I'm trying to use Clang-Tidy to automatically gate check-ins/builds on Visual Studios.
I know that in cmake there is a variable "CMAKE_CXX_CLANG_TIDY", but setting it to my tidy executable with the proper checks doesn't seem to do anything when building the project.
Also, I am unable to easily generate a compile_commands.json for Clang to use. Using CMAKE to generate it messes up individual dependencies, and the only way to generate it through Visual Studios seems to be non automated methods such as Extensions.
I am running the latest version of Clang, Cmake 3.11.3, and Visual Studios 2017.
Related
I am novice at cmake, so please be gentle.
I have a medium sized project that has been using visual studio with cmake. I would like to use the build/install features that I currently use in visual studio, but with cmake in the terminal.
Currently the project uses a cmakesettings.json to switch between the different builds and locations. When I searched this though, it seems to be specific to visual studio?
https://github.com/microsoft/CmakeSettings
Is there a tool or easy way to use these settings with cmake instead of visual studio?
Note that in VS2019, the correct way to do this is to use CMakePresets.json and then you can build in a VS2019 or higher, VS2022, or in a CI using cmake from the cmd.exe. CMakeSettings.json is deprecated. To enabled support for them, there is an option that needs to be enabled. See this link https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/cmake-presets-vs?view=msvc-160 for more information.
I use Clang 6.0.0 (from the latest build of the Windows installer) with Visual Studio 2017 to build my project, and everything works fine except for one thing, it rebuilds every file every single time. Not only that, it even recompiles everything when no code changed at all and I merely use "Start Debugging" or "Start Without Debugging"! The .obj files are still there, but it doesn't seem to be reusing them, which of course is prohibitively slow!
This happens only when using Clang 6 with "LLVM-vs2014" set in my project, when I switch "Visual Studio 2017 (v141)" or "Visual Studio 2017 - Clang with Microsoft CodeGen (v141_clang_c2)" I don't have that problem, it only compiles what changed.
What could possibly cause this behaviour?
Edit: Maybe that's what the website means by "A 64-bit version is also available, but it doesn't integrate as well with Visual Studio."
You can use fafnir.
https://github.com/kazatsuyu/fafnir
Visual Studio manages build dependencies using .tlog file, but it appears to generate wrong dependencies for recent clang. To fix it, fafnir uses API hooking to SetFileInformationByHandle through DLL injection.
Usage
Download the latest version from the release page on GitHub
Unzip it
Run install.bat
Specify the path of the directory of LLVM/clang
Specify new_toolset_name (in the form of v[0-9]+_clang_.*)
References
(Written in Japanese) Visual Studioでも最新のClangを使えるようにしたらキャッシュされていなかった
(Written in Japanese) Visual Studioでも最新のClangが使いたい！
Visual Studio 2017 RC includes much tighter CMake integration, allowing one to skip the intermediate step of generating project/solution files and use CMake effectively as the project file itself. There is sufficient documentation from Microsoft for using these features with regular C++ files, and there is sufficient documentation on this website (example) for making CUDA and Cmake play nicely, when it comes to linking CUDA code to C++ code.
What I can't find information on is how to make CMake, Visual Studio 2017 RC, and CUDA 8.0 all play nicely. This is a difficult problem, because 2017RC has no integration for the CUDA SDK anyways, and I was hoping to use 2017RC so that my C++ interface to the CUDA code could use C++14 and/or C++17. I'm working on the beginning of a large project that will primarily involve writing a static CUDA library that is accessed through C++: so, I'd like to get the CMake to take care of compiling my CUDA sources into a static library, and for it to help with feeding the linking information to Visual Studio. So far, I haven't had any success with using FindCUDA's various features to accomplish this, but I'm assuming that's due to a misunderstanding on my part. I've read through the documentation on separable compilation from Nvidia, but that wasn't helpful for figuring out CMake.
Further, whenever I try to use CMake in VS2017RC, I still end up with the various vcxproj files that CMake likes to spit out. Is this due to an error on my part? How do I edit the build command arguments, or CMakeLists.txt, to get the functionality demonstrated here to work?
The very short (and only at the time of writing) answer is that you can't. CUDA 8 doesn't support VS2017. Only VS2015 is presently supported.
You can always find the compiler/IDE versions which the release version of CUDA supports here
Edit to add that the CUDA 9 release will add official support for VS2017.
All you need to do is set the CUDA_HOST_COMPILER variable to a supported compiler for example the visual studio 2015 compiler.
In my case this is:
C:/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0/VC/bin/amd64/cl.exe
As both runtime libraries are binary compatible you can use the 2015 compiler within CUDA and compile all the rest of the application with the 2017 compiler.
Following the instructions here,
I've installed prerequisites, downloaded the source for version 3.9 and had CMake generate LLVM.sln. Building the full solution takes some times, but seems to do what it's supposed to do.
