Alexa failed to response - aws-lambda

Created a new aws-lambda function and tests are also executed fine. Then I created a new Alexa skill and configured everything and even added Display Interface under Interface section. But when I try to execute my commands in Alexa simulator
Its response is like There was a problem with the requested skill's response.
And Skill I/O json files looks like
Input Json :
{
"version":"1.0",
"session":{
"new":true,
"sessionId":"amzn1.echo-api.session.2739cca3-6804-4872-b137-a4d33bca1d76",
"application":{
"applicationId":"amzn1.ask.skill.c5444c1d-574f-44fe-981e-351b08cab8b6"
},
"user":{
"userId":"amzn1.ask.account.AGMVQCXC6XYWORU62MNGISCR6ECHRTHHSBKNIDWFBQDKL66AQDHERNVOA2K5VI32G6HZMYN7GYVGSRWSVFPQWDBCJ2WVUBXJ2AY6F5T374UYHH7ZFOOWJKPJV6KYSNOMXXIDY5C2KUJ4ID7GHXELOH23CKN6WHVLQREOCQXANHDOLDKL722UBIZZFPE4MJAU5S5TCHL5HGOZO6Y"
}
},
"context":{
"AudioPlayer":{
"playerActivity":"IDLE"
},
"Display":{
},
"System":{
"application":{
"applicationId":"amzn1.ask.skill.c5444c1d-574f-44fe-981e-351b08cab8b6"
},
"user":{
"userId":"amzn1.ask.account.AGMVQCXC6XYWORU62MNGISCR6ECHRTHHSBKNIDWFBQDKL66AQDHERNVOA2K5VI32G6HZMYN7GYVGSRWSVFPQWDBCJ2WVUBXJ2AY6F5T374UYHH7ZFOOWJKPJV6KYSNOMXXIDY5C2KUJ4ID7GHXELOH23CKN6WHVLQREOCQXANHDOLDKL722UBIZZFPE4MJAU5S5TCHL5HGOZO6Y"
},
"device":{
"deviceId":"amzn1.ask.device.AG6K3BI3PXMWLBUTDHHUIYBJCEEYRCTYIW7YCRT7U53VFQHRAGF6HVTOIHBR2KDVWPZHMRUJKQOYZRYA6V3CY7AJE6UYBA6NYAFYKCYPNX4HHHEOKXTX7BAQUG3BZQIPIO3FWSVXX4V4VIAPWPHPRSYJSSYOJYXBR6R6LBIEO4MODOO5QD4TM",
"supportedInterfaces":{
"AudioPlayer":{
},
"Display":{
"templateVersion":"1.0",
"markupVersion":"1.0"
}
}
},
"apiEndpoint":"https://api.eu.amazonalexa.com",
"apiAccessToken":"eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsImtpZCI6IjEifQ.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.QAuP9lSUeLOUs6NPf7Y90CRR1eXnz-2_hnL3Lut6Dq9pPOrgKlCr_fUklwJlrA04XU7RdxTxxw7plpQ6HxzqLowxxn2ERH3ex1zMC24erXLym2XYalEOcWkBJNlJlL-S4a06Jk8hYRJaATK-VhKxRuiKyfvwE0Pkb2p91EnXayueEuSMCZ7ChpARabujzKJ-I_dw8UsTDaYbR1wrBbDwZbxRxFX7ieiN3rG9TiJM8EjydUJIWXBmzP-FMzhW4hk9b0CPQxLLyFspl5XqKGzI6xMMMHl-3yFliqawZFcoiWbHjkSeBuu7jHeHtAYbH5Zu5tyaL1fcuFWT1pMZJInfQQ"
}
},
"request":{
"type":"LaunchRequest",
"requestId":"amzn1.echo-api.request.90ad6d97-86bc-473b-ac50-31fd2d100c89",
"timestamp":"2018-08-17T05:28:09Z",
"locale":"en-US",
"shouldLinkResultBeReturned":false
}
}
output Json :
{
"body":{
"version":"1.0",
"response":{
"outputSpeech":{
"type":"SSML",
"ssml":"Welcome to your personal Tableau assitent. How may i help you today?"
},
"card":{
"type":"Simple",
"title":"Tableau Insights!",
"content":"Welcome to your personal Tableau assitent. How may i help you today?"
},
"reprompt":{
"outputSpeech":{
"type":"PlainText",
"text":"How may i help you today?"
}
},
"shouldEndSession":false
},
"sessionAttributes":{
"speechOutput":"Welcome to your personal Tableau assitent. How may i help you today?",
"repromptText":"How may i help you today?"
}
}
}
And the index.js file is here.

