How do you disable this kind of pop up in office add in?
Thanks
This is in fact a very much valid question and a good one. We have a work item to improve this experience and reduce the cases where it would appear only to commands that have ExecuteFunction action. When the improvement is implemented, it will be possible to completely avoid this pop up for add-ins that use displayDialogAsync API from ShowTaskPane action commands for cases where the displayDialogAsync API call is made from some user control click handler. I can't provide the timeline for when this improvement will be implemented, but we do have it in our backlog.
Related
I want to prevent users from closing a window by Alt + F4 or by clicking the close button.
How to achieve this?
I guess the windows API can do it, but I don't have any experience, and I can't find a specific solution.
Of course, it's good to be able to implement it,don't have to use a specific API.
Background: it is very difficult to find the last place in Word after closing it for a few days. After word2013, word2013 brought with it a way to return to the previous reading position, but that thing is very unstable and often can't be saved. When word is closed, I want to stop closing and pop up a notice to remind me to add a bookmark before exiting.
EDIT: This won't work, as it turned out. At least the message hook won't work because the message is posted and not sent, and about the CBT hook I'm not sure either, and I can't test it at the moment to give an evidence-based statement. The solution is probably to subclass the window but this is also non-trivial and I can't explain it properly and with working examples right now. I can't delete this answer though because it already has a comment. See here for more info. So take it with a grain of salt. I'm turning the answer to community wiki, feel free to edit it and fix/improve the solution!
EDIT2: Seems even subclassing won't be enough because Word is doing things its own way.
You need a windows hook. Either a CBT hook or a getmessage hook will do.
You have to create a DLL for this to work. The hook handler must be located in the DLL. It must have the same bitness as Word (probably 64 Bit). Then you call SetWindowsHookEx to install a global hook.
In the hook, you will have to check whether the current action is a window-closing attempt (in a CBT hook you would check for a HCBT_SYSCOMMAND of SC_CLOSE, in a getmessage hook you would check for a WM_CLOSE message), and whether it is about a Word window (for example using the window class - not sure if it has a recognizable class, you'd have to check - or the process' executable file name which you can get using GetModuleFileName since you will run inside Word's process) and prevent the action (by returning 1 from a CBT hook or returning 0 from a getmessage hook - to allow, call CallNextHookEx).
I need my Visual Studio extension to react to debugging events. I've registered a IDebugEventCallback2 and I'm receiving events, but all I get for each event is an opaque IDebugEvent2 and a Guid, many of which are not only undocumented but don't appear anywhere on the web (or in my registry).
My specific requirement at the moment is to know when the process is Continued - ie. the user has hit Continue, Run to cursor, etc. What Guid should I be looking for?
Or is there some other event family that I should be subscribing to?
(More generally, is there some way I'm missing to find out about the events that are delivered to my IDebugEventCallback2::Event callback, when many of them don't appear in MSDN or anywhere else? Thanks!)
There is no easy way to do this. Actions such as Continue and Run to cursor are abstractions implemented by Visual Studio and do not correspond to any unique event(s) with respect to the debug engine. The debug engine event reporting interface IDebugEventCallback2 will enable you to get notified only on fine-grained events such as when creating a breakpoint or reaching a breakpoint.
While Visual Studio enables you to perform actions such as Continue and Run to cursor programmatically, it does not provide a direct way to get notified when they are taken.
You can use EnvDTE.DebuggerEvents.OnXxx events to get notified when something is about to happen. In particular, the OnEnterBreakMode event enables you to intercept a breakpoint hit and possibly take an action. You can also inspect all the details of the reached breakpoint(s) using the current EnvDTE.Debugger inside the event handler.
Now with some effort, you can use these constructs to implement events that correspond to all Visual Studio debugging actions including Continue and Run to cursor accurately. If you require additional events not provided by EnvDTE.DebuggerEvents (such as when a breakpoint is inserted), you have no choice but use IDebugEventCallback2.Event. In this case if you have specific events in mind, please mention them explicitly and I might be able to tell you the corresponding IDebugEventCallback2.Event GUIDs.
You probably got off on the wrong foot here, the IDebugXxx interfaces were really intended to create your own debugging engine. Still useful perhaps to see what is going on in the existing engine, you are suppose to use QueryInterface() to discover the specific interface that matches the event. Like IDebugEngineCreateEvent2, IDebugProcessCreateEvent2, IDebugProcessDestroyEvent2, etcetera. There are a bunch of them, they are listed in the VSSDK\VisualStudioIntegration\Common\Inc\msdbg.h header and include their IID.
Best thing to do is peek at this sample, it shows how to crack the event notification into the specific interfaces. The AD7Events.cs source file shows the wrappers. Do keep in mind that this sample was made to show how to create an engine, not how to use the one already built into VS.
But yes, you are not going to get a "continue debug" event out of this. A debugging engine does not need that event since it is already responsible for taking care of that by itself. It already knows when it calls IDebugProgram3::Continue().
Surely what you are looking for is IVsDebugger.AdviseDebuggerEvents(). That's the one that tells you what the built-in debugger is doing. You need to pass an object of a class that implements IVsDebuggerEvents, your OnModeChanged() method will be called with a DBGMODE notification. I don't see a lot of fantastic examples that demonstrate usage, this web page might be helpful.
I'm currently developing a wp7 app (don't want to tell too much ;), but I'm struggling a little with the user interaction.
