I try to add labels to map done with d3-geomap, but can't make it work.
The choropleth map itself gets painted correctly, but adding the labels doesn't work out right. The labels show up on the wrong position.
After painting the map I loaded again the topojson file again and then add text blocks like that:
d3.json("https://d3-geomap.github.io/d3-geomap/topojson/countries/ESP.json").then(function(es) {
let path = d3.geoPath().projection(d3.geoMercator());
svg.select("svg").append("g")
.selectAll("labels")
.data(topojson.feature(es, es.objects.units).features)
.enter().append("text")
.attr("class", "place-label")
.attr("x", function(d) { return path.centroid(d)[0]; })
.attr("y", function(d) { return path.centroid(d)[1]; })
.attr("text-anchor","middle")
.text(function(d) { return d.properties.name; });
});
The problem here is that I can't figure out the correct position of the labels. I also tried to apply the same transform as to the polygons, but then have all the same y position.
Here is the example on bl.ocks.
I made some changes to your code and published it in this gist. When testing it locally, the map displayed like the image below. At this size, labels don't work well, but if you resize the map and/or show fewer labels it should be okay.
Some info on the changes. Whenever you want to draw something on top of a map with d3-geomap, it should go in the postUpdate function. This way the map is already rendered and its SVG elements, the geo data and the path object are accessible via the map object you created. No need to load the Topojson file a second time. The function passed to postUpdate looks like follows:
function drawLabels() {
map.svg.append("g").attr('class', 'zoom')
.selectAll("text")
.data(topojson.feature(map.geo, map.geo.objects.units).features)
.enter().append("text")
.attr("class", "place-label")
.attr("x", function(d) { return map.path.centroid(d)[0]; })
.attr("y", function(d) { return map.path.centroid(d)[1]; })
.attr("text-anchor","middle")
.text(function(d) { return d.properties.name; })
.on('click', map.clicked.bind(map));
}
This page of the documentation shows the available map attributes and accessor functions. Hope this helps.
I want to draw a pie chart for every point on the map instead of a circle.
The map and the points are displaying well but the pie chart is not showing over the map points. There is no error also. I can see the added pie chart code inside map also.
Below is the code snippet .
var w = 600;
var h = 600;
var bounds = [[78,30], [87, 8]]; // rough extents of India
var proj = d3.geo.mercator()
.scale(800)
.translate([w/2,h/2])
.rotate([(bounds[0][0] + bounds[1][0]) / -2,
(bounds[0][1] + bounds[1][1]) / -2]); // rotate the project to bring India into view.
var path = d3.geo.path().projection(proj);
var map = d3.select("#chart").append("svg:svg")
.attr("width", w)
.attr("height", h);
var india = map.append("svg:g")
.attr("id", "india");
var gDataPoints = map.append("g"); // appended second
d3.json("data/states.json", function(json) {
india.selectAll("path")
.data(json.features)
.enter().append("path")
.attr("d", path);
});
d3.csv("data/water.csv", function(csv) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(csv))
gDataPoints.selectAll("circle")
.data(csv)
.enter()
.append("circle")
.attr("id", function (d,i) {
return "chart"+i;
})
.attr("cx", function (d) {
return proj([d.lon, d.lat])[0];
})
.attr("cy", function (d) {
return proj([d.lon, d.lat])[1];
})
.attr("r", function (d) {
return 3;
})
.each(function (d,i) {
barchart("chart"+i);
})
.style("fill", "red")
//.style("opacity", 1);
});
function barchart(id){
var data=[15,30,35,20];
var radius=30;
var color=d3.scale.category10()
var svg1=d3.select("#"+id)
.append("svg").attr('width',100).attr('height',100);
var group=svg1.append('g').attr("transform","translate(" + radius + "," + radius + ")");
var arc=d3.svg.arc()
.innerRadius('0')
.outerRadius(radius);
var pie=d3.layout.pie()
.value(function(d){
return d;
});
var arcs=group.selectAll(".arc")
.data(pie(data))
.enter()
.append('g')
.attr('class','arc')
arcs.append('path')
.attr('d',arc)
.attr("fill",function(d,i){
return color(d.data);
//return colors[i]
});
}
water.csv:
lon,lat,quality,complaints
80.06,20.07,4,17
72.822,18.968,2,62
77.216,28.613,5,49
92.79,87.208,4,3
87.208,21.813,1,12
77.589,12.987,2,54
16.320,75.724,4,7
In testing your code I was unable to see the pie charts rendering, at all. But, I believe I still have a solution for you.
You do not need a separate pie chart function to call on each point. I'm sure that there are a diversity of opinions on this, but d3 questions on Stack Overflow often invoke extra functions that lengthen code while under-utilizing d3's strengths and built in functionality.
Why do I feel this way in this case? It is hard to preserve the link between data bound to svg objects and your pie chart function, which is why you have to pass the id of the point to your function. This will be compounded if you want to have pie chart data in your csv itself.
With d3's databinding and selections, you can do everything you need with much simpler code. It took me some time to get the hang of how to do this, but it does make life easier once you get the hang of it.
Note: I apologize, I ported the code you've posted to d3v4, but I've included a link to the d3v3 code below, as well as d3v4, though in the snippets the only apparent change may be from color(i) to color[i]
In this case, rather than calling a function to append pie charts to each circle element with selection.each(), we can append a g element instead and then append elements directly to each g with selections.
Also, to make life easier, if we initially append each g element with a transform, we can use relative measurements to place items in each g, rather than finding out the absolute svg coordinates we would need otherwise.
d3.csv("water.csv", function(error, water) {
// Append one g element for each row in the csv and bind data to it:
var points = gDataPoints.selectAll("g")
.data(water)
.enter()
.append("g")
.attr("transform",function(d) { return "translate("+projection([d.lon,d.lat])+")" })
.attr("id", function (d,i) { return "chart"+i; })
.append("g").attr("class","pies");
// Add a circle to it if needed
points.append("circle")
.attr("r", 3)
.style("fill", "red");
// Select each g element we created, and fill it with pie chart:
var pies = points.selectAll(".pies")
.data(pie([0,15,30,35,20]))
.enter()
.append('g')
.attr('class','arc');
pies.append("path")
.attr('d',arc)
.attr("fill",function(d,i){
return color[i];
});
});
Now, what if we wanted to show data from the csv for each pie chart, and perhaps add a label. This is now done quite easily. In the csv, if there was a column labelled data, with values separated by a dash, and a column named label, we could easily adjust our code to show this new data:
d3.csv("water.csv", function(error, water) {
var points = gDataPoints.selectAll("g")
.data(water)
.enter()
.append("g")
.attr("transform",function(d) { return "translate("+projection([d.lon,d.lat])+")" })
.attr("class","pies")
points.append("text")
.attr("y", -radius - 5)
.text(function(d) { return d.label })
.style('text-anchor','middle');
var pies = points.selectAll(".pies")
.data(function(d) { return pie(d.data.split(['-'])); })
.enter()
.append('g')
.attr('class','arc');
pies.append("path")
.attr('d',arc)
.attr("fill",function(d,i){
return color[i];
});
});
The data we want to display is already bound to the initial g that we created for each row in the csv. Now all we have to do is append the elements we want to display and choose what properties of the bound data we want to show.
The result in this case looks like:
I've posted examples in v3 and v4 to show a potential implementation that follows the above approach for the pie charts:
With one static data array for all pie charts as in the example: v4 and v3
And by pulling data from the csv to display: v4 and v3
I've attached text to gnodes in the force layout like this.
var gnodes = svg.selectAll('g.gnode')
.data(graph.nodes)
.enter()
.append('g')
.classed('gnode', true);
var labels = gnodes.append("text")
.attr("dx", 5)
.attr("dy", 5)
.attr("font-size","1.5em")
.text("");
What I'd like to do is loop through all gnodes and selectively (on the basis of node.index) change the text of some of the corresponding labels. I'm not sure how I'd do that?
labels.text("text", function(d) {
console.log("gnode Object d is " + d);
return "a function for this text";
});
This doesn't work. I'd appreciate any help. For those wanting the whole code, here it is.
This question has been asked before but I don't think the given solution is the cleanest way to do it so I'm hoping someone may have figured it out since then. I am generating multiple pie charts using d3.js and am dynamically updating them through SQL queries. This is my update function:
function updateCharts()
{
var updatedDataSet = getDataSet();
// Create a pie layout and bind the new data to it
var layout = d3.layout.pie()
.value(function(d, i) { return d[i].count; })
.sort(null);
// Select the pie chart
var pieChartSVG = d3.selectAll("#pie");
// Select each slice of the pie chart
var arcsUpdate = pieChartSVG.selectAll("g.slice")
.data(layout([updatedDataSet]))
.enter();
// Apply transitions to the pie chart to reflect the new dataset
arcsUpdate.select("path")
.attr("fill", function(d, i) { return color(i); })
.attr("d", arc)
.transition()
.duration(1000)
.attrTween("d", arcTween);
}
But it doesn't work. If I take the .enter() out of arcsUpdate then it works but applies the same changes(data and tweens) to each chart. I could get around this by doing a foreach() on the elements returned from pieChartSVG but I can't think of a way of doing that other than the one described in the other question.
I have had to use the solution from the other question as I have to move forward but it's not a "clean" solution so I'd love to know if anybody is aware of a better way to handle it.
I thought you need take the .enter() out of arcsUpdate just like
var arcsUpdate = pieChartSVG.selectAll("path")
.data(layout([updatedDataSet]));
// Apply transitions to the pie chart to reflect the new dataset
arcsUpdate.enter()
.append("path")
.attr("fill", function(d, i) { return color(i); })
.attr("d", arc)
.transition()
.duration(1000)
.attrTween("d", arcTween);
This is the correct way.
And if it applies the same changes(data and tweens) to each chart. Please check out they are binding same updateDataSet or not.
I'm using D3.js to build a circular heat chart, and I want to add events so that when I mouseover any section of the chart, all the elements at the same angle also highlight. (Like the mouseover events on this Guardian visualisation.)
At the moment, I'm doing this by explicitly adding data attributes to the HTML for every path element:
g.selectAll("path").data(data)
.enter().append("path")
.attr("d", d3.svg.arc().innerRadius(ir).outerRadius(or).startAngle(sa).endAngle(ea))
.attr("data-pathnumber", function(d) { return d.pathNumber });
And then my mouseover event selects by data attribute:
d3.selectAll("#chart4 path").on('mouseover', function() {
var d = d3.select(this).data()[0];
d3.selectAll('path[data-pathnumber="' + d.pathNumber + '"]').attr('fill', 'black');
});
However, is this actually the correct way to do things in D3? It feels to me like there "ought" to be a way to select the path based only on the data stored in the DOM, not on explicit data attributes.
If you store the reference to your paths, you can use selection.filter here:
var paths = g.selectAll("path").data(data)
.enter().append("path")
.attr("d", d3.svg.arc().innerRadius(ir).outerRadius(or).startAngle(sa).endAngle(ea))
;
Mouseover:
d3.selectAll("#chart4 path").on('mouseover', function(thisData) {
paths
.filter(function (d) { return d.pathNumber === thisData.pathNumber; })
.attr('fill', 'black');
});