When you use SSML response type always include <speak> tag.
In your LaunchRequest response, outputSpeech type is set to SSML and you have passed a plain text. You should enclose SSML response with a bare minimum <speak> ... </speak>
"outputSpeech":{
"type":"SSML",
"ssml":"<speak> Welcome to your personal Tableau assitent. How may i help you today? </speak>"
},
More on SSML here
Also, check out the ask-nodejs-sdk which will take care of these things and you can further reduce your development effort.

Related

Use GitHub GraphQL to retrieve all open milestones and all issues (open and closed) for the milestone

I understand that GitHub's GraphQL-based v4 API is much more efficient than the v3 API.
I would like to use the GraphQL API to retrieve, for a given repo:
All of the open milestones.
For each milestone, its title, description, all of its issues (open and closed)
For each issue, its title, description, status, and all messages.
Is there a straightforward way to do this?
Yes. It is straightforward to do so . The query looks like :
{
repository(owner: "gatsbyjs", name: "gatsby") {
description
url
milestones(states: [OPEN],first:2) {
nodes{
title
description
url
issues(states:[OPEN,CLOSED], first:2){
nodes{
title
state
url
comments(first:2){
nodes{
url
body
createdAt
}
pageInfo{
hasNextPage
endCursor
}
}
}
pageInfo{
endCursor
hasNextPage
}
}
}
pageInfo{
endCursor
hasNextPage
}
}
}
}
Note:
For the repository which the url is https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby , its owner is gatsbyjs and its name is gatsby
Go to its API Explorer to try and fine tune the query.Click Ctrl+Space will auto-suggest the available fields that can be retrieved.
Do the paginating by yourself to loop through all records by adjusting the starting cursor and the number of records to be returned in first , after.
It gives you the following :
{
"data": {
"repository": {
"description": "Build blazing fast, modern apps and websites with React",
"url": "https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby",
"milestones": {
"nodes": [
{
"title": "Next Major",
"description": "Issues that will require a breaking change, and which would constitute being done in the next major version of Gatsby.",
"url": "https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/milestone/5",
"issues": {
"nodes": [
{
"title": "Make accessibility warnings errors",
"state": "OPEN",
"url": "https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/issues/19945",
"comments": {
"nodes": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/issues/19945#issuecomment-568891716",
"body": "Hiya!\n\nThis issue has gone quiet. Spooky quiet. 👻\n\nWe get a lot of issues, so we currently close issues after 30 days of inactivity. It’s been at least 20 days since the last update here.\nIf we missed this issue or if you want to keep it open, please reply here. You can also add the label \"not stale\" to keep this issue open!\nAs a friendly reminder: the best way to see this issue, or any other, fixed is to open a Pull Request. Check out [gatsby.dev/contribute](https://www.gatsbyjs.org/contributing/how-to-contribute/) for more information about opening PRs, triaging issues, and contributing!\n\nThanks for being a part of the Gatsby community! 💪💜",
"createdAt": "2019-12-25T12:02:26Z"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/issues/19945#issuecomment-570779866",
"body": "Hey again!\n\nIt’s been 30 days since anything happened on this issue, so our friendly neighborhood robot (that’s me!) is going to close it.\nPlease keep in mind that I’m only a robot, so if I’ve closed this issue in error, I’m `HUMAN_EMOTION_SORRY`. Please feel free to reopen this issue or create a new one if you need anything else.\nAs a friendly reminder: the best way to see this issue, or any other, fixed is to open a Pull Request. Check out [gatsby.dev/contribute](https://www.gatsbyjs.org/contributing/how-to-contribute/) for more information about opening PRs, triaging issues, and contributing!\n\nThanks again for being part of the Gatsby community! 💪💜",
"createdAt": "2020-01-04T12:02:28Z"
}
],
"pageInfo": {
"hasNextPage": false,
"endCursor": "Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpHOIgVo2g=="
}
}
},
{
"title": "Configurable output folder",
"state": "OPEN",
"url": "https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/issues/1878",
"comments": {
"nodes": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/issues/1878#issuecomment-324062470",
"body": "Do you have a specific use case in mind? This has been discussed before but no one has come up with a concrete use case that justified adding a new option.\r\n\r\nEvery option we add to Gatsby makes the project more complex which has all sorts of long-term costs so unless something is really valuable, I'd rather people handle this sort of thing themselves e.g. just copy the files to the output directory you want or create a symlink. This could easily be turned into a plugin that people could install, etc.",
"createdAt": "2017-08-22T15:27:41Z"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby/issues/1878#issuecomment-324074853",
"body": "Yes, I have a use-case. I am going to use Gatsby for a documentation part as a part of complex project. All static files (Gatsby output, plus some others) should be placed into one folder `build`, that will be deployed somehow later. In other words, the Gatsby output is only one subfolder in my setup.\r\n\r\nSo far I have worked this around in `postbuild` step, but it looks hacky:\r\n\r\n```\r\n\"build\": \"gatsby build\",\r\n\"postbuild\": \"mv public build/gatsby-subsite\"\r\n```\r\nAdding configurable output folder will reduce this complexity and will help me not to move files around one more time.",
"createdAt": "2017-08-22T16:08:21Z"
}
],
"pageInfo": {
"hasNextPage": true,
"endCursor": "Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpHOE1D9ZQ=="
}
}
}
],
"pageInfo": {
"endCursor": "Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpLPgAAAAAAAArvODwULXA==",
"hasNextPage": true
}
}
}
],
"pageInfo": {
"endCursor": "Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpHOAEEbsw==",
"hasNextPage": false
}
}
}
}
}

