
Spring boot, in a nutshell, doesn't allow any type of coordination between multiple instances
of the same microservice.
All the work of such a coordination is done by the third parties that spring boot gets integrated with.
One example of this is indeed a #Scheduled annotation.
Another is DB migration support via flyway.
When many nodes start and the migration has to be done, flyway is responsible to lock the migration table by itself, spring boot has nothing to do with it.
So, bottom line, there is no such support and all options that you've raised can work.
Related
There are three instances of the application on the server. but we want to execute the cronjob schedular logic on one instance of the application.
Using Spring-data, couchbase repository with couchbase database. is there any simple solution to my problem please suggest me. thanks in advance . i suffer from this problem from many days.
Facing similar situations with multiple spring boot instances, we schedule the cron externally, this can be a simple cron script that executes a curl, or a specific external scheduler app/instance. Your load balancer will pick an instance to run on.
You could also consider using quartz or shedlock with couchbase to manage without external trigger.
I have multiple jobs for my Spring Batch application, but only a single job uses some specific Spring Boot auto configuration features:
a job that uses spring-data-jpa auto configuration, to configure a database for business transactions (not for Spring Batch management)
a job that does not use the database at all
I have packaged both jobs in the same unit because it makes sense from business perspective. Both jobs will work together and the output of one job will be the input of the other job.
Is it possible to disable database specific auto configuration when I run the second job?
I just tried using profiles and I have disabled the autoconfiguration for a specific profile. I am pretty happy with this solution but I wonder if there are other solutions?
This is similar to trying to lazy load beans specific to a given job: How to apply something like #Lazy to Spring Batch?. While the Spring profiles feature may fix your issue, I believe it is working around the root issue which is packaging all jobs in a monolithic way.
I would package each job separately and this problem (and many others) disappears by design. There are several advantages to this approach:
Independent lifecyle management (bugs, features, etc)
Flexible deployment
Separate logs
Separate configurations (as in the current issue)
Easier/Better scalability
And all the good reasons to make one thing do one thing and do it well.
I have one #Scheduler job which runs on multiple servers in a clustered environment. However I want to restrict the job to run in only in one server and other servers should not run the same job once any other server has started it .
I have explored Spring Batch has lock mechanism using some Database table , but looking for any a solution only in spring task:scheduler.
I had the same problem and the solution what I implemented was a the Lock mechanism with Hazelcast and to made it easy to use I also added a proper annotation and a bit of spring AOP for that. So with this trick I was able to enforce a single schedule over the cluster done with a single annotation.
Spring Batch has this nice functionality that it would not run the job with same job arguments twice.
You can use this feature so that when a spring batch job kicks start in another server it does not run.
Usually people pass a timestamp as argument so it will by pass this logic, which you can change it.
Just looking for some information if others have solved this pattern. I want to use Spring Integration and Spring Batch together. Both of these are SpringBoot applications and ideally I'd like to keep them and their respective configuration separated, so they are both their own executable jar. I'm having problems executing them in their own process space and I believe I want, unless someone can convince me otherwise, each to run like they are their own Spring Boot app and initialize themselves with their own profiles and properties. What I'm having trouble with though is the invocation of the job in my SpringBatch project from my SpringIntegration project. At first I couldn't get the properties loaded from the batch project, so I realized I need to pass the spring.active.profiles as a Job Parameter and that seemed to solve that. But there are other things in the Spring Boot Batch application that aren't loading correctly like the schema-platform.sql file and the database isn't getting initialized, etc.
On this initial launch of the job I might want the response to go back to Spring Integration for some messaging on Job Status. There might be times when I want to run a job without Spring Integration kicking off the job, but still take advantage of sending statuses back to the Spring Integration project providing its listening on a channel or something.
I've reviewed quite a few Spring samples and have yet to find my exact scenario, most are with the two dependencies in the same project, so maybe I'm doing something that's not possible, but I'm sure I'm just missing a little something in the Spring configuration.
My questions/issues are:
I don't want the Spring Integration project to know anything about the SpringBatch configuration other than the job its kicking off. I have found a good way to do that reference to the Job Bean without getting my entire batch configuration loading.
Should I keep these two projects separated or would it be better to combine them since I have two-way communication between both.
How should the Job be launch from the integration project. We're using the spring-batch-integration project with JobLaunchRequest and JobLauncher. This seems to run it in the same process as the Spring Integration project and I'm missing a lot of my SpringBootBatch projects initialization
Should I be using a CommandLineRunner instead to force it to another process.
Is SpringApplication.run(BatchConfiguration.class) the answer?
Looking for some general project configuration setup to meet these requirements.
Spring Cloud Data Flow in combination with Spring Cloud Task does exactly what you're asking. It launches Spring Cloud Task applications (which can contain batch jobs) as new processes on the platform you choose. I'd encourage you to check out that project here: http://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-dataflow/
Have one service named AccountService.5 instances are needed to support the traffic.all these instances run in docker container.Now I need to run a schedule task.this task should only run on a single AccountService instance.but not all the five instances.which one is not important
My question is how to configure to achieve this.Can eureka do this?and zookeeper seems have the ability to manage the cluster.Do I need to register the AccountService into Zookeeper?
Hope someone can share experience with me
Consider using a shared data store like Redis or, if you're already using a DB, a table in the DB, to have a task lock. The first instance to come up can grab the lock, run the task, and release the lock.
Include spring-cloud-task in your dependency (which is suitable for scheduled tasks).
Then enable this property - spring.cloud.task.single-instance-enabled=true
Add Spring Integration dependencies. Copy/paste from here - https://docs.spring.io/spring-cloud-task/docs/current/reference/#features-single-instance-enabled
Note:
Locks are created and stored under TASK_LOCK table. Make sure its clean, otherwise you will have problems restarting.
Use Spring Based task scheduling #Schedule
For more click here