When looking at get_library in bindings/python/llvm/common.py, the Python binding makes use of a file named "LLVM-<current version>.dll" but I can't find any "LLVM-3.9.dll" in the generated files.
How do I build LLVM-3.9.dll from source with Visual Studio?
You can check out my repository which is based on CRoger instructions and simply build the project LLVM.vcxproj in Visual Studio.
I am creating a very large project (a few thousand lines) and so would rather not use Notepad++. An IDE would make it so much easier. I have experience with Microsoft Visual Studio and love it. Is there some easy way to use Cygwin's GCC from within Microsoft Visual Studio?
Alternately, are there any other good Windows IDEs for GCC besides NetBeans and Eclipse? (I hate both of them with a passion.)
There are several ways to go here:
Option 1: Create a Custom Build Tool
Visual Studio 2005 and newer will let you register custom build tools. They tell the IDE how to transform files of one form (e.g. a .cpp file) into another form (e.g. an .obj file).
So far as I know, no one has done this yet for GCC. And, doing it yourself requires writing COM code, which is probably too deep a pool to dive into just for a single project. You'd have to have a compelling reason to take this project on.
You then have to manually adjust each project to tell it to use the custom build tool instead of the default, since you're using a file name extension (.cpp, probably) that Visual C++ already knows about. You'll run into trouble if you try to mix the VC++ and g++ compilers for a single executable built from multiple modules.
On the plus side, if you were looking to start an open source project, this sounds like a good one to me. I expect you'd quickly gather a big user base.
Option 2: Makefile Project
Start Visual Studio and say File > New Project.
In the Visual C++ section, select Makefile Project
Fill out the Makefile Project Wizard:
Build command line: make
Clean commands: make clean
Rebuild command line: make clean all
You can leave the Output (for debugging) field alone if you've named your executable after the project name and it lands where Visual Studio expects to find it.
Leave the rest of the fields alone unless you know what they are and why you want to change them. As an example, you might choose to pass a -D flag on the Preprocessor definitions line to get separate debug and release outputs. If you know you want this, you know how to set it up, so I'm not going to make this long answer even longer in order to explain it.
You'll be asked the same set of questions for the Release build. If you want to bother with separate debug and release builds, you'd make any changes here.
Having done all this, you still have to create the Makefile, and add a make.exe to your PATH. As with the debug vs. release question, going into that level of detail would push this answer off topic.
As ugly as this looks, it's still easier than creating custom build tools. Plus, you say you need to port to Unix eventually, so you're going to need that Makefile anyway.
Option 3: Cross-Platform Development
You say you want to port this program to Unix at some point, but that doesn't mean you must use GCC on Windows now. It is quite possible to write your program so that it builds under Visual C++ on Windows and GCC/Makefiles on *ix systems.
There are several tools that make this easier. One very popular option is CMake, which is available as an installation time option in newer versions of Visual Studio. There are many alternatives such as SCons and Bakefile.
Clang
You can use the Clang compiler with Visual Studio to target Android, iOS, and Windows.
If you are targeting Android, you can use the Clang/LLVM compiler that ships with the Android NDK and toolchain to build your project. Likewise, Visual Studio can use Clang running on a Mac to build projects targeting iOS. Support for Android and iOS is included in the “Mobile Development with C++” workload. For more information about targeting Android or iOS check out our posts tagged with the keywords “Android” and “iOS”.
If you are targeting Windows, you have a few options:
Use Clang/LLVM; “Clang for Windows” includes instructions to install Clang/LLVM as a platform toolset in Visual Studio.
Use Clang to target Windows with Clang/C2 (Clang frontend with Microsoft Code Generation).
GCC
If your project targets Linux or Android, you can consider using GCC. Visual Studio’s C++ Android development natively supports building your projects with the GCC that ships with the Android NDK, just like it does for Clang. You can also target Linux – either remotely or locally with the Windows Subsystem for Linux – with GCC.
Check out our post on Visual C++ for Linux Development for much more info about how to use Visual Studio to target Linux with GCC. If you are specifically interested in targeting WSL locally, check out Targeting WSL from Visual Studio.
Source: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/use-any-c-compiler-with-visual-studio/
I'm from the future.
I keep (poking at) a C/C++ toolchain using Visual Code on Win/Lin/Mac and MinGW installed from Choclatey.
(This was done for my sanity - install GDB and GCC however you want)
I've run it with GCC and GDB with IntelliSense using MS's own weird JSON makefiles.
Someday, someone (you?) will write a Gradle or Python script to generate these; for now the examples online in the docs seem to work.
It seems to require three types of JSON thing;
a single IntelliSense configuration for the whole workspace
a Debugging Configuration entry for each binary you want to debug
these can invoke the build tasks
a Build Task per-artifact
I don't think that there's a "require" or "dependency" thingie-mah-bob; sorry