The main question, I'm not sure about is: Should I offer an explicit save button in dialogs and use the phone back button as cancel, or should I save implicit the time the user taps the phone back button ...
The more I think about, the more I'm unsure about the best user experience.
I already read the user experience and interaction guide from Microsoft, but there isn't any advice in there about that issue ...
Thx alot for your suggestions.
On page 68 of the Windows Phone 7 UI Design and Interaction Guide it states:
Changes to Application Settings should be immediately implemented. This means that a "Done", "OK", or other confirming dialog is not neededd. In some cases, even though the change has happened immediately, the user may not have feedback that the change has occurred until an ongoing event is completed or a future event occurs. Examples would be joining a secure Wi-Fi network or changing the frequency of alarms.
Keeping Application Settings brief and clear should be a design goal. Complex, multi-page, multi-level Application Settings can frustrate or confuse users into thinking that they have entered another application entirely.
Although the same page also goes on to say:
Immediately implement user-selected Application Settings without a confirming dialog box and provide a feedback method to indicate that the change has occurred.
Avoid creating Application Settings that have more than 2 pages (screens). Settings that require more than a single screen should use overlying half screens to avoid losing context when
the SIP Keyboard is displayed.
If a task cannot be undone, always provide the user with an option to cancel. Text entry is an example. Actions that overwrite or delete data, or are irreversable must have a “Cancel” button.
When using additional screens with commit and cancel buttons, clicking those buttons should perform the associated action and return the user to the main settings screen.
To keep the heading of settings control panels consistent, the heading for the settings page should look as follows:
SETTINGS
<CPL Name/ Application Name>
Applications that fetch data over the network must have an option to disable data usage.
So, I think you only get in to questions over explicit vs. implicit if you have multiple pages for settings, and if you do it sounds like the explicit would be the way to go with sub-pages, but implicit for the initial page.
You should use explicit saving of settings.
However, for data entered it will depend on the application and the data being entered.
It's typcial to include a save button (or equivalent) otherwise there's (probably) no way for the user to cancel out of a partially entered form. This can also cause issues if there are validation issues which would prevent the saving of the partially entered data.
It depends on the app though. There is no universal rule for this.
Hy everybody,
I'm wondering if it's possible to add a new button via C++ or C# to windows 7 explorer "context strip"(don't know if this is correct name) - like on picture below.
My reason for this is because a lot of times I'm switching on&off "Show hidden files, folders and drives" functionality under Tools->Folder option->View. Therefore i want to simplify this process with a click of a button.
I was looking into ShellExecteEx function, but I am not sure I can do that. Can Anybody direct me in right direction?
thanks,
regards
I highly recommend using AutoIt for this task. Second URL comes complete with examples of how to insert buttons in various programs - however, be sure to read complete topic for misc. updates to the provided code.
See:
http://www.autoitscript.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=9517
Btw: I misread topic to begin with; gui 'context' related material in Windows is often taken to deal with right-click menus
Edit: limit on urls for new users on Stack Overflow mean I had to cut out some of less essential links - google away.
To answer part of the question, I think it is possible as for quite some time we've seen small programs to add a "New Folder" button to the explorer. I think those still works with Win 7.
Look at http://tools.tortoisesvn.net/StExBar for example
[Edit] Forgot to clarify that Source Code for StExBar is on Google Code
I'm writing a DLL that is automatically injected on load in a specific application. Because I'd like to run the program while working on it, and my users might want to load the program without it in specific cases (e.g. bug hunting), I sometimes want to prevent loading the DLL.
Currently I do this by checking GetKeyState for VK_LCONTROL, VK_LSHIFT , and VK_LMENU on load, and if all are down, I silently unload myself.
However, it can take quite a few seconds for the program to load and to see if the DLL was loaded or not, so I want to inform the users when we're unloading. I've considered a MessageBox, but that's too disruptive. I've tried MessageBeep, but that didn't seem to do anything on my setup. Currently I'm using a simple dual beep (Beep, Sleep, Beep) to indicate unloading, but that will probably become rather annoying to my co workers. I've also considered a system-tray icon, but that would introduce a lot of code and bug potential, while I'm aiming for a minimal notification as to not introduce any subtle bugs.
Would anyone else know a subtle way (preferably visual) to inform the user that their input has been succesfully received?
Given the limited scope of your goal, this might actually be an appropriate use of a taskbar notification balloon tip.
Edit: Added link the Joe posted in his concurring answer. Thanks, Joe! :)
If your app has a status bar at the bottom, you could place some message text there...
Have you considered a timed messagebox that closes itself?
http://www.codeguru.com/cpp/misc/misc/messageboxhandling/article.php/c203
You could open a window with a short message and close it automatically again after 0.5 seconds or so. It doesn't need user interaction so I don't think it's very disruptive.
Change the window title, then change it back afterwards. Then you can see the change even if the user has Alt-Tabbed over to some other program in the meanwhile, without stealing the focus from the user.
Concur with Greg D.
Look here: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vclanguage/thread/15cbdc8d-fde3-44ab-bbbc-e50cb2071674/
Two ideas:
Turn it around. Have a visual indication when the DLL is loaded, and have the absence of the indicator let you know that the DLL has been unloaded. Perhaps a suffix in the title bar. That way, you can tell at any time, not just during startup.
FlashWindowEx.