How can I express the following condition using Timing: "make some prescription three days after encounter start date, 1 tab x 3 times per day"?
(I understand how to express the latter part of the expression, as the authors provided Timing documentation with an example).
The relativeDate extension allows you to specify a date as relative to some other date.
HL7 Pharmacy Work Group is planning changes to the Dosage type used in FHIR to support "conditional doses" such as this one. Currently this is not supported in FHIR.
Related
Is there any documentation on FluxAggregator or OCR? I thought the first one was properly documented previously. I would like to implement an Oracle as a POC for integration.
I was hinted at the Fluxmonitor, would I use one to query n api's and send the aggregate to a FluxAggregator contract address?
Having another process e.g. a requestor query last rounds value via the aggregators' function?
Would I use the last version v0.6?
FluxAggregator was the aggregation contract used prior to OffChainReporting(OCR). This is why the last version with FluxAggregator is in v0.6.
For Documentation of OCR Please see
https://docs.chain.link/docs/off-chain-reporting/
and
https://docs.chain.link/docs/jobs/types/offchain-reporting/
for more information.
I'm trying to make a table using asdoc that will include both the value labels and the variable labels in the output. When I run the following line of code in Stata
asdoc list progname progtype progterm publicprivate cohortsize grereq, label
I get this in the console (no variable labels):
But in the word doc, it comes out looking like this (has variable labels but no value labels in the table cells):
How do I get both the variable and value labels in the table?
The last update of asdoc was on April 10, 2021. I announced the following in that update.
It is now almost three years that I have been developing asdoc and constantly adding features to it. With the addition of _docx and xl() classes to Stata, it is high time to add support for native docx and xlsx output to asdoc. Also, given that there exists a significant number of LaTeX users, asdoc should be able to create LaTeX documents. It gives me immense pleasure to announce asdocx that is not only more flexible in making customized tables, but also creates documents in native docx, xlsx, html, and tex formats. If you have enjoyed and find asdoc useful, please consider buying a copy of asdocx to support its development. Details related to asdocx can be found on this page.
I am still committed to fixing bugs / issues in asdoc. However, I think it makes more sense to me to add features to asdocx than asdoc, given that asdocx supports all latest developments in Word, Excel and LaTeX.
The requested feature is already available in asdocx. See the following example.
sysuse nlsw88
asdocx list industry age race married grade south in 1/20, replace label
First of, is there any real documentation of the toolkit ? What I would like is to specify a range of selectable dates. For example I don't want to display dates before today. If the user select a start date of Jan. 27th 2012, I want to allow only dates after these for the return date
Documentation is a little bit sparse for the toolkit - your best bet is to look in the source of the sample app but they don't cover all the scenarios.
The default control doesn't seem to support a minimum or maximum value for the selected date, but if you download the source you should be able to modify it according to your needs. The layout of the source is pretty straightforward and you should be able to find an acceptable place to add the code, the only thing you need to decide is how you handle it from a UI perspective. In my opinion, you are better off handling the range check once the control returns - if it is an invalid date, pop up a message and re-show the control.
I've found that in the absence of documentation, the WindowsPhoneGeek blog (in this specific case see link here) usually does a good job of explaining the Silverlight Toolkit components in their various articles.
These articles can be a great help when following ZombieSheep's advice of taking a look at the toolkit sample code.
First of, is there any real documentation of the toolkit ? What I would like is to specify a range of selectable dates. For example I don't want to display dates before today. If the user select a start date of Jan. 27th 2012, I want to allow only dates after these for the return date
Documentation is a little bit sparse for the toolkit - your best bet is to look in the source of the sample app but they don't cover all the scenarios.
The default control doesn't seem to support a minimum or maximum value for the selected date, but if you download the source you should be able to modify it according to your needs. The layout of the source is pretty straightforward and you should be able to find an acceptable place to add the code, the only thing you need to decide is how you handle it from a UI perspective. In my opinion, you are better off handling the range check once the control returns - if it is an invalid date, pop up a message and re-show the control.
I've found that in the absence of documentation, the WindowsPhoneGeek blog (in this specific case see link here) usually does a good job of explaining the Silverlight Toolkit components in their various articles.
These articles can be a great help when following ZombieSheep's advice of taking a look at the toolkit sample code.
When you're passing variables through your site using GET requests, do you validate (regular expressions, filters, etc.) them before you use them?
Say you have the URL http://www.example.com/i=45&p=custform. You know that "i" will always be an integer and "p" will always contain only letters and/or numbers. Is it worth the time to make sure that no one has attempted to manipulate the values and then resubmit the page?
Yes. Without a doubt. Never trust user input.
To improve the user experience, input fields can (and IMHO should) be validated on the client. This can pre-empt a round trip to the server that only leads to the same form and an error message.
However, input must always be validated on the server side since the user can just change the input data manually in the GET url or send crafted POST data.
In a worst case scenario you can end up with an SQL injection, or even worse, a XSS vulnerability.
Most frameworks already have some builtin way to clean the input, but even without this it's usually very easy to clean the input using a combination of regular exceptions and lookup tables.
Say you know it's an integer, use int.Parse or match it against the regex "^\d+$".
If it's a string and the choices are limited, make a dictionary and run the string through it. If you don't get a match change the string to a default.
If it's a user specified string, match it against a strict regex like "^\w+$"
As with any user input it is extremely important to check to make sure it is what you expect it is. So yes!
Yes, yes, and thrice yes.
Many web frameworks will do this for you of course, e.g., Struts 2.
One important reason is to check for sql injection.
So yes, always sanitize user input.
not just what the others are saying. Imagine a querystring variable called nc, which can be seen to have values of 10, 50 and 100 when the user selects 10, 50 and 100 results per page respectively. Now imagine someone changing this to 50000. If you are just checking that to be an integer, you will be showing 50000 results per page, affecting your pageviews, server loads, script times and so on. Plus this could be your entire database. When you have such rules (10, 50 or 100 results per page), you should additionaly check to see if the value of nr is 10, 50 or 100 only, and if not, set it to a default. This can simply be a min(nc, 100), so it will work if nc is changed to 25, 75 and so on, but will default to 100 if it sees anything above 100.
I want to stress how important this is. I know the first answer discussed SQL Injection and XSS Vulnerabilities. The latest rave in SQL Injection is passing a binary encoded SQL statement in query strings, which if it finds a SQL injection hole, it will add a http://reallybadsite.com'/> to every text field in your database.
As web developers we have to validate all input, and clean all the output.
Remember a hacker isn't going to use IE to compromise your site, so you can't rely on any validation in the web.
Yes, check them as thoroughly as you can. In PHP I always check the types (IsInt(i), IsString(p)).