Is it possible or is there a function that works similar to debug.getupvalues / debug.getupvalue in the lua library that I could use, as I won't be able to use either soon and I depend on them slightly to keep parts of the code I have working.
Also if I could get the function code for debug.getupvalue it would be a great help as I could just use that as a function instead of using the debug library anymore, although I doubt it is code in Lua.
And before you say it, yes I know the debug library is the most undependable library in all of Lua but it made my code work and I would like to find a way to stop using it before it's too late.
The debug library is not meant to be used in production code (as opposed to tests and unusual debugging situations). There are 3 possible solutions. Two of them require changes to the code where the closures are defined. The other would require you to know C:
Add more closures in the same scope as the upvalues that will give you the access that you need.
Use tables instead of closures.
Write a C library that makes use of lua_getupvalue.
To see the source code of debug.getupvalue, download Lua 5.3.5 and look at src/ldblib.c, line 260. lua_getupvalue is in src/lapi.c, line 1222.
Related
I am trying to do some deep code analysis on a python2 codebase that is large and messy enough that most analysis tools I've tried have not worked. I have however been able to use pycscope to generate a cscope database. I can even use it to do basic things like find function usages or all functions called directly from a given function.
To me, it seems like the fact that there is a database and that it can be used for simple things means that it should be possible to use it for more complex things too. For example if I wanted to find all functions that are called from within a given function recursively, or all codepaths that depend on that function.
However cscope documentation is very light and I'm not much of a c-expert. Is there an actual query language for it? An extension that knows how to use the database in this manner?
I want to store brief snippets of code in the database (following a standard signature) and "inject" them at runtime. One way would be using eval(my_code). Is there some way to debug the injected code using breakpoints, etc? (I'm using Rubymine)
I'm aware I can just log to console, etc, but I'd prefer IDE-style debugging if possible.
Hm. Let's analyze your question. Firstly, it does not seem to have anything to do with databases: You simply store a code block in the source form somewhere. It can be a file, or a database. Secondly, you don't want IDE-style "debugging", but TDD-style. (But don't concentrate on that question now.)
What you need, is assertions about your code. That is, you need to describe what output should your code produce given some input examples. And then, you need to run that code and see whether its function matches the expectations. Furthermore, if you are not sure about the source of your snippets, run them in a sandbox (with $SAFE = 4). If your code fails the expectations, raise nice errors (TypeError, or even better, your custom made exception), and then you can eg. rescue those exceptions and eg. use some default code snippets...
... but maybe I'm not actually answering the same question that you are asking. If that's the case, then let me share one link to this sourcify gem, which let's you know the source, so that you can insert a breakpoint by saying eg. require 'rdebug' in the middle of code, or can even convert code to sexps. That's all I know.
I would like to know if the following is possible in Scala (but I think the question can be applied also to Java):
Create a Scala file dynamically (ok, no problem here)
Compile it (I don't think this would be a real problem)
Load/Unload the new class dynamically
Aside from knowing if dynamic code loading/reloading is possible (it's possible in Java so I think it's feasible also in Scala) I would like also to know the implication of this in terms of performance degradation (I could have many many classes, with no name clash but really many of them!).
TIA!
P.S.: I know other questions about class loading in Scala exist, but I haven't been able to find an answer about performance!
Yes, everything you want to do is certainly possible. You might like to take a look at ScalaMock, which is an example of creating Scala source code dynamically. And at SBT which is an example of calling the compiler from code. And then there are many different systems that load classes dynamically - look at the documentation for loadLibrary as a starting point.
But, depending on what you want to achieve, you might like to look at Scala Macros instead. They provide the same kind of flexibility as you would get by generating source code and then compiling it, but without many of the downsides of that approach. The original version of ScalaMock used to work by generating source code, but I'm in the process of moving to using macros instead.
It's all possible in Scala, as is clearly demonstrated by the REPL. It's even going to be relatively easy with Scala 2.10.
I understand that over a thousand built-in rewrite rules in Mathematica populate the global rules table by default. Is there any way to get Mathematica to give a full or even partial list of those rules?
The best way is to get a job at Wolfram Research.
Failing that, I think that for things not completely compiled into the kernel you can recover most of the rules/definitions. Look at
Attributes[fn]
where fn is the command that you're interested in. If it returns
{Protected, ReadProtected}
then there's something you can get a look at (although often it's just a MakeBoxes (formatting) definition or a AutoLoad/Stub type definition). To see what's there run
Unprotect[fn];
ClearAttributes[fn, ReadProtected];
??fn
Quite often you'll have to run an example of the command to load it if it was a stub. You'll also have to dig down from the user-facing commands to the back-end implementations.
Eventually you'll most likely reach a core command that is compiled into the kernel that you can not see the details of.
I previously mentioned this in tips for creating Graph diagrams and it got a mention in What is in your Mathematica tool bag?.
An good example, with a nice bite-sized and digestible bit of code is Experimental`AngularSlider[] mentioned in Circular/Angular slider. I'll leave it up to you to look at the code produced.
Another example is something like BoxWhiskerChart, where you need to call it once in order to load all of the code. Then you see that BoxWhiskerChart proceeds to call Charting`iBoxWhiskerChart which you'll have to unprotect to look at, etc...
I just installed the scheme48 package from macports and have started experiencing. I was watching this youtube video, link here and was attempting to perform some of the examples. In the lecture the professor is running scheme on a Sun terminal. For example, I attempt to do '(first 473)' and get 'Error: undefined variable first'. Now, I'm assuming I haven't loaded the correct package / library or what ever it is called in scheme but am not sure what the syntax and library is. I believe that scheme48 and the scheme version on that sun terminal in the video are not the same and could be part of the problem.
So, what library do I need to use and how do I load it?
Those lecture notes are based on a book called Simply Scheme, and you can find the library code that is used in the book here. Specifically, you need simply.scm.
(But whether it is a good idea to have these kind of overloading functions is debatable. Specifically, note that first is used in a way that is different from many other languages.)