How to get name/confidence individually from classify_text?

Most of the other methods in the language api, such as analyze_syntax, analyze_sentiment etc, have the ability to return the constituent elements like
sentiment.score
sentiment.magnitude
token.part_of_speech.tag
etc etc etc....
but I have not found a way to return name and confidence in isolation from classify_text. It doesn't look like it's possible but that seems weird. Am missing something? Thanks
The language.documents.classifyText method returns a ClassificationCategory object which contains name and confidence. If you only want one of the fields you can filter by categories/name or categories/confidence. As an example I executed:
POST https://language.googleapis.com/v1/documents:classifyText?fields=categories%2Fname&key={YOUR_API_KEY}
{
"document": {
"content": "this is a test for a StackOverflow question. I get an error because I need more words in the document and I don't know what else to say",
"type": "PLAIN_TEXT"
}
}
Which returns:
{
"categories": [
{
"name": "/Science/Computer Science"
},
{
"name": "/Computers & Electronics/Programming"
},
{
"name": "/Jobs & Education"
}
]
}
Direct link to API explorer for interactive testing of my example (change content, filters, etc.)

Amazon Alexa Device Discovery for Smart Home API with Lambda Failing

I have setup an Alexa Smart Home Skill, all settings done, oauth2 processed done and skill is enabled on my Amazon Echo device. Lambda function is setup and linked to the skill. When I "Discover Devices" I can see the payload hit my Lambda function in the log. I am literally returning via the context.succeed() method the following JSON with a test appliance. However Echo tells me that it fails to find any devices.
{
"header": {
"messageId": "42e0bf9c-18e2-424f-bb11-f8a12df1a79e",
"name": "DiscoverAppliancesResponse",
"namespace": "Alexa.ConnectedHome.Discovery",
"payloadVersion": "2"
},
"payload": {
"discoveredAppliances": [
{
"actions": [
"incrementPercentage",
"decrementPercentage",
"setPercentage",
"turnOn",
"turnOff"
],
"applianceId": "0d6884ab-030e-8ff4-ffffaa15c06e0453",
"friendlyDescription": "Study Light connected to Loxone Kit",
"friendlyName": "Study Light",
"isReachable": true,
"manufacturerName": "Loxone",
"modelName": "Spot"
}
]
}
}
Does the above payload look correct?
According to https://developer.amazon.com/public/solutions/alexa/alexa-skills-kit/docs/smart-home-skill-api-reference#discovery-messages the version attribute is required. Your response seems to be missing that attribute.
In my (very short) experience with this, even the smallest mistake in the response would generate a silent error like the one you are experiencing.
I had the same problem. If you are creating discovery for "Entertainment Device", make sure you have wrapped the output in 'event' key for context.succeed
var payload = {
endpoints:
[
{
"endpointId": "My-id",
"manufacturerName": "Manufacturer",
"friendlyName": "Living room TV",
"description": "65in LED TV from Demo AV Company",
"displayCategories": [ ],
"cookie": {
"data": "e.g. ip address",
},
"capabilities":
[
{
"interface": "Alexa.Speaker",
"version": "1.0",
"type": "AlexaInterface"
},
]
}
]
};
var header = request.directive.header;
header.name = "Discover.Response";
context.succeed({ event: {
header: header, payload: payload
} });
Although, in the sample code, this is never mentioned and an incorrect example is given (https://developer.amazon.com/public/solutions/alexa/alexa-skills-kit/docs/steps-to-create-a-smart-home-skill). However, the response body provided includes the "event" key.
Recreating lambda function helped me fix the issue. I also set "Enable trigger" check button while creating, though I'm not sure if that matters. After that my device provided by skill was found successfully.
Edit: Answer was wrong. Only useful information was this
This context.fail syntax is actually deprecated. Look up the Lambda context object properties, it should look more like "callback(null, resultObj)" now.
Did you include the return statement in your function?
return {
"header": header,
"payload": payload
}
It was missing in the example and after adding it, I was able to 'discover' my device.

What services can I use to fetch an image of a person based on their email address, without authentication

I know gravatar allows this, and I'd like to look into facebook, google plus, twitter, instagram, and anything else.
Do you guys know of any services like this?
EDIT: to clarify, by "without authentication" do I mean user authentication, I expect to use some sort of API
One possible approach, using Facebook Graph Api would be to perform a search against the name for users objects and also retrieve their pictures, using API version 2.2 it would be a call like:
GET graph.facebook.com
/search?q=miles davis&type=user&fields=id,name,picture
This would retrieve id, name and picture object for a search on miles davis, first results as example:
{
"data": [
{
"id": "805353876185303",
"name": "Miles Davis",
"picture": {
"data": {
"is_silhouette": true,
"url": "https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net/hprofile-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-1/c15.0.50.50/p50x50/10354686_10150004552801856_220367501106153455_n.jpg?oh=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX&oe=XXXXXX&__gda__=XXXXXXX_XXXXXXXXXXXXX"
}
}
},
{
"id": "1572370603017419",
"name": "Miles Davis",
"picture": {
"data": {
"is_silhouette": false,
"url": "https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net/hprofile-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-1/p50x50/1501761_1382020035385811_1384168153_n.jpg?oh=XXXXXXXXX&oe=XXXXXXXXXXX&__gda__=XXXXXX_XXXXXX"
}
}
}, ...........
The field is_silhouette is false if the user has a profile picure.

Intel XDK : Parse.com integration "Unauthorized"

I am very new to Intel XDK and i try to make a very simple app like this in that video tutorial: Using Services Datafeed in App Designer.
But instead of the specific service from Rotten Tomatoes i want to integrate a database i have in Parse.com. For that i followed this video tutorial: "Integrating a New Service"
"[https]://software.intel.com/en-us/html5/videos/integrating-a-new-service",
and at the end the response was: "Unauthorized".
Then i found only this answer which comes from Intel's HTML5 Development Forums. I did not get anything either with this. The response was again: "Unauthorized".
And now i am confused and disappointed because:
I can't find other resources to help my self
I don't want to do it someone else instead of me, but
Without a full example, how is supposed to make it to learn?
My code now is similar with this in video: "Integrating a New Service"
In apiconfig.json
{
"MyService": {
"name": "The external service",
"description": "A great API with an external service",
"dashboardUrl": "https://parse.com",
"auth": "key",
"signature": "apiSecret"
}
}
In MyService.js
(function (credentials) {
var exports = {};
exports.ServiceObject = function(params) {
var url = 'https://api.parse.com/1/classes/ServiceObject';
params['apiKey'] = credentials.apiKey;
url = url + '?' + $.param(params);
return $.ajax({url: url, type: 'GET'});
};
return exports;
})
And in MyService.json
{
"endpoints": [
{
"name": "classes",
"dashboardUrl": "https://parse.com/docs/rest",
"methods": [
{
"MethodName": "ServiceObject",
"Synopsis": "Show the entries",
"parameters": [
{
"Name": "objectId",
"Required": "N",
"Default": "",
"Type": "string",
"Description": "The object ID"
},
{
"Name": "text",
"Required": "N",
"Default": "",
"Type": "string",
"Description": "The text"
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
Can someone help me more? In whatever way he thinks best.
Thank you all
Edit:
After the following answer, my problem solved.
"MyService.js" file after the correction is:
(function (credentials) {
var exports = {};
exports.ServiceObject = function(params) {
var url = 'https://api.parse.com/1/classes/ServiceObject';
return $.ajax({
url : url,
headers : {
'X-Parse-Application-Id' : credentials.apiKey,
'X-Parse-REST-API-Key' : credentials.apiSecret
}
});
};
return exports;
})
# user1736947: Your answer was concise and precise, exactly what i needed.
Certainly in the future I will need a lot of help, but for now I can go on my self-education thanks to you.
Thank you very much.
The way the authentication keys are accepted is different for different services. The example in the video.. rottentomatoes.. it accepted keys as a url parameter, so we append the key to the url and send it. However, seems like parse wants the keys in the headers (according to this)
So the equivalent ajax call will be something like :
exports.ServiceObject = function(params) {
var url = 'https://api.parse.com/1/classes/ServiceObject';
return $.ajax({
url : url,
headers : {
'X-Parse-Application-Id' : credentials.apiKey,
'X-Parse-REST-API-Key' : credentials.apiSecret
}
});
This might not fix everything but it will move you a step beyond the authorization issue. Let me know if you are able to retreive the class this way.
To get a particular row entry, append the url with params.objectID.
Also, the XDK services tab has a parse-similar service ... kinvey. It also allows you to create a database online and retreive it.